Cards like Trophy Mage
5.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards like Clone
13× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Clone 26%
- Mirror Image 23%
- Stunt Double 23%
- Waxen Shapethief 6%
Other options: Sakashima's Protege
Cards like Cackling Counterpart
7.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: See Double, Self-Reflection
Cards like Arcane Adaptation
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards like Aphetto Alchemist
4.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Jandor's Saddlebags, Magewright's Stone, Synod Artificer, Puppet Strings, Voltaic Construct
Cards like Gilded Lotus
4.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards like Gogo, Master of Mimicry
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards like Crystal Shard
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Crystal Shard 29%
- Erratic Portal 10%
Cards like Liquimetal Torque
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards like Fabricate
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 48%
- Scour for Scrap 13%
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
5.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Aetherize
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards like Irenicus's Vile Duplication
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards like Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass
2.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Archaeomancer
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Scrivener
Cards like Tezzeret the Seeker
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Azami, Lady of Scrolls
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sky Diamond
1.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sky Diamond 23%
- Prismatic Lens 10%
- Coldsteel Heart 3%
- Star Compass 3%
Other options: Corrupted Grafstone, Guardian Idol, Obsidian Obelisk
Cards like Grand Architect
7.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Solemn Simulacrum
3.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Clever Impersonator
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Unsummon
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
- Unsummon 26%
- Repulse 3%
- Unsubstantiate 3%
Other options: Drag Under, Unexplained Disappearance, Voyage's End, Ephara's Dispersal, Galestrike, Stern Dismissal, Force Away, Fading Hope, Just the Wind, Consuming Vortex, Ice Magic, Drown in Shapelessness, Symbol of Unsummoning, Sweep Away, Arrester's Admonition, Select for Inspection
All top picks (50)
- Supplant Form relevance 0.41 · 51.6% (16 of 31 decks)
- Myr Reservoir relevance 0.44 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Ashes of the Fallen relevance 0.46 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.28 · 45.2% (14 of 31 decks)
- Campfire relevance 0.31 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 0.25 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.28 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Library of Leng relevance 0.27 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.25 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.27 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.26 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Reconstruction relevance 0.28 · 19.4% (6 of 31 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.24 · 35.5% (11 of 31 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.25 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.21 · 48.4% (15 of 31 decks)
- Artificial Evolution relevance 0.28 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.27 · 19.4% (6 of 31 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.23 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Myr Galvanizer relevance 0.27 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.20 · 45.2% (14 of 31 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.22 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Salvager of Ruin relevance 0.28 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Recall relevance 0.25 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.20 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.20 · 35.5% (11 of 31 decks)
- Mirror Gallery relevance 0.24 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Clone relevance 0.21 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Myr Turbine relevance 0.24 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Mirror Image relevance 0.21 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.23 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.21 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.23 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Sword of Light and Shadow relevance 0.23 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.19 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 0.23 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- The Peregrine Dynamo relevance 0.24 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.21 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.18 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.21 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Telekinetic Bonds relevance 0.25 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.18 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Aether Adept relevance 0.22 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Gogo, Master of Mimicry relevance 0.20 · 19.4% (6 of 31 decks)
- Myr Welder relevance 0.23 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.21 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.19 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.19 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Erratic Portal relevance 0.23 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 0.20 · 19.4% (6 of 31 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.19 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 0.25 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.25 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.26 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.21 · 48.4% (15 of 31 decks)
- Myr Galvanizer relevance 0.27 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Salvager of Ruin relevance 0.28 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.20 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.20 · 35.5% (11 of 31 decks)
- Clone relevance 0.21 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Mirror Image relevance 0.21 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.21 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.19 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- The Peregrine Dynamo relevance 0.24 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.18 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Aether Adept relevance 0.22 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Gogo, Master of Mimicry relevance 0.20 · 19.4% (6 of 31 decks)
- Myr Welder relevance 0.23 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Vedalken Aethermage relevance 0.20 · 19.4% (6 of 31 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.19 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.13 · 61.3% (19 of 31 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.19 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Vedalken Mastermind relevance 0.22 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.16 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.15 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Shapesharer relevance 0.20 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Filigree Sages relevance 0.19 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Myr Kinsmith relevance 0.21 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Grand Architect relevance 0.17 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Myr Landshaper relevance 0.20 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Containment Construct relevance 0.19 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro relevance 0.20 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Undercover Operative relevance 0.17 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.17 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 0.18 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.15 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.13 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Noble Benefactor relevance 0.18 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Vesuvan Doppelganger relevance 0.17 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Pili-Pala relevance 0.16 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Naban, Dean of Iteration relevance 0.16 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.14 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Alloy Myr relevance 0.16 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 0.14 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Archaeomender relevance 0.16 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Fatestitcher relevance 0.15 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Echo, Perceptive Prodigy relevance 0.16 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Memnarch relevance 0.15 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.14 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.14 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Exclusion Mage relevance 0.15 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Myr Reservoir relevance 0.44 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Ashes of the Fallen relevance 0.46 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.28 · 45.2% (14 of 31 decks)
- Campfire relevance 0.31 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.28 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Library of Leng relevance 0.27 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.25 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.23 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.22 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Mirror Gallery relevance 0.24 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Myr Turbine relevance 0.24 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.23 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.23 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Sword of Light and Shadow relevance 0.23 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.18 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.21 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.21 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.19 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Erratic Portal relevance 0.23 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.17 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- The Enigma Jewel // Locus of Enlightenment relevance 0.16 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- The Underworld Cookbook relevance 0.18 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass relevance 0.15 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.13 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.13 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.13 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 0.13 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.13 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Liquimetal Coating relevance 0.14 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Whetstone relevance 0.15 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.13 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Soldevi Digger relevance 0.15 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Prismatic Lens relevance 0.13 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Contagion Engine relevance 0.13 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.13 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.12 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.12 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Minion Reflector relevance 0.14 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Thran Foundry relevance 0.14 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.13 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.11 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Orb of Dreams relevance 0.13 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.10 · 19.4% (6 of 31 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.09 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Soul Foundry relevance 0.13 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Tablet of Compleation relevance 0.12 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Planar Portal relevance 0.12 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.10 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Key to the Side-Door relevance 0.12 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Portal of Sanctuary relevance 0.12 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
