Cards like Memnite
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
89% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
82% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Memnite 89%
- Phyrexian Walker 82%
Cards like Mishra's Bauble
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
93% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
77% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mishra's Bauble 91%
- Urza's Bauble 80%
Cards like Cathar's Shield
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
73% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Cathar's Shield 77%
- Accorder's Shield 75%
Cards like Welding Jar
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
93% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
68% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Welding Jar 91%
- Herbal Poultice 70%
Cards like Zuran Orb
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
52% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Zuran Orb 70%
- Claws of Gix 61%
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
8.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards like Riddlesmith
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Riddlesmith 50%
- Vedalken Archmage 25%
Cards like Spellbook
3.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
95% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other blue decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.62 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Preordain
4.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other blue decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Preordain 48%
- Serum Visions 41%
Other options: Deliberate, Scour All Possibilities, Foresee, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Stonecoil Serpent
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Stonecoil Serpent 36%
- Shifting Wall 16%
- Phyrexian Marauder 11%
Cards like Retract
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Retract 34%
- Hurkyl's Recall 18%
Cards like Wayfarer's Bauble
6.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
- Wayfarer's Bauble 25%
- