Cards like Etherium Sculptor
4.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
56% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 72%
- Foundry Inspector 56%
- Cloud Key 37%
- Helm of Awakening 8%
Other options: Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate
Cards like Essence Flux
7.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
42% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other blue decks
Cards
- Essence Flux 58%
- Planar Incision 44%
- Teferi's Time Twist 19%
- Spaceshift 2%
Cards like Thought Vessel
4.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other blue decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.63 in other blue decks
Cards
- Thought Vessel 75%
- Decanter of Endless Water 31%
- Spellbook 27%
Cards like Thran Dynamo
8.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Gilded Lotus
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
6.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mystic Forge
7.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 80%
- Basalt Monolith 21%
- Mana Vault 19%
- Grim Monolith 17%
Cards like Sky Diamond
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sky Diamond 37%
- Prismatic Lens 26%
- Coldsteel Heart 17%
- Star Compass 10%
- Guardian Idol 7%
- Obsidian Obelisk 4%
- Corrupted Grafstone 1%
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
3.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Manifold Key
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Trinket Mage
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
- Trinket Mage 17%
- Transit Mage 12%
- Treasure Mage 9%
- Trophy Mage 9%
- Tribute Mage 7%
Cards like Wayfarer's Bauble
3.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Armillary Sphere, Traveler's Amulet, Keys to the House, Braidwood Sextant, Ominous Parcel, Renegade Map, Wanderer's Twig
Cards like Creepy Doll
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Creepy Doll 28%
- Volatile Rig 7%
Cards like Shimmer Myr
4.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Fabricate
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 30%
- Scour for Scrap 13%
Cards like Solemn Simulacrum
6.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Lotus Petal
5.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Silver Myr
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
- Silver Myr 33%
- Myr Convert 6%
- Hedron Crawler 3%
- Plague Myr 3%
- Manakin 2%
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
3.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 63% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Padeem, Consul of Innovation
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Force of Will
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Will 17%
- Force of Negation 16%
Cards like Relm's Sketching
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Stolen Identity
Cards like Pongify
1.05× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 34%
- Rapid Hybridization 30%
All top picks (50)
- Creepy Doll relevance 0.63 · 28.1% (25 of 89 decks)
- Wirefly Hive relevance 0.66 · 18.0% (16 of 89 decks)
- Crooked Scales relevance 0.65 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Sorcerer's Strongbox relevance 0.64 · 18.0% (16 of 89 decks)
- Zndrsplt, Eye of Wisdom relevance 0.55 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Goblin Lyre relevance 0.59 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Boompile relevance 0.49 · 28.1% (25 of 89 decks)
- Bottle of Suleiman relevance 0.55 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- The Irencrag relevance 0.42 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.34 · 36.0% (32 of 89 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.31 · 46.1% (41 of 89 decks)
- Krark's Thumb relevance 0.47 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Voyager Staff relevance 0.40 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.26 · 58.4% (52 of 89 decks)
- Volatile Rig relevance 0.48 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.30 · 43.8% (39 of 89 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.28 · 48.3% (43 of 89 decks)
- Siren's Ruse relevance 0.34 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Fractured Powerstone relevance 0.35 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.23 · 58.4% (52 of 89 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.20 · 71.9% (64 of 89 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.23 · 56.2% (50 of 89 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.25 · 43.8% (39 of 89 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.30 · 25.8% (23 of 89 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.24 · 47.2% (42 of 89 decks)
- The Mechanist, Aerial Artisan relevance 0.30 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.23 · 48.3% (43 of 89 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.29 · 28.1% (25 of 89 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.22 · 51.7% (46 of 89 decks)
- Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass relevance 0.27 · 31.5% (28 of 89 decks)
- Glaring Fleshraker relevance 0.31 · 20.2% (18 of 89 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.28 · 30.3% (27 of 89 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.22 · 49.4% (44 of 89 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.21 · 56.2% (50 of 89 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.25 · 37.1% (33 of 89 decks)
- Sisay's Ring relevance 0.33 · 11.2% (10 of 89 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.28 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.25 · 34.8% (31 of 89 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.23 · 42.7% (38 of 89 decks)
- Jhoira's Familiar relevance 0.27 · 25.8% (23 of 89 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.24 · 31.5% (28 of 89 decks)
- Semblance Anvil relevance 0.29 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.26 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.25 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.25 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.21 · 42.7% (38 of 89 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.23 · 37.1% (33 of 89 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.27 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.26 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.26 · 21.3% (19 of 89 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Creepy Doll relevance 0.63 · 28.1% (25 of 89 decks)
- Zndrsplt, Eye of Wisdom relevance 0.55 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Volatile Rig relevance 0.48 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.20 · 71.9% (64 of 89 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.23 · 56.2% (50 of 89 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.25 · 43.8% (39 of 89 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.24 · 47.2% (42 of 89 decks)
- The Mechanist, Aerial Artisan relevance 0.30 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.23 · 48.3% (43 of 89 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.22 · 51.7% (46 of 89 decks)
- Glaring Fleshraker relevance 0.31 · 20.2% (18 of 89 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.21 · 56.2% (50 of 89 decks)
- Jhoira's Familiar relevance 0.27 · 25.8% (23 of 89 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.24 · 31.5% (28 of 89 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.21 · 42.7% (38 of 89 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.26 · 21.3% (19 of 89 decks)
- Palladium Myr relevance 0.24 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.17 · 52.8% (47 of 89 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.21 · 31.5% (28 of 89 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.26 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.20 · 36.0% (32 of 89 decks)
- Silver Myr relevance 0.20 · 32.6% (29 of 89 decks)
