Cards like Llanowar Elves
6.2× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
87% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Sultai decks
66% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Sultai decks
2.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.38 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 76%
- Elvish Mystic 58%
- Fyndhorn Elves 32%
- Urborg Elf 29%
- Druid of the Cowl 4%
- Boreal Druid 4%
- Llanowar Tribe 2%
- Llanowar Dead 1%
- Fyndhorn Elder 1%
- Leaf Gilder 1%
Other options: Greenweaver Druid, Woodland Mystic, Nantuko Elder, Bog Initiate, Wirewood Elf, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Apprentice Wizard, Orochi Sustainer, Sea Scryer
Cards like Imperious Perfect
12× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Imperious Perfect 56%
- Elvish Archdruid 50%
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary 20%
- Canopy Tactician 5%
- Galadhrim Brigade 5%
- Joraga Warcaller 2%
Other options: Elvish Clancaller
Cards like Glen Elendra Guardian
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Elvish Warmaster
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Elvish Warmaster 35%
- Wolverine Riders 25%
Cards like Harmonized Crescendo
18× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Lys Alana Huntmaster
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Kindred Discovery
17× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Stolen by the Fae
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Dream Harvest
5.6× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Sultai decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Virulent Emissary
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Prosperous Innkeeper, Bogwater Lumaret, Social Climber, Greenhouse Propagator
Cards like Quickling
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Sultai decks
Cards like High Fae Trickster
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Maraleaf Pixie
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Realmwalker
7.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Realmwalker 20%
- Eladamri, Korvecdal 15%
Other options: Vizier of the Menagerie, Augur of Autumn
Cards like Glamermite
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Glamermite 20%
- Pestermite 3%
Other options: Giant-Sized Flying Ant, Deceiver Exarch, Divining Duelist
Cards like Priest of Titania
2.2× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Bloodline Bidding
6.5× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Nightmare Sower
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.18 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Scion of Oona
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Scion of Oona 44%
- Faerie Noble 1%
Cards like Cloud of Faeries
2.6× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
All top picks (50)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 0.30 · 52.2% (238 of 456 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.30 · 51.5% (235 of 456 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.31 · 49.1% (224 of 456 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.31 · 47.1% (215 of 456 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 0.32 · 44.1% (201 of 456 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.33 · 42.8% (195 of 456 decks)
- Spell Stutter relevance 0.33 · 42.1% (192 of 456 decks)
- Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor relevance 0.33 · 41.2% (188 of 456 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.28 · 55.7% (254 of 456 decks)
- Stolen by the Fae relevance 0.37 · 31.1% (142 of 456 decks)
- Voracious Tome-Skimmer relevance 0.30 · 51.1% (233 of 456 decks)
- Archmage of Echoes relevance 0.37 · 29.2% (133 of 456 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.38 · 26.8% (122 of 456 decks)
- Faerie Formation relevance 0.39 · 25.9% (118 of 456 decks)
- Nymris, Oona's Trickster relevance 0.39 · 25.0% (114 of 456 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.39 · 24.6% (112 of 456 decks)
- Eclipsed Elf relevance 0.40 · 23.0% (105 of 456 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.40 · 22.8% (104 of 456 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.31 · 48.2% (220 of 456 decks)
- Quickling relevance 0.40 · 21.7% (99 of 456 decks)
- Trystan's Command relevance 0.40 · 21.3% (97 of 456 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.41 · 20.0% (91 of 456 decks)
- Glamermite relevance 0.41 · 19.7% (90 of 456 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.32 · 44.5% (203 of 456 decks)
- Glamer Gifter relevance 0.42 · 18.4% (84 of 456 decks)
- Nightmare Sower relevance 0.42 · 16.7% (76 of 456 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.33 · 40.1% (183 of 456 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.35 · 35.3% (161 of 456 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.35 · 35.3% (161 of 456 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.43 · 15.1% (69 of 456 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.43 · 15.1% (69 of 456 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.30 · 50.0% (228 of 456 decks)
