Cards like Banishing Knack
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
90% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other blue decks
77% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
2.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other blue decks
Cards like Sol Ring
5.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
100% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
80% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
2.6 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 97%
- Mana Vault 70%
- Grim Monolith 53%
- Basalt Monolith 37%
Cards like Rhystic Study
4.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
93% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
73% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.53 in other blue decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 87%
- Mystic Remora 80%
Cards like Mystical Tutor
5.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
60% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Force of Negation
5.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
60% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Negation 73%
- Force of Will 70%
Cards like Commandeer
15× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
- Commandeer 53%
- Misdirection 47%
- Snapback 33%
- Disrupting Shoal 20%
Cards like Chrome Mox
9.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 67%
- Mox Diamond 50%
Cards like Mental Misstep
6.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other blue decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mental Misstep 63%
- Flusterstorm 57%
- Dispel 13%
- Miscast 3%
Other options: Spell Blast, Spell Burst, Clash of Wills
Cards like Swan Song
7.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swan Song 73%
- Strix Serenade 40%
Cards like Gilded Drake
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Gilded Drake 30%
- Volatile Stormdrake 27%
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
4.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
87% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Pongify
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 67%
- Rapid Hybridization 47%
Cards like Mirrormade
8.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Tribute Mage
3.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards like Tezzeret, Cruel Captain
4.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Manifold Key
2.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Manifold Key 30%
- Voltaic Key 17%
- Filigree Sages 3%
Other options: Synod Artificer, Galvanic Key, Voltaic Construct
Cards like Clever Impersonator
7.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards like Transmute Artifact
5.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
- Transmute Artifact 20%
- Reshape 13%
Cards like Fabricate
2.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 27%
- Scour for Scrap 23%
Cards like Grafdigger's Cage
8.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Flare of Denial
5.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Propaganda
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other blue decks
Cards
- Propaganda 20%
- War Tax 3%
Cards like Winter Moon
5.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Winter Moon 17%
- Winter Orb 3%
Cards like Teferi's Ageless Insight
4.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Lotus Petal
3.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Gitaxian Probe
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Aetherize
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards like Consider
1.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
All top picks (50)
- Banishing Knack relevance 0.27 · 73.3% (22 of 30 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.23 · 76.7% (23 of 30 decks)
- Retraction Helix relevance 0.25 · 70.0% (21 of 30 decks)
- Kitsa, Otterball Elite relevance 0.29 · 40.0% (12 of 30 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.25 · 40.0% (12 of 30 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.20 · 60.0% (18 of 30 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.21 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.27 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.26 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.20 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.24 · 33.3% (10 of 30 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.18 · 63.3% (19 of 30 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.20 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.24 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.15 · 73.3% (22 of 30 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.17 · 60.0% (18 of 30 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.16 · 63.3% (19 of 30 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.24 · 23.3% (7 of 30 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.23 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.20 · 40.0% (12 of 30 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.25 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.21 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.18 · 46.7% (14 of 30 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.19 · 43.3% (13 of 30 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.22 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 0.23 · 20.0% (6 of 30 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.16 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.18 · 43.3% (13 of 30 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.22 · 23.3% (7 of 30 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.17 · 46.7% (14 of 30 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.20 · 33.3% (10 of 30 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.14 · 66.7% (20 of 30 decks)
- Weathered Runestone relevance 0.25 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.22 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- Paradise Mantle relevance 0.20 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.21 · 23.3% (7 of 30 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 0.23 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Flesh Duplicate relevance 0.23 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.19 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
- Harbinger of the Seas relevance 0.20 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.13 · 70.0% (21 of 30 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.12 · 73.3% (22 of 30 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.17 · 40.0% (12 of 30 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.23 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.12 · 70.0% (21 of 30 decks)
- Psychic Surgery relevance 0.24 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Malleable Impostor relevance 0.24 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.18 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.23 · 76.7% (23 of 30 decks)
- Kitsa, Otterball Elite relevance 0.29 · 40.0% (12 of 30 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.24 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.15 · 73.3% (22 of 30 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.23 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.21 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.22 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.22 · 23.3% (7 of 30 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.17 · 46.7% (14 of 30 decks)
- Flesh Duplicate relevance 0.23 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Harbinger of the Seas relevance 0.20 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.12 · 70.0% (21 of 30 decks)
- Malleable Impostor relevance 0.24 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.17 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
- Samut, Tyrant of Naktamun relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- The Unagi of Kyoshi Island relevance 0.19 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Dimensional Infiltrator relevance 0.21 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Katara, Waterbending Master relevance 0.20 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.16 · 23.3% (7 of 30 decks)
- Noble Benefactor relevance 0.20 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Hydro-Man, Fluid Felon relevance 0.19 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.18 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.16 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- Brazen Borrower // Petty Theft relevance 0.19 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.12 · 40.0% (12 of 30 decks)
