Cards like Kami of Whispered Hopes
10× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
56% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Kami of Whispered Hopes 63%
- Gyre Sage 56%
- Incubation Druid 51%
Cards like Evolution Witness
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Piper Wright, Publick Reporter
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Extruder
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards like Fathom Mage
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Fathom Mage 59%
- Benthic Biomancer 20%
- Pensive Professor 19%
Cards like Neoform
16× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Neoform 27%
- Eldritch Evolution 24%
Cards like Hardened Scales
2.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Simic decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Simic decks
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 48%
- Elvish Mystic 37%
- Fyndhorn Elves 23%
- Orochi Merge-Keeper 1%
- Boreal Druid 1%
Other options: Gyre Engineer, Orochi Sustainer, Fyndhorn Elder, Druid of the Cowl, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener
Cards like Rapid Hybridization
2.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.49 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rapid Hybridization 44%
- Pongify 32%
Cards like Wizard Class
8.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Mutagen Man, Living Ooze
7.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Michelangelo, Mutant BFF, Crustacean Commando, Genghis Frog, Slithering Cryptid
Cards like Sol Ring
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 77% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.94 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 82%
- Basalt Monolith 12%
- Mana Vault 11%
- Grim Monolith 1%
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 21%
- Mystic Remora 21%
Cards like Zimone, Paradox Sculptor
5.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Force of Will
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Force of Will 16%
- Force of Negation 13%
Cards like Duskshell Crawler
4.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Gnarlid Colony, Tuskguard Captain, Drix Fatemaker, Trollbred Guardian, Crowned Ceratok, Baloth Pup
Cards like Chord of Calling
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Collective Resistance
10× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Walking Ballista
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Lyla, Holographic Assistant
3.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Clinquant Skymage, Oneirophage, Ravenhill Flock
Cards like Reshape
4.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Reshape 22%
- Transmute Artifact 6%
Cards like Krark-Clan Ironworks
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Tarrian's Soulcleaver
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Extruder relevance 0.95 · 62.3% (384 of 616 decks)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 0.76 · 76.1% (469 of 616 decks)
- Clan Crafter relevance 0.89 · 57.1% (352 of 616 decks)
- Cryptic Trilobite relevance 0.86 · 55.7% (343 of 616 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.67 · 72.4% (446 of 616 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.79 · 53.9% (332 of 616 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.87 · 36.4% (224 of 616 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.56 · 76.1% (469 of 616 decks)
- Arcbound Ravager relevance 0.82 · 37.8% (233 of 616 decks)
- Tarrian's Soulcleaver relevance 0.59 · 67.7% (417 of 616 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest relevance 0.55 · 69.5% (428 of 616 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 0.68 · 46.9% (289 of 616 decks)
- Lonis, Cryptozoologist relevance 0.65 · 46.6% (287 of 616 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.70 · 25.6% (158 of 616 decks)
- Tangletrove Kelp relevance 0.64 · 32.8% (202 of 616 decks)
- Senator Peacock relevance 0.75 · 17.0% (105 of 616 decks)
- Five Hundred Year Diary relevance 0.68 · 25.8% (159 of 616 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.50 · 53.7% (331 of 616 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.60 · 36.0% (222 of 616 decks)
- Martha Jones relevance 0.73 · 16.7% (103 of 616 decks)
- Throne of Geth relevance 0.74 · 15.3% (94 of 616 decks)
- Donatello, the Brains relevance 0.67 · 23.1% (142 of 616 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.59 · 33.3% (205 of 616 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 0.59 · 32.3% (199 of 616 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.65 · 22.2% (137 of 616 decks)
- Maester Seymour relevance 0.63 · 23.9% (147 of 616 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.43 · 58.9% (363 of 616 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.67 · 14.4% (89 of 616 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.43 · 56.5% (348 of 616 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.56 · 29.5% (182 of 616 decks)
- Mutagen Man, Living Ooze relevance 0.53 · 33.1% (204 of 616 decks)
- Sarinth Steelseeker relevance 0.60 · 21.4% (132 of 616 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.51 · 36.0% (222 of 616 decks)
- Scurry Oak relevance 0.61 · 17.5% (108 of 616 decks)
- Ulvenwald Mysteries relevance 0.61 · 17.4% (107 of 616 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.49 · 39.0% (240 of 616 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.58 · 22.1% (136 of 616 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.44 · 45.3% (279 of 616 decks)
- Erdwal Illuminator relevance 0.57 · 20.9% (129 of 616 decks)
- Confront the Unknown relevance 0.63 · 12.5% (77 of 616 decks)
