Cards like Avacyn's Pilgrim
6.5× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Abzan decks
64% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Abzan decks
2.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.37 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Avacyn's Pilgrim 73%
- Llanowar Elves 57%
- Elvish Mystic 51%
- Fyndhorn Elves 49%
- Boreal Druid 4%
- Steward of Valeron 1%
Other options: Fyndhorn Elder, Nantuko Elder, Llanowar Dead, Wirewood Elf, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Deafening Silence
15× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Deafening Silence 49%
- Eidolon of Rhetoric 27%
- Rule of Law 26%
Other options: Curse of Exhaustion
Cards like Eladamri's Call
10× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Abzan decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Hushbringer
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Archon of Emeria
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Archon of Emeria 48%
- Phyrexian Censor 21%
Cards like Bloom Tender
8.0× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Abzan decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Bloom Tender 41%
- Faeburrow Elder 32%
Cards like Voice of Victory
14× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Abzan decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Voice of Victory 37%
- Grand Abolisher 31%
Cards like Chord of Calling
5.2× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Abzan decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Drana and Linvala
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Stony Silence
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Stony Silence 23%
- Null Rod 17%
Cards like Mother of Runes
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Chrome Mox
8.0× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 17%
- Mox Diamond 13%
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
6.2× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Abzan decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Manglehorn
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Manglehorn 21%
- Dauntless Dismantler 15%
Cards like Thalia, Guardian of Thraben
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
3.2× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 76% of other Abzan decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.78 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Gaddock Teeg
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Gaddock Teeg 23%
- Sanctum Prelate 18%
Cards like Silence
6.1× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Deathrite Shaman
13× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Abzan decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Path to Exile
4.2× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 46% of other Abzan decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.46 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Eldritch Evolution
2.9× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Abzan decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Ohran Frostfang
20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Abzan decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Survival of the Fittest
6.3× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Abzan decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Smothering Tithe
4.9× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Abzan decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
12× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Abzan decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok
Cards like Selfless Spirit
4.0× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Abzan decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Other options: Selfless Savior, Dauntless Bodyguard, Resolute Watchdog
All top picks (50)
- Yasharn, Implacable Earth relevance 0.57 · 39.1% (77 of 197 decks)
- Hushbringer relevance 0.58 · 31.0% (61 of 197 decks)
- Rest in Peace relevance 0.62 · 24.4% (48 of 197 decks)
- Doorkeeper Thrull relevance 0.59 · 28.9% (57 of 197 decks)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 0.46 · 51.8% (102 of 197 decks)
- Sanctum Prelate relevance 0.64 · 17.8% (35 of 197 decks)
- Dauthi Voidwalker relevance 0.46 · 49.2% (97 of 197 decks)
- Drana and Linvala relevance 0.46 · 46.7% (92 of 197 decks)
- Aven Mindcensor relevance 0.45 · 45.7% (90 of 197 decks)
- Thalia, Guardian of Thraben relevance 0.50 · 36.0% (71 of 197 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite relevance 0.41 · 53.8% (106 of 197 decks)
- Deafening Silence relevance 0.43 · 48.7% (96 of 197 decks)
- Archon of Emeria relevance 0.43 · 47.7% (94 of 197 decks)
- Clarion Conqueror relevance 0.55 · 20.8% (41 of 197 decks)
- Drannith Magistrate relevance 0.41 · 49.7% (98 of 197 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.40 · 49.2% (97 of 197 decks)
- Thorn of Amethyst relevance 0.58 · 13.2% (26 of 197 decks)
- Gaddock Teeg relevance 0.51 · 23.4% (46 of 197 decks)
- Linvala, Keeper of Silence relevance 0.54 · 17.3% (34 of 197 decks)
- Grim Hireling relevance 0.55 · 15.7% (31 of 197 decks)
- Null Rod relevance 0.54 · 16.8% (33 of 197 decks)
- Archon of Valor's Reach relevance 0.48 · 27.4% (54 of 197 decks)
- Rule of Law relevance 0.49 · 25.9% (51 of 197 decks)
- Stony Silence relevance 0.49 · 22.8% (45 of 197 decks)
- Thalia, Heretic Cathar relevance 0.48 · 25.4% (50 of 197 decks)
- Archivist of Oghma relevance 0.42 · 35.5% (70 of 197 decks)
- Giver of Runes relevance 0.49 · 20.3% (40 of 197 decks)
- Containment Priest relevance 0.52 · 14.2% (28 of 197 decks)
- Sigarda, Font of Blessings relevance 0.48 · 18.8% (37 of 197 decks)
- Ranger-Captain of Eos relevance 0.39 · 40.1% (79 of 197 decks)
- Opposition Agent relevance 0.40 · 37.1% (73 of 197 decks)
