Cards like Slip Through Space
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
45% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Slip Through Space 43%
- Renegade Tactics 38%
- Enter the Enigma 33%
- Stun 8%
- Panic 4%
- Pym Particles 3%
Other options: Touch of Invisibility
Cards like Expedite
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards like Sudden Breakthrough
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Other options: Rig for War, Smaug's Fury, Fit of Rage, The Chase Is On, Rise to the Challenge, Slaughter Cry, Thunder Strike, Mouser Attack!, Skillful Lunge, Sure Strike
Cards like Traitorous Greed
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Traitorous Greed 42%
- Act of Treason 22%
- Vengeful Possession 10%
- Besmirch 10%
- Mark of Mutiny 9%
- Twisted Fealty 8%
- Portent of Betrayal 6%
- Take for a Ride 5%
- Traitorous Blood 4%
- Bloody Betrayal 4%
- Threaten 3%
- Wrangle 3%
- Traitorous Instinct 3%
- Price of Loyalty 2%
- Unwilling Recruit 1%
- Limits of Solidarity 1%
Other options: Claim the Firstborn, Press into Service, Malevolent Whispers, Captivating Crew, Lose Calm, Mascot Interception, Spreading Insurrection, Tentative Connection
Cards like Veyran, Voice of Duality
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Ink-Treader decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards like Charge Through
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.99 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Charge Through 44%
- Might of the Meek 20%
- Impolite Entrance 20%
- Ancestral Anger 14%
- Rile 1%
Other options: Crash Through
Cards like Viridescent Wisps
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Viridescent Wisps 39%
- Niveous Wisps 36%
Cards like Involuntary Employment
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Cards like Gold Rush
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Gold Rush 35%
- Reckless Ransacking 27%
Cards like Shelter
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Shelter 36%
- Gods Willing 9%
- Blessed Breath 9%
- Emerge Unscathed 5%
- Apostle's Blessing 3%
- Feat of Resistance 2%
- Angelic Intervention 1%
- Center Soul 1%
Other options: Razor Barrier, Stave Off
Cards like Tyvar's Stand
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Ink-Treader decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Other options: Ranger's Guile, Woodcutter's Grit
Cards like Zada, Hedron Grinder
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Cards like Faeburrow Elder
1.7× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Ink-Treader decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Faeburrow Elder 30%
- Bloom Tender 28%
Cards like Leap
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards like Tamiyo's Safekeeping
7.3× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other Ink-Treader decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Cards like Cerulean Wisps
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Cerulean Wisps 35%
- Refocus 8%
Cards like Thought Vessel
2.4× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Ink-Treader decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.7× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other Ink-Treader decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.75 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 53%
- Commander's Sphere 12%
Cards like Fleeting Distraction
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Other options: Arcane Subtraction, Befuddle, Bewilder, Code of Constraint, Turn the Tide, Shocking Grasp, Hydrolash, Disorient, Depower, Dazzling Lights, Hydrosurge, Hampering Snare, Icy Reception, Hysterical Blindness, Roilmage's Trick, Jace's Scrutiny, Blinding Spray, Constricting Tendrils, Uncomfortable Chill
Cards like Defiant Strike
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Other options: Guided Strike, Captain's Defense, Gallantry
Cards like Flick a Coin
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Cards like Startle
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Cards like Quandrix Apprentice
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards like Kykar, Wind's Fury
15× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Ink-Treader decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards like Mythos of Illuna
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
5.2× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Ink-Treader decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Other options: Academy Wall, Muse Seeker, Windrider Wizard, Lunar Mystic
Cards like Young Pyromancer
Over 20× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Cards like Enter the Unknown
