Cards like Etherium Sculptor
12× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Esper decks
51% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Esper decks
Cards
Other options: Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate
Cards like Sol Ring
6.1× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
97% of decks run one or more
vs. 86% of other Esper decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Esper decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.97 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 97%
- Mana Vault 35%
- Grim Monolith 15%
- Basalt Monolith 15%
Cards like Lotus Petal
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Esper decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Lotus Petal 70%
- Lion's Eye Diamond 30%
Cards like Chrome Mox
6.9× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Esper decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Esper decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 39%
- Mox Diamond 38%
Cards like Mystic Remora
3.0× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Esper decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Esper decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.45 in other Esper decks
Cards like Gifts Ungiven
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Gifts Ungiven 61%
- Intuition 27%
Cards like Mishra's Bauble
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Mishra's Bauble 60%
- Urza's Bauble 24%
Cards like O'aka, Traveling Merchant
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Force of Will
3.8× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Esper decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Esper decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Force of Will 40%
- Force of Negation 32%
Cards like Demonic Consultation
5.0× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Esper decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Demonic Consultation 28%
- Tainted Pact 22%
Cards like Grand Abolisher
5.1× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Esper decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Grand Abolisher 41%
- Voice of Victory 29%
Cards like Flusterstorm
4.8× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Esper decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Flusterstorm 32%
- Mental Misstep 22%
- Dispel 4%
- Miscast 1%
Other options: Spell Blast, Spell Burst, Clash of Wills
Cards like Baleful Strix
7.0× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Esper decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Baleful Strix 38%
- Thought Monitor 24%
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
3.2× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Esper decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Esper decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Esper decks
Cards like Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Tezzeret, Cruel Captain
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Repurposing Bay
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Esper decks
Cards like Mystic Forge
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like The Reality Chip
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Esper decks
Cards like Fierce Guardianship
1.4× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Esper decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Esper decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Mystical Tutor
4.6× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Esper decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Esper decks
Cards
Other options: Merchant Scroll, Eerie Procession
Cards like Entomb
4.9× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Esper decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Entomb 40%
- Unmarked Grave 6%
Cards like Swan Song
2.3× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Esper decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Swan Song 49%
- Strix Serenade 4%
Cards like Transmute Artifact
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Transmute Artifact 19%
- Reshape 12%
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
2.8× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Esper decks
Cards like Fabricate
5.6× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Fabricate 34%
- Scour for Scrap 7%
Cards like Talisman of Dominance
1.03× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 57% of other Esper decks
51% of decks run two or more
vs. 50% of other Esper decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Krark-Clan Ironworks
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Aether Spellbomb
14× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Esper decks
Cards
Other options: Necrogen Spellbomb, Basilica Skullbomb, Surgical Skullbomb
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
11× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Esper decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Esper decks
Cards like Smothering Tithe
1.5× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other Esper decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other Esper decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Hex Parasite relevance 0.53 · 57.7% (90 of 156 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.43 · 78.8% (123 of 156 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.49 · 59.6% (93 of 156 decks)
- Solemnity relevance 0.42 · 69.9% (109 of 156 decks)
- Black Mage's Rod relevance 0.50 · 50.0% (78 of 156 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.52 · 45.5% (71 of 156 decks)
- Golbez, Crystal Collector relevance 0.50 · 46.2% (72 of 156 decks)
- O'aka, Traveling Merchant relevance 0.55 · 32.7% (51 of 156 decks)
- Soul Diviner relevance 0.55 · 30.8% (48 of 156 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.41 · 58.3% (91 of 156 decks)
- Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter relevance 0.49 · 39.7% (62 of 156 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.38 · 62.8% (98 of 156 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.29 · 92.3% (144 of 156 decks)
- Power Conduit relevance 0.55 · 23.7% (37 of 156 decks)