- Threefold Thunderhulk relevance 0.25 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Y'shtola Rhul relevance 0.25 · 11.2% (10 of 89 decks)
- Treasure Mage relevance 0.24 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Sharding Sphinx relevance 0.23 · 11.2% (10 of 89 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.21 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.17 · 37.1% (33 of 89 decks)
- Shimmer Myr relevance 0.21 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.17 · 36.0% (32 of 89 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.19 · 24.7% (22 of 89 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.22 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.16 · 41.6% (37 of 89 decks)
- Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter relevance 0.21 · 13.5% (12 of 89 decks)
- Sojourner's Companion relevance 0.25 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Shuri, Wakandan Inventor relevance 0.23 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.19 · 18.0% (16 of 89 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.19 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.18 · 18.0% (16 of 89 decks)
- Auton Soldier relevance 0.20 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Frogmite relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Krang, Master Mind relevance 0.22 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Scampering Surveyor relevance 0.22 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.17 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.20 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Karn, Legacy Reforged relevance 0.21 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.19 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Whirler Rogue relevance 0.20 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Iron Man, Modern Marvel relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.20 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Wirefly Hive relevance 0.66 · 18.0% (16 of 89 decks)
- Crooked Scales relevance 0.65 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Sorcerer's Strongbox relevance 0.64 · 18.0% (16 of 89 decks)
- Goblin Lyre relevance 0.59 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Boompile relevance 0.49 · 28.1% (25 of 89 decks)
- Bottle of Suleiman relevance 0.55 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- The Irencrag relevance 0.42 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.31 · 46.1% (41 of 89 decks)
- Krark's Thumb relevance 0.47 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Voyager Staff relevance 0.40 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.28 · 48.3% (43 of 89 decks)
- Fractured Powerstone relevance 0.35 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.23 · 58.4% (52 of 89 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.30 · 25.8% (23 of 89 decks)
- Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass relevance 0.27 · 31.5% (28 of 89 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.28 · 30.3% (27 of 89 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.25 · 37.1% (33 of 89 decks)
- Sisay's Ring relevance 0.33 · 11.2% (10 of 89 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.25 · 34.8% (31 of 89 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.23 · 42.7% (38 of 89 decks)
- Semblance Anvil relevance 0.29 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.26 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.25 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.25 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.23 · 37.1% (33 of 89 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.27 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.26 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Ring of the Lucii relevance 0.30 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.23 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.19 · 44.9% (40 of 89 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.23 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Obsidian Obelisk relevance 0.32 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.17 · 51.7% (46 of 89 decks)
- Star Compass relevance 0.27 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.20 · 31.5% (28 of 89 decks)
- Ebony Fly relevance 0.29 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.22 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Stonespeaker Crystal relevance 0.26 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.20 · 25.8% (23 of 89 decks)
- Guardian Idol relevance 0.27 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.13 · 69.7% (62 of 89 decks)
- Aether Spellbomb relevance 0.20 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.21 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.25 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Planar Atlas relevance 0.27 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Solar Transformer relevance 0.27 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.24 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Nexus of Becoming relevance 0.25 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.25 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Ur-Golem's Eye relevance 0.26 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
All enchantments (29)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.29 · 28.1% (25 of 89 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.24 · 24.7% (22 of 89 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.21 · 20.2% (18 of 89 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.20 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.23 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.21 · 11.2% (10 of 89 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.19 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.19 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.19 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Echoes of Eternity relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.10 · 21.3% (19 of 89 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.10 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Roll-Roll-Roll-Roll relevance 0.16 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.09 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Does Machines relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.11 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.08 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.08 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.09 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
All instants (50)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.26 · 58.4% (52 of 89 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.30 · 43.8% (39 of 89 decks)
- Siren's Ruse relevance 0.34 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.22 · 49.4% (44 of 89 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.24 · 21.3% (19 of 89 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.23 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.22 · 13.5% (12 of 89 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.22 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Paradoxical Outcome relevance 0.21 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.18 · 13.5% (12 of 89 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.18 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.16 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Stoic Rebuttal relevance 0.19 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.18 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Spell Burst relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.17 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Illusionist's Stratagem relevance 0.19 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.14 · 20.2% (18 of 89 decks)