3.3× as likely as other Ink-Treader decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Ink-Treader decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Ink-Treader decks
All top picks (50)
- Sudden Breakthrough relevance 0.73 · 48.0% (83 of 173 decks)
- Traitorous Greed relevance 0.75 · 41.6% (72 of 173 decks)
- Involuntary Employment relevance 0.74 · 42.2% (73 of 173 decks)
- Ancestors' Aid relevance 0.71 · 43.9% (76 of 173 decks)
- Spawning Breath relevance 0.75 · 37.0% (64 of 173 decks)
- Niveous Wisps relevance 0.73 · 36.4% (63 of 173 decks)
- Fists of Flame relevance 0.65 · 48.6% (84 of 173 decks)
- Startle relevance 0.73 · 36.4% (63 of 173 decks)
- Kari Zev's Expertise relevance 0.74 · 34.7% (60 of 173 decks)
- Luxurious Libation relevance 0.74 · 34.1% (59 of 173 decks)
- Expedite relevance 0.61 · 52.0% (90 of 173 decks)
- Renegade Tactics relevance 0.69 · 38.2% (66 of 173 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.65 · 42.8% (74 of 173 decks)
- Gold Rush relevance 0.70 · 34.7% (60 of 173 decks)
- Viridescent Wisps relevance 0.67 · 38.7% (67 of 173 decks)
- Furnace Reins relevance 0.72 · 27.7% (48 of 173 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.62 · 42.2% (73 of 173 decks)
- Crimson Wisps relevance 0.63 · 40.5% (70 of 173 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.59 · 43.9% (76 of 173 decks)
- Leonin Lightscribe relevance 0.67 · 30.1% (52 of 173 decks)
- Shelter relevance 0.63 · 35.8% (62 of 173 decks)
- Nivmagus Elemental relevance 0.71 · 23.1% (40 of 173 decks)
- Depths of Desire relevance 0.70 · 23.7% (41 of 173 decks)
- Enter the Unknown relevance 0.63 · 33.5% (58 of 173 decks)
- Reckless Ransacking relevance 0.66 · 27.2% (47 of 173 decks)
- Defiant Strike relevance 0.63 · 30.6% (53 of 173 decks)
- Silverfur Partisan relevance 0.69 · 21.4% (37 of 173 decks)
- Deekah, Fractal Theorist relevance 0.67 · 23.7% (41 of 173 decks)
- Feather, the Redeemed relevance 0.59 · 35.3% (61 of 173 decks)
- Swell of Growth relevance 0.66 · 23.7% (41 of 173 decks)
- Venerated Rotpriest relevance 0.64 · 26.6% (46 of 173 decks)
- Act of Treason relevance 0.67 · 22.0% (38 of 173 decks)
- Flick a Coin relevance 0.68 · 21.4% (37 of 173 decks)
- Make Mischief relevance 0.69 · 17.9% (31 of 173 decks)
- Young Pyromancer relevance 0.58 · 35.3% (61 of 173 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.57 · 34.7% (60 of 173 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.57 · 32.9% (57 of 173 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.59 · 28.9% (50 of 173 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.66 · 17.9% (31 of 173 decks)
- Supplant Form relevance 0.64 · 15.6% (27 of 173 decks)
- Might of the Meek relevance 0.60 · 19.7% (34 of 173 decks)
- Zada, Hedron Grinder relevance 0.56 · 24.9% (43 of 173 decks)
- Impolite Entrance relevance 0.59 · 19.7% (34 of 173 decks)
- Bandage relevance 0.63 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Storm-Kiln Artist relevance 0.38 · 58.4% (101 of 173 decks)
- Monastery Mentor relevance 0.51 · 28.3% (49 of 173 decks)
- Twisted Image relevance 0.59 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Wild Defiance relevance 0.58 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Mythos of Illuna relevance 0.54 · 17.3% (30 of 173 decks)
- Veyran, Voice of Duality relevance 0.42 · 42.2% (73 of 173 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Leonin Lightscribe relevance 0.67 · 30.1% (52 of 173 decks)
- Nivmagus Elemental relevance 0.71 · 23.1% (40 of 173 decks)
- Silverfur Partisan relevance 0.69 · 21.4% (37 of 173 decks)
- Deekah, Fractal Theorist relevance 0.67 · 23.7% (41 of 173 decks)
- Feather, the Redeemed relevance 0.59 · 35.3% (61 of 173 decks)
- Venerated Rotpriest relevance 0.64 · 26.6% (46 of 173 decks)
- Young Pyromancer relevance 0.58 · 35.3% (61 of 173 decks)
- Zada, Hedron Grinder relevance 0.56 · 24.9% (43 of 173 decks)
- Storm-Kiln Artist relevance 0.38 · 58.4% (101 of 173 decks)
- Monastery Mentor relevance 0.51 · 28.3% (49 of 173 decks)
- Veyran, Voice of Duality relevance 0.42 · 42.2% (73 of 173 decks)
- Mirrorwing Dragon relevance 0.53 · 15.0% (26 of 173 decks)
- Dragonsguard Elite relevance 0.59 · 9.8% (17 of 173 decks)
- Third Path Iconoclast relevance 0.46 · 25.4% (44 of 173 decks)
- Clever Lumimancer relevance 0.60 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
- Mavinda, Students' Advocate relevance 0.53 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.40 · 34.7% (60 of 173 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.48 · 15.6% (27 of 173 decks)
- Quandrix Apprentice relevance 0.47 · 16.8% (29 of 173 decks)
- Stormchaser Drake relevance 0.52 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Ashling, Flame Dancer relevance 0.50 · 9.8% (17 of 173 decks)
