Pearl Dragon
Played in 36 White decks
730+17+6+2+1+5+1+5+
Color Identity Spread
30.5% White
Commanders
Sylvia Brightspear 28.6% of decks
Sylvia Brightspear 28.6% of decks
Rashida Scalebane 12.1% of decks
Rashida Scalebane 12.1% of decks
Kongming, "Sleeping Dragon" 7.7% of decks
Kongming, "Sleeping Dragon" 7.7% of decks
Icingdeath, Frost Tyrant 5.3% of decks
Icingdeath, Frost Tyrant 5.3% of decks
Yosei, the Morning Star 5.7% of decks
Yosei, the Morning Star 5.7% of decks
Prava of the Steel Legion 2.7% of decks
Prava of the Steel Legion 2.7% of decks
Most Relevant
Crystal Dragon // Rob the Hoard 75.0% of decks
Crystal Dragon // Rob the Hoard 75.0% of decks
White Dragon 66.7% of decks
White Dragon 66.7% of decks
Eternal Dragon 80.6% of decks
Eternal Dragon 80.6% of decks
Ancestor Dragon 75.0% of decks
Ancestor Dragon 75.0% of decks
Timeless Dragon 69.4% of decks
Timeless Dragon 69.4% of decks
Protector of the Wastes 63.9% of decks
Protector of the Wastes 63.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (7)
- Sylvia Brightspear relevance 2.65 · 28.6% (6 of 21 decks)
- Rashida Scalebane relevance 2.49 · 12.1% (7 of 58 decks)
- Kongming, "Sleeping Dragon" relevance 1.79 · 7.7% (4 of 52 decks)
- Icingdeath, Frost Tyrant relevance 1.68 · 5.3% (4 of 76 decks)
- Yosei, the Morning Star relevance 1.47 · 5.7% (3 of 53 decks)
- Prava of the Steel Legion relevance 0.64 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Radiant, Archangel relevance 0.51 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Crystal Dragon // Rob the Hoard relevance 4.65 · 75.0% (27 of 36 decks)
- White Dragon relevance 4.38 · 66.7% (24 of 36 decks)
- Eternal Dragon relevance 4.38 · 80.6% (29 of 36 decks)
- Ancestor Dragon relevance 4.27 · 75.0% (27 of 36 decks)
- Timeless Dragon relevance 3.69 · 69.4% (25 of 36 decks)
- Protector of the Wastes relevance 3.65 · 63.9% (23 of 36 decks)
- Riling Dawnbreaker // Signaling Roar relevance 3.46 · 55.6% (20 of 36 decks)
- Guardian Scalelord relevance 3.40 · 72.2% (26 of 36 decks)
- Icingdeath, Frost Tyrant relevance 3.33 · 58.3% (21 of 36 decks)
- Yosei, the Morning Star relevance 3.20 · 61.1% (22 of 36 decks)
- Ao, the Dawn Sky relevance 3.15 · 75.0% (27 of 36 decks)
- Ancient Gold Dragon relevance 2.86 · 63.9% (23 of 36 decks)
- Clarion Conqueror relevance 2.66 · 55.6% (20 of 36 decks)
- Sunscorch Regent relevance 2.63 · 77.8% (28 of 36 decks)
- Steel Hellkite relevance 2.50 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Grand Master of Flowers relevance 2.26 · 36.1% (13 of 36 decks)
- Nadaar, Selfless Paladin relevance 2.07 · 38.9% (14 of 36 decks)
- Citadel Siege relevance 1.81 · 33.3% (12 of 36 decks)
- Dion, Bahamut's Dominant // Bahamut, Warden of Light relevance 1.14 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
- Kindred Boon relevance 0.96 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.62 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.58 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.58 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.57 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
- Marble Diamond relevance 0.57 · 33.3% (12 of 36 decks)
- Disenchant relevance 0.57 · 27.8% (10 of 36 decks)
- Secret Rendezvous relevance 0.56 · 27.8% (10 of 36 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.53 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.50 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 0.47 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Crystal Dragon // Rob the Hoard relevance 4.65 · 75.0% (27 of 36 decks)
- White Dragon relevance 4.38 · 66.7% (24 of 36 decks)
- Eternal Dragon relevance 4.38 · 80.6% (29 of 36 decks)
- Ancestor Dragon relevance 4.27 · 75.0% (27 of 36 decks)
- Timeless Dragon relevance 3.69 · 69.4% (25 of 36 decks)
- Protector of the Wastes relevance 3.65 · 63.9% (23 of 36 decks)
- Riling Dawnbreaker // Signaling Roar relevance 3.46 · 55.6% (20 of 36 decks)
- Guardian Scalelord relevance 3.40 · 72.2% (26 of 36 decks)
- Icingdeath, Frost Tyrant relevance 3.33 · 58.3% (21 of 36 decks)
- Yosei, the Morning Star relevance 3.20 · 61.1% (22 of 36 decks)
- Ao, the Dawn Sky relevance 3.15 · 75.0% (27 of 36 decks)
- Ancient Gold Dragon relevance 2.86 · 63.9% (23 of 36 decks)
- Clarion Conqueror relevance 2.66 · 55.6% (20 of 36 decks)
- Sunscorch Regent relevance 2.63 · 77.8% (28 of 36 decks)
- Steel Hellkite relevance 2.50 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Nadaar, Selfless Paladin relevance 2.07 · 38.9% (14 of 36 decks)
- Dion, Bahamut's Dominant // Bahamut, Warden of Light relevance 1.14 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.62 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.58 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.57 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
- Marble Diamond relevance 0.57 · 33.3% (12 of 36 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.38 · 27.8% (10 of 36 decks)
- Archaeomancer's Map relevance 0.37 · 27.8% (10 of 36 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Citadel Siege relevance 1.81 · 33.3% (12 of 36 decks)
- Kindred Boon relevance 0.96 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
All instants (1)
- Disenchant relevance 0.57 · 27.8% (10 of 36 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Austere Command relevance 0.58 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Secret Rendezvous relevance 0.56 · 27.8% (10 of 36 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.53 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.50 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 0.47 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Grand Master of Flowers relevance 2.26 · 36.1% (13 of 36 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Haven of the Spirit Dragon relevance 3.25 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Cave of the Frost Dragon relevance 2.28 · 50.0% (18 of 36 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.46 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.39 · 27.8% (10 of 36 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.36 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
EDH data for Pearl Dragon: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 36 real decks.






