- Mother of Runes relevance 0.43 · 27.4% (54 of 197 decks)
- Serra Ascendant relevance 0.38 · 39.6% (78 of 197 decks)
- Chalice of the Void relevance 0.58 · 7.6% (15 of 197 decks)
- Ethersworn Canonist relevance 0.44 · 24.9% (49 of 197 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 0.45 · 21.3% (42 of 197 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.27 · 72.6% (143 of 197 decks)
- Kataki, War's Wage relevance 0.49 · 13.2% (26 of 197 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 0.37 · 40.1% (79 of 197 decks)
- Voice of Victory relevance 0.38 · 37.1% (73 of 197 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.32 · 51.3% (101 of 197 decks)
- Esper Sentinel relevance 0.29 · 60.4% (119 of 197 decks)
- Eidolon of Rhetoric relevance 0.41 · 27.4% (54 of 197 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.29 · 59.4% (117 of 197 decks)
- Boromir, Warden of the Tower relevance 0.35 · 42.1% (83 of 197 decks)
- Root Maze relevance 0.53 · 8.6% (17 of 197 decks)
- Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.34 · 46.2% (91 of 197 decks)
- Phyrexian Censor relevance 0.43 · 21.3% (42 of 197 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.35 · 41.1% (81 of 197 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.42 · 23.4% (46 of 197 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Yasharn, Implacable Earth relevance 0.57 · 39.1% (77 of 197 decks)
- Hushbringer relevance 0.58 · 31.0% (61 of 197 decks)
- Doorkeeper Thrull relevance 0.59 · 28.9% (57 of 197 decks)
- Collector Ouphe relevance 0.46 · 51.8% (102 of 197 decks)
- Sanctum Prelate relevance 0.64 · 17.8% (35 of 197 decks)
- Dauthi Voidwalker relevance 0.46 · 49.2% (97 of 197 decks)
- Drana and Linvala relevance 0.46 · 46.7% (92 of 197 decks)
- Aven Mindcensor relevance 0.45 · 45.7% (90 of 197 decks)
- Thalia, Guardian of Thraben relevance 0.50 · 36.0% (71 of 197 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite relevance 0.41 · 53.8% (106 of 197 decks)
- Archon of Emeria relevance 0.43 · 47.7% (94 of 197 decks)
- Clarion Conqueror relevance 0.55 · 20.8% (41 of 197 decks)
- Drannith Magistrate relevance 0.41 · 49.7% (98 of 197 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.40 · 49.2% (97 of 197 decks)
- Gaddock Teeg relevance 0.51 · 23.4% (46 of 197 decks)
- Linvala, Keeper of Silence relevance 0.54 · 17.3% (34 of 197 decks)
- Grim Hireling relevance 0.55 · 15.7% (31 of 197 decks)
- Archon of Valor's Reach relevance 0.48 · 27.4% (54 of 197 decks)
- Thalia, Heretic Cathar relevance 0.48 · 25.4% (50 of 197 decks)
- Archivist of Oghma relevance 0.42 · 35.5% (70 of 197 decks)
- Giver of Runes relevance 0.49 · 20.3% (40 of 197 decks)
- Containment Priest relevance 0.52 · 14.2% (28 of 197 decks)
- Sigarda, Font of Blessings relevance 0.48 · 18.8% (37 of 197 decks)
- Ranger-Captain of Eos relevance 0.39 · 40.1% (79 of 197 decks)
- Opposition Agent relevance 0.40 · 37.1% (73 of 197 decks)
- Mother of Runes relevance 0.43 · 27.4% (54 of 197 decks)
- Serra Ascendant relevance 0.38 · 39.6% (78 of 197 decks)
- Ethersworn Canonist relevance 0.44 · 24.9% (49 of 197 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 0.45 · 21.3% (42 of 197 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.27 · 72.6% (143 of 197 decks)
- Kataki, War's Wage relevance 0.49 · 13.2% (26 of 197 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 0.37 · 40.1% (79 of 197 decks)
- Voice of Victory relevance 0.38 · 37.1% (73 of 197 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.32 · 51.3% (101 of 197 decks)
- Esper Sentinel relevance 0.29 · 60.4% (119 of 197 decks)
- Eidolon of Rhetoric relevance 0.41 · 27.4% (54 of 197 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.29 · 59.4% (117 of 197 decks)
- Boromir, Warden of the Tower relevance 0.35 · 42.1% (83 of 197 decks)
- Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.34 · 46.2% (91 of 197 decks)
- Phyrexian Censor relevance 0.43 · 21.3% (42 of 197 decks)
- Solitude relevance 0.44 · 16.2% (32 of 197 decks)
- Strict Proctor relevance 0.52 · 8.1% (16 of 197 decks)
- Sheoldred, the Apocalypse relevance 0.41 · 22.3% (44 of 197 decks)
- Aven Interrupter relevance 0.39 · 23.9% (47 of 197 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.41 · 17.3% (34 of 197 decks)
- Adeline, Resplendent Cathar relevance 0.41 · 18.3% (36 of 197 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.37 · 27.4% (54 of 197 decks)
- Elvish Spirit Guide relevance 0.41 · 17.3% (34 of 197 decks)
- Dauntless Dismantler relevance 0.42 · 14.7% (29 of 197 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.27 · 57.4% (113 of 197 decks)
All artifacts (41)
- Thorn of Amethyst relevance 0.58 · 13.2% (26 of 197 decks)
- Null Rod relevance 0.54 · 16.8% (33 of 197 decks)
- Chalice of the Void relevance 0.58 · 7.6% (15 of 197 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.50 · 8.1% (16 of 197 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.35 · 16.8% (33 of 197 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.34 · 13.2% (26 of 197 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.33 · 13.7% (27 of 197 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.38 · 7.6% (15 of 197 decks)
- Torpor Orb relevance 0.40 · 4.6% (9 of 197 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.28 · 8.1% (16 of 197 decks)
- Horn of Gondor relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (7 of 197 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.28 · 6.6% (13 of 197 decks)
- Dolmen Gate relevance 0.32 · 3.6% (7 of 197 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.32 · 3.6% (7 of 197 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (21 of 197 decks)