- Waterbender's Restoration relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.16 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.14 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.13 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.15 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.13 · 13.5% (12 of 89 decks)
- Katara's Reversal relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.15 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.15 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Urza's Command relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.12 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Masterful Replication relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.15 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Summary Dismissal relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.15 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.15 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.11 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.10 · 30.3% (27 of 89 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.13 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.09 · 37.1% (33 of 89 decks)
- Forbid relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Eldrazi Confluence relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Deny Existence relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.10 · 22.5% (20 of 89 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.11 · 18.0% (16 of 89 decks)
- Glen Elendra's Answer relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.09 · 33.7% (30 of 89 decks)
- Defabricate relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.13 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Time Stop relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.10 · 14.6% (13 of 89 decks)
All sorceries (31)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.34 · 36.0% (32 of 89 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.28 · 23.6% (21 of 89 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.21 · 28.1% (25 of 89 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.22 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.21 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.15 · 30.3% (27 of 89 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.18 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.16 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.16 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.16 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Traverse Eternity relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Flow of Ideas relevance 0.15 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.15 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.10 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.11 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 0.12 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.12 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.08 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.11 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.11 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.10 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.09 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.04 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (10)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.21 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.18 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.15 · 19.1% (17 of 89 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.16 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Karn, Scion of Urza relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.11 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.11 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.07 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- The Gold Saucer relevance 0.54 · 39.3% (35 of 89 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.35 · 56.2% (50 of 89 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.33 · 15.7% (14 of 89 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.32 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.23 · 39.3% (35 of 89 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.26 · 27.0% (24 of 89 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.27 · 20.2% (18 of 89 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.20 · 40.4% (36 of 89 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.17 · 51.7% (46 of 89 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.19 · 34.8% (31 of 89 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.20 · 29.2% (26 of 89 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.21 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.21 · 12.4% (11 of 89 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.16 · 32.6% (29 of 89 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.19 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.19 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.15 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.13 · 31.5% (28 of 89 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.17 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.14 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.13 · 28.1% (25 of 89 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.17 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.16 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.14 · 13.5% (12 of 89 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.15 · 9.0% (8 of 89 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.07 · 66.3% (59 of 89 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Northampton Farm relevance 0.19 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.11 · 13.5% (12 of 89 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.12 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.13 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Diamond City relevance 0.16 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.09 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.06 · 25.8% (23 of 89 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.09 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.12 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.11 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.10 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.10 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
All lands (27)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.24 · 73.0% (65 of 89 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.18 · 76.4% (68 of 89 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.24 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.22 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.17 · 16.9% (15 of 89 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.18 · 6.7% (6 of 89 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.17 · 10.1% (9 of 89 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.18 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.15 · 7.9% (7 of 89 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (5 of 89 decks)
- Urza's Workshop relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Ugin's Labyrinth relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Treasure Map // Treasure Cove relevance 0.16 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.16 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.11 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.11 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.11 · 4.5% (4 of 89 decks)
- Shrine of the Forsaken Gods relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.07 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.07 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 82.0% (73 of 89 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Edgar, King of Figaro, from 89 real Commander decks.