Cards like Narset's Reversal
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
65% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other blue decks
Cards
- Narset's Reversal 70%
- Twincast 63%
- Insidious Will 43%
Cards like Echo Mage
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Echo Mage 46%
- Meletis Charlatan 43%
- Sigil Tracer 9%
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
3.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Muse Seeker, Windrider Wizard, Lunar Mystic
Cards like Mnemonic Deluge
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Psionic Ritual
Cards like Solve the Equation
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
- Solve the Equation 33%
- Mystical Tutor 23%
- Personal Tutor 17%
- Merchant Scroll 12%
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Baral, Chief of Compliance
4.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Twinning Staff
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Twinning Staff 58%
- Ether 18%
Cards like Vizier of Tumbling Sands
4.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands 21%
- Kelpie Guide 11%
- Ioreth of the Healing House 7%
- Forensic Researcher 2%
- Clever Conjurer 1%
Other options: Nimbleclaw Adept, North Pole Patrol
Cards like Eternal Dominion
18× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
- Eternal Dominion 34%
- Bribery 13%
- Acquire 3%
Cards like Curse of Echoes
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Curse of Echoes 20%
- Hive Mind 13%
Cards like Thran Dynamo
3.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Ichor Elixir, Sisay's Ring, Ring of the Lucii, Ur-Golem's Eye
Cards like Lithoform Engine
17× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like See Double
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Self-Reflection
Cards like Adaptive Training Post
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Opt
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Isochron Scepter
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Pongify
1.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 38%
- Rapid Hybridization 36%
Cards like Gilded Lotus
1.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards like Fact or Fiction
4.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Fortune's Favor, Epiphany at the Drownyard
Cards like Replication Technique
6.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Meletis Charlatan relevance 0.75 · 43.4% (72 of 166 decks)
- Echo Mage relevance 0.69 · 45.8% (76 of 166 decks)
- Swarm Intelligence relevance 0.56 · 63.9% (106 of 166 decks)
- Twincast relevance 0.54 · 62.7% (104 of 166 decks)
- Twinning Staff relevance 0.57 · 57.8% (96 of 166 decks)
- Eternal Dominion relevance 0.66 · 33.7% (56 of 166 decks)
- Echo Storm relevance 0.59 · 41.0% (68 of 166 decks)
- Flawless Forgery relevance 0.68 · 22.9% (38 of 166 decks)
- Mirari relevance 0.64 · 24.7% (41 of 166 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.48 · 51.8% (86 of 166 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.50 · 44.6% (74 of 166 decks)
- Taigam, Master Opportunist relevance 0.56 · 32.5% (54 of 166 decks)
- Sea Gate Stormcaller relevance 0.62 · 21.1% (35 of 166 decks)
- Insidious Will relevance 0.50 · 42.8% (71 of 166 decks)
- Adaptive Training Post relevance 0.53 · 36.1% (60 of 166 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.51 · 39.8% (66 of 166 decks)
- Mercurial Spelldancer relevance 0.47 · 45.8% (76 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Echoes relevance 0.60 · 20.5% (34 of 166 decks)
- Complete the Circuit relevance 0.53 · 30.1% (50 of 166 decks)
- The Mirari Conjecture relevance 0.54 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
- Wandering Archaic // Explore the Vastlands relevance 0.46 · 40.4% (67 of 166 decks)
- Psychic Rebuttal relevance 0.55 · 19.3% (32 of 166 decks)
- See Double relevance 0.41 · 44.6% (74 of 166 decks)
- Deekah, Fractal Theorist relevance 0.46 · 32.5% (54 of 166 decks)
- Ether relevance 0.53 · 18.1% (30 of 166 decks)
- Font of Magic relevance 0.51 · 18.7% (31 of 166 decks)
- A Little Chat relevance 0.52 · 16.3% (27 of 166 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.46 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
- Split Decision relevance 0.53 · 13.9% (23 of 166 decks)
- Thunderclap Drake relevance 0.38 · 44.6% (74 of 166 decks)
- Invasion of Arcavios // Invocation of the Founders relevance 0.49 · 17.5% (29 of 166 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.38 · 40.4% (67 of 166 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.27 · 70.5% (117 of 166 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.40 · 28.9% (48 of 166 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.41 · 26.5% (44 of 166 decks)
- Hive Mind relevance 0.47 · 13.3% (22 of 166 decks)
- Wizards of Thay relevance 0.41 · 22.3% (37 of 166 decks)
- Naru Meha, Master Wizard relevance 0.40 · 22.9% (38 of 166 decks)
- Uyo, Silent Prophet relevance 0.44 · 13.3% (22 of 166 decks)
