Cards like Open the Armory
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Sword of Feast and Famine
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Arahbo, the First Fang
6.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Stoneforge Mystic
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Sram, Senior Edificer
5.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Heroic Intervention
2.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Selesnya decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.47 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Basilisk Collar
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
2.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. 28% of other Selesnya decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 63%
- Lightning Greaves 34%
Cards like Quietus Spike
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Quietus Spike 16%
- Scytheclaw 6%
Cards like Beast Within
1.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 39% of other Selesnya decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 19% of other Selesnya decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Beast Within 53%
- Generous Gift 34%
Cards like Sword of the Animist
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Eladamri's Call
1.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Eladamri's Call 19%
- Worldly Tutor 19%
- Sylvan Tutor 3%
Cards like Mithril Coat
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Mithril Coat 28%
- Darksteel Plate 13%
Cards like Snake Umbra
15× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Snake Umbra 19%
- Keen Sense 16%
Cards like Cultivate
1.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 54% of other Selesnya decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. 32% of other Selesnya decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Cultivate 38%
- Rampant Growth 34%
- Kodama's Reach 28%
- Traverse the Outlands 3%
- Peregrination 3%
- Search for Tomorrow 3%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Grow from the Ashes, Nissa's Expedition, Slimefoot's Survey, Shared Roots, Explosive Vegetation, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Migration Path, Celebrate the Harvest, Path to the Festival, Boundless Realms, New Generation's Technique, Harvest Season, Reshape the Earth
Cards like Armadillo Cloak
13× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Behemoth Sledge
8.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Behemoth Sledge 22%
- Loxodon Warhammer 13%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Selesnya decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Ranger's Path, Field Trip, Hunting Wilds, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Winds of Rath
4.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Winds of Rath 16%
- Wrath of God 9%
- Vanquish the Horde 3%
- Day of Judgment 3%
- Rout 3%
Other options: Doomskar, End Hostilities, Sublime Exhalation
Cards like Toski, Bearer of Secrets
2.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Oakhame Adversary, Ohran Viper
Cards like Argentum Armor
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Argentum Armor 25%
- Ultima Weapon 3%
- Meteor Sword 3%
Cards like Lion Sash
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Robe of Stars
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Robe of Stars 19%
- Haystack 3%
Cards like Spirit Mantle
18× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Spirit Mantle 22%
- Holy Mantle 3%
Cards like Flawless Maneuver
4.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Enchantress's Presence
1.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Selesnya decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Wild Growth
1.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Verdant Haven, Market Festival, Glittering Frost, Dawn's Reflection, Blighted Burgeoning, Overgrowth
Cards like Sheltered by Ghosts
2.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: On Thin Ice, Hardlight Containment, Faith Unbroken, Chained to the Rocks, Ossification
Cards like Sol Ring
1.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
94% of decks run one or more
vs. 73% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.75 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Ethereal Armor
1.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Setessan Champion
1.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Mother of Runes
1.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Selesnya decks
All top picks (50)
- Puresteel Paladin relevance 0.26 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Feline Sovereign relevance 0.32 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Balan, Wandering Knight relevance 0.32 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Nazahn, Revered Bladesmith relevance 0.31 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Stoneforge Mystic relevance 0.28 · 46.9% (15 of 32 decks)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.22 · 68.8% (22 of 32 decks)
- Armored Skyhunter relevance 0.29 · 40.6% (13 of 32 decks)
- Steelshaper's Gift relevance 0.26 · 50.0% (16 of 32 decks)
- Arahbo, the First Fang relevance 0.30 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Leonin Warleader relevance 0.30 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.27 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.22 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Argentum Armor relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.30 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Regal Caracal relevance 0.28 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Sword of Fire and Ice relevance 0.27 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Forge Anew relevance 0.27 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.29 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.26 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Lion Sash relevance 0.25 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Sigarda's Aid relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (16 of 32 decks)
- Sram, Senior Edificer relevance 0.19 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- O-Naginata relevance 0.31 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Inquisitorial Rosette relevance 0.31 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Pride Sovereign relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Stonehewer Giant relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Sword of Light and Shadow relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Open the Armory relevance 0.18 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.25 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Arahbo, Roar of the World relevance 0.30 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Leonin Shikari relevance 0.26 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Nazgûl Battle-Mace relevance 0.28 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Sovereign Okinec Ahau relevance 0.24 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Grappling Hook relevance 0.27 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Masterwork of Ingenuity relevance 0.26 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Kemba, Kha Regent relevance 0.26 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.24 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Quietus Spike relevance 0.26 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Codsworth, Handy Helper relevance 0.24 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Cloud, Midgar Mercenary relevance 0.25 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Infiltration Lens relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Godsend relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.21 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.20 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.23 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Gorgon Flail relevance 0.27 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Brimaz, King of Oreskos relevance 0.24 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Leonin Abunas relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Pip-Boy 3000 relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.18 · 43.8% (14 of 32 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Puresteel Paladin relevance 0.26 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Feline Sovereign relevance 0.32 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Balan, Wandering Knight relevance 0.32 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Nazahn, Revered Bladesmith relevance 0.31 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Stoneforge Mystic relevance 0.28 · 46.9% (15 of 32 decks)
- Armored Skyhunter relevance 0.29 · 40.6% (13 of 32 decks)
