Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Combine Guildmage relevance 0.46 · 34.2% (27 of 79 decks)
- Sharktocrab relevance 0.44 · 38.0% (30 of 79 decks)
- Skatewing Spy relevance 0.43 · 34.2% (27 of 79 decks)
- Biogenic Upgrade relevance 0.44 · 30.4% (24 of 79 decks)
- Experiment One relevance 0.42 · 25.3% (20 of 79 decks)
- Galloping Lizrog relevance 0.37 · 38.0% (30 of 79 decks)
- Roalesk, Apex Hybrid relevance 0.40 · 29.1% (23 of 79 decks)
- Simic Locket relevance 0.40 · 27.8% (22 of 79 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.37 · 34.2% (27 of 79 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 0.38 · 29.1% (23 of 79 decks)
- Skitter Eel relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Merfolk Skydiver relevance 0.30 · 50.6% (40 of 79 decks)
- Cloudfin Raptor relevance 0.39 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 0.38 · 24.1% (19 of 79 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.28 · 55.7% (44 of 79 decks)
- Elusive Krasis relevance 0.38 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
- Applied Biomancy relevance 0.41 · 15.2% (12 of 79 decks)
- Renegade Krasis relevance 0.39 · 16.5% (13 of 79 decks)
- Gyre Engineer relevance 0.33 · 31.6% (25 of 79 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.29 · 44.3% (35 of 79 decks)
- Evolution Vat relevance 0.42 · 11.4% (9 of 79 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.35 · 19.0% (15 of 79 decks)
- Regenesis relevance 0.41 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.33 · 24.1% (19 of 79 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.26 · 44.3% (35 of 79 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.25 · 49.4% (39 of 79 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.34 · 17.7% (14 of 79 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.32 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.37 · 11.4% (9 of 79 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.27 · 38.0% (30 of 79 decks)
- Simic Manipulator relevance 0.34 · 17.7% (14 of 79 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 0.29 · 32.9% (26 of 79 decks)
- Cytoplast Root-Kin relevance 0.36 · 11.4% (9 of 79 decks)
- Sauroform Hybrid relevance 0.41 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Pteramander relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Incubation // Incongruity relevance 0.31 · 19.0% (15 of 79 decks)
- Benthic Biomancer relevance 0.26 · 36.7% (29 of 79 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.30 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.24 · 43.0% (34 of 79 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.30 · 20.3% (16 of 79 decks)
- Pollenbright Druid relevance 0.32 · 13.9% (11 of 79 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.20 · 58.2% (46 of 79 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.30 · 20.3% (16 of 79 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.33 · 12.7% (10 of 79 decks)
- Aeromunculus relevance 0.36 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Biomancer's Familiar relevance 0.27 · 26.6% (21 of 79 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.27 · 27.8% (22 of 79 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.23 · 43.0% (34 of 79 decks)
- Quench relevance 0.35 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Trollbred Guardian relevance 0.30 · 15.2% (12 of 79 decks)
Card Stacks
18
Card Stacks
18Showing 1-2 of 18
Cards like Gyre Sage
6.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Gyre Sage 44%
- Incubation Druid 43%
- Kami of Whispered Hopes 19%
Cards like Fathom Mage
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.99 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Merfolk Skydiver
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Essence Capture
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
6.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards like Simic Locket
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Simic Locket 28%
- Simic Cluestone 11%
Cards like Master of the Pearl Trident
2.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Hardened Scales
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Simic decks
Cards like Fangs of Kalonia
9.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Combine Guildmage
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Evolution Witness
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Cold-Eyed Selkie
6.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 48%
- Commander's Sphere 10%
Cards like Elusive Krasis
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Rapid Hybridization
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rapid Hybridization 42%
- Pongify 15%
Cards like Trollbred Guardian
2.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Trollbred Guardian 15%
- Crowned Ceratok 3%
- Tuskguard Captain 1%
- Gnarlid Colony 1%
- Duskshell Crawler 1%
- Pridemalkin 1%
Other options: Drix Fatemaker, Baloth Pup
Cards like Biogenic Upgrade
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Skatewing Spy
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Skatewing Spy 34%
- Sapphire Drake 1%
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Combine Guildmage relevance 0.46 · 34.2% (27 of 79 decks)
- Sharktocrab relevance 0.44 · 38.0% (30 of 79 decks)
- Skatewing Spy relevance 0.43 · 34.2% (27 of 79 decks)
- Experiment One relevance 0.42 · 25.3% (20 of 79 decks)
- Galloping Lizrog relevance 0.37 · 38.0% (30 of 79 decks)
- Roalesk, Apex Hybrid relevance 0.40 · 29.1% (23 of 79 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.37 · 34.2% (27 of 79 decks)
- Skitter Eel relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Merfolk Skydiver relevance 0.30 · 50.6% (40 of 79 decks)
- Cloudfin Raptor relevance 0.39 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
- Experiment Kraj relevance 0.38 · 24.1% (19 of 79 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.28 · 55.7% (44 of 79 decks)
- Elusive Krasis relevance 0.38 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
- Renegade Krasis relevance 0.39 · 16.5% (13 of 79 decks)
- Gyre Engineer relevance 0.33 · 31.6% (25 of 79 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.26 · 44.3% (35 of 79 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.25 · 49.4% (39 of 79 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.34 · 17.7% (14 of 79 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.27 · 38.0% (30 of 79 decks)
- Simic Manipulator relevance 0.34 · 17.7% (14 of 79 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 0.29 · 32.9% (26 of 79 decks)
- Cytoplast Root-Kin relevance 0.36 · 11.4% (9 of 79 decks)
- Sauroform Hybrid relevance 0.41 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Pteramander relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Benthic Biomancer relevance 0.26 · 36.7% (29 of 79 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.30 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.24 · 43.0% (34 of 79 decks)
- Pollenbright Druid relevance 0.32 · 13.9% (11 of 79 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.30 · 20.3% (16 of 79 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.33 · 12.7% (10 of 79 decks)
- Aeromunculus relevance 0.36 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Biomancer's Familiar relevance 0.27 · 26.6% (21 of 79 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.27 · 27.8% (22 of 79 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.23 · 43.0% (34 of 79 decks)
- Trollbred Guardian relevance 0.30 · 15.2% (12 of 79 decks)
- Aquastrand Spider relevance 0.34 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Vinelasher Kudzu relevance 0.34 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.30 · 15.2% (12 of 79 decks)