- Scarblade's Malice relevance 0.43 · 14.9% (68 of 456 decks)
- Unwelcome Sprite relevance 0.43 · 14.9% (68 of 456 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.36 · 32.0% (146 of 456 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.36 · 31.1% (142 of 456 decks)
- Faebloom Trick relevance 0.38 · 26.3% (120 of 456 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.40 · 23.0% (105 of 456 decks)
- Oona, Queen of the Fae relevance 0.32 · 43.4% (198 of 456 decks)
- Faerie Harbinger relevance 0.40 · 22.6% (103 of 456 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.40 · 21.9% (100 of 456 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.41 · 19.7% (90 of 456 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.41 · 18.4% (84 of 456 decks)
- Glen Elendra's Answer relevance 0.35 · 34.6% (158 of 456 decks)
- Urborg Elf relevance 0.37 · 29.2% (133 of 456 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.32 · 42.5% (194 of 456 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.39 · 25.0% (114 of 456 decks)
- Glen Elendra Liege relevance 0.43 · 14.5% (66 of 456 decks)
- Malleable Impostor relevance 0.40 · 21.5% (98 of 456 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.35 · 33.3% (152 of 456 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 0.30 · 52.2% (238 of 456 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.30 · 51.5% (235 of 456 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.31 · 49.1% (224 of 456 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.31 · 47.1% (215 of 456 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 0.32 · 44.1% (201 of 456 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.33 · 42.8% (195 of 456 decks)
- Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor relevance 0.33 · 41.2% (188 of 456 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.28 · 55.7% (254 of 456 decks)
- Voracious Tome-Skimmer relevance 0.30 · 51.1% (233 of 456 decks)
- Archmage of Echoes relevance 0.37 · 29.2% (133 of 456 decks)
- Faerie Formation relevance 0.39 · 25.9% (118 of 456 decks)
- Nymris, Oona's Trickster relevance 0.39 · 25.0% (114 of 456 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.39 · 24.6% (112 of 456 decks)
- Eclipsed Elf relevance 0.40 · 23.0% (105 of 456 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.40 · 22.8% (104 of 456 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.31 · 48.2% (220 of 456 decks)
- Quickling relevance 0.40 · 21.7% (99 of 456 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.41 · 20.0% (91 of 456 decks)
- Glamermite relevance 0.41 · 19.7% (90 of 456 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.32 · 44.5% (203 of 456 decks)
- Glamer Gifter relevance 0.42 · 18.4% (84 of 456 decks)
- Nightmare Sower relevance 0.42 · 16.7% (76 of 456 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.35 · 35.3% (161 of 456 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.35 · 35.3% (161 of 456 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.43 · 15.1% (69 of 456 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.43 · 15.1% (69 of 456 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.30 · 50.0% (228 of 456 decks)
- Unwelcome Sprite relevance 0.43 · 14.9% (68 of 456 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.36 · 32.0% (146 of 456 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.36 · 31.1% (142 of 456 decks)
- Oona, Queen of the Fae relevance 0.32 · 43.4% (198 of 456 decks)
- Faerie Harbinger relevance 0.40 · 22.6% (103 of 456 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.40 · 21.9% (100 of 456 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.41 · 19.7% (90 of 456 decks)
- Urborg Elf relevance 0.37 · 29.2% (133 of 456 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.32 · 42.5% (194 of 456 decks)
- Glen Elendra Liege relevance 0.43 · 14.5% (66 of 456 decks)
- Malleable Impostor relevance 0.40 · 21.5% (98 of 456 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.32 · 41.9% (191 of 456 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.24 · 69.5% (317 of 456 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.30 · 50.9% (232 of 456 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.34 · 38.4% (175 of 456 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 0.40 · 20.8% (95 of 456 decks)
- Chomping Changeling relevance 0.34 · 36.6% (167 of 456 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.42 · 15.1% (69 of 456 decks)
- Talion, the Kindly Lord relevance 0.33 · 39.9% (182 of 456 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.35 · 33.6% (153 of 456 decks)
- Blightwing Bandit relevance 0.40 · 20.2% (92 of 456 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 0.38 · 24.8% (113 of 456 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.44 · 12.9% (59 of 456 decks)
All artifacts (42)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.41 · 18.4% (84 of 456 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.39 · 25.0% (114 of 456 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.40 · 22.1% (101 of 456 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.43 · 14.3% (65 of 456 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.38 · 24.3% (111 of 456 decks)
