Extinction
Played in 113 Dimir decks
430+20+3+6+5+7+4+5+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Gríma, Saruman's Footman 2.5% of decks
Gríma, Saruman's Footman 2.5% of decks
Dragonlord Silumgar 4.2% of decks
Dragonlord Silumgar 4.2% of decks
Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Cultist of the Absolute 10.0% of decks
Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Cultist of the Absolute 10.0% of decks
Sivitri Scarzam 2.6% of decks
Sivitri Scarzam 2.6% of decks
Most Relevant
Roil Elemental 22.1% of decks
Roil Elemental 22.1% of decks
Empress Galina 22.1% of decks
Empress Galina 22.1% of decks
Nyx Lotus 22.1% of decks
Nyx Lotus 22.1% of decks
Treachery 20.4% of decks
Treachery 20.4% of decks
Maralen of the Mornsong 16.8% of decks
Maralen of the Mornsong 16.8% of decks
Stubborn Denial 23.9% of decks
Stubborn Denial 23.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Gríma, Saruman's Footman relevance 2.05 · 2.5% (15 of 595 decks)
- Dragonlord Silumgar relevance 1.84 · 4.2% (8 of 190 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Cultist of the Absolute relevance 0.69 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- Sivitri Scarzam relevance 0.52 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Roil Elemental relevance 1.50 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Empress Galina relevance 1.41 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 1.25 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Treachery relevance 1.11 · 20.4% (23 of 113 decks)
- Maralen of the Mornsong relevance 1.06 · 16.8% (19 of 113 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 1.05 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 1.03 · 19.5% (22 of 113 decks)
- Tishana's Tidebinder relevance 1.01 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 1.00 · 16.8% (19 of 113 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.99 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Bladegriff Prototype relevance 0.96 · 15.0% (17 of 113 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.96 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.95 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Rev, Tithe Extractor relevance 0.94 · 21.2% (24 of 113 decks)
- Evil Twin relevance 0.92 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Crippling Fear relevance 0.91 · 33.6% (38 of 113 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.90 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- No Mercy relevance 0.89 · 25.7% (29 of 113 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.88 · 21.2% (24 of 113 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.88 · 25.7% (29 of 113 decks)
- Undermine relevance 0.88 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.88 · 13.3% (15 of 113 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.85 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.78 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Helm of Obedience relevance 0.77 · 13.3% (15 of 113 decks)
- Thief of Sanity relevance 0.77 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Malleable Impostor relevance 0.76 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.76 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.75 · 20.4% (23 of 113 decks)
- Astral Dragon relevance 0.75 · 17.7% (20 of 113 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Roil Elemental relevance 1.50 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Empress Galina relevance 1.41 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Maralen of the Mornsong relevance 1.06 · 16.8% (19 of 113 decks)
- Tishana's Tidebinder relevance 1.01 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Bladegriff Prototype relevance 0.96 · 15.0% (17 of 113 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.96 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Rev, Tithe Extractor relevance 0.94 · 21.2% (24 of 113 decks)
- Evil Twin relevance 0.92 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.88 · 25.7% (29 of 113 decks)
- Thief of Sanity relevance 0.77 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Malleable Impostor relevance 0.76 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.76 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.75 · 20.4% (23 of 113 decks)
- Astral Dragon relevance 0.75 · 17.7% (20 of 113 decks)
- Clone relevance 0.70 · 18.6% (21 of 113 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.69 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Opposition Agent relevance 0.62 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Dauthi Voidwalker relevance 0.60 · 27.4% (31 of 113 decks)
- Aura Thief relevance 0.59 · 8.8% (10 of 113 decks)
- Notion Thief relevance 0.59 · 25.7% (29 of 113 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 1.25 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.95 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Helm of Obedience relevance 0.77 · 13.3% (15 of 113 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Treachery relevance 1.11 · 20.4% (23 of 113 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 1.03 · 19.5% (22 of 113 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.90 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- No Mercy relevance 0.89 · 25.7% (29 of 113 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.88 · 13.3% (15 of 113 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 0.64 · 13.3% (15 of 113 decks)
All instants (5)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 1.05 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.88 · 21.2% (24 of 113 decks)
- Undermine relevance 0.88 · 23.0% (26 of 113 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.85 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.62 · 26.5% (30 of 113 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Mathemagics relevance 1.00 · 16.8% (19 of 113 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.99 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Crippling Fear relevance 0.91 · 33.6% (38 of 113 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.78 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.72 · 21.2% (24 of 113 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.69 · 38.9% (44 of 113 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.67 · 20.4% (23 of 113 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 1.12 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.83 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.79 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.63 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
All lands (5)
- Multiversal Passage relevance 0.99 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.90 · 30.1% (34 of 113 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.70 · 29.2% (33 of 113 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.68 · 29.2% (33 of 113 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.61 · 29.2% (33 of 113 decks)
EDH data for Extinction: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 113 real decks.













