- Oran-Rief Ooze relevance 0.33 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Unruly Krasis relevance 0.33 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Simic Guildmage relevance 0.33 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Scuttlegator relevance 0.33 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.26 · 24.1% (19 of 79 decks)
- Momir Vig, Simic Visionary relevance 0.29 · 12.7% (10 of 79 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.22 · 40.5% (32 of 79 decks)
- Inspirited Vanguard relevance 0.35 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Lorescale Coatl relevance 0.29 · 12.7% (10 of 79 decks)
- Sporeback Troll relevance 0.32 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Hydra Trainer relevance 0.32 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Centaur Nurturer relevance 0.34 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
Artifacts
35
Artifacts
35 Showing 1-10 of 35
Page size
All artifacts (35)
- Simic Locket relevance 0.40 · 27.8% (22 of 79 decks)
- Evolution Vat relevance 0.42 · 11.4% (9 of 79 decks)
- Simic Keyrune relevance 0.32 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Simic Cluestone relevance 0.31 · 11.4% (9 of 79 decks)
- Tome of the Guildpact relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Seal of the Guildpact relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.17 · 25.3% (20 of 79 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.13 · 45.6% (36 of 79 decks)
- Traveler's Amulet relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Thunderous Velocipede relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Blitzball Stadium relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.16 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.17 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.16 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Doc Ock's Tentacles relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.15 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.14 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.13 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Prophetic Prism relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Atmospheric Greenhouse relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.11 · 16.5% (13 of 79 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.11 · 16.5% (13 of 79 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Icon of Ancestry relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Tarrian's Soulcleaver relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.10 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.09 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.09 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.05 · 48.1% (38 of 79 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.03 · 51.9% (41 of 79 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All enchantments (50)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.29 · 44.3% (35 of 79 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.33 · 24.1% (19 of 79 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.20 · 58.2% (46 of 79 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.31 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.30 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.22 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
- Slimebind relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Durable Handicraft relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Song of Freyalise relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Enigmatic Incarnation relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- The First Iroan Games relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Krasis Incubation relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Aquatic Incursion relevance 0.24 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.23 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Ranger Class relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.21 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Fae Flight relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Ooze Flux relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.14 · 36.7% (29 of 79 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.20 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.15 · 21.5% (17 of 79 decks)
- Tall as a Beanstalk relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.18 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Additive Evolution relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Shielding Plax relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Beorn's Hospitality relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Deeproot Waters relevance 0.15 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Capture Sphere relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.15 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.15 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Deeproot Pilgrimage relevance 0.14 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Path of Discovery relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Merrow Commerce relevance 0.14 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.13 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.12 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Death's Presence relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Eyes Everywhere relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Roaring Earth relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Essence Capture relevance 0.38 · 29.1% (23 of 79 decks)
- Applied Biomancy relevance 0.41 · 15.2% (12 of 79 decks)
- Regenesis relevance 0.41 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.32 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.37 · 11.4% (9 of 79 decks)
- Incubation // Incongruity relevance 0.31 · 19.0% (15 of 79 decks)
- Quench relevance 0.35 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.27 · 24.1% (19 of 79 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.26 · 25.3% (20 of 79 decks)
- Invigorating Surge relevance 0.30 · 12.7% (10 of 79 decks)
- River Heralds' Boon relevance 0.32 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.24 · 27.8% (22 of 79 decks)
- Synchronized Strike relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Root Snare relevance 0.31 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.19 · 46.8% (37 of 79 decks)
- Plasm Capture relevance 0.26 · 15.2% (12 of 79 decks)
- Repudiate // Replicate relevance 0.26 · 12.7% (10 of 79 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.21 · 25.3% (20 of 79 decks)
- Snakeform relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Rakshasa's Disdain relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.20 · 20.3% (16 of 79 decks)
- Feed the Clan relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Bounty of Might relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Quandrix Command relevance 0.18 · 21.5% (17 of 79 decks)
- Band Together relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.21 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Biomass Mutation relevance 0.18 · 13.9% (11 of 79 decks)
- Solidarity of Heroes relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Ruinous Intrusion relevance 0.20 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Mystic Genesis relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Saved by the Shell relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.16 · 19.0% (15 of 79 decks)
- Spell Rupture relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.12 · 41.8% (33 of 79 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Glorious Decay relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Psychic Barrier relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.16 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.14 · 13.9% (11 of 79 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All sorceries (50)