- Gathering Stone relevance 0.44 · 12.9% (59 of 456 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.42 · 14.7% (67 of 456 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.42 · 12.3% (56 of 456 decks)
- Dawn-Blessed Pennant relevance 0.45 · 9.2% (42 of 456 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.45 · 6.4% (29 of 456 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.43 · 7.5% (34 of 456 decks)
- Banner of Kinship relevance 0.44 · 5.5% (25 of 456 decks)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.41 · 7.0% (32 of 456 decks)
- Mirrormind Crown relevance 0.44 · 4.2% (19 of 456 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.27 · 22.4% (102 of 456 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.44 · 3.7% (17 of 456 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.43 · 3.7% (17 of 456 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.44 · 3.5% (16 of 456 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.42 · 3.7% (17 of 456 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (38 of 456 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.42 · 3.3% (15 of 456 decks)
- Talisman of Dominance relevance 0.31 · 7.7% (35 of 456 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.43 · 3.1% (14 of 456 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (23 of 456 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.42 · 2.9% (13 of 456 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.34 · 4.2% (19 of 456 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.35 · 3.9% (18 of 456 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.29 · 6.4% (29 of 456 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.32 · 4.4% (20 of 456 decks)
- Rimefire Torque relevance 0.42 · 2.6% (12 of 456 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.42 · 2.4% (11 of 456 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.31 · 4.2% (19 of 456 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.29 · 4.6% (21 of 456 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.39 · 2.6% (12 of 456 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.20 · 19.1% (87 of 456 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.37 · 2.6% (12 of 456 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.37 · 2.4% (11 of 456 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.21 · 10.1% (46 of 456 decks)
- Staff of Eden, Vault's Key relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (13 of 456 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.29 · 2.4% (11 of 456 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 63.2% (288 of 456 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.06 · 72.4% (330 of 456 decks)
All enchantments (41)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.35 · 33.3% (152 of 456 decks)
- Presence of Gond relevance 0.43 · 14.7% (67 of 456 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.39 · 23.0% (105 of 456 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.37 · 27.2% (124 of 456 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.30 · 47.6% (217 of 456 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.29 · 50.9% (232 of 456 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.44 · 11.8% (54 of 456 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.41 · 14.3% (65 of 456 decks)
- Morcant's Eyes relevance 0.45 · 9.9% (45 of 456 decks)
- Feywild Visitor relevance 0.44 · 9.6% (44 of 456 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.37 · 17.5% (80 of 456 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.41 · 11.8% (54 of 456 decks)
- Prowess of the Fair relevance 0.45 · 7.2% (33 of 456 decks)
- Leyline of Transformation relevance 0.44 · 7.5% (34 of 456 decks)
- Flourishing Defenses relevance 0.45 · 5.3% (24 of 456 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.39 · 11.6% (53 of 456 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.45 · 5.5% (25 of 456 decks)
- Faerie Tauntings relevance 0.45 · 5.0% (23 of 456 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.44 · 5.7% (26 of 456 decks)
- Mornsong Aria relevance 0.44 · 5.3% (24 of 456 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.42 · 5.7% (26 of 456 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.44 · 4.6% (21 of 456 decks)
- Shimmerwilds Growth relevance 0.41 · 5.5% (25 of 456 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.35 · 12.7% (58 of 456 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.37 · 8.8% (40 of 456 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf's Embrace relevance 0.45 · 4.2% (19 of 456 decks)
- Noggle the Mind relevance 0.45 · 4.2% (19 of 456 decks)
- Blossombind relevance 0.44 · 3.9% (18 of 456 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (24 of 456 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.44 · 3.5% (16 of 456 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.35 · 4.8% (22 of 456 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.42 · 3.5% (16 of 456 decks)