- Karok Wrangler relevance 0.54 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief relevance 0.46 · 12.1% (21 of 173 decks)
- Quandrix Pledgemage relevance 0.53 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.47 · 9.2% (16 of 173 decks)
- Hunted Phantasm relevance 0.46 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Kykar, Wind's Fury relevance 0.37 · 19.7% (34 of 173 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 0.46 · 6.9% (12 of 173 decks)
- Stormcatch Mentor relevance 0.41 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.43 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.36 · 11.6% (20 of 173 decks)
- Kalamax, the Stormsire relevance 0.41 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Zaffai, Thunder Conductor relevance 0.45 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.38 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
- Orvar, the All-Form relevance 0.39 · 6.9% (12 of 173 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 0.41 · 4.6% (8 of 173 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.29 · 24.3% (42 of 173 decks)
- Hana Kami relevance 0.48 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.37 · 7.5% (13 of 173 decks)
- Pollen-Shield Hare // Hare Raising relevance 0.40 · 4.6% (8 of 173 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 0.38 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
- Giggling Skitterspike relevance 0.39 · 4.6% (8 of 173 decks)
- Bria, Riptide Rogue relevance 0.37 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Stormsplitter relevance 0.40 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Tender Wildguide relevance 0.37 · 4.6% (8 of 173 decks)
- Balmor, Battlemage Captain relevance 0.35 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.33 · 6.9% (12 of 173 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.27 · 15.6% (27 of 173 decks)
- Goldspan Dragon relevance 0.33 · 4.6% (8 of 173 decks)
- Varchild's War-Riders relevance 0.38 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
All artifacts (39)
- Genesis Chamber relevance 0.43 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.33 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.28 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Long-Forgotten Gohei relevance 0.44 · 2.9% (5 of 173 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.31 · 7.5% (13 of 173 decks)
- Glaring Spotlight relevance 0.40 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Boros Signet relevance 0.29 · 6.4% (11 of 173 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.22 · 21.4% (37 of 173 decks)
- Talisman of Impulse relevance 0.27 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
- Feldon's Cane relevance 0.36 · 2.9% (5 of 173 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.18 · 29.5% (51 of 173 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.23 · 11.6% (20 of 173 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.25 · 6.4% (11 of 173 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.25 · 6.4% (11 of 173 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (8 of 173 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.20 · 16.2% (28 of 173 decks)
- Talisman of Conviction relevance 0.23 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.23 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
- Talisman of Creativity relevance 0.22 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Mirror Shield relevance 0.33 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Talisman of Progress relevance 0.20 · 6.9% (12 of 173 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.13 · 34.7% (60 of 173 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Dragonfire Blade relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (5 of 173 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (5 of 173 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (5 of 173 decks)
- Venser's Journal relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.05 · 52.6% (91 of 173 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.10 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 36.4% (63 of 173 decks)
All enchantments (24)
- Wild Defiance relevance 0.58 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Leyline of Resonance relevance 0.49 · 9.2% (16 of 173 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.40 · 9.8% (17 of 173 decks)
- Frontline Heroism relevance 0.44 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Dovescape relevance 0.44 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.39 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.34 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Skrelv's Hive relevance 0.34 · 2.9% (5 of 173 decks)