- Kitsa, Otterball Elite relevance 0.37 · 27.7% (46 of 166 decks)
- Mentor's Guidance relevance 0.45 · 11.4% (19 of 166 decks)
- Mindsplice Apparatus relevance 0.36 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
- Gadwick's First Duel relevance 0.48 · 8.4% (14 of 166 decks)
- Myojin of Cryptic Dreams relevance 0.41 · 14.5% (24 of 166 decks)
- Will Kenrith relevance 0.45 · 9.0% (15 of 166 decks)
- Demilich relevance 0.43 · 10.2% (17 of 166 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.37 · 18.7% (31 of 166 decks)
- Founding the Third Path relevance 0.42 · 9.6% (16 of 166 decks)
- Tomb of Horrors Adventurer relevance 0.42 · 9.0% (15 of 166 decks)
- Case of the Shifting Visage relevance 0.42 · 8.4% (14 of 166 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Meletis Charlatan relevance 0.75 · 43.4% (72 of 166 decks)
- Echo Mage relevance 0.69 · 45.8% (76 of 166 decks)
- Taigam, Master Opportunist relevance 0.56 · 32.5% (54 of 166 decks)
- Sea Gate Stormcaller relevance 0.62 · 21.1% (35 of 166 decks)
- Mercurial Spelldancer relevance 0.47 · 45.8% (76 of 166 decks)
- Wandering Archaic // Explore the Vastlands relevance 0.46 · 40.4% (67 of 166 decks)
- Deekah, Fractal Theorist relevance 0.46 · 32.5% (54 of 166 decks)
- Thunderclap Drake relevance 0.38 · 44.6% (74 of 166 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.38 · 40.4% (67 of 166 decks)
- Wizards of Thay relevance 0.41 · 22.3% (37 of 166 decks)
- Naru Meha, Master Wizard relevance 0.40 · 22.9% (38 of 166 decks)
- Uyo, Silent Prophet relevance 0.44 · 13.3% (22 of 166 decks)
- Kitsa, Otterball Elite relevance 0.37 · 27.7% (46 of 166 decks)
- Myojin of Cryptic Dreams relevance 0.41 · 14.5% (24 of 166 decks)
- Demilich relevance 0.43 · 10.2% (17 of 166 decks)
- Tomb of Horrors Adventurer relevance 0.42 · 9.0% (15 of 166 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.34 · 21.1% (35 of 166 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.34 · 13.9% (23 of 166 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.21 · 60.8% (101 of 166 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.29 · 27.1% (45 of 166 decks)
- Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 0.36 · 7.2% (12 of 166 decks)
- Sigil Tracer relevance 0.35 · 9.0% (15 of 166 decks)
- Mocking Sprite relevance 0.30 · 13.9% (23 of 166 decks)
- Mischievous Quanar relevance 0.37 · 4.8% (8 of 166 decks)
- Lier, Disciple of the Drowned relevance 0.29 · 13.9% (23 of 166 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.31 · 11.4% (19 of 166 decks)
- Curious Homunculus // Voracious Reader relevance 0.32 · 9.0% (15 of 166 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.24 · 27.7% (46 of 166 decks)
- Slick Imitator relevance 0.33 · 6.6% (11 of 166 decks)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 0.26 · 16.3% (27 of 166 decks)
- Archmage of Echoes relevance 0.31 · 6.0% (10 of 166 decks)
- God-Eternal Kefnet relevance 0.31 · 6.6% (11 of 166 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.21 · 28.9% (48 of 166 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.23 · 21.1% (35 of 166 decks)
- Dreamscape Artist relevance 0.27 · 9.0% (15 of 166 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.21 · 22.9% (38 of 166 decks)
- Drafna, Founder of Lat-Nam relevance 0.27 · 7.2% (12 of 166 decks)
- Burnished Hart relevance 0.25 · 9.6% (16 of 166 decks)
- Apprentice Wizard relevance 0.26 · 6.6% (11 of 166 decks)
- Micromancer relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (9 of 166 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.22 · 13.9% (23 of 166 decks)
- Gogo, Master of Mimicry relevance 0.25 · 6.0% (10 of 166 decks)
- Inga Rune-Eyes relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.23 · 7.2% (12 of 166 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.23 · 6.6% (11 of 166 decks)
- Silver Myr relevance 0.19 · 14.5% (24 of 166 decks)
- Nimble Obstructionist relevance 0.27 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 0.20 · 10.2% (17 of 166 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.21 · 9.6% (16 of 166 decks)
- Troop of Ponies relevance 0.25 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Twinning Staff relevance 0.57 · 57.8% (96 of 166 decks)
- Mirari relevance 0.64 · 24.7% (41 of 166 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.48 · 51.8% (86 of 166 decks)
- Adaptive Training Post relevance 0.53 · 36.1% (60 of 166 decks)
- Ether relevance 0.53 · 18.1% (30 of 166 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.40 · 28.9% (48 of 166 decks)
- Mindsplice Apparatus relevance 0.36 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.37 · 18.7% (31 of 166 decks)
- Spell Satchel relevance 0.42 · 6.0% (10 of 166 decks)
- Wizard's Spellbook relevance 0.36 · 7.8% (13 of 166 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.29 · 12.0% (20 of 166 decks)
- Blue Mage's Cane relevance 0.32 · 4.2% (7 of 166 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.24 · 15.1% (25 of 166 decks)
- Sword of Wealth and Power relevance 0.31 · 4.2% (7 of 166 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.22 · 18.7% (31 of 166 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.23 · 12.7% (21 of 166 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.27 · 7.2% (12 of 166 decks)
- Rimefire Torque relevance 0.27 · 6.6% (11 of 166 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.22 · 13.9% (23 of 166 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.18 · 28.9% (48 of 166 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.22 · 8.4% (14 of 166 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.18 · 21.7% (36 of 166 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.18 · 21.1% (35 of 166 decks)
- Panoptic Mirror relevance 0.28 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.18 · 19.3% (32 of 166 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.19 · 15.7% (26 of 166 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.20 · 11.4% (19 of 166 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.20 · 8.4% (14 of 166 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (11 of 166 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.18 · 7.2% (12 of 166 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (7 of 166 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.15 · 15.1% (25 of 166 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.12 · 31.3% (52 of 166 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.19 · 4.2% (7 of 166 decks)
- Star Compass relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.14 · 9.0% (15 of 166 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.15 · 6.0% (10 of 166 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Moonsnare Prototype relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.07 · 56.6% (94 of 166 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.08 · 39.8% (66 of 166 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (8 of 166 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.13 · 4.2% (7 of 166 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.06 · 57.8% (96 of 166 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.14 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.10 · 8.4% (14 of 166 decks)
All enchantments (45)
- Swarm Intelligence relevance 0.56 · 63.9% (106 of 166 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.51 · 39.8% (66 of 166 decks)
- Curse of Echoes relevance 0.60 · 20.5% (34 of 166 decks)
- The Mirari Conjecture relevance 0.54 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
- Font of Magic relevance 0.51 · 18.7% (31 of 166 decks)
- Hive Mind relevance 0.47 · 13.3% (22 of 166 decks)
- Gadwick's First Duel relevance 0.48 · 8.4% (14 of 166 decks)
- Founding the Third Path relevance 0.42 · 9.6% (16 of 166 decks)
- Case of the Shifting Visage relevance 0.42 · 8.4% (14 of 166 decks)
- Double Down relevance 0.43 · 4.8% (8 of 166 decks)
- Spellweaver Volute relevance 0.42 · 6.0% (10 of 166 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.31 · 16.3% (27 of 166 decks)
- Arcane Melee relevance 0.33 · 5.4% (9 of 166 decks)
- Paradox Haze relevance 0.30 · 7.8% (13 of 166 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.27 · 9.0% (15 of 166 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.23 · 12.7% (21 of 166 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.25 · 7.2% (12 of 166 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.23 · 10.2% (17 of 166 decks)
- Eye of the Storm relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Metallurgic Summonings relevance 0.23 · 5.4% (9 of 166 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (8 of 166 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.19 · 7.8% (13 of 166 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (8 of 166 decks)
- The Clone Saga relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Rune of Flight relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.12 · 25.3% (42 of 166 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (8 of 166 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (8 of 166 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.12 · 15.1% (25 of 166 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.14 · 6.0% (10 of 166 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.15 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.10 · 10.8% (18 of 166 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.12 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.09 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.08 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
All instants (50)
- Twincast relevance 0.54 · 62.7% (104 of 166 decks)
- Insidious Will relevance 0.50 · 42.8% (71 of 166 decks)
- Complete the Circuit relevance 0.53 · 30.1% (50 of 166 decks)
- Psychic Rebuttal relevance 0.55 · 19.3% (32 of 166 decks)
- See Double relevance 0.41 · 44.6% (74 of 166 decks)
- A Little Chat relevance 0.52 · 16.3% (27 of 166 decks)