- Palinchron relevance 0.17 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.14 · 23.3% (7 of 30 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- Aboleth Spawn relevance 0.16 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Pili-Pala relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Grand Architect relevance 0.14 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.11 · 36.7% (11 of 30 decks)
- Wandering Archaic // Explore the Vastlands relevance 0.15 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.12 · 23.3% (7 of 30 decks)
- Meldweb Curator relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Chrome Prowler relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Dreamshackle Geist relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Tishana's Tidebinder relevance 0.13 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Gitaxian Anatomist relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Rattlechains relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 0.13 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- The Wondrous Wasp relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Thopter Assembly relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Emrakul, the Exigent Doom relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.12 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.18 · 63.3% (19 of 30 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.24 · 23.3% (7 of 30 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.16 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.20 · 33.3% (10 of 30 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.14 · 66.7% (20 of 30 decks)
- Weathered Runestone relevance 0.25 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Paradise Mantle relevance 0.20 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.19 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.13 · 70.0% (21 of 30 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.13 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.12 · 66.7% (20 of 30 decks)
- Winter Moon relevance 0.18 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.17 · 23.3% (7 of 30 decks)
- Moonsnare Prototype relevance 0.18 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- Cursed Totem relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.11 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 0.15 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.14 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (6 of 30 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.17 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.12 · 40.0% (12 of 30 decks)
- Mask of the Schemer relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.11 · 36.7% (11 of 30 decks)
- Damping Sphere relevance 0.16 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Disruptor Flute relevance 0.16 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.15 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Phial of Galadriel relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.13 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Grindstone relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Energy Chamber relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Sentinel Tower relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.11 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- Dawnsire, Sunstar Dreadnought relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.08 · 43.3% (13 of 30 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Blade of Selves relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Pithing Needle relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.09 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Rimefire Torque relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Apple of Eden, Isu Relic relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Font of Mythos relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Realmbreaker, the Invasion Tree relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Conqueror's Flail relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.09 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.25 · 40.0% (12 of 30 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.27 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.26 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.25 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.23 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Psychic Surgery relevance 0.24 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.18 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.19 · 20.0% (6 of 30 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.18 · 23.3% (7 of 30 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (6 of 30 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.16 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.09 · 86.7% (26 of 30 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (6 of 30 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.08 · 80.0% (24 of 30 decks)
- Capture Sphere relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.16 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.16 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Deep Freeze relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Blossombind relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Stasis Field relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Ghostly Touch relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Artificer's Intuition relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- War Tax relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Words of Wind relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (6 of 30 decks)
- Observed Stasis relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Swarm Intelligence relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Pendrell Mists relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Soothsaying relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- The Bath Song relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Parallel Thoughts relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Chakra Meditation relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Thought Reflection relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Utter Insignificance relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Insight relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Standstill relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.10 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.09 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.09 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.09 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
All instants (50)
- Banishing Knack relevance 0.27 · 73.3% (22 of 30 decks)
- Retraction Helix relevance 0.25 · 70.0% (21 of 30 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.20 · 60.0% (18 of 30 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.21 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.20 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.24 · 33.3% (10 of 30 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.20 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.17 · 60.0% (18 of 30 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.16 · 63.3% (19 of 30 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.20 · 40.0% (12 of 30 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.18 · 46.7% (14 of 30 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 0.23 · 20.0% (6 of 30 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.22 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.21 · 23.3% (7 of 30 decks)
