Change per day
Archetypes
72% of decks lean toward it
70% of decks lean toward it
65% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
Haywire Mite 39.6% of decks
Haywire Mite 39.6% of decks
Scrap Trawler 26.2% of decks
Scrap Trawler 26.2% of decks
Cathodion 20.3% of decks
Cathodion 20.3% of decks
Emry, Lurker of the Loch 33.7% of decks
Emry, Lurker of the Loch 33.7% of decks
Myr Retriever 21.8% of decks
Myr Retriever 21.8% of decks
Oswald Fiddlebender 25.7% of decks
Oswald Fiddlebender 25.7% of decks
With signature card Solemn Simulacrum
72% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Seat of the Synod
70% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Intruder Alarm
65% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 71 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
-
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Scrap Trawler 26%
- Myr Retriever 22%
- Junk Diver 15%
- Workshop Assistant 8%
- Spine of Ish Sah 1%
-
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Ink-Treader decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Other options: Voyager Quickwelder, Helm of Awakening, Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate
-
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Other options: Pyre of Heroes
-
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Ink-Treader decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Kiora's Follower 23%
- Ioreth of the Healing House 23%
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands 6%
- Fatestitcher 3%
- Kelpie Guide 3%
Other options: North Pole Patrol, Forensic Researcher
-
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Circuit Mender 20%
- Filigree Familiar 16%
Other options: Oasis Gardener, Reservoir Walker, Peace Strider
-
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
-
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Ink-Treader decks
-
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 74% of other Ink-Treader decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.82 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 67%
- Basalt Monolith 11%
- Mana Vault 6%
- Grim Monolith 3%
-
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Ink-Treader decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Bloom Tender 31%
- Faeburrow Elder 25%
-
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
-
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
- Goblin Engineer 20%
- Scrap Welder 8%
-
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
Other options: Puppet Strings, Jandor's Saddlebags
-
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 69% of other Ink-Treader decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.75 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
-
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Ink-Treader decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.18 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Ink-Treader decks
-
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Ink-Treader decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Ink-Treader decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Ink-Treader decks
Cards
That's every card stack.
All top picks (50)
- Haywire Mite relevance 0.69 · 39.6% (80 of 202 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.73 · 26.2% (53 of 202 decks)
- Cathodion relevance 0.75 · 20.3% (41 of 202 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.65 · 33.7% (68 of 202 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.71 · 21.8% (44 of 202 decks)
- Oswald Fiddlebender relevance 0.68 · 25.7% (52 of 202 decks)
- Circuit Mender relevance 0.72 · 19.8% (40 of 202 decks)
- Canoptek Tomb Sentinel relevance 0.73 · 17.3% (35 of 202 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.64 · 28.7% (58 of 202 decks)
- Filigree Familiar relevance 0.71 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Treasure Keeper relevance 0.71 · 14.9% (30 of 202 decks)
- Phyrexian Triniform relevance 0.70 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.67 · 20.8% (42 of 202 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.62 · 27.7% (56 of 202 decks)
- Junk Diver relevance 0.69 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.65 · 19.8% (40 of 202 decks)
- Thopter Shop relevance 0.69 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.62 · 23.3% (47 of 202 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.62 · 21.8% (44 of 202 decks)
- Enthusiastic Mechanaut relevance 0.63 · 20.3% (41 of 202 decks)
- Arcbound Shikari relevance 0.68 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.62 · 19.8% (40 of 202 decks)
- Goblin Engineer relevance 0.61 · 20.3% (41 of 202 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.56 · 28.7% (58 of 202 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 0.62 · 18.3% (37 of 202 decks)
- Goblin Welder relevance 0.60 · 20.8% (42 of 202 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.64 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Thornbite Staff relevance 0.67 · 11.9% (24 of 202 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.59 · 19.8% (40 of 202 decks)
- Triplicate Titan relevance 0.61 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Organic Extinction relevance 0.62 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Su-Chi Cave Guard relevance 0.67 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Myr Battlesphere relevance 0.60 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Breya's Apprentice relevance 0.66 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Wake the Past relevance 0.58 · 14.9% (30 of 202 decks)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 0.59 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.53 · 22.8% (46 of 202 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.57 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Canoptek Spyder relevance 0.63 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Workshop Assistant relevance 0.64 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Weapons Manufacturing relevance 0.60 · 11.4% (23 of 202 decks)
- Riptide Gearhulk relevance 0.56 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.43 · 38.6% (78 of 202 decks)
- Daretti, Scrap Savant relevance 0.60 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.59 · 11.4% (23 of 202 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.56 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Scrap Welder relevance 0.62 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Zabaz, the Glimmerwasp relevance 0.62 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Purphoros, Bronze-Blooded relevance 0.61 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.56 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Haywire Mite relevance 0.69 · 39.6% (80 of 202 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.73 · 26.2% (53 of 202 decks)
- Cathodion relevance 0.75 · 20.3% (41 of 202 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.65 · 33.7% (68 of 202 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.71 · 21.8% (44 of 202 decks)
- Oswald Fiddlebender relevance 0.68 · 25.7% (52 of 202 decks)
- Circuit Mender relevance 0.72 · 19.8% (40 of 202 decks)
- Canoptek Tomb Sentinel relevance 0.73 · 17.3% (35 of 202 decks)
- Filigree Familiar relevance 0.71 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Treasure Keeper relevance 0.71 · 14.9% (30 of 202 decks)
- Phyrexian Triniform relevance 0.70 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.67 · 20.8% (42 of 202 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.62 · 27.7% (56 of 202 decks)
- Junk Diver relevance 0.69 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.65 · 19.8% (40 of 202 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.62 · 21.8% (44 of 202 decks)
- Enthusiastic Mechanaut relevance 0.63 · 20.3% (41 of 202 decks)
- Arcbound Shikari relevance 0.68 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.62 · 19.8% (40 of 202 decks)
- Goblin Engineer relevance 0.61 · 20.3% (41 of 202 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 0.62 · 18.3% (37 of 202 decks)
- Goblin Welder relevance 0.60 · 20.8% (42 of 202 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.59 · 19.8% (40 of 202 decks)
- Triplicate Titan relevance 0.61 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Su-Chi Cave Guard relevance 0.67 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Myr Battlesphere relevance 0.60 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Breya's Apprentice relevance 0.66 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 0.59 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.53 · 22.8% (46 of 202 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.57 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Canoptek Spyder relevance 0.63 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Workshop Assistant relevance 0.64 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Riptide Gearhulk relevance 0.56 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.43 · 38.6% (78 of 202 decks)