- Split Decision relevance 0.53 · 13.9% (23 of 166 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.27 · 70.5% (117 of 166 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.27 · 24.7% (41 of 166 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.26 · 25.9% (43 of 166 decks)
- Make Disappear relevance 0.36 · 5.4% (9 of 166 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.23 · 29.5% (49 of 166 decks)
- Ertai's Meddling relevance 0.34 · 4.2% (7 of 166 decks)
- Reenact the Crime relevance 0.29 · 7.8% (13 of 166 decks)
- Elminster's Simulacrum relevance 0.28 · 5.4% (9 of 166 decks)
- String of Disappearances relevance 0.32 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Hubris relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.18 · 27.7% (46 of 166 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.17 · 30.1% (50 of 166 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.14 · 50.6% (84 of 166 decks)
- Turnabout relevance 0.24 · 6.6% (11 of 166 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.24 · 6.6% (11 of 166 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.22 · 9.6% (16 of 166 decks)
- Thieves' Fortune relevance 0.34 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (22 of 166 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.16 · 31.9% (53 of 166 decks)
- Weave Fate relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.18 · 16.9% (28 of 166 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.16 · 23.5% (39 of 166 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.21 · 6.6% (11 of 166 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.19 · 12.0% (20 of 166 decks)
- Griptide relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.17 · 18.1% (30 of 166 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.21 · 6.0% (10 of 166 decks)
- Uncomfortable Chill relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.17 · 15.7% (26 of 166 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.19 · 10.2% (17 of 166 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.22 · 4.2% (7 of 166 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.19 · 9.0% (15 of 166 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.15 · 25.3% (42 of 166 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.19 · 7.8% (13 of 166 decks)
- Force Away relevance 0.29 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (8 of 166 decks)
- Test of Talents relevance 0.29 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (11 of 166 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.11 · 54.2% (90 of 166 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (10 of 166 decks)
- Crippling Chill relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Mission Briefing relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (7 of 166 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.12 · 36.1% (60 of 166 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Eternal Dominion relevance 0.66 · 33.7% (56 of 166 decks)
- Echo Storm relevance 0.59 · 41.0% (68 of 166 decks)
- Flawless Forgery relevance 0.68 · 22.9% (38 of 166 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.50 · 44.6% (74 of 166 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.46 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.41 · 26.5% (44 of 166 decks)
- Mentor's Guidance relevance 0.45 · 11.4% (19 of 166 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.30 · 16.9% (28 of 166 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.24 · 32.5% (54 of 166 decks)
- Blatant Thievery relevance 0.31 · 12.0% (20 of 166 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.25 · 27.7% (46 of 166 decks)
- Spelltwine relevance 0.35 · 6.0% (10 of 166 decks)
- Temporal Fissure relevance 0.34 · 6.0% (10 of 166 decks)
- Clone Legion relevance 0.30 · 10.8% (18 of 166 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.29 · 12.7% (21 of 166 decks)
- Cut Your Losses relevance 0.28 · 12.7% (21 of 166 decks)
- Flood of Recollection relevance 0.29 · 9.0% (15 of 166 decks)
- Rooftop Nuisance relevance 0.35 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.28 · 9.0% (15 of 166 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.24 · 16.3% (27 of 166 decks)
- Arcane Heist relevance 0.29 · 5.4% (9 of 166 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.27 · 6.6% (11 of 166 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.23 · 14.5% (24 of 166 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.25 · 8.4% (14 of 166 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.22 · 11.4% (19 of 166 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.24 · 7.8% (13 of 166 decks)
- Knowledge Exploitation relevance 0.29 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.22 · 9.6% (16 of 166 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.16 · 33.1% (55 of 166 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (8 of 166 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.20 · 12.0% (20 of 166 decks)
- Will of the Temur relevance 0.24 · 4.2% (7 of 166 decks)
- Recurring Insight relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.14 · 33.7% (56 of 166 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (11 of 166 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (11 of 166 decks)