- Biogenic Upgrade relevance 0.44 · 30.4% (24 of 79 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.30 · 20.3% (16 of 79 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.27 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 0.31 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Bond of Flourishing relevance 0.32 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Courage in Crisis relevance 0.28 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.21 · 26.6% (21 of 79 decks)
- Unexpected Results relevance 0.26 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.24 · 11.4% (9 of 79 decks)
- Aquitect's Will relevance 0.24 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Give // Take relevance 0.25 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Lead the Stampede relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Body of Research relevance 0.21 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Thrive relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Stealth Mission relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Shattered Wings relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.20 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.16 · 21.5% (17 of 79 decks)
- Clear the Mind relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Overcome relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.18 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Bygone Marvels relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Visions of Dominance relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Sprouting Renewal relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Shimmer of Possibility relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Drag Under relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Incremental Growth relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Miming Slime relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Stream of Thought relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Applied Geometry relevance 0.15 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Map the Wastes relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Kapow! relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.12 · 12.7% (10 of 79 decks)
- Yuna's Decision relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.14 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.14 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.11 · 13.9% (11 of 79 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.10 · 25.3% (20 of 79 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Biomantic Mastery relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Winternight Stories relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Increasing Savagery relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Mind into Matter relevance 0.12 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.08 · 32.9% (26 of 79 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.12 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
Planeswalkers
3
Planeswalkers
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All planeswalkers (3)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.35 · 19.0% (15 of 79 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
Utility Lands
43
Utility Lands
43 Showing 1-10 of 43
Page size
All utility lands (43)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.30 · 30.4% (24 of 79 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.25 · 26.6% (21 of 79 decks)
- Guildmages' Forum relevance 0.31 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.18 · 26.6% (21 of 79 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.18 · 20.3% (16 of 79 decks)
- Captivating Cave relevance 0.23 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Vastwood Fortification // Vastwood Thicket relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.18 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Ipnu Rivulet relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.16 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.11 · 24.1% (19 of 79 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.10 · 35.4% (28 of 79 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.11 · 16.5% (13 of 79 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Daily Bugle Building relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.11 · 11.4% (9 of 79 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.11 · 11.4% (9 of 79 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.11 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.12 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.10 · 12.7% (10 of 79 decks)
- Memorial to Genius relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.06 · 29.1% (23 of 79 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Study Hall relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.07 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.07 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.06 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.07 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.06 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
Lands
50
Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All lands (50)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.23 · 35.4% (28 of 79 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.22 · 11.4% (9 of 79 decks)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.21 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.16 · 26.6% (21 of 79 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.19 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.19 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.14 · 30.4% (24 of 79 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Unclaimed Territory relevance 0.15 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Public Thoroughfare relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.09 · 46.8% (37 of 79 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.14 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Guadosalam, Farplane Gateway relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.11 · 15.2% (12 of 79 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.14 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Ancient Ziggurat relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.12 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.11 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.08 · 31.6% (25 of 79 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.10 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.07 · 34.2% (27 of 79 decks)
- Mutant Town relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.08 · 11.4% (9 of 79 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.05 · 46.8% (37 of 79 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.08 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.06 · 20.3% (16 of 79 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.08 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.06 · 29.1% (23 of 79 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.07 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.06 · 13.9% (11 of 79 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.07 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.07 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.06 · 16.5% (13 of 79 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.08 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.07 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.07 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.07 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.06 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.02 · 60.8% (48 of 79 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.05 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.04 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 91.1% (72 of 79 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Zegana, Utopian Speaker, from 79 real Commander decks.