Battering Wurm
Played in 300 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
300 decks
- Green 217 · 72.3%
- Gruul 16 · 5.3%
- Jund 15 · 5.0%
- Naya 12 · 4.0%
- Five-Color 11 · 3.7%
- Selesnya 8 · 2.7%
- Other (9) 21 · 7.0%
Commanders
7
Commanders
7Showing 1-7 of 7
Page size
All commanders (7)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 4.06 · 7.2% (172 of 2,375 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 1.40 · 7.4% (2 of 27 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 1.12 · 1.1% (11 of 969 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.91 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.83 · 6.1% (2 of 33 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.82 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.82 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
Parallel Cards
6
Parallel Cards
Showing 1-6 of 6
Page size
All parallel cards (6)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
All most relevant (30)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 4.54 · 64.7% (194 of 300 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 4.15 · 56.3% (169 of 300 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 4.11 · 51.0% (153 of 300 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 4.10 · 66.0% (198 of 300 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 3.96 · 52.7% (158 of 300 decks)
- Carnage Wurm relevance 3.96 · 45.7% (137 of 300 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 3.85 · 57.0% (171 of 300 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 3.83 · 49.7% (149 of 300 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 3.68 · 49.7% (149 of 300 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 3.62 · 61.7% (185 of 300 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 3.54 · 44.7% (134 of 300 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 3.45 · 53.3% (160 of 300 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 3.39 · 46.3% (139 of 300 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 3.38 · 44.0% (132 of 300 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 3.32 · 44.7% (134 of 300 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 3.32 · 45.7% (137 of 300 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 3.32 · 64.7% (194 of 300 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 3.23 · 50.3% (151 of 300 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 3.04 · 57.7% (173 of 300 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 2.82 · 54.0% (162 of 300 decks)
- Elfhame Wurm relevance 2.66 · 31.7% (95 of 300 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 2.64 · 54.7% (164 of 300 decks)
- Roaring Slagwurm relevance 2.64 · 28.3% (85 of 300 decks)
- Deathcoil Wurm relevance 2.53 · 28.3% (85 of 300 decks)
- Crush of Wurms relevance 2.48 · 31.7% (95 of 300 decks)
- Gravetiller Wurm relevance 2.48 · 26.7% (80 of 300 decks)
- Soul Swallower relevance 2.47 · 30.0% (90 of 300 decks)
- Symbiotic Wurm relevance 2.47 · 31.0% (93 of 300 decks)
- Phantom Wurm relevance 2.44 · 26.0% (78 of 300 decks)
- Pouncing Wurm relevance 2.30 · 24.3% (73 of 300 decks)
Creatures
45
Creatures
45 Showing 1-10 of 45
Page size
All creatures (45)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 4.54 · 64.7% (194 of 300 decks)
- Elderscale Wurm relevance 4.15 · 56.3% (169 of 300 decks)
- Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 4.11 · 51.0% (153 of 300 decks)
- Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 4.10 · 66.0% (198 of 300 decks)
- Bookwurm relevance 3.96 · 52.7% (158 of 300 decks)
- Carnage Wurm relevance 3.96 · 45.7% (137 of 300 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 3.85 · 57.0% (171 of 300 decks)
- Penumbra Wurm relevance 3.83 · 49.7% (149 of 300 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 3.68 · 49.7% (149 of 300 decks)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 3.62 · 61.7% (185 of 300 decks)
- Plated Slagwurm relevance 3.54 · 44.7% (134 of 300 decks)
- Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 3.45 · 53.3% (160 of 300 decks)
- Panglacial Wurm relevance 3.39 · 46.3% (139 of 300 decks)
- Sifter Wurm relevance 3.38 · 44.0% (132 of 300 decks)
- Balustrade Wurm relevance 3.32 · 44.7% (134 of 300 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 3.32 · 45.7% (137 of 300 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 3.32 · 64.7% (194 of 300 decks)
- Emergent Woodwurm relevance 3.23 · 50.3% (151 of 300 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 2.82 · 54.0% (162 of 300 decks)
- Elfhame Wurm relevance 2.66 · 31.7% (95 of 300 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 2.64 · 54.7% (164 of 300 decks)
- Roaring Slagwurm relevance 2.64 · 28.3% (85 of 300 decks)
- Deathcoil Wurm relevance 2.53 · 28.3% (85 of 300 decks)
- Gravetiller Wurm relevance 2.48 · 26.7% (80 of 300 decks)
- Soul Swallower relevance 2.47 · 30.0% (90 of 300 decks)
- Symbiotic Wurm relevance 2.47 · 31.0% (93 of 300 decks)
- Phantom Wurm relevance 2.44 · 26.0% (78 of 300 decks)
- Pouncing Wurm relevance 2.30 · 24.3% (73 of 300 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 2.24 · 35.7% (107 of 300 decks)
- Siege Wurm relevance 2.17 · 25.3% (76 of 300 decks)
- Hazard of the Dunes relevance 2.17 · 26.3% (79 of 300 decks)
- Witherscale Wurm relevance 2.14 · 24.3% (73 of 300 decks)
- Ravenous Lindwurm relevance 2.13 · 24.0% (72 of 300 decks)
- Duskdale Wurm relevance 2.12 · 23.7% (71 of 300 decks)
- Boneyard Wurm relevance 2.08 · 27.3% (82 of 300 decks)
- Germinating Wurm relevance 2.07 · 26.7% (80 of 300 decks)
- Voracious Wurm relevance 2.00 · 22.3% (67 of 300 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 1.99 · 28.3% (85 of 300 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 1.97 · 44.7% (134 of 300 decks)
- Pathbreaker Wurm relevance 1.96 · 21.7% (65 of 300 decks)
- Iron-Craw Crusher relevance 1.93 · 23.0% (69 of 300 decks)
- Vigorspore Wurm relevance 1.89 · 21.0% (63 of 300 decks)
- Argothian Wurm relevance 1.88 · 21.0% (63 of 300 decks)
- Metamorphic Wurm relevance 1.86 · 18.3% (55 of 300 decks)
- Havenwood Wurm relevance 1.77 · 17.7% (53 of 300 decks)
Enchantments
2
Enchantments
2 
All enchantments (2)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 3.04 · 57.7% (173 of 300 decks)
- Wurmweaver Coil relevance 1.62 · 18.3% (55 of 300 decks)
Sorceries
3
Sorceries
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All sorceries (3)
- Crush of Wurms relevance 2.48 · 31.7% (95 of 300 decks)
- Roar of the Wurm relevance 1.91 · 22.3% (67 of 300 decks)
- Wurmcalling relevance 1.76 · 24.0% (72 of 300 decks)
EDH data for Battering Wurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 300 real decks.