- Mists of Lórien relevance 0.24 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (7 of 166 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.19 · 6.0% (10 of 166 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.17 · 9.6% (16 of 166 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (7 of 166 decks)
- Baral's Expertise relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Taigam's Scheming relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.15 · 15.1% (25 of 166 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.17 · 7.2% (12 of 166 decks)
- Hunted by The Family relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Acquire relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.17 · 6.0% (10 of 166 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (3)
- Will Kenrith relevance 0.45 · 9.0% (15 of 166 decks)
- Jace Reawakened relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (9 of 166 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.11 · 4.2% (7 of 166 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Arcavios // Invocation of the Founders relevance 0.49 · 17.5% (29 of 166 decks)
- Invasion of Vryn // Overloaded Mage-Ring relevance 0.42 · 7.2% (12 of 166 decks)
All utility lands (43)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.52 · 30.7% (51 of 166 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.39 · 42.8% (71 of 166 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.29 · 23.5% (39 of 166 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.21 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.18 · 33.7% (56 of 166 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.21 · 14.5% (24 of 166 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.19 · 23.5% (39 of 166 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.21 · 13.3% (22 of 166 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.19 · 18.7% (31 of 166 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (9 of 166 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.19 · 19.9% (33 of 166 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.21 · 11.4% (19 of 166 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.21 · 10.8% (18 of 166 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.21 · 12.0% (20 of 166 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.18 · 19.9% (33 of 166 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (8 of 166 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.21 · 7.2% (12 of 166 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.19 · 9.0% (15 of 166 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.20 · 6.6% (11 of 166 decks)
- Faerie Conclave relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.18 · 7.2% (12 of 166 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (8 of 166 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (8 of 166 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.14 · 21.7% (36 of 166 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.09 · 57.2% (95 of 166 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.13 · 16.9% (28 of 166 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.14 · 9.0% (15 of 166 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.13 · 4.8% (8 of 166 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.08 · 44.6% (74 of 166 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 5.4% (9 of 166 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.15 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.11 · 6.0% (10 of 166 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.13 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.10 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.08 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (19)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.46 · 40.4% (67 of 166 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.28 · 7.2% (12 of 166 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.20 · 9.6% (16 of 166 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.19 · 8.4% (14 of 166 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.16 · 12.7% (21 of 166 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (7 of 166 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.16 · 5.4% (9 of 166 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.16 · 5.4% (9 of 166 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.16 · 5.4% (9 of 166 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.16 · 5.4% (9 of 166 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.14 · 6.0% (10 of 166 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.15 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (4 of 166 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.08 · 3.0% (5 of 166 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 74.7% (124 of 166 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Errant, Street Artist, from 166 real Commander decks.