Cruel Feeding
Played in 78 Rakdos decks
Color Identity Spread
16.1% Rakdos
All commanders (1)
- Greven, Predator Captain relevance 2.77 · 3.5% (21 of 593 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Alchemist's Gift relevance 2.49 · 41.0% (32 of 78 decks)
- Blessing of Belzenlok relevance 2.46 · 37.2% (29 of 78 decks)
- Rush of Vitality relevance 1.59 · 29.5% (23 of 78 decks)
- Unexpected Fangs relevance 1.49 · 26.9% (21 of 78 decks)
- Return to Action relevance 1.27 · 25.6% (20 of 78 decks)
- Toxin Analysis relevance 1.24 · 20.5% (16 of 78 decks)
- Wall of Blood relevance 1.13 · 25.6% (20 of 78 decks)
- Immolating Souleater relevance 1.06 · 21.8% (17 of 78 decks)
- Lupine Prototype relevance 1.03 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
- Moltensteel Dragon relevance 1.02 · 17.9% (14 of 78 decks)
- Rowan, Scion of War relevance 0.92 · 19.2% (15 of 78 decks)
- Essence Harvest relevance 0.91 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
- Yargle, Glutton of Urborg relevance 0.90 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Generator Servant relevance 0.87 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.82 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
- Eternal Thirst relevance 0.81 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
- Rotting Regisaur relevance 0.80 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Phyrexian Purge relevance 0.80 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
- Daring Fiendbonder relevance 0.77 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.75 · 32.1% (25 of 78 decks)
- Blood Celebrant relevance 0.74 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
- Whip of Erebos relevance 0.74 · 26.9% (21 of 78 decks)
- Give In to Violence relevance 0.73 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
- Monoist Sentry relevance 0.70 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Mask of Griselbrand relevance 0.67 · 19.2% (15 of 78 decks)
- Fire Covenant relevance 0.67 · 24.4% (19 of 78 decks)
- Temur Battle Rage relevance 0.66 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 0.65 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Scarblade's Malice relevance 0.63 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Unspeakable Symbol relevance 0.63 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Wall of Blood relevance 1.13 · 25.6% (20 of 78 decks)
- Immolating Souleater relevance 1.06 · 21.8% (17 of 78 decks)
- Lupine Prototype relevance 1.03 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
- Moltensteel Dragon relevance 1.02 · 17.9% (14 of 78 decks)
- Rowan, Scion of War relevance 0.92 · 19.2% (15 of 78 decks)
- Yargle, Glutton of Urborg relevance 0.90 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Generator Servant relevance 0.87 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
- Rotting Regisaur relevance 0.80 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Daring Fiendbonder relevance 0.77 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
- Blood Celebrant relevance 0.74 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
- Monoist Sentry relevance 0.70 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Phyrexian Soulgorger relevance 0.65 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Qarsi Revenant relevance 0.63 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Doom Whisperer relevance 0.60 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Combat Celebrant relevance 0.48 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
- Treasonous Ogre relevance 0.45 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
- Lightning Skelemental relevance 0.45 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Darkstar Augur relevance 0.44 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
All artifacts (7)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.82 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.75 · 32.1% (25 of 78 decks)
- Whip of Erebos relevance 0.74 · 26.9% (21 of 78 decks)
- Mask of Griselbrand relevance 0.67 · 19.2% (15 of 78 decks)
- Vorrac Battlehorns relevance 0.55 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.51 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
- Black Mage's Rod relevance 0.43 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Eternal Thirst relevance 0.81 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
- Unspeakable Symbol relevance 0.63 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
- Vampiric Link relevance 0.61 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
All instants (17)
- Alchemist's Gift relevance 2.49 · 41.0% (32 of 78 decks)
- Blessing of Belzenlok relevance 2.46 · 37.2% (29 of 78 decks)
- Rush of Vitality relevance 1.59 · 29.5% (23 of 78 decks)
- Unexpected Fangs relevance 1.49 · 26.9% (21 of 78 decks)
- Return to Action relevance 1.27 · 25.6% (20 of 78 decks)
- Toxin Analysis relevance 1.24 · 20.5% (16 of 78 decks)
- Give In to Violence relevance 0.73 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
- Fire Covenant relevance 0.67 · 24.4% (19 of 78 decks)
- Temur Battle Rage relevance 0.66 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Scarblade's Malice relevance 0.63 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Cremate relevance 0.61 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Soul's Fire relevance 0.59 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
- Orcish Medicine relevance 0.57 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Tainted Strike relevance 0.56 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Shock relevance 0.50 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Supernatural Stamina relevance 0.47 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.45 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Essence Harvest relevance 0.91 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
- Phyrexian Purge relevance 0.80 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.46 · 21.8% (17 of 78 decks)
- Circle of Power relevance 0.46 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.47 · 24.4% (19 of 78 decks)
EDH data for Cruel Feeding: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 78 real decks.