Color Identity Spread
2.1% Naya
All commanders (3)
- Mayael the Anima relevance 2.72 · 3.2% (65 of 2,040 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 1.99 · 6.3% (12 of 189 decks)
- Jacques le Vert relevance 0.31 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.93 · 24.6% (63 of 256 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.79 · 15.2% (39 of 256 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.77 · 52.3% (134 of 256 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.75 · 18.0% (46 of 256 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.70 · 15.6% (40 of 256 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.66 · 11.7% (30 of 256 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.65 · 34.4% (88 of 256 decks)
- Xenagos, God of Revels relevance 0.63 · 23.0% (59 of 256 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.63 · 36.7% (94 of 256 decks)
- Rhonas the Indomitable relevance 0.62 · 9.8% (25 of 256 decks)
- Gisela, Blade of Goldnight relevance 0.62 · 18.4% (47 of 256 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.61 · 10.9% (28 of 256 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.60 · 14.1% (36 of 256 decks)
- Ilharg, the Raze-Boar relevance 0.59 · 12.1% (31 of 256 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.59 · 12.5% (32 of 256 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.58 · 12.5% (32 of 256 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.57 · 13.7% (35 of 256 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.55 · 20.3% (52 of 256 decks)
- Aurelia, the Warleader relevance 0.55 · 16.8% (43 of 256 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.54 · 11.7% (30 of 256 decks)
- Balefire Dragon relevance 0.54 · 10.9% (28 of 256 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 0.54 · 10.9% (28 of 256 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.53 · 40.2% (103 of 256 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.53 · 13.7% (35 of 256 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.52 · 27.0% (69 of 256 decks)
- Halana and Alena, Partners relevance 0.51 · 15.6% (40 of 256 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.51 · 11.7% (30 of 256 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.49 · 19.9% (51 of 256 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.48 · 31.3% (80 of 256 decks)
All creatures (35)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.93 · 24.6% (63 of 256 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.79 · 15.2% (39 of 256 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.75 · 18.0% (46 of 256 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.70 · 15.6% (40 of 256 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.66 · 11.7% (30 of 256 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.65 · 34.4% (88 of 256 decks)
- Xenagos, God of Revels relevance 0.63 · 23.0% (59 of 256 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.63 · 36.7% (94 of 256 decks)
- Rhonas the Indomitable relevance 0.62 · 9.8% (25 of 256 decks)
- Gisela, Blade of Goldnight relevance 0.62 · 18.4% (47 of 256 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.61 · 10.9% (28 of 256 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.60 · 14.1% (36 of 256 decks)
- Ilharg, the Raze-Boar relevance 0.59 · 12.1% (31 of 256 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.59 · 12.5% (32 of 256 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.58 · 12.5% (32 of 256 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.57 · 13.7% (35 of 256 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.55 · 20.3% (52 of 256 decks)
- Aurelia, the Warleader relevance 0.55 · 16.8% (43 of 256 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.54 · 11.7% (30 of 256 decks)
- Balefire Dragon relevance 0.54 · 10.9% (28 of 256 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 0.54 · 10.9% (28 of 256 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.53 · 13.7% (35 of 256 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.52 · 27.0% (69 of 256 decks)
- Halana and Alena, Partners relevance 0.51 · 15.6% (40 of 256 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.51 · 11.7% (30 of 256 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.47 · 10.2% (26 of 256 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 0.47 · 12.5% (32 of 256 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.45 · 10.2% (26 of 256 decks)
- Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 0.45 · 10.9% (28 of 256 decks)
- Iroas, God of Victory relevance 0.45 · 12.5% (32 of 256 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.45 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- Greenwarden of Murasa relevance 0.44 · 6.6% (17 of 256 decks)
- Moldgraf Monstrosity relevance 0.44 · 7.0% (18 of 256 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.43 · 19.9% (51 of 256 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.77 · 52.3% (134 of 256 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.53 · 40.2% (103 of 256 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.49 · 19.9% (51 of 256 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.45 · 14.1% (36 of 256 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.48 · 31.3% (80 of 256 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.43 · 17.6% (45 of 256 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.45 · 9.8% (25 of 256 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.50 · 26.6% (68 of 256 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.45 · 18.0% (46 of 256 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.44 · 18.4% (47 of 256 decks)
All lands (5)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.65 · 21.5% (55 of 256 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.49 · 16.8% (43 of 256 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.48 · 38.3% (98 of 256 decks)
- Wind-Scarred Crag relevance 0.47 · 14.8% (38 of 256 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.45 · 26.6% (68 of 256 decks)
EDH data for Surrak, the Hunt Caller: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 256 real decks.