Cosmic Epiphany
Played in 162 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (8)
- Rona, Sheoldred's Faithful relevance 2.56 · 6.9% (19 of 275 decks)
- The Mouth of Sauron relevance 1.89 · 7.1% (8 of 112 decks)
- Xande, Dark Mage relevance 1.18 · 2.4% (5 of 208 decks)
- Vohar, Vodalian Desecrator relevance 1.17 · 1.0% (9 of 866 decks)
- Vulture, Scheming Scavenger relevance 0.90 · 5.6% (2 of 36 decks)
- Shadowheart, Dark Justiciar // Clan Crafter relevance 0.57 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Taigam, Sidisi's Hand relevance 0.57 · 1.1% (2 of 184 decks)
- Wydwen, the Biting Gale relevance 0.38 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 1.08 · 22.8% (37 of 162 decks)
- Rise from the Tides relevance 0.87 · 17.3% (28 of 162 decks)
- Fandaniel, Telophoroi Ascian relevance 0.84 · 20.4% (33 of 162 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.84 · 21.0% (34 of 162 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.82 · 25.9% (42 of 162 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.71 · 34.0% (55 of 162 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.69 · 42.0% (68 of 162 decks)
- Cornered by Black Mages relevance 0.69 · 13.6% (22 of 162 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.68 · 24.1% (39 of 162 decks)
- Inspiration from Beyond relevance 0.67 · 12.3% (20 of 162 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.67 · 17.3% (28 of 162 decks)
- Sedgemoor Witch relevance 0.66 · 14.8% (24 of 162 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.65 · 17.3% (28 of 162 decks)
- Lier, Disciple of the Drowned relevance 0.65 · 14.2% (23 of 162 decks)
- Wizards of Thay relevance 0.65 · 13.0% (21 of 162 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.64 · 28.4% (46 of 162 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.63 · 14.8% (24 of 162 decks)
- Professor Onyx relevance 0.61 · 13.0% (21 of 162 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.61 · 17.3% (28 of 162 decks)
- Circle of Power relevance 0.60 · 11.7% (19 of 162 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.59 · 11.7% (19 of 162 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.57 · 13.6% (22 of 162 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.57 · 10.5% (17 of 162 decks)
- Vohar, Vodalian Desecrator relevance 0.56 · 17.3% (28 of 162 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.56 · 11.7% (19 of 162 decks)
- Emet-Selch of the Third Seat relevance 0.53 · 13.6% (22 of 162 decks)
- Tainted Indulgence relevance 0.53 · 13.0% (21 of 162 decks)
- Secrets of the Dead relevance 0.52 · 13.6% (22 of 162 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.51 · 22.8% (37 of 162 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.51 · 11.1% (18 of 162 decks)
All creatures (16)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 1.08 · 22.8% (37 of 162 decks)
- Fandaniel, Telophoroi Ascian relevance 0.84 · 20.4% (33 of 162 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.84 · 21.0% (34 of 162 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.82 · 25.9% (42 of 162 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.67 · 17.3% (28 of 162 decks)
- Sedgemoor Witch relevance 0.66 · 14.8% (24 of 162 decks)
- Lier, Disciple of the Drowned relevance 0.65 · 14.2% (23 of 162 decks)
- Wizards of Thay relevance 0.65 · 13.0% (21 of 162 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.59 · 11.7% (19 of 162 decks)
- Vohar, Vodalian Desecrator relevance 0.56 · 17.3% (28 of 162 decks)
- Emet-Selch of the Third Seat relevance 0.53 · 13.6% (22 of 162 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.51 · 11.1% (18 of 162 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.48 · 12.3% (20 of 162 decks)
- Curious Homunculus // Voracious Reader relevance 0.48 · 8.0% (13 of 162 decks)
- Sphinx of Forgotten Lore relevance 0.46 · 7.4% (12 of 162 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.44 · 9.3% (15 of 162 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Mindsplice Apparatus relevance 0.44 · 9.3% (15 of 162 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.56 · 11.7% (19 of 162 decks)
- Secrets of the Dead relevance 0.52 · 13.6% (22 of 162 decks)
- Font of Magic relevance 0.48 · 8.0% (13 of 162 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.47 · 8.6% (14 of 162 decks)
All instants (15)
- Consider relevance 0.71 · 34.0% (55 of 162 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.69 · 42.0% (68 of 162 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.68 · 24.1% (39 of 162 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.65 · 17.3% (28 of 162 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.64 · 28.4% (46 of 162 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.63 · 14.8% (24 of 162 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.57 · 13.6% (22 of 162 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.57 · 10.5% (17 of 162 decks)
- Tainted Indulgence relevance 0.53 · 13.0% (21 of 162 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.51 · 22.8% (37 of 162 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.50 · 20.4% (33 of 162 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.48 · 19.1% (31 of 162 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.46 · 35.8% (58 of 162 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.44 · 10.5% (17 of 162 decks)
- Forbidden Alchemy relevance 0.44 · 10.5% (17 of 162 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Rise from the Tides relevance 0.87 · 17.3% (28 of 162 decks)
- Cornered by Black Mages relevance 0.69 · 13.6% (22 of 162 decks)
- Inspiration from Beyond relevance 0.67 · 12.3% (20 of 162 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.61 · 17.3% (28 of 162 decks)
- Circle of Power relevance 0.60 · 11.7% (19 of 162 decks)
- Tendrils of Agony relevance 0.50 · 9.3% (15 of 162 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.48 · 21.0% (34 of 162 decks)
- Singularity Rupture relevance 0.46 · 22.2% (36 of 162 decks)
- Spelltwine relevance 0.45 · 8.6% (14 of 162 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Professor Onyx relevance 0.61 · 13.0% (21 of 162 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.57 · 25.9% (42 of 162 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.45 · 11.7% (19 of 162 decks)
All lands (2)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.52 · 26.5% (43 of 162 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.46 · 23.5% (38 of 162 decks)
EDH data for Cosmic Epiphany: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 162 real decks.