- Damping Sphere relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Talisman of Hierarchy relevance 0.20 · 10.7% (21 of 197 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.20 · 8.6% (17 of 197 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.19 · 10.2% (20 of 197 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.20 · 8.1% (16 of 197 decks)
- Trinisphere relevance 0.32 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.24 · 3.6% (7 of 197 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.16 · 7.6% (15 of 197 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.14 · 7.6% (15 of 197 decks)
- Eldrazi Monument relevance 0.23 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (7 of 197 decks)
- The Soul Stone relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Thrumming Stone relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (7 of 197 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.15 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.14 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Orzhov Signet relevance 0.12 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.05 · 38.1% (75 of 197 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 71.1% (140 of 197 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Rest in Peace relevance 0.62 · 24.4% (48 of 197 decks)
- Deafening Silence relevance 0.43 · 48.7% (96 of 197 decks)
- Rule of Law relevance 0.49 · 25.9% (51 of 197 decks)
- Stony Silence relevance 0.49 · 22.8% (45 of 197 decks)
- Root Maze relevance 0.53 · 8.6% (17 of 197 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.42 · 23.4% (46 of 197 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.36 · 18.8% (37 of 197 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.38 · 12.2% (24 of 197 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.33 · 18.8% (37 of 197 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.28 · 16.2% (32 of 197 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.23 · 28.9% (57 of 197 decks)
- Flowering of the White Tree relevance 0.30 · 8.1% (16 of 197 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.28 · 7.1% (14 of 197 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.29 · 5.6% (11 of 197 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.26 · 9.1% (18 of 197 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.22 · 16.8% (33 of 197 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.23 · 11.2% (22 of 197 decks)
- Birthing Ritual relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (9 of 197 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.22 · 12.2% (24 of 197 decks)
- Charitable Levy relevance 0.33 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Authority of the Consuls relevance 0.22 · 10.2% (20 of 197 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.22 · 9.1% (18 of 197 decks)
- Dollmaker's Shop // Porcelain Gallery relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Aura of Silence relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (14 of 197 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Druids' Repository relevance 0.30 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Gleaming Splendor relevance 0.24 · 3.6% (7 of 197 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.18 · 9.6% (19 of 197 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Smuggler's Share relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Touch the Spirit Realm relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (7 of 197 decks)
- Phyrexian Reclamation relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (7 of 197 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Reconnaissance relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (7 of 197 decks)
- Darksteel Mutation relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Swift Reconfiguration relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Stronghold Arena relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- True Conviction relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Bastion of Remembrance relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Necromancy relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Tocasia's Welcome relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Binding the Old Gods relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Skrelv's Hive relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (7 of 197 decks)
- Anointed Procession relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
All instants (50)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.35 · 41.1% (81 of 197 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.33 · 37.6% (74 of 197 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.31 · 42.1% (83 of 197 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.30 · 37.6% (74 of 197 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.28 · 37.1% (73 of 197 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.33 · 19.8% (39 of 197 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.34 · 16.2% (32 of 197 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.32 · 16.2% (32 of 197 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.27 · 25.9% (51 of 197 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.27 · 24.4% (48 of 197 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.26 · 22.3% (44 of 197 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.31 · 8.6% (17 of 197 decks)
- Flare of Fortitude relevance 0.30 · 10.2% (20 of 197 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.28 · 11.7% (23 of 197 decks)
- Grand Crescendo relevance 0.32 · 5.6% (11 of 197 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.23 · 20.3% (40 of 197 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.27 · 9.1% (18 of 197 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.30 · 4.6% (9 of 197 decks)
- Calamity's Wake relevance 0.37 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Orim's Chant relevance 0.28 · 4.6% (9 of 197 decks)