- Chalice of the Void relevance 0.54 · 24.4% (38 of 156 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.41 · 48.1% (75 of 156 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.52 · 24.4% (38 of 156 decks)
- Tormod's Crypt relevance 0.51 · 24.4% (38 of 156 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.42 · 42.3% (66 of 156 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.34 · 60.9% (95 of 156 decks)
- Encroaching Mycosynth relevance 0.49 · 20.5% (32 of 156 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.42 · 35.9% (56 of 156 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.46 · 24.4% (38 of 156 decks)
- Shimmer Myr relevance 0.47 · 23.7% (37 of 156 decks)
- Voyager Quickwelder relevance 0.47 · 20.5% (32 of 156 decks)
- Imotekh the Stormlord relevance 0.50 · 14.1% (22 of 156 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.43 · 28.8% (45 of 156 decks)
- Artificer's Intuition relevance 0.49 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
- Aether Spellbomb relevance 0.47 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Mendicant Core, Guidelight relevance 0.47 · 15.4% (24 of 156 decks)
- Welding Jar relevance 0.49 · 12.8% (20 of 156 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.39 · 30.8% (48 of 156 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.39 · 30.1% (47 of 156 decks)
- Defense Grid relevance 0.46 · 14.1% (22 of 156 decks)
- Oswald Fiddlebender relevance 0.44 · 17.3% (27 of 156 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.40 · 25.6% (40 of 156 decks)
- Ethersworn Canonist relevance 0.40 · 23.1% (36 of 156 decks)
- Rook Turret relevance 0.48 · 10.9% (17 of 156 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.43 · 15.4% (24 of 156 decks)
- Mesmeric Orb relevance 0.43 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.37 · 30.1% (47 of 156 decks)
- Mm'menon, the Right Hand relevance 0.46 · 12.2% (19 of 156 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.42 · 17.3% (27 of 156 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.39 · 23.7% (37 of 156 decks)
- Intuition relevance 0.38 · 26.9% (42 of 156 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.39 · 21.2% (33 of 156 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.41 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.41 · 16.0% (25 of 156 decks)
- Dispatch relevance 0.38 · 22.4% (35 of 156 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.33 · 33.3% (52 of 156 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Hex Parasite relevance 0.53 · 57.7% (90 of 156 decks)
- Golbez, Crystal Collector relevance 0.50 · 46.2% (72 of 156 decks)
- O'aka, Traveling Merchant relevance 0.55 · 32.7% (51 of 156 decks)
- Soul Diviner relevance 0.55 · 30.8% (48 of 156 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.41 · 58.3% (91 of 156 decks)
- Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter relevance 0.49 · 39.7% (62 of 156 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.38 · 62.8% (98 of 156 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.41 · 48.1% (75 of 156 decks)
- Shimmer Myr relevance 0.47 · 23.7% (37 of 156 decks)
- Voyager Quickwelder relevance 0.47 · 20.5% (32 of 156 decks)
- Imotekh the Stormlord relevance 0.50 · 14.1% (22 of 156 decks)
- Mendicant Core, Guidelight relevance 0.47 · 15.4% (24 of 156 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.39 · 30.8% (48 of 156 decks)
- Oswald Fiddlebender relevance 0.44 · 17.3% (27 of 156 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.40 · 25.6% (40 of 156 decks)
- Ethersworn Canonist relevance 0.40 · 23.1% (36 of 156 decks)
- Rook Turret relevance 0.48 · 10.9% (17 of 156 decks)
- Mm'menon, the Right Hand relevance 0.46 · 12.2% (19 of 156 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.42 · 17.3% (27 of 156 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.39 · 23.7% (37 of 156 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.39 · 21.2% (33 of 156 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.33 · 33.3% (52 of 156 decks)
- Shuri, Wakandan Inventor relevance 0.44 · 9.6% (15 of 156 decks)
- Emet-Selch of the Third Seat relevance 0.35 · 23.1% (36 of 156 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.24 · 59.0% (92 of 156 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.28 · 46.2% (72 of 156 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.43 · 9.0% (14 of 156 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.40 · 11.5% (18 of 156 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.38 · 14.1% (22 of 156 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.39 · 10.9% (17 of 156 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.35 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Pactdoll Terror relevance 0.41 · 7.7% (12 of 156 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.38 · 10.3% (16 of 156 decks)
- Millikin relevance 0.41 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.38 · 9.6% (15 of 156 decks)
- Thrull Parasite relevance 0.43 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.32 · 17.9% (28 of 156 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.29 · 25.6% (40 of 156 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.35 · 11.5% (18 of 156 decks)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.25 · 38.5% (60 of 156 decks)
- Jhoira's Familiar relevance 0.38 · 7.7% (12 of 156 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.33 · 12.2% (19 of 156 decks)
- Urza, Chief Artificer relevance 0.38 · 5.8% (9 of 156 decks)
- Neerdiv, Devious Diver relevance 0.39 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Arcbound Ravager relevance 0.38 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Marionette Apprentice relevance 0.32 · 12.2% (19 of 156 decks)
- Lady Octopus, Inspired Inventor relevance 0.36 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- Riddlesmith relevance 0.36 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- Noxious Gearhulk relevance 0.34 · 7.1% (11 of 156 decks)
- Memnite relevance 0.36 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.43 · 78.8% (123 of 156 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.49 · 59.6% (93 of 156 decks)
- Black Mage's Rod relevance 0.50 · 50.0% (78 of 156 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.52 · 45.5% (71 of 156 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.29 · 92.3% (144 of 156 decks)