- Consign to Memory relevance 0.23 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.12 · 73.3% (22 of 30 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.17 · 40.0% (12 of 30 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.13 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.18 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.13 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Mystic Reflection relevance 0.20 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.11 · 70.0% (21 of 30 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.10 · 73.3% (22 of 30 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.11 · 66.7% (20 of 30 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.13 · 40.0% (12 of 30 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.10 · 73.3% (22 of 30 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.12 · 46.7% (14 of 30 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (6 of 30 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- Louisoix's Sacrifice relevance 0.18 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.09 · 73.3% (22 of 30 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.10 · 60.0% (18 of 30 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.15 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.10 · 53.3% (16 of 30 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.13 · 23.3% (7 of 30 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.10 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.09 · 63.3% (19 of 30 decks)
- Whirlwind Denial relevance 0.16 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.16 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Meddle relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.08 · 73.3% (22 of 30 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.11 · 36.7% (11 of 30 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.12 · 23.3% (7 of 30 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.14 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.13 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Withdraw relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
All sorceries (45)
- Step Through relevance 0.19 · 43.3% (13 of 30 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.18 · 43.3% (13 of 30 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.15 · 46.7% (14 of 30 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.20 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.14 · 36.7% (11 of 30 decks)
- Donate relevance 0.18 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (6 of 30 decks)
- Recall relevance 0.16 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.15 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.13 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Ransack relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Donatello's Technique relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Turtles in Time relevance 0.15 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Paradigm Shift relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Step Between Worlds relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (6 of 30 decks)
- Crashing Wave relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.10 · 23.3% (7 of 30 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.10 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- Eagle Vision relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Tunnel Vision relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Displacement Wave relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.09 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Show and Tell relevance 0.10 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.10 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.09 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.07 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.10 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.09 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.09 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.08 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.08 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.08 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.08 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.07 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.07 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.06 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.06 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (13)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.15 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.13 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.13 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.12 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.10 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.09 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.09 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.09 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.09 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.08 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.07 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.40 · 60.0% (18 of 30 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.32 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.24 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.20 · 40.0% (12 of 30 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.23 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.18 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.17 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.14 · 50.0% (15 of 30 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.14 · 40.0% (12 of 30 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.16 · 26.7% (8 of 30 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.12 · 46.7% (14 of 30 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.10 · 73.3% (22 of 30 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.10 · 66.7% (20 of 30 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.17 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.10 · 56.7% (17 of 30 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.13 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.17 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Tolaria relevance 0.16 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.14 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.15 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.11 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.10 · 23.3% (7 of 30 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.07 · 40.0% (12 of 30 decks)
- Detection Tower relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.10 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Trenzalore Clocktower relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- The Surgical Bay relevance 0.11 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.08 · 20.0% (6 of 30 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.09 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Amonkhet Raceway relevance 0.10 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.06 · 43.3% (13 of 30 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.09 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.09 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.08 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.09 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.07 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.07 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.07 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.06 · 6.7% (2 of 30 decks)
All lands (23)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.13 · 70.0% (21 of 30 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.19 · 30.0% (9 of 30 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.15 · 46.7% (14 of 30 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.14 · 40.0% (12 of 30 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.14 · 36.7% (11 of 30 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (10 of 30 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (10 of 30 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.12 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.13 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.12 · 16.7% (5 of 30 decks)
- Teferi's Isle relevance 0.13 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.11 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.08 · 33.3% (10 of 30 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Scorched Ruins relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.10 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.10 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.09 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.08 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.07 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.06 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 90.0% (27 of 30 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Wan Shi Tong, Librarian, from 30 real Commander decks.