Compulsive Research
Played in 1,263 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
3030+7+6+13+15+4+5+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Runo Stromkirk // Krothuss, Lord of the Deep relevance 1.74 · 3.5% (107 of 3,049 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 1.66 · 8.5% (23 of 272 decks)
- Araumi of the Dead Tide relevance 1.21 · 2.4% (48 of 2,001 decks)
- Oskar, Rubbish Reclaimer relevance 1.21 · 2.6% (42 of 1,635 decks)
- Scion of Halaster // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 1.16 · 2.4% (42 of 1,777 decks)
- Emet-Selch of the Third Seat relevance 1.08 · 2.3% (32 of 1,367 decks)
- Vohar, Vodalian Desecrator relevance 1.00 · 2.5% (22 of 877 decks)
- Alpharael, Dreaming Acolyte relevance 0.92 · 6.4% (6 of 94 decks)
- Golbez, Crystal Collector relevance 0.92 · 1.1% (90 of 8,173 decks)
- Rona, Sheoldred's Faithful relevance 0.90 · 3.6% (10 of 281 decks)
- Emet-Selch, Unsundered // Hades, Sorcerer of Eld relevance 0.80 · 1.3% (33 of 2,488 decks)
- Taigam, Sidisi's Hand relevance 0.79 · 3.7% (7 of 191 decks)
- Superior Spider-Man relevance 0.77 · 1.9% (15 of 776 decks)
- Xande, Dark Mage relevance 0.75 · 3.3% (7 of 212 decks)
- Xanathar, Guild Kingpin relevance 0.71 · 1.4% (19 of 1,320 decks)
- Lazav, Familiar Stranger relevance 0.68 · 1.8% (12 of 682 decks)
- Circu, Dimir Lobotomist relevance 0.67 · 2.1% (9 of 429 decks)
- Lazav, the Multifarious relevance 0.60 · 1.4% (12 of 851 decks)
- Ultimecia, Time Sorceress // Ultimecia, Omnipotent relevance 0.54 · 1.5% (8 of 519 decks)
- Ludevic, Necrogenius // Olag, Ludevic's Hubris relevance 0.53 · 2.7% (4 of 149 decks)
- Nebuchadnezzar relevance 0.50 · 2.0% (5 of 255 decks)
- Taskmaster, Mercenary Mimic relevance 0.50 · 1.0% (12 of 1,165 decks)
- Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher // Agent of the Shadow Thieves relevance 0.48 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- The Mouth of Sauron relevance 0.45 · 2.6% (3 of 115 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Armix, Filigree Thrasher relevance 0.44 · 4.3% (2 of 47 decks)
- Symbiote Spider-Man relevance 0.43 · 1.3% (6 of 477 decks)
- Dralnu, Lich Lord relevance 0.42 · 1.7% (4 of 238 decks)
- Dungeon Delver // Safana, Calimport Cutthroat relevance 0.39 · 1.1% (6 of 565 decks)
- Katara, Seeking Revenge relevance 0.38 · 1.9% (3 of 161 decks)
- Rassilon, the War President relevance 0.36 · 1.3% (4 of 305 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.88 · 20.0% (253 of 1,263 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.70 · 42.7% (539 of 1,263 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.67 · 26.4% (334 of 1,263 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.66 · 16.9% (214 of 1,263 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.59 · 21.8% (275 of 1,263 decks)
- Charcoal Diamond relevance 0.56 · 20.7% (262 of 1,263 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.54 · 15.3% (193 of 1,263 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.51 · 13.1% (165 of 1,263 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.50 · 24.1% (305 of 1,263 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.50 · 40.9% (516 of 1,263 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.49 · 36.1% (456 of 1,263 decks)
- Notion Rain relevance 0.48 · 13.0% (164 of 1,263 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (128 of 1,263 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.47 · 21.5% (271 of 1,263 decks)
- Sign in Blood relevance 0.44 · 14.9% (188 of 1,263 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.44 · 20.8% (263 of 1,263 decks)
- Forbidden Alchemy relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (130 of 1,263 decks)
- Deranged Assistant relevance 0.42 · 12.2% (154 of 1,263 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.40 · 17.4% (220 of 1,263 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.40 · 10.5% (132 of 1,263 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.39 · 20.5% (259 of 1,263 decks)
- Merfolk Looter relevance 0.39 · 8.7% (110 of 1,263 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.39 · 18.8% (237 of 1,263 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.39 · 13.6% (172 of 1,263 decks)