- Power Conduit relevance 0.55 · 23.7% (37 of 156 decks)
- Chalice of the Void relevance 0.54 · 24.4% (38 of 156 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.52 · 24.4% (38 of 156 decks)
- Tormod's Crypt relevance 0.51 · 24.4% (38 of 156 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.42 · 42.3% (66 of 156 decks)
- Encroaching Mycosynth relevance 0.49 · 20.5% (32 of 156 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.42 · 35.9% (56 of 156 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.46 · 24.4% (38 of 156 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.43 · 28.8% (45 of 156 decks)
- Aether Spellbomb relevance 0.47 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Welding Jar relevance 0.49 · 12.8% (20 of 156 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.39 · 30.1% (47 of 156 decks)
- Defense Grid relevance 0.46 · 14.1% (22 of 156 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.43 · 15.4% (24 of 156 decks)
- Mesmeric Orb relevance 0.43 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.42 · 10.9% (17 of 156 decks)
- Perpetual Timepiece relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (12 of 156 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.23 · 62.8% (98 of 156 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.42 · 9.6% (15 of 156 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.25 · 55.1% (86 of 156 decks)
- Golem's Heart relevance 0.45 · 5.8% (9 of 156 decks)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.42 · 7.7% (12 of 156 decks)
- Machinist's Arsenal relevance 0.43 · 7.1% (11 of 156 decks)
- Instant Ramen relevance 0.43 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- The Regalia relevance 0.41 · 5.8% (9 of 156 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 0.37 · 10.3% (16 of 156 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.36 · 10.3% (16 of 156 decks)
- Mycosynth Lattice relevance 0.37 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.33 · 12.8% (20 of 156 decks)
- Ring of the Lucii relevance 0.40 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Chromatic Star relevance 0.38 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (12 of 156 decks)
- Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (12 of 156 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.37 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.36 · 7.1% (11 of 156 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.30 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.17 · 69.9% (109 of 156 decks)
- Chromatic Sphere relevance 0.36 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.34 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Nihil Spellbomb relevance 0.35 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.20 · 46.2% (72 of 156 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.28 · 13.5% (21 of 156 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.20 · 46.2% (72 of 156 decks)
- Thopter Foundry relevance 0.31 · 9.6% (15 of 156 decks)
- Adaptive Omnitool relevance 0.35 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
All enchantments (32)
- Solemnity relevance 0.42 · 69.9% (109 of 156 decks)
- Artificer's Intuition relevance 0.49 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
- Biotransference relevance 0.44 · 9.0% (14 of 156 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.40 · 10.9% (17 of 156 decks)
- Ripples of Undeath relevance 0.35 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.34 · 7.7% (12 of 156 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.36 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.24 · 32.7% (51 of 156 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.28 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.32 · 3.2% (5 of 156 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.30 · 3.2% (5 of 156 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.18 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Ballad of the Black Flag relevance 0.32 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
- Secrets of the Dead relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.19 · 7.7% (12 of 156 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (78 of 156 decks)
- Forge Anew relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
- Cemetery Tampering relevance 0.24 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.09 · 47.4% (74 of 156 decks)
- Touch the Spirit Realm relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (5 of 156 decks)
- Out of the Tombs relevance 0.23 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.09 · 36.5% (57 of 156 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.14 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Authority of the Consuls relevance 0.14 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.13 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Gleaming Splendor relevance 0.14 · 3.2% (5 of 156 decks)
- Land Tax relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
- Darksteel Mutation relevance 0.15 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.12 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.09 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
All instants (50)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.34 · 60.9% (95 of 156 decks)
- Intuition relevance 0.38 · 26.9% (42 of 156 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.41 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Dispatch relevance 0.38 · 22.4% (35 of 156 decks)
- Entomb relevance 0.29 · 40.4% (63 of 156 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.40 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.37 · 9.0% (14 of 156 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.33 · 7.1% (11 of 156 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.27 · 14.1% (22 of 156 decks)
- Deadly Dispute relevance 0.30 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.25 · 17.3% (27 of 156 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.23 · 21.8% (34 of 156 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.25 · 14.1% (22 of 156 decks)
- Restoration Magic relevance 0.30 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.23 · 21.2% (33 of 156 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.27 · 7.7% (12 of 156 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.21 · 22.4% (35 of 156 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.19 · 25.0% (39 of 156 decks)