- Grave Venerations relevance 0.44 · 3.3% (15 of 456 decks)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.42 · 3.1% (14 of 456 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.36 · 3.9% (18 of 456 decks)
- Descendants' Path relevance 0.43 · 2.9% (13 of 456 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.32 · 4.2% (19 of 456 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (24 of 456 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.30 · 2.9% (13 of 456 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (12 of 456 decks)
- Cunning Rhetoric relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (14 of 456 decks)
All instants (50)
- Spell Stutter relevance 0.33 · 42.1% (192 of 456 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.38 · 26.8% (122 of 456 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.33 · 40.1% (183 of 456 decks)
- Scarblade's Malice relevance 0.43 · 14.9% (68 of 456 decks)
- Faebloom Trick relevance 0.38 · 26.3% (120 of 456 decks)
- Glen Elendra's Answer relevance 0.35 · 34.6% (158 of 456 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.44 · 13.6% (62 of 456 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.41 · 15.4% (70 of 456 decks)
- Unforgiving Aim relevance 0.45 · 10.7% (49 of 456 decks)
- Unbury relevance 0.45 · 10.3% (47 of 456 decks)
- Faerie Fencing relevance 0.45 · 9.9% (45 of 456 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.44 · 10.1% (46 of 456 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.43 · 9.6% (44 of 456 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.45 · 7.0% (32 of 456 decks)
- Wild Unraveling relevance 0.45 · 7.0% (32 of 456 decks)
- Faerie Trickery relevance 0.45 · 4.8% (22 of 456 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.44 · 5.5% (25 of 456 decks)
- Unexpected Assistance relevance 0.45 · 5.0% (23 of 456 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.42 · 7.5% (34 of 456 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.36 · 12.3% (56 of 456 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.40 · 7.7% (35 of 456 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.39 · 8.6% (39 of 456 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.44 · 4.6% (21 of 456 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.44 · 4.6% (21 of 456 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.33 · 14.9% (68 of 456 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.33 · 15.8% (72 of 456 decks)
- Kindred Summons relevance 0.45 · 4.4% (20 of 456 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.41 · 5.3% (24 of 456 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.38 · 7.5% (34 of 456 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.25 · 35.1% (160 of 456 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.30 · 19.3% (88 of 456 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.34 · 10.7% (49 of 456 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.36 · 7.9% (36 of 456 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.38 · 5.5% (25 of 456 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.33 · 11.0% (50 of 456 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.37 · 5.7% (26 of 456 decks)
- Go for the Throat relevance 0.40 · 4.4% (20 of 456 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (24 of 456 decks)
- Dose of Dawnglow relevance 0.44 · 3.7% (17 of 456 decks)
- Dina's Guidance relevance 0.42 · 3.9% (18 of 456 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.33 · 8.3% (38 of 456 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (57 of 456 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.26 · 25.0% (114 of 456 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (22 of 456 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.27 · 20.0% (91 of 456 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.38 · 4.4% (20 of 456 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.36 · 4.6% (21 of 456 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.39 · 4.2% (19 of 456 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (15 of 456 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.41 · 3.3% (15 of 456 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Stolen by the Fae relevance 0.37 · 31.1% (142 of 456 decks)
- Trystan's Command relevance 0.40 · 21.3% (97 of 456 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.40 · 23.0% (105 of 456 decks)
- Bloodline Bidding relevance 0.41 · 19.3% (88 of 456 decks)
- Kindred Dominance relevance 0.43 · 13.2% (60 of 456 decks)
- Tegwyll's Scouring relevance 0.44 · 12.7% (58 of 456 decks)
- Notorious Throng relevance 0.39 · 20.0% (91 of 456 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.45 · 10.1% (46 of 456 decks)
- Faerie Slumber Party relevance 0.45 · 9.9% (45 of 456 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.45 · 9.9% (45 of 456 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.44 · 10.3% (47 of 456 decks)
- Celestial Reunion relevance 0.45 · 6.6% (30 of 456 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.44 · 7.7% (35 of 456 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.44 · 5.0% (23 of 456 decks)