- Assassin's Trophy relevance 0.15 · 55.3% (109 of 197 decks)
- Inkshield relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (14 of 197 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.21 · 15.2% (30 of 197 decks)
- Tear Asunder relevance 0.24 · 8.6% (17 of 197 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.25 · 5.1% (10 of 197 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.22 · 7.6% (15 of 197 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.20 · 10.2% (20 of 197 decks)
- Dire Tactics relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- March of the Multitudes relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (7 of 197 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.19 · 10.7% (21 of 197 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.17 · 18.8% (37 of 197 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.14 · 32.0% (63 of 197 decks)
- Galadriel's Dismissal relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Secure the Wastes relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.19 · 6.6% (13 of 197 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Eerie Interlude relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Thraben Charm relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Final Showdown relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.10 · 44.7% (88 of 197 decks)
- Mythos of Nethroi relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (7 of 197 decks)
- Erode relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.15 · 4.6% (9 of 197 decks)
- Dismember relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Angel's Grace relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Everybody Lives! relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.06 · 69.5% (137 of 197 decks)
- Anguished Unmaking relevance 0.10 · 25.4% (50 of 197 decks)
- Golgari Charm relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
All sorceries (42)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.34 · 34.5% (68 of 197 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.35 · 23.9% (47 of 197 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.36 · 12.7% (25 of 197 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.37 · 10.2% (20 of 197 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.31 · 21.8% (43 of 197 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.25 · 34.5% (68 of 197 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.29 · 13.2% (26 of 197 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (12 of 197 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.23 · 10.2% (20 of 197 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.23 · 8.1% (16 of 197 decks)
- Damn relevance 0.20 · 12.7% (25 of 197 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.21 · 6.6% (13 of 197 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.21 · 6.6% (13 of 197 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.15 · 23.9% (47 of 197 decks)
- Visions of Glory relevance 0.30 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Ecological Appreciation relevance 0.30 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.15 · 16.8% (33 of 197 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.16 · 10.2% (20 of 197 decks)
- Living Death relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Chain of Smog relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.12 · 17.8% (35 of 197 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Patriarch's Bidding relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Lively Dirge relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Eerie Ultimatum relevance 0.13 · 9.1% (18 of 197 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 7.6% (15 of 197 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Painful Truths relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Raise the Past relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Unearth relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Merciless Eviction relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Vanquish the Horde relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 0.12 · 4.6% (9 of 197 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.09 · 19.8% (39 of 197 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.11 · 6.6% (13 of 197 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.08 · 7.6% (15 of 197 decks)
- Night's Whisper relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (7)
- Elspeth, Sun's Champion relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Grist, the Hunger Tide relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.27 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Elspeth, Storm Slayer relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (7 of 197 decks)
- Ajani, Strength of the Pride relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Tyvar, Jubilant Brawler relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Sorin of House Markov // Sorin, Ravenous Neonate relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.34 · 6.1% (12 of 197 decks)
- Invasion of Gobakhan // Lightshield Array relevance 0.29 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.33 · 23.4% (46 of 197 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.28 · 26.4% (52 of 197 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.21 · 51.3% (101 of 197 decks)
- Silent Clearing relevance 0.29 · 18.3% (36 of 197 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.30 · 13.7% (27 of 197 decks)
- Nurturing Peatland relevance 0.26 · 17.8% (35 of 197 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.24 · 17.8% (35 of 197 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.25 · 13.2% (26 of 197 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.24 · 14.2% (28 of 197 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.27 · 9.1% (18 of 197 decks)