- Arahbo, the First Fang relevance 0.30 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Leonin Warleader relevance 0.30 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.30 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Regal Caracal relevance 0.28 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Lion Sash relevance 0.25 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Sram, Senior Edificer relevance 0.19 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Pride Sovereign relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Stonehewer Giant relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Arahbo, Roar of the World relevance 0.30 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Leonin Shikari relevance 0.26 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Sovereign Okinec Ahau relevance 0.24 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Kemba, Kha Regent relevance 0.26 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.24 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Codsworth, Handy Helper relevance 0.24 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Cloud, Midgar Mercenary relevance 0.25 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Brimaz, King of Oreskos relevance 0.24 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Leonin Abunas relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 0.23 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- King of the Pride relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Qasali Slingers relevance 0.23 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Whitemane Lion relevance 0.25 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 0.25 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Nacatl War-Pride relevance 0.25 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Kemba, Kha Enduring relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Taj-Nar Swordsmith relevance 0.24 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Sigarda, Host of Herons relevance 0.22 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Halvar, God of Battle // Sword of the Realms relevance 0.21 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Recruiter of the Guard relevance 0.23 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Knight of Glory relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Ocelot Pride relevance 0.21 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Aven Squire relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Masako the Humorless relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Jazal Goldmane relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Qasali Pridemage relevance 0.19 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Kutzil's Flanker relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- The Wandering Rescuer relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Kutzil, Malamet Exemplar relevance 0.11 · 75.0% (24 of 32 decks)
- Prowling Serpopard relevance 0.21 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Danitha, New Benalia's Light relevance 0.17 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Brawn relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Armory Automaton relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Grand Abolisher relevance 0.18 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Hammer of Nazahn relevance 0.22 · 68.8% (22 of 32 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.27 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.22 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Argentum Armor relevance 0.30 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Sword of Fire and Ice relevance 0.27 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.29 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.26 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- O-Naginata relevance 0.31 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Inquisitorial Rosette relevance 0.31 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Sword of Light and Shadow relevance 0.28 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.25 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Nazgûl Battle-Mace relevance 0.28 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Grappling Hook relevance 0.27 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Masterwork of Ingenuity relevance 0.26 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Quietus Spike relevance 0.26 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Infiltration Lens relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Godsend relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.21 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.20 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.23 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Gorgon Flail relevance 0.27 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Pip-Boy 3000 relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.18 · 43.8% (14 of 32 decks)
- Kusari-Gama relevance 0.26 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Sword of Sinew and Steel relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.20 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Bloodforged Battle-Axe relevance 0.23 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Thran Power Suit relevance 0.22 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.25 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.21 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.24 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.19 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Behemoth Sledge relevance 0.20 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.19 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.19 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Inquisitor's Flail relevance 0.23 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.19 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Silver Shroud Costume relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Kaldra Compleat relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.20 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- The Irencrag relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.19 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.12 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Robe of Stars relevance 0.18 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.19 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Scytheclaw relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Chitinous Cloak relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.19 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Forge Anew relevance 0.27 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Sigarda's Aid relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (16 of 32 decks)
- Well Rested relevance 0.22 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Mirri's Guile relevance 0.22 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Glare of Subdual relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- With Great Power . . . relevance 0.21 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Angelic Benediction relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Pariah relevance 0.21 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.18 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.18 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Angelic Exaltation relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Gift of Immortality relevance 0.18 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.17 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Privileged Position relevance 0.17 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Strong Back relevance 0.16 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 0.17 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.15 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.17 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Shield of the Oversoul relevance 0.13 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Paladin Class relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Crystalline Armor relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Celestial Mantle relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Spectra Ward relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Momentum relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Compulsory Rest relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Hanna's Custody relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Folk Hero relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Mantle of the Ancients relevance 0.12 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Spirit Mantle relevance 0.12 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Unflinching Courage relevance 0.13 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Super State relevance 0.14 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.12 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Commander's Insignia relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Leader's Talent relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Oppressive Rays relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Quarantine Field relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Flickering Ward relevance 0.14 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.11 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Idolized relevance 0.14 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Sixth Sense relevance 0.14 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Canopy Cover relevance 0.13 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Benevolent Blessing relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Armadillo Cloak relevance 0.12 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Darksteel Mutation relevance 0.12 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Hold for Ransom relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
All instants (50)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.19 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Flare of Fortitude relevance 0.21 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.20 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Unexpectedly Absent relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Return to Dust relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Argivian Find relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Rebuff the Wicked relevance 0.19 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Battlefield Improvisation relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.17 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.15 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.12 · 53.1% (17 of 32 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.15 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Avoid Fate relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.17 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Nature's Chant relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.17 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.15 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- White Sun's Zenith relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.11 · 46.9% (15 of 32 decks)