- Dream Harvest relevance 0.32 · 20.4% (93 of 456 decks)
- Bogslither's Embrace relevance 0.45 · 4.4% (20 of 456 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.36 · 8.6% (39 of 456 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.35 · 10.5% (48 of 456 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.41 · 3.9% (18 of 456 decks)
- Temporal Cleansing relevance 0.44 · 3.5% (16 of 456 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.43 · 3.5% (16 of 456 decks)
- Into the Fae Court relevance 0.44 · 3.3% (15 of 456 decks)
- Bounty of Skemfar relevance 0.44 · 3.3% (15 of 456 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.39 · 3.9% (18 of 456 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (15 of 456 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.42 · 3.3% (15 of 456 decks)
- Patriarch's Bidding relevance 0.43 · 3.1% (14 of 456 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.43 · 3.1% (14 of 456 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.35 · 4.2% (19 of 456 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.22 · 24.1% (110 of 456 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.21 · 27.0% (123 of 456 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.42 · 2.9% (13 of 456 decks)
- Pact of the Serpent relevance 0.42 · 2.6% (12 of 456 decks)
- Return Upon the Tide relevance 0.42 · 2.6% (12 of 456 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.42 · 2.6% (12 of 456 decks)
- Assert Perfection relevance 0.42 · 2.4% (11 of 456 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (14 of 456 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.31 · 4.2% (19 of 456 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.37 · 3.1% (14 of 456 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.40 · 2.6% (12 of 456 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.22 · 16.2% (74 of 456 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.37 · 3.1% (14 of 456 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.18 · 29.8% (136 of 456 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.36 · 2.9% (13 of 456 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.38 · 2.4% (11 of 456 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.19 · 17.1% (78 of 456 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.35 · 2.6% (12 of 456 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.22 · 9.6% (44 of 456 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (11 of 456 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.18 · 13.8% (63 of 456 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (7)
- Tyvar Kell relevance 0.45 · 10.7% (49 of 456 decks)
- Oko, Lorwyn Liege // Oko, Shadowmoor Scion relevance 0.45 · 9.2% (42 of 456 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.45 · 8.6% (39 of 456 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.45 · 4.8% (22 of 456 decks)
- Tyvar, Jubilant Brawler relevance 0.39 · 3.9% (18 of 456 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.38 · 3.3% (15 of 456 decks)
- Tasha, the Witch Queen relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (19 of 456 decks)
All utility lands (46)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.34 · 31.6% (144 of 456 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.42 · 12.3% (56 of 456 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.45 · 8.3% (38 of 456 decks)
- Faerie Conclave relevance 0.44 · 9.2% (42 of 456 decks)
- Abundant Countryside relevance 0.45 · 7.5% (34 of 456 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.43 · 8.3% (38 of 456 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.45 · 6.6% (30 of 456 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.39 · 12.1% (55 of 456 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.41 · 6.8% (31 of 456 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.33 · 16.9% (77 of 456 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.35 · 12.5% (57 of 456 decks)
- Revitalizing Repast // Old-Growth Grove relevance 0.35 · 11.8% (54 of 456 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.21 · 56.4% (257 of 456 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.37 · 8.3% (38 of 456 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.38 · 7.0% (32 of 456 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.34 · 10.7% (49 of 456 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.31 · 13.6% (62 of 456 decks)
- Festering Thicket relevance 0.38 · 5.3% (24 of 456 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (57 of 456 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.35 · 9.2% (42 of 456 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.34 · 9.2% (42 of 456 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.26 · 26.3% (120 of 456 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.34 · 9.4% (43 of 456 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.37 · 5.0% (23 of 456 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.33 · 9.2% (42 of 456 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.34 · 6.8% (31 of 456 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (28 of 456 decks)