- Zabaz, the Glimmerwasp relevance 0.62 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Scrap Welder relevance 0.62 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Purphoros, Bronze-Blooded relevance 0.61 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Calming Licid relevance 0.63 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Losheel, Clockwork Scholar relevance 0.59 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.47 · 25.2% (51 of 202 decks)
- Stinging Licid relevance 0.62 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Soul Sculptor relevance 0.62 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Enraging Licid relevance 0.62 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Transmogrifying Licid relevance 0.62 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Scrapyard Recombiner relevance 0.62 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Dominating Licid relevance 0.61 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Arcbound Stinger relevance 0.61 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Alloy Golem relevance 0.61 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Tempting Licid relevance 0.60 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Syr Ginger, the Meal Ender relevance 0.58 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.64 · 28.7% (58 of 202 decks)
- Thopter Shop relevance 0.69 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.62 · 23.3% (47 of 202 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.64 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Thornbite Staff relevance 0.67 · 11.9% (24 of 202 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.59 · 11.4% (23 of 202 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.56 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.56 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.50 · 18.8% (38 of 202 decks)
- Illusionary Mask relevance 0.62 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Cryogen Relic relevance 0.57 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Ice Cauldron relevance 0.61 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.49 · 15.8% (32 of 202 decks)
- Esoteric Duplicator relevance 0.55 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.53 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Mindslaver relevance 0.54 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Aether Vial relevance 0.53 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- The Enigma Jewel // Locus of Enlightenment relevance 0.53 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Sundial of the Infinite relevance 0.53 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.48 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.49 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Mycosynth Lattice relevance 0.48 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Timesifter relevance 0.49 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.45 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Sword of the Paruns relevance 0.50 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Knowledge Pool relevance 0.44 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Encroaching Mycosynth relevance 0.46 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.45 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.44 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.42 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.37 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.46 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Trading Post relevance 0.41 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Slagstone Refinery relevance 0.49 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.39 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.41 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.32 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.34 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.37 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Liquimetal Coating relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Aetherflux Conduit relevance 0.33 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Aetherworks Marvel relevance 0.33 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.27 · 11.9% (24 of 202 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.31 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Mirrorworks relevance 0.40 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.37 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.29 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.28 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.41 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
All enchantments (46)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.56 · 28.7% (58 of 202 decks)
- Weapons Manufacturing relevance 0.60 · 11.4% (23 of 202 decks)
- Raging River relevance 0.61 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Teferi's Realm relevance 0.60 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Humility relevance 0.56 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Opalescence relevance 0.55 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Earnest Fellowship relevance 0.52 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Crab Umbra relevance 0.52 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Enchanted Evening relevance 0.49 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Sneak Attack relevance 0.49 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.46 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Blood Moon relevance 0.45 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Eye of the Storm relevance 0.43 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.38 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.37 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Hive Mind relevance 0.34 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Goblin Bombardment relevance 0.36 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.30 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.38 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.29 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Clan Crafter relevance 0.37 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Birthing Ritual relevance 0.37 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Static Prison relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.33 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Primal Prayers relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Aether Revolt relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Shiny Impetus relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Martial Impetus relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Era of Innovation relevance 0.30 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Dazzling Theater // Prop Room relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Evolutionary Escalation relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Fires of Yavimaya relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.17 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Gleaming Splendor relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.15 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.14 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Sterling Grove relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
All instants (50)
- Squelch relevance 0.61 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Lightning Storm relevance 0.59 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Dispatch relevance 0.46 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Cosmic Intervention relevance 0.43 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.42 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.34 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Flare of Duplication relevance 0.33 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.27 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.20 · 17.3% (35 of 202 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.23 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.20 · 9.9% (20 of 202 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.18 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Electrosiphon relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.21 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.19 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.18 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Aether Spike relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Galvanic Discharge relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.19 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.20 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.17 · 12.4% (25 of 202 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.19 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.17 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.15 · 18.3% (37 of 202 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Take the Bait relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.15 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.17 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.18 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.16 · 9.9% (20 of 202 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.17 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.15 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.15 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.13 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.10 · 26.2% (53 of 202 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
