Fanatic of Xenagos
Played in 33 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
9.7% Naya
- Gruul 244 · 71.6%
- Naya 33 · 9.7%
- Jund 23 · 6.7%
- Five-Color 20 · 5.9%
- Temur 16 · 4.7%
- Other (3) 5 · 1.5%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (2)
- Johan relevance 2.08 · 3.9% (6 of 152 decks)
- Palladia-Mors relevance 1.01 · 1.8% (2 of 114 decks)
All most relevant (5)
- Destructive Revelry relevance 1.76 · 30.3% (10 of 33 decks)
- Titanic Ultimatum relevance 1.12 · 33.3% (11 of 33 decks)
- Kitt Kanto, Mayhem Diva relevance 1.04 · 24.2% (8 of 33 decks)
- Naya Charm relevance 0.75 · 27.3% (9 of 33 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.63 · 24.2% (8 of 33 decks)
All creatures (1)
- Kitt Kanto, Mayhem Diva relevance 1.04 · 24.2% (8 of 33 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.63 · 24.2% (8 of 33 decks)
All instants (2)
- Destructive Revelry relevance 1.76 · 30.3% (10 of 33 decks)
- Naya Charm relevance 0.75 · 27.3% (9 of 33 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Titanic Ultimatum relevance 1.12 · 33.3% (11 of 33 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 1.02 · 24.2% (8 of 33 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.66 · 27.3% (9 of 33 decks)
- Temple of Triumph relevance 0.65 · 27.3% (9 of 33 decks)
All lands (10)
- Rabanastre, Royal City relevance 1.15 · 24.2% (8 of 33 decks)
- Boros Guildgate relevance 0.99 · 24.2% (8 of 33 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.91 · 30.3% (10 of 33 decks)
- Wind-Scarred Crag relevance 0.86 · 27.3% (9 of 33 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.79 · 27.3% (9 of 33 decks)
- Mossfire Valley relevance 0.65 · 33.3% (11 of 33 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.57 · 45.5% (15 of 33 decks)
- Game Trail relevance 0.48 · 30.3% (10 of 33 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.41 · 27.3% (9 of 33 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.41 · 24.2% (8 of 33 decks)
EDH data for Fanatic of Xenagos: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 33 real decks.