- Vigean Graftmage relevance 0.59 · 14.8% (91 of 616 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.55 · 20.9% (129 of 616 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 0.51 · 26.3% (162 of 616 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.39 · 51.3% (316 of 616 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.48 · 29.9% (184 of 616 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.51 · 22.1% (136 of 616 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.40 · 44.3% (273 of 616 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.52 · 19.2% (118 of 616 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.47 · 26.8% (165 of 616 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.33 · 62.5% (385 of 616 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Extruder relevance 0.95 · 62.3% (384 of 616 decks)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 0.76 · 76.1% (469 of 616 decks)
- Cryptic Trilobite relevance 0.86 · 55.7% (343 of 616 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.67 · 72.4% (446 of 616 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.56 · 76.1% (469 of 616 decks)
- Arcbound Ravager relevance 0.82 · 37.8% (233 of 616 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest relevance 0.55 · 69.5% (428 of 616 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 0.68 · 46.9% (289 of 616 decks)
- Lonis, Cryptozoologist relevance 0.65 · 46.6% (287 of 616 decks)
- Tangletrove Kelp relevance 0.64 · 32.8% (202 of 616 decks)
- Senator Peacock relevance 0.75 · 17.0% (105 of 616 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.50 · 53.7% (331 of 616 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.60 · 36.0% (222 of 616 decks)
- Martha Jones relevance 0.73 · 16.7% (103 of 616 decks)
- Donatello, the Brains relevance 0.67 · 23.1% (142 of 616 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 0.59 · 32.3% (199 of 616 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.65 · 22.2% (137 of 616 decks)
- Maester Seymour relevance 0.63 · 23.9% (147 of 616 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.43 · 58.9% (363 of 616 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.67 · 14.4% (89 of 616 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.43 · 56.5% (348 of 616 decks)
- Mutagen Man, Living Ooze relevance 0.53 · 33.1% (204 of 616 decks)
- Sarinth Steelseeker relevance 0.60 · 21.4% (132 of 616 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.51 · 36.0% (222 of 616 decks)
- Scurry Oak relevance 0.61 · 17.5% (108 of 616 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.49 · 39.0% (240 of 616 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.44 · 45.3% (279 of 616 decks)
- Erdwal Illuminator relevance 0.57 · 20.9% (129 of 616 decks)
- Vigean Graftmage relevance 0.59 · 14.8% (91 of 616 decks)
- Peregrin Took relevance 0.51 · 26.3% (162 of 616 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.39 · 51.3% (316 of 616 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.51 · 22.1% (136 of 616 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.40 · 44.3% (273 of 616 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.33 · 62.5% (385 of 616 decks)
- Nyssa of Traken relevance 0.65 · 6.0% (37 of 616 decks)
- Irma, Part-Time Mutant relevance 0.51 · 17.7% (109 of 616 decks)
- Displaced Dinosaurs relevance 0.56 · 10.9% (67 of 616 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.50 · 14.9% (92 of 616 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.49 · 17.0% (105 of 616 decks)
- Kellan, Inquisitive Prodigy // Tail the Suspect relevance 0.49 · 14.6% (90 of 616 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.42 · 27.3% (168 of 616 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.45 · 18.8% (116 of 616 decks)
- Ornery Tumblewagg relevance 0.52 · 10.2% (63 of 616 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.37 · 37.5% (231 of 616 decks)
- Danny Pink relevance 0.47 · 13.3% (82 of 616 decks)
- Graf Mole relevance 0.55 · 6.8% (42 of 616 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.40 · 26.1% (161 of 616 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.42 · 21.3% (131 of 616 decks)
- Pensive Professor relevance 0.43 · 19.0% (117 of 616 decks)
- Stridehangar Automaton relevance 0.50 · 7.3% (45 of 616 decks)
All artifacts (40)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.79 · 53.9% (332 of 616 decks)
- Grinding Station relevance 0.87 · 36.4% (224 of 616 decks)
- Tarrian's Soulcleaver relevance 0.59 · 67.7% (417 of 616 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.70 · 25.6% (158 of 616 decks)
- Five Hundred Year Diary relevance 0.68 · 25.8% (159 of 616 decks)
- Throne of Geth relevance 0.74 · 15.3% (94 of 616 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.59 · 33.3% (205 of 616 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.56 · 29.5% (182 of 616 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.52 · 19.2% (118 of 616 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.48 · 17.5% (108 of 616 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.32 · 47.6% (293 of 616 decks)
- Arcade Cabinet relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (46 of 616 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.50 · 7.3% (45 of 616 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.49 · 5.7% (35 of 616 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.43 · 9.3% (57 of 616 decks)
- Transmutation Font relevance 0.48 · 4.2% (26 of 616 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.32 · 17.4% (107 of 616 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.34 · 11.9% (73 of 616 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.23 · 41.1% (253 of 616 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (45 of 616 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.31 · 13.1% (81 of 616 decks)
- Radiant Lotus relevance 0.52 · 2.8% (17 of 616 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.30 · 12.0% (74 of 616 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.30 · 10.7% (66 of 616 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.30 · 10.6% (65 of 616 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.31 · 9.9% (61 of 616 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.27 · 13.6% (84 of 616 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.30 · 9.7% (60 of 616 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.30 · 7.8% (48 of 616 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.29 · 8.8% (54 of 616 decks)