- Read the Bones relevance 0.39 · 11.6% (146 of 1,263 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.39 · 14.6% (185 of 1,263 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.38 · 10.0% (126 of 1,263 decks)
- Gyruda, Doom of Depths relevance 0.38 · 11.8% (149 of 1,263 decks)
- Vohar, Vodalian Desecrator relevance 0.38 · 11.7% (148 of 1,263 decks)
- Persist relevance 0.36 · 10.8% (137 of 1,263 decks)
All creatures (7)
- Deranged Assistant relevance 0.42 · 12.2% (154 of 1,263 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.40 · 17.4% (220 of 1,263 decks)
- Merfolk Looter relevance 0.39 · 8.7% (110 of 1,263 decks)
- Gyruda, Doom of Depths relevance 0.38 · 11.8% (149 of 1,263 decks)
- Vohar, Vodalian Desecrator relevance 0.38 · 11.7% (148 of 1,263 decks)
- Obsessive Stitcher relevance 0.36 · 9.3% (117 of 1,263 decks)
- Consuming Aberration relevance 0.34 · 18.1% (229 of 1,263 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.59 · 21.8% (275 of 1,263 decks)
- Charcoal Diamond relevance 0.56 · 20.7% (262 of 1,263 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.50 · 24.1% (305 of 1,263 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.49 · 36.1% (456 of 1,263 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.47 · 21.5% (271 of 1,263 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.35 · 22.9% (289 of 1,263 decks)
All instants (13)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.88 · 20.0% (253 of 1,263 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.70 · 42.7% (539 of 1,263 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.67 · 26.4% (334 of 1,263 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.66 · 16.9% (214 of 1,263 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.50 · 40.9% (516 of 1,263 decks)
- Forbidden Alchemy relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (130 of 1,263 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.40 · 10.5% (132 of 1,263 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.39 · 18.8% (237 of 1,263 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.36 · 15.8% (200 of 1,263 decks)
- Dihada's Ploy relevance 0.34 · 6.8% (86 of 1,263 decks)
- Thirst for Identity relevance 0.33 · 7.0% (89 of 1,263 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.32 · 15.7% (198 of 1,263 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.32 · 11.2% (142 of 1,263 decks)
All sorceries (15)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.54 · 15.3% (193 of 1,263 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.51 · 13.1% (165 of 1,263 decks)
- Notion Rain relevance 0.48 · 13.0% (164 of 1,263 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (128 of 1,263 decks)
- Sign in Blood relevance 0.44 · 14.9% (188 of 1,263 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.44 · 20.8% (263 of 1,263 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.39 · 20.5% (259 of 1,263 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.39 · 13.6% (172 of 1,263 decks)
- Read the Bones relevance 0.39 · 11.6% (146 of 1,263 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.39 · 14.6% (185 of 1,263 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.38 · 10.0% (126 of 1,263 decks)
- Persist relevance 0.36 · 10.8% (137 of 1,263 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 0.34 · 14.6% (185 of 1,263 decks)
- Singularity Rupture relevance 0.34 · 16.3% (206 of 1,263 decks)
- Extract from Darkness relevance 0.34 · 12.4% (157 of 1,263 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.37 · 12.1% (153 of 1,263 decks)
- Fetid Pools relevance 0.35 · 18.0% (227 of 1,263 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.35 · 19.0% (240 of 1,263 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.34 · 8.4% (106 of 1,263 decks)
All lands (5)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.54 · 27.8% (351 of 1,263 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.54 · 27.3% (345 of 1,263 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.48 · 20.2% (255 of 1,263 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.47 · 16.0% (202 of 1,263 decks)
- Mistvault Bridge relevance 0.33 · 11.2% (142 of 1,263 decks)
EDH data for Compulsive Research: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,263 real decks.



















































