- Arcane Bombardment relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Jeskai Ascendancy relevance 0.21 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Rite of the Dragoncaller relevance 0.30 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Stormchaser's Talent relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Whirlwind of Thought relevance 0.16 · 9.2% (16 of 173 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.17 · 4.6% (8 of 173 decks)
- Sorcerer Class relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Assemble the Legion relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.10 · 4.6% (8 of 173 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (5 of 173 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (5 of 173 decks)
- Annie Joins Up relevance 0.07 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
All instants (50)
- Sudden Breakthrough relevance 0.73 · 48.0% (83 of 173 decks)
- Ancestors' Aid relevance 0.71 · 43.9% (76 of 173 decks)
- Spawning Breath relevance 0.75 · 37.0% (64 of 173 decks)
- Niveous Wisps relevance 0.73 · 36.4% (63 of 173 decks)
- Fists of Flame relevance 0.65 · 48.6% (84 of 173 decks)
- Startle relevance 0.73 · 36.4% (63 of 173 decks)
- Luxurious Libation relevance 0.74 · 34.1% (59 of 173 decks)
- Expedite relevance 0.61 · 52.0% (90 of 173 decks)
- Gold Rush relevance 0.70 · 34.7% (60 of 173 decks)
- Viridescent Wisps relevance 0.67 · 38.7% (67 of 173 decks)
- Crimson Wisps relevance 0.63 · 40.5% (70 of 173 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.59 · 43.9% (76 of 173 decks)
- Shelter relevance 0.63 · 35.8% (62 of 173 decks)
- Depths of Desire relevance 0.70 · 23.7% (41 of 173 decks)
- Reckless Ransacking relevance 0.66 · 27.2% (47 of 173 decks)
- Defiant Strike relevance 0.63 · 30.6% (53 of 173 decks)
- Swell of Growth relevance 0.66 · 23.7% (41 of 173 decks)
- Flick a Coin relevance 0.68 · 21.4% (37 of 173 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.57 · 34.7% (60 of 173 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.59 · 28.9% (50 of 173 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.66 · 17.9% (31 of 173 decks)
- Supplant Form relevance 0.64 · 15.6% (27 of 173 decks)
- Might of the Meek relevance 0.60 · 19.7% (34 of 173 decks)
- Bandage relevance 0.63 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Twisted Image relevance 0.59 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.46 · 31.8% (55 of 173 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.51 · 19.1% (33 of 173 decks)
- Blessed Breath relevance 0.60 · 9.2% (16 of 173 decks)
- Sheltering Light relevance 0.58 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.47 · 21.4% (37 of 173 decks)
- Stun relevance 0.58 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
- Adverse Conditions relevance 0.59 · 6.9% (12 of 173 decks)
- Kodama's Might relevance 0.58 · 6.9% (12 of 173 decks)
- Sigil Blessing relevance 0.53 · 9.2% (16 of 173 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.47 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Blacksmith's Skill relevance 0.49 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.45 · 14.5% (25 of 173 decks)
- Glacial Ray relevance 0.54 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Accelerate relevance 0.52 · 6.9% (12 of 173 decks)
- Plunge into Winter relevance 0.52 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Blindblast relevance 0.53 · 4.6% (8 of 173 decks)
- Gods Willing relevance 0.48 · 9.2% (16 of 173 decks)
- Peer Through Depths relevance 0.51 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.47 · 9.2% (16 of 173 decks)
- Pressure Point relevance 0.51 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
- Word of Seizing relevance 0.49 · 6.4% (11 of 173 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.49 · 6.9% (12 of 173 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.48 · 7.5% (13 of 173 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.46 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Blessed Defiance relevance 0.51 · 4.6% (8 of 173 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Traitorous Greed relevance 0.75 · 41.6% (72 of 173 decks)
- Involuntary Employment relevance 0.74 · 42.2% (73 of 173 decks)
- Kari Zev's Expertise relevance 0.74 · 34.7% (60 of 173 decks)
- Renegade Tactics relevance 0.69 · 38.2% (66 of 173 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.65 · 42.8% (74 of 173 decks)
- Furnace Reins relevance 0.72 · 27.7% (48 of 173 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.62 · 42.2% (73 of 173 decks)
- Enter the Unknown relevance 0.63 · 33.5% (58 of 173 decks)
- Act of Treason relevance 0.67 · 22.0% (38 of 173 decks)
- Make Mischief relevance 0.69 · 17.9% (31 of 173 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.57 · 32.9% (57 of 173 decks)