- Agadeem's Awakening // Agadeem, the Undercrypt relevance 0.25 · 7.1% (14 of 197 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.17 · 31.0% (61 of 197 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.28 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.21 · 12.7% (25 of 197 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.19 · 20.3% (40 of 197 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.24 · 6.6% (13 of 197 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.23 · 7.1% (14 of 197 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.18 · 20.3% (40 of 197 decks)
- Shadowy Backstreet relevance 0.19 · 16.2% (32 of 197 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.21 · 9.6% (19 of 197 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.20 · 10.7% (21 of 197 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.17 · 15.7% (31 of 197 decks)
- Kabira Takedown // Kabira Plateau relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Indatha Triome relevance 0.13 · 42.6% (84 of 197 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (10 of 197 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Vault of the Archangel relevance 0.18 · 9.6% (19 of 197 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (9 of 197 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (9 of 197 decks)
- Petrified Hamlet relevance 0.28 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (7 of 197 decks)
- Restless Prairie relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Abundant Countryside relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.14 · 6.6% (13 of 197 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Shizo, Death's Storehouse relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.10 · 16.8% (33 of 197 decks)
- Razorgrass Ambush // Razorgrass Field relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.12 · 4.6% (9 of 197 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.10 · 10.7% (21 of 197 decks)
- Westvale Abbey // Ormendahl, Profane Prince relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (4 of 197 decks)
All lands (50)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.34 · 37.6% (74 of 197 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.30 · 40.1% (79 of 197 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.35 · 23.4% (46 of 197 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.31 · 36.0% (71 of 197 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.28 · 45.7% (90 of 197 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.32 · 27.9% (55 of 197 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.30 · 29.9% (59 of 197 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.30 · 32.5% (64 of 197 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.28 · 36.5% (72 of 197 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.33 · 17.8% (35 of 197 decks)
- Scrubland relevance 0.26 · 37.6% (74 of 197 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.29 · 26.4% (52 of 197 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.26 · 37.6% (74 of 197 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.29 · 24.4% (48 of 197 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.25 · 36.5% (72 of 197 decks)
- Vault of Champions relevance 0.19 · 55.8% (110 of 197 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.18 · 58.9% (116 of 197 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.16 · 69.0% (136 of 197 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.15 · 73.1% (144 of 197 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.16 · 66.5% (131 of 197 decks)
- Undergrowth Stadium relevance 0.17 · 57.4% (113 of 197 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.26 · 11.7% (23 of 197 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.25 · 11.7% (23 of 197 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (14 of 197 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (20 of 197 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.24 · 10.2% (20 of 197 decks)
- Godless Shrine relevance 0.11 · 81.2% (160 of 197 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.10 · 81.7% (161 of 197 decks)
- Brightclimb Pathway // Grimclimb Pathway relevance 0.24 · 8.1% (16 of 197 decks)
- Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.10 · 81.2% (160 of 197 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.23 · 8.6% (17 of 197 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.25 · 5.6% (11 of 197 decks)
- Fetid Heath relevance 0.22 · 10.7% (21 of 197 decks)
- Caves of Koilos relevance 0.15 · 40.6% (80 of 197 decks)
- Darkbore Pathway // Slitherbore Pathway relevance 0.23 · 7.1% (14 of 197 decks)
- Llanowar Wastes relevance 0.14 · 39.1% (77 of 197 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.21 · 7.1% (14 of 197 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.25 · 3.6% (7 of 197 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.13 · 36.5% (72 of 197 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.20 · 4.6% (9 of 197 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.18 · 8.6% (17 of 197 decks)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Shattered Sanctum relevance 0.16 · 12.2% (24 of 197 decks)
- Wastewood Verge relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (14 of 197 decks)
- Twilight Mire relevance 0.16 · 12.7% (25 of 197 decks)
- Concealed Courtyard relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Bleachbone Verge relevance 0.18 · 6.1% (12 of 197 decks)
- Ancient Ziggurat relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Unclaimed Territory relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Deathcap Glade relevance 0.15 · 10.2% (20 of 197 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Tymna the Weaver, from 197 real Commander partner decks.