All sorceries (41)
- Organic Extinction relevance 0.62 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Wake the Past relevance 0.58 · 14.9% (30 of 202 decks)
- Trash for Treasure relevance 0.56 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Enduring Ideal relevance 0.53 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Donate relevance 0.47 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.47 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.44 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.36 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.38 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Dance of the Manse relevance 0.41 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Trait Doctoring relevance 0.35 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.30 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Reckless Handling relevance 0.39 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.22 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Jolted Awake relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Attune with Aether relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.18 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.22 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Confiscation Coup relevance 0.30 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Localized Destruction relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.20 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Spectacular Showdown relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- The Battle of Bywater relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Jeska's Will relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Wargate relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.11 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Bring to Light relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.12 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.10 · 9.9% (20 of 202 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.08 · 22.8% (46 of 202 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.09 · 11.4% (23 of 202 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (7)
- Daretti, Scrap Savant relevance 0.60 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Saheeli, Filigree Master relevance 0.47 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.36 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.36 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Teferi, Who Slows the Sunset relevance 0.30 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Saheeli, Sublime Artificer relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.47 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.48 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.50 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.42 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.40 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.41 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.31 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.40 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Adagia, Windswept Bastion relevance 0.33 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.30 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.37 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Racers' Ring relevance 0.35 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Sokenzan, Crucible of Defiance relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Skybridge Towers relevance 0.35 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.20 · 14.9% (30 of 202 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.25 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.24 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.24 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- HELIOS One relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Rush of Inspiration // Crackling Falls relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Sheltering Landscape relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.17 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Bountiful Landscape relevance 0.22 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Botanical Plaza relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Raugrin Triome relevance 0.16 · 24.3% (49 of 202 decks)
- Jetmir's Garden relevance 0.15 · 21.8% (44 of 202 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Spara's Headquarters relevance 0.15 · 24.3% (49 of 202 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Sunbaked Canyon relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Perilous Landscape relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Ketria Triome relevance 0.14 · 22.3% (45 of 202 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Irrigated Farmland relevance 0.22 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Thundering Falls relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Legion Leadership // Legion Stronghold relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Hidden Hideout relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Sheltered Thicket relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.12 · 17.3% (35 of 202 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
All lands (50)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.52 · 23.3% (47 of 202 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.51 · 19.8% (40 of 202 decks)
- Ancient Den relevance 0.51 · 20.3% (41 of 202 decks)
- Great Furnace relevance 0.50 · 18.8% (38 of 202 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.46 · 22.8% (46 of 202 decks)
- Rustvale Bridge relevance 0.49 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Razortide Bridge relevance 0.46 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- Silverbluff Bridge relevance 0.45 · 11.9% (24 of 202 decks)
- Slagwoods Bridge relevance 0.45 · 11.4% (23 of 202 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.44 · 11.4% (23 of 202 decks)
- Thornglint Bridge relevance 0.44 · 9.9% (20 of 202 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.42 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Rith's Grove relevance 0.39 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 0.39 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Treva's Ruins relevance 0.38 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.35 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.34 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Copperline Gorge relevance 0.32 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Seachrome Coast relevance 0.31 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.29 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.31 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Shivan Reef relevance 0.25 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.27 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Spirebluff Canal relevance 0.30 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Battlefield Forge relevance 0.22 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Training Center relevance 0.21 · 15.8% (32 of 202 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.24 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Inspiring Vantage relevance 0.29 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Adarkar Wastes relevance 0.23 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Spectator Seating relevance 0.20 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.22 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.18 · 21.3% (43 of 202 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.22 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Aether Hub relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Jungle Shrine relevance 0.19 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Mystic Monastery relevance 0.18 · 18.3% (37 of 202 decks)
- Deserted Beach relevance 0.22 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Rockfall Vale relevance 0.22 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.19 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Glimmervoid relevance 0.33 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.19 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- Sea of Clouds relevance 0.19 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.18 · 16.8% (34 of 202 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.21 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Seaside Citadel relevance 0.18 · 15.8% (32 of 202 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.20 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Stormcarved Coast relevance 0.21 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Plateau relevance 0.19 · 11.9% (24 of 202 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.26 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Bjorna, Nightfall Alchemist, from 202 real Commander partner decks.





























































































































































































