Denizen of the Deep
Played in 59 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
7.6% Azorius
All commanders (2)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Rebbec, Architect of Ascension relevance 0.84 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief // Far Traveler relevance 0.46 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 3.66 · 55.9% (33 of 59 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 3.27 · 49.2% (29 of 59 decks)
- Conspiracy Unraveler relevance 3.21 · 49.2% (29 of 59 decks)
- Discontinuity relevance 3.19 · 49.2% (29 of 59 decks)
- Academy Researchers relevance 3.16 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths relevance 3.13 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 3.12 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 3.10 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Crush of Tentacles relevance 3.09 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Aberrant Researcher // Perfected Form relevance 3.09 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 3.08 · 50.8% (30 of 59 decks)
- Deem Inferior relevance 3.04 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Deepmuck Desperado relevance 3.04 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Constrictor Sage relevance 3.04 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 3.03 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Disciple of the Ring relevance 3.03 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Coveted Peacock relevance 3.03 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 3.01 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Conundrum Sphinx relevance 3.01 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Complicate relevance 3.00 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Deceiver Exarch relevance 2.99 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Academy Journeymage relevance 2.99 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Draconic Lore relevance 2.98 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Deep Freeze relevance 2.98 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Aberrant Mind Sorcerer relevance 2.98 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Confiscation Coup relevance 2.96 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 2.96 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Aethersquall Ancient relevance 2.94 · 52.5% (31 of 59 decks)
- Contradict relevance 2.93 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Cold Case Cracker relevance 2.93 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
All creatures (27)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 3.66 · 55.9% (33 of 59 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 3.27 · 49.2% (29 of 59 decks)
- Conspiracy Unraveler relevance 3.21 · 49.2% (29 of 59 decks)
- Academy Researchers relevance 3.16 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Daring Sleuth // Bearer of Overwhelming Truths relevance 3.13 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Aberrant Researcher // Perfected Form relevance 3.09 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 3.08 · 50.8% (30 of 59 decks)
- Deepmuck Desperado relevance 3.04 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Constrictor Sage relevance 3.04 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 3.03 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Disciple of the Ring relevance 3.03 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Coveted Peacock relevance 3.03 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Conundrum Sphinx relevance 3.01 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Deceiver Exarch relevance 2.99 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Academy Journeymage relevance 2.99 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Aberrant Mind Sorcerer relevance 2.98 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Aethersquall Ancient relevance 2.94 · 52.5% (31 of 59 decks)
- Cold Case Cracker relevance 2.93 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Departed Deckhand relevance 2.93 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Aetherplasm relevance 2.91 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Daring Archaeologist relevance 2.90 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Crafty Cutpurse relevance 2.90 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Academy Drake relevance 2.89 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Abbey Gargoyles relevance 2.89 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 2.89 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Archmage's Newt relevance 2.89 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Aven Fisher relevance 2.83 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Deep Freeze relevance 2.98 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Day of the Dragons relevance 2.89 · 50.8% (30 of 59 decks)
- Curse of Echoes relevance 2.84 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
All instants (14)
- Discontinuity relevance 3.19 · 49.2% (29 of 59 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 3.12 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Complicate relevance 3.00 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Draconic Lore relevance 2.98 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 2.96 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Contradict relevance 2.93 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Desertion relevance 2.92 · 50.8% (30 of 59 decks)
- Absorb Identity relevance 2.92 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 2.91 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 2.89 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Commence the Endgame relevance 2.88 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Aether Gust relevance 2.86 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 2.86 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Dire Downdraft relevance 2.85 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 3.10 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Crush of Tentacles relevance 3.09 · 47.5% (28 of 59 decks)
- Deem Inferior relevance 3.04 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Compelling Argument relevance 3.01 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Confiscation Coup relevance 2.96 · 45.8% (27 of 59 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 2.89 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
EDH data for Denizen of the Deep: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 59 real decks.