- Zagoth Triome relevance 0.22 · 32.5% (148 of 456 decks)
- Foreboding Landscape relevance 0.25 · 19.3% (88 of 456 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.38 · 3.7% (17 of 456 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.37 · 3.7% (17 of 456 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.25 · 14.0% (64 of 456 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.21 · 24.1% (110 of 456 decks)
- Winding Canyons relevance 0.42 · 2.6% (12 of 456 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.25 · 11.0% (50 of 456 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.35 · 3.7% (17 of 456 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (14 of 456 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.24 · 11.8% (54 of 456 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.34 · 3.7% (17 of 456 decks)
- Fetid Pools relevance 0.25 · 6.1% (28 of 456 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.36 · 2.6% (12 of 456 decks)
- Kishla Village relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (13 of 456 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (14 of 456 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.30 · 2.6% (12 of 456 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (11 of 456 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.17 · 6.4% (29 of 456 decks)
All lands (50)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.34 · 38.2% (174 of 456 decks)
- Secluded Glen relevance 0.40 · 21.5% (98 of 456 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.42 · 16.9% (77 of 456 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.42 · 15.1% (69 of 456 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.45 · 8.1% (37 of 456 decks)
- Elven Passage relevance 0.45 · 8.1% (37 of 456 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Palace relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (31 of 456 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.45 · 7.5% (34 of 456 decks)
- Unclaimed Territory relevance 0.44 · 7.7% (35 of 456 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.35 · 19.1% (87 of 456 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.37 · 11.6% (53 of 456 decks)
- Thriving Moor relevance 0.41 · 5.7% (26 of 456 decks)
- Vernal Fen relevance 0.34 · 12.5% (57 of 456 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.37 · 9.0% (41 of 456 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.35 · 9.4% (43 of 456 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.31 · 14.5% (66 of 456 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.32 · 13.8% (63 of 456 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.36 · 8.1% (37 of 456 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.41 · 4.6% (21 of 456 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.36 · 8.3% (38 of 456 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.27 · 27.6% (126 of 456 decks)
- Necroblossom Snarl relevance 0.38 · 5.5% (25 of 456 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.28 · 21.9% (100 of 456 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.39 · 4.6% (21 of 456 decks)
- Deathcap Glade relevance 0.27 · 25.7% (117 of 456 decks)
- Tainted Isle relevance 0.36 · 7.0% (32 of 456 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.27 · 25.2% (115 of 456 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.35 · 7.7% (35 of 456 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.37 · 5.5% (25 of 456 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.38 · 4.6% (21 of 456 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.35 · 7.5% (34 of 456 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.42 · 3.9% (18 of 456 decks)
- Tainted Wood relevance 0.35 · 7.0% (32 of 456 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.26 · 24.8% (113 of 456 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.27 · 21.5% (98 of 456 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.36 · 5.5% (25 of 456 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.33 · 9.6% (44 of 456 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.32 · 11.0% (50 of 456 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.35 · 6.8% (31 of 456 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.27 · 20.2% (92 of 456 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (22 of 456 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (22 of 456 decks)
- Wastewood Verge relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (38 of 456 decks)
- Undergrowth Stadium relevance 0.24 · 26.3% (120 of 456 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.31 · 9.4% (43 of 456 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.35 · 4.6% (21 of 456 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.37 · 4.4% (20 of 456 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.23 · 30.7% (140 of 456 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.32 · 7.9% (36 of 456 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.34 · 5.0% (23 of 456 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Maralen, Fae Ascendant, from 456 real Commander decks.