- Impolite Entrance relevance 0.59 · 19.7% (34 of 173 decks)
- Mythos of Illuna relevance 0.54 · 17.3% (30 of 173 decks)
- Ancestral Anger relevance 0.56 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Croaking Counterpart relevance 0.53 · 17.9% (31 of 173 decks)
- Mark of Mutiny relevance 0.62 · 9.2% (16 of 173 decks)
- Vengeful Possession relevance 0.60 · 9.8% (17 of 173 decks)
- Besmirch relevance 0.60 · 9.8% (17 of 173 decks)
- Aether Mutation relevance 0.59 · 9.8% (17 of 173 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.45 · 25.4% (44 of 173 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 0.55 · 10.4% (18 of 173 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 0.55 · 9.2% (16 of 173 decks)
- Fiery Gambit relevance 0.57 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
- Kick in the Door relevance 0.56 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
- Twisted Fealty relevance 0.56 · 7.5% (13 of 173 decks)
- Irresistible Prey relevance 0.54 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
- Launch the Fleet relevance 0.52 · 8.1% (14 of 173 decks)
- Choco-Comet relevance 0.53 · 7.5% (13 of 173 decks)
- Portent of Betrayal relevance 0.54 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Heat Shimmer relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (13 of 173 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 0.49 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Improvised Weaponry relevance 0.53 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
- Catch // Release relevance 0.50 · 6.9% (12 of 173 decks)
- Jet's Brainwashing relevance 0.51 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.46 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Take for a Ride relevance 0.50 · 4.6% (8 of 173 decks)
- Spitting Image relevance 0.47 · 6.9% (12 of 173 decks)
- Brightflame relevance 0.48 · 4.6% (8 of 173 decks)
- Over the Edge relevance 0.47 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
- Honor relevance 0.44 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Bloody Betrayal relevance 0.49 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Traitorous Blood relevance 0.49 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Eerie Procession relevance 0.48 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Oracle's Restoration relevance 0.43 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
- Spiraling Embers relevance 0.43 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Threaten relevance 0.48 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.39 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Invoke the Winds relevance 0.47 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Splicer's Skill relevance 0.44 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.40 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Ral, Storm Conduit relevance 0.46 · 6.4% (11 of 173 decks)
- Ral, Monsoon Mage // Ral, Leyline Prodigy relevance 0.39 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
- Saheeli, Sublime Artificer relevance 0.35 · 6.4% (11 of 173 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.24 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
All utility lands (49)
- Song-Mad Treachery // Song-Mad Ruins relevance 0.48 · 6.4% (11 of 173 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.39 · 6.4% (11 of 173 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.37 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Lindblum, Industrial Regency // Mage Siege relevance 0.36 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Legion Leadership // Legion Stronghold relevance 0.29 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Pinnacle Monk // Mystic Peak relevance 0.32 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Kher Keep relevance 0.38 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Elegant Parlor relevance 0.28 · 7.5% (13 of 173 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.26 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.28 · 6.4% (11 of 173 decks)
- Tranquil Landscape relevance 0.25 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Thundering Falls relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (12 of 173 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.25 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Bountiful Landscape relevance 0.24 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Perilous Landscape relevance 0.25 · 6.9% (12 of 173 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.24 · 7.5% (13 of 173 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (5 of 173 decks)
- Raugrin Triome relevance 0.17 · 34.1% (59 of 173 decks)
- Sheltering Landscape relevance 0.24 · 6.9% (12 of 173 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.24 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Sheltered Thicket relevance 0.25 · 4.6% (8 of 173 decks)