- Disenchant relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.12 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Brought Back relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.13 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Pledge of Unity relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.13 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Collected Company relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Airbender's Reversal relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Cache Grab relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Restoration Magic relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Final Showdown relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Once Upon a Time relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Hallow relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Congregation at Dawn relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Cosmic Intervention relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Reverent Mantra relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Pawpatch Formation relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Emergency Eject relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Wing Shards relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Crib Swap relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Brave the Elements relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.11 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.08 · 40.6% (13 of 32 decks)
- Loran's Escape relevance 0.10 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Steelshaper's Gift relevance 0.26 · 50.0% (16 of 32 decks)
- Open the Armory relevance 0.18 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.18 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Avatar's Wrath relevance 0.19 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.16 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.14 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Split Up relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.16 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Divine Reckoning relevance 0.16 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.17 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.17 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Dusk // Dawn relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.13 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Unfinished Business relevance 0.16 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.16 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.13 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.13 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Retether relevance 0.14 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Flower // Flourish relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Gather the Pack relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Peregrination relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Abundant Harvest relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Repair and Recharge relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Safewright Quest relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Adventurous Impulse relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Caravan Vigil relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Enlarge relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Slash the Ranks relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Winds of Rath relevance 0.11 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Terminus relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Shatter the Sky relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Fragmentize relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Restoration Seminar relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Recommission relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Time of Need relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Raise the Past relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Rout relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Sanctify relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Open the Vaults relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Single Combat relevance 0.09 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Fumigate relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (12)
- Archangel Elspeth relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Ajani, Adversary of Tyrants relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Ajani, Caller of the Pride relevance 0.16 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- The Eternal Wanderer relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Gideon of the Trials relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Garruk, Unleashed relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Nahiri, the Lithomancer relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Ajani Steadfast relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Elspeth Resplendent relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.08 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ixalan // Belligerent Regisaur relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.27 · 34.4% (11 of 32 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.25 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.24 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.24 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Daily Bugle Building relevance 0.23 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Windbrisk Heights relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Ice Floe relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Kor Haven relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Animal Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.20 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Cathedral of War relevance 0.18 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.19 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.16 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.15 · 28.1% (9 of 32 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.18 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Labyrinth of Skophos relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.16 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.15 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Roadside Reliquary relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.15 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.09 · 75.0% (24 of 32 decks)
- Adagia, Windswept Bastion relevance 0.16 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.14 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.14 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.15 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.12 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Secluded Steppe relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.13 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Drannith Ruins relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- The Gold Saucer relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Mystifying Maze relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.13 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Drifting Meadow relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.09 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Hall of the Bandit Lord relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Hall of Oracles relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.09 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
All lands (50)
- Savannah relevance 0.17 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.14 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (16 of 32 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.15 · 31.3% (10 of 32 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.18 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.17 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Dowsing Dagger // Lost Vale relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.09 · 62.5% (20 of 32 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.14 · 18.8% (6 of 32 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.11 · 46.9% (15 of 32 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.11 · 43.8% (14 of 32 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.09 · 59.4% (19 of 32 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.13 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (4 of 32 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.08 · 43.8% (14 of 32 decks)
- Ancient Den relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Holdout Settlement relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.11 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Flagstones of Trokair relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.05 · 81.3% (26 of 32 decks)
- Saltcrusted Steppe relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.06 · 56.3% (18 of 32 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.07 · 43.8% (14 of 32 decks)
- Gathering Place relevance 0.11 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Unclaimed Territory relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Tranquil Expanse relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.06 · 37.5% (12 of 32 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Grasslands relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.04 · 71.9% (23 of 32 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.07 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.08 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.08 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.08 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.06 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.07 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.01 · 87.5% (28 of 32 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Mirri, Weatherlight Duelist, from 32 real Commander decks.