- Magnifying Glass relevance 0.47 · 2.4% (15 of 616 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.31 · 4.1% (25 of 616 decks)
- Nuka-Cola Vending Machine relevance 0.37 · 2.9% (18 of 616 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.24 · 7.3% (45 of 616 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.21 · 13.8% (85 of 616 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.18 · 20.6% (127 of 616 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.18 · 15.9% (98 of 616 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.17 · 7.0% (43 of 616 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 67.0% (413 of 616 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 82.1% (506 of 616 decks)
All enchantments (43)
- Clan Crafter relevance 0.89 · 57.1% (352 of 616 decks)
- Ulvenwald Mysteries relevance 0.61 · 17.4% (107 of 616 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.48 · 22.9% (141 of 616 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.48 · 22.2% (137 of 616 decks)
- Fleeting Memories relevance 0.62 · 7.0% (43 of 616 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.47 · 14.8% (91 of 616 decks)
- Ongoing Investigation relevance 0.54 · 8.8% (54 of 616 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.41 · 27.3% (168 of 616 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.25 · 71.4% (440 of 616 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.35 · 29.5% (182 of 616 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.37 · 22.7% (140 of 616 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.29 · 38.8% (239 of 616 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.42 · 8.8% (54 of 616 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.32 · 23.2% (143 of 616 decks)
- On the Trail relevance 0.44 · 5.4% (33 of 616 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.42 · 7.0% (43 of 616 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.40 · 8.6% (53 of 616 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.27 · 29.9% (184 of 616 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.28 · 20.3% (125 of 616 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.32 · 8.3% (51 of 616 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.30 · 9.9% (61 of 616 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.25 · 20.6% (127 of 616 decks)
- Evolutionary Escalation relevance 0.48 · 2.4% (15 of 616 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.45 · 2.8% (17 of 616 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.27 · 10.1% (62 of 616 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.29 · 5.7% (35 of 616 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.22 · 20.6% (127 of 616 decks)
- Trail of Evidence relevance 0.42 · 2.4% (15 of 616 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (19 of 616 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.26 · 4.9% (30 of 616 decks)
- High Score relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (20 of 616 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.30 · 3.9% (24 of 616 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.32 · 2.6% (16 of 616 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (15 of 616 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (15 of 616 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (18 of 616 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (20 of 616 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.26 · 2.8% (17 of 616 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (16 of 616 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (16 of 616 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.22 · 2.9% (18 of 616 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (15 of 616 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (15 of 616 decks)
All instants (50)
- Confront the Unknown relevance 0.63 · 12.5% (77 of 616 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.48 · 29.9% (184 of 616 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.51 · 16.2% (100 of 616 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.45 · 26.6% (164 of 616 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.49 · 13.8% (85 of 616 decks)
- Invigorating Surge relevance 0.50 · 9.1% (56 of 616 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.41 · 18.8% (116 of 616 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.40 · 15.1% (93 of 616 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.35 · 26.3% (162 of 616 decks)
- Rampage of the Clans relevance 0.50 · 5.2% (32 of 616 decks)
- Deduce relevance 0.47 · 7.5% (46 of 616 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.36 · 23.4% (144 of 616 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.36 · 15.4% (95 of 616 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.41 · 7.0% (43 of 616 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 0.49 · 4.1% (25 of 616 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.32 · 18.2% (112 of 616 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.35 · 12.0% (74 of 616 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.27 · 30.2% (186 of 616 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.37 · 8.1% (50 of 616 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.30 · 16.9% (104 of 616 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.32 · 13.5% (83 of 616 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.22 · 46.6% (287 of 616 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.28 · 20.1% (124 of 616 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.31 · 12.7% (78 of 616 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.29 · 16.1% (99 of 616 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.32 · 10.1% (62 of 616 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.32 · 10.1% (62 of 616 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.32 · 8.8% (54 of 616 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.30 · 11.5% (71 of 616 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.29 · 12.7% (78 of 616 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.25 · 20.5% (126 of 616 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.24 · 23.5% (145 of 616 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.39 · 3.9% (24 of 616 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.30 · 7.3% (45 of 616 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (31 of 616 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.22 · 27.1% (167 of 616 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.19 · 43.5% (268 of 616 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.21 · 32.0% (197 of 616 decks)
- Solidarity of Heroes relevance 0.41 · 3.1% (19 of 616 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.22 · 26.6% (164 of 616 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.30 · 5.5% (34 of 616 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.30 · 5.4% (33 of 616 decks)
- Intuition relevance 0.41 · 2.9% (18 of 616 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.30 · 5.4% (33 of 616 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.27 · 8.6% (53 of 616 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.27 · 7.3% (45 of 616 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.35 · 3.6% (22 of 616 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (19 of 616 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.23 · 12.8% (79 of 616 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (28 of 616 decks)
All sorceries (38)
- Reshape relevance 0.58 · 22.1% (136 of 616 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.55 · 20.9% (129 of 616 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.47 · 26.8% (165 of 616 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.47 · 24.0% (148 of 616 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.41 · 29.4% (181 of 616 decks)
- Follow the Bodies relevance 0.57 · 6.0% (37 of 616 decks)
- Over the Edge relevance 0.49 · 9.3% (57 of 616 decks)
- They Went This Way relevance 0.52 · 5.7% (35 of 616 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.43 · 9.4% (58 of 616 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.29 · 27.9% (172 of 616 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.46 · 4.2% (26 of 616 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.38 · 6.2% (38 of 616 decks)
- Root Out relevance 0.48 · 3.4% (21 of 616 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.34 · 6.3% (39 of 616 decks)
- Hard Evidence relevance 0.45 · 3.4% (21 of 616 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.29 · 10.6% (65 of 616 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.32 · 6.7% (41 of 616 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.35 · 4.5% (28 of 616 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (32 of 616 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.25 · 14.4% (89 of 616 decks)
- Give // Take relevance 0.39 · 3.2% (20 of 616 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.23 · 14.1% (87 of 616 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (31 of 616 decks)
- True Ancestry relevance 0.40 · 2.4% (15 of 616 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.25 · 7.8% (48 of 616 decks)
- Visions of Dominance relevance 0.39 · 2.4% (15 of 616 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.32 · 2.9% (18 of 616 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.17 · 15.9% (98 of 616 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.15 · 27.1% (167 of 616 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.16 · 17.7% (109 of 616 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.27 · 2.9% (18 of 616 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (123 of 616 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.14 · 12.5% (77 of 616 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.12 · 21.9% (135 of 616 decks)
- Oversimplify relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (16 of 616 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (15 of 616 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.19 · 2.9% (18 of 616 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (16 of 616 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.52 · 5.8% (36 of 616 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.43 · 6.8% (42 of 616 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.39 · 10.7% (66 of 616 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.42 · 5.5% (34 of 616 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.31 · 7.3% (45 of 616 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.31 · 6.7% (41 of 616 decks)
All utility lands (44)
- Animal Sanctuary relevance 0.70 · 12.0% (74 of 616 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.51 · 37.3% (230 of 616 decks)
- Kitchen relevance 0.55 · 12.7% (78 of 616 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.44 · 15.7% (97 of 616 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.40 · 24.2% (149 of 616 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.44 · 13.5% (83 of 616 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.51 · 5.2% (32 of 616 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.38 · 18.2% (112 of 616 decks)