- Retraction Helix relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.16 · 43.6% (68 of 156 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.17 · 35.9% (56 of 156 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.17 · 32.1% (50 of 156 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.26 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.19 · 22.4% (35 of 156 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.18 · 22.4% (35 of 156 decks)
- Ad Nauseam relevance 0.22 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.12 · 55.8% (87 of 156 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.16 · 28.2% (44 of 156 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.17 · 21.2% (33 of 156 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.14 · 39.7% (62 of 156 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.15 · 32.1% (50 of 156 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.21 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.15 · 28.2% (44 of 156 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.12 · 53.2% (83 of 156 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.20 · 9.0% (14 of 156 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.13 · 42.3% (66 of 156 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.18 · 12.8% (20 of 156 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.16 · 19.2% (30 of 156 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.20 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (5 of 156 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.12 · 49.4% (77 of 156 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (78 of 156 decks)
- Void Rend relevance 0.16 · 19.2% (30 of 156 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.14 · 34.6% (54 of 156 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.17 · 12.8% (20 of 156 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.14 · 30.1% (47 of 156 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (6 of 156 decks)
- Drown in the Loch relevance 0.24 · 3.2% (5 of 156 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
All sorceries (48)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.41 · 16.0% (25 of 156 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.33 · 34.0% (53 of 156 decks)
- Voyage Home relevance 0.40 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.37 · 11.5% (18 of 156 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.33 · 19.2% (30 of 156 decks)
- Damn relevance 0.24 · 29.5% (46 of 156 decks)
- Organic Extinction relevance 0.33 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Glimpse the Unthinkable relevance 0.34 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.22 · 36.5% (57 of 156 decks)
- Singularity Rupture relevance 0.32 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.23 · 24.4% (38 of 156 decks)
- Space-Time Anomaly relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Traumatize relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (6 of 156 decks)
- Unmarked Grave relevance 0.29 · 5.8% (9 of 156 decks)
- Dance of the Manse relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (11 of 156 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.20 · 20.5% (32 of 156 decks)
- Praetor's Grasp relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (12 of 156 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.24 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- Lively Dirge relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (9 of 156 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.18 · 18.6% (29 of 156 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (6 of 156 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.20 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (12 of 156 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.16 · 12.2% (19 of 156 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.11 · 44.2% (69 of 156 decks)
- White Sun's Twilight relevance 0.26 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Cut Your Losses relevance 0.26 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.16 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.12 · 17.3% (27 of 156 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.16 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- Time Wipe relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (5 of 156 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.18 · 3.2% (5 of 156 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
- Open the Vaults relevance 0.22 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.17 · 3.2% (5 of 156 decks)
- Doomsday relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
- Insatiable Avarice relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
- Feed the Swarm relevance 0.20 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Dark Deal relevance 0.20 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Avatar's Wrath relevance 0.19 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Yawgmoth's Will relevance 0.16 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Vindicate relevance 0.13 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.13 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (8)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.37 · 30.1% (47 of 156 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.33 · 12.8% (20 of 156 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.40 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Tezzeret, Master of the Bridge relevance 0.34 · 10.3% (16 of 156 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.34 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- Teferi, Time Raveler relevance 0.21 · 36.5% (57 of 156 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.53 · 28.8% (45 of 156 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.41 · 21.2% (33 of 156 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.34 · 37.2% (58 of 156 decks)
- Midgar, City of Mako // Reactor Raid relevance 0.43 · 12.8% (20 of 156 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.37 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.20 · 61.5% (96 of 156 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.29 · 25.0% (39 of 156 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.35 · 7.7% (12 of 156 decks)