All enchantments (42)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.27 · 19.4% (6 of 31 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 0.23 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Telekinetic Bonds relevance 0.25 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Leyline of Transformation relevance 0.21 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.18 · 19.4% (6 of 31 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.16 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.16 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Back from the Brink relevance 0.19 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.16 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.17 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.13 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Artificer's Intuition relevance 0.15 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.13 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Sunken Hope relevance 0.14 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.12 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.09 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.11 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Dance of Many relevance 0.12 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.11 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Soothsaying relevance 0.11 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Exchange of Words relevance 0.11 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Parallel Thoughts relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.10 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- The Phasing of Zhalfir relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Mystic Redaction relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.08 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.07 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.08 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.08 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.06 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.08 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.07 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.07 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.07 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.06 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Fraying Sanity relevance 0.06 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.05 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.05 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.05 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.05 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.05 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
All instants (50)
- Supplant Form relevance 0.41 · 51.6% (16 of 31 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.24 · 35.5% (11 of 31 decks)
- Artificial Evolution relevance 0.28 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.19 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.18 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.17 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.13 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.12 · 45.2% (14 of 31 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 0.18 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 0.18 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Curfew relevance 0.18 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.13 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.13 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.14 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.11 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Spell Snip relevance 0.16 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.14 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Arcane Epiphany relevance 0.15 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Bounce Off relevance 0.14 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.11 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.12 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.11 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.12 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.10 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Boing! relevance 0.13 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.08 · 41.9% (13 of 31 decks)
- Squelch relevance 0.12 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Absorb Identity relevance 0.12 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.11 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.09 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Disappearing Act relevance 0.11 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- String of Disappearances relevance 0.11 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.09 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.08 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.10 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.07 · 45.2% (14 of 31 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.09 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.10 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.08 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.07 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Remove Soul relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.09 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.09 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Sapphire Charm relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Spectral Interference relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.09 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.07 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.06 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.09 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.09 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Reconstruction relevance 0.28 · 19.4% (6 of 31 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.20 · 45.2% (14 of 31 decks)
- Recall relevance 0.25 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.21 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.17 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.12 · 48.4% (15 of 31 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.13 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.14 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.13 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Path of the Enigma relevance 0.16 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 0.14 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Mists of Lórien relevance 0.14 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.12 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.13 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.13 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.11 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.10 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.11 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Library of Lat-Nam relevance 0.12 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.11 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.09 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.10 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.08 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Mass Appeal relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.09 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Silent Departure relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Silver Scrutiny relevance 0.09 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.07 · 19.4% (6 of 31 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 0.09 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Mirage Mockery relevance 0.09 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Call to Mind relevance 0.09 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.08 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.08 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Sakashima's Will relevance 0.08 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.08 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.08 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.08 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Nanogene Conversion relevance 0.08 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.08 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Inundate relevance 0.07 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Flood of Recollection relevance 0.07 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.07 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.07 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.07 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.07 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.07 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.06 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Cut Your Losses relevance 0.06 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Tasha's Hideous Laughter relevance 0.06 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.27 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.17 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.10 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Jace, Vryn's Prodigy // Jace, Telepath Unbound relevance 0.08 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.04 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.35 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.29 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.20 · 61.3% (19 of 31 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.22 · 38.7% (12 of 31 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.20 · 48.4% (15 of 31 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.22 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.15 · 19.4% (6 of 31 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.16 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Haunted Fengraf relevance 0.18 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.15 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.13 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.13 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.13 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.13 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.11 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.12 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.12 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.13 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.12 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.10 · 29.0% (9 of 31 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.10 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.12 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.09 · 32.3% (10 of 31 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.11 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.10 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.09 · 25.8% (8 of 31 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.09 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.09 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Sequestered Stash relevance 0.12 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.10 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Springjack Pasture relevance 0.11 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.10 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Hall of Echoes relevance 0.11 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Study Hall relevance 0.11 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.11 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Winding Canyons relevance 0.11 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.09 · 12.9% (4 of 31 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.10 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Eden, Seat of the Sanctum relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.06 · 48.4% (15 of 31 decks)
- Moonring Island relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Blighted Cataract relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Urza's Factory relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.09 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Magosi, the Waterveil relevance 0.09 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.09 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Skyline Cascade relevance 0.08 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Memorial to Genius relevance 0.08 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
All lands (25)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.09 · 22.6% (7 of 31 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.09 · 16.1% (5 of 31 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.09 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Thaumatic Compass // Spires of Orazca relevance 0.10 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.08 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.09 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Urza's Workshop relevance 0.08 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.08 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.07 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.07 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.07 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.07 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.06 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.06 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.06 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.06 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.06 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.05 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.05 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.05 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.05 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.05 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.05 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.05 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 83.9% (26 of 31 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Linessa, Zephyr Mage, from 31 real Commander decks.