- Jetmir's Garden relevance 0.16 · 32.4% (56 of 173 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.15 · 37.0% (64 of 173 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.24 · 4.6% (8 of 173 decks)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.23 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
- Ketria Triome relevance 0.15 · 34.7% (60 of 173 decks)
- Spara's Headquarters relevance 0.15 · 32.9% (57 of 173 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (5 of 173 decks)
- Irrigated Farmland relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Temple of Enlightenment relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.15 · 11.6% (20 of 173 decks)
- Temple of Epiphany relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Glittering Massif relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (5 of 173 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Temple of Triumph relevance 0.19 · 2.9% (5 of 173 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.11 · 16.2% (28 of 173 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.13 · 6.9% (12 of 173 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.14 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
All lands (50)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.26 · 23.7% (41 of 173 decks)
- Vivid Grove relevance 0.34 · 4.6% (8 of 173 decks)
- Vivid Meadow relevance 0.33 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Jungle Shrine relevance 0.21 · 27.2% (47 of 173 decks)
- Shivan Reef relevance 0.24 · 13.3% (23 of 173 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.24 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Mystic Monastery relevance 0.20 · 27.2% (47 of 173 decks)
- Frontier Bivouac relevance 0.19 · 28.3% (49 of 173 decks)
- Adarkar Wastes relevance 0.24 · 11.6% (20 of 173 decks)
- Vivid Crag relevance 0.33 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.30 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Seaside Citadel relevance 0.19 · 24.3% (42 of 173 decks)
- Boros Guildgate relevance 0.26 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Vivid Creek relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Thriving Bluff relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (8 of 173 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.22 · 11.6% (20 of 173 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.25 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
- Azorius Guildgate relevance 0.25 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.25 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.25 · 4.6% (8 of 173 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.21 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.24 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
- Battlefield Forge relevance 0.20 · 11.6% (20 of 173 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.18 · 17.3% (30 of 173 decks)
- Molten Tributary relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Training Center relevance 0.19 · 12.7% (22 of 173 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.21 · 5.2% (9 of 173 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.17 · 15.6% (27 of 173 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- Izzet Guildgate relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (7 of 173 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.16 · 16.2% (28 of 173 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.15 · 20.2% (35 of 173 decks)
- Cinder Glade relevance 0.16 · 16.8% (29 of 173 decks)
- Spectator Seating relevance 0.18 · 10.4% (18 of 173 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.17 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.14 · 24.9% (43 of 173 decks)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (6 of 173 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.19 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Sacred Foundry relevance 0.13 · 31.2% (54 of 173 decks)
- Grasslands relevance 0.24 · 2.9% (5 of 173 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.13 · 27.2% (47 of 173 decks)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (4 of 173 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.13 · 25.4% (44 of 173 decks)
- Stormcarved Coast relevance 0.18 · 5.8% (10 of 173 decks)
- Steam Vents relevance 0.12 · 36.4% (63 of 173 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.17 · 6.9% (12 of 173 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.14 · 17.9% (31 of 173 decks)
- Command Bridge relevance 0.24 · 2.9% (5 of 173 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Ink-Treader Nephilim, from 173 real Commander decks.