- Ishgard, the Holy See // Faith & Grief relevance 0.34 · 7.7% (12 of 156 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.32 · 7.1% (11 of 156 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.31 · 7.7% (12 of 156 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.31 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.27 · 11.5% (18 of 156 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.31 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.27 · 9.0% (14 of 156 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.19 · 34.6% (54 of 156 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (11 of 156 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.20 · 26.3% (41 of 156 decks)
- Castle Doom relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (5 of 156 decks)
- Shadowy Backstreet relevance 0.21 · 19.2% (30 of 156 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.25 · 7.7% (12 of 156 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.22 · 11.5% (18 of 156 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.17 · 25.6% (40 of 156 decks)
- Monumental Henge relevance 0.30 · 3.2% (5 of 156 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.21 · 9.6% (15 of 156 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.22 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.22 · 5.8% (9 of 156 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.14 · 40.4% (63 of 156 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Contaminated Landscape relevance 0.20 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.18 · 9.0% (14 of 156 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.18 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.19 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.17 · 10.3% (16 of 156 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.29 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Phyrexia's Core relevance 0.29 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (6 of 156 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.28 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.14 · 17.3% (27 of 156 decks)
- Adventurer's Inn relevance 0.26 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Raffine's Tower relevance 0.11 · 31.4% (49 of 156 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (6 of 156 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.14 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Celestial Colonnade relevance 0.23 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.23 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.22 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
All lands (50)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.33 · 55.1% (86 of 156 decks)
- Ancient Den relevance 0.33 · 48.7% (76 of 156 decks)
- Vault of Whispers relevance 0.33 · 44.9% (70 of 156 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.29 · 48.7% (76 of 156 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.37 · 23.1% (36 of 156 decks)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.42 · 7.1% (11 of 156 decks)
- Mishra's Workshop relevance 0.38 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Razortide Bridge relevance 0.32 · 12.2% (19 of 156 decks)
- Mistvault Bridge relevance 0.31 · 10.3% (16 of 156 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.26 · 19.2% (30 of 156 decks)
- Goldmire Bridge relevance 0.30 · 9.0% (14 of 156 decks)
- Glimmervoid relevance 0.30 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- Insomnia, Crown City relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (5 of 156 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.22 · 11.5% (18 of 156 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.18 · 28.2% (44 of 156 decks)
- Skycloud Expanse relevance 0.23 · 9.6% (15 of 156 decks)
- Matzalantli, the Great Door // The Core relevance 0.31 · 3.2% (5 of 156 decks)
- Bleachbone Verge relevance 0.22 · 10.3% (16 of 156 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.15 · 40.4% (63 of 156 decks)
- Darkwater Catacombs relevance 0.22 · 9.6% (15 of 156 decks)
- Desolate Mire relevance 0.24 · 5.8% (9 of 156 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.19 · 19.2% (30 of 156 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.17 · 29.5% (46 of 156 decks)
- Crossroads Village relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
- Floodfarm Verge relevance 0.20 · 12.2% (19 of 156 decks)
- Concealed Courtyard relevance 0.24 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.20 · 12.2% (19 of 156 decks)
- Sharlayan, Nation of Scholars relevance 0.32 · 2.6% (4 of 156 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.17 · 23.1% (36 of 156 decks)
- Deserted Beach relevance 0.18 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Shattered Sanctum relevance 0.18 · 16.7% (26 of 156 decks)
- Arcane Sanctum relevance 0.16 · 27.6% (43 of 156 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.16 · 26.9% (42 of 156 decks)
- Prairie Stream relevance 0.18 · 18.6% (29 of 156 decks)
- Glacial Fortress relevance 0.15 · 34.0% (53 of 156 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.17 · 19.9% (31 of 156 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.15 · 31.4% (49 of 156 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.15 · 31.4% (49 of 156 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.16 · 25.0% (39 of 156 decks)
- Isolated Chapel relevance 0.15 · 30.1% (47 of 156 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.21 · 5.8% (9 of 156 decks)
- Drowned Catacomb relevance 0.15 · 29.5% (46 of 156 decks)
- Sunken Hollow relevance 0.17 · 15.4% (24 of 156 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.14 · 35.3% (55 of 156 decks)
- Mystic Gate relevance 0.21 · 5.8% (9 of 156 decks)
- Seachrome Coast relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (7 of 156 decks)
- Scrubland relevance 0.15 · 27.6% (43 of 156 decks)
- Idyllic Beachfront relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (5 of 156 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.13 · 38.5% (60 of 156 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Noctis, Prince of Lucis, from 156 real Commander decks.