- Vastwood Fortification // Vastwood Thicket relevance 0.46 · 5.0% (31 of 616 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.31 · 27.6% (170 of 616 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.37 · 11.4% (70 of 616 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.37 · 8.3% (51 of 616 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.24 · 35.7% (220 of 616 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.33 · 8.9% (55 of 616 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.24 · 29.5% (182 of 616 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.27 · 15.7% (97 of 616 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.33 · 6.7% (41 of 616 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.31 · 8.9% (55 of 616 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.23 · 25.6% (158 of 616 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.29 · 8.6% (53 of 616 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.41 · 3.1% (19 of 616 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.25 · 14.8% (91 of 616 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.29 · 6.5% (40 of 616 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.21 · 27.8% (171 of 616 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (34 of 616 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.40 · 2.4% (15 of 616 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.25 · 7.6% (47 of 616 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.20 · 14.9% (92 of 616 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (43 of 616 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (44 of 616 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.17 · 17.5% (108 of 616 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.18 · 14.0% (86 of 616 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.27 · 3.1% (19 of 616 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.23 · 3.9% (24 of 616 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.19 · 6.7% (41 of 616 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (22 of 616 decks)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (16 of 616 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (103 of 616 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.11 · 37.3% (230 of 616 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.24 · 2.8% (17 of 616 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (30 of 616 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.24 · 2.6% (16 of 616 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (23 of 616 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.14 · 4.4% (27 of 616 decks)
All lands (48)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.44 · 29.7% (183 of 616 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.43 · 31.2% (192 of 616 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.48 · 10.1% (62 of 616 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.37 · 8.1% (50 of 616 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.31 · 12.2% (75 of 616 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.34 · 7.1% (44 of 616 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.31 · 10.6% (65 of 616 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.26 · 18.5% (114 of 616 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.30 · 9.6% (59 of 616 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.25 · 20.3% (125 of 616 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.28 · 11.9% (73 of 616 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.31 · 7.1% (44 of 616 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.28 · 8.3% (51 of 616 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.22 · 22.7% (140 of 616 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.26 · 11.7% (72 of 616 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.25 · 12.3% (76 of 616 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.19 · 36.0% (222 of 616 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.25 · 10.9% (67 of 616 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.26 · 9.9% (61 of 616 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.20 · 27.4% (169 of 616 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.26 · 9.3% (57 of 616 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.26 · 8.8% (54 of 616 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.21 · 19.6% (121 of 616 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.18 · 36.0% (222 of 616 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.14 · 45.8% (282 of 616 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (29 of 616 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.13 · 47.7% (294 of 616 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.12 · 53.6% (330 of 616 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.11 · 62.7% (386 of 616 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (37 of 616 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.12 · 46.3% (285 of 616 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (23 of 616 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.17 · 11.7% (72 of 616 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.13 · 32.0% (197 of 616 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.19 · 6.2% (38 of 616 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.13 · 26.0% (160 of 616 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.16 · 7.6% (47 of 616 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (15 of 616 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.16 · 7.5% (46 of 616 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (17 of 616 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.08 · 62.0% (382 of 616 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (33 of 616 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.20 · 2.9% (18 of 616 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.16 · 3.7% (23 of 616 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (22 of 616 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 83.6% (515 of 616 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 90.7% (559 of 616 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 91.2% (562 of 616 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Lonis, Genetics Expert, from 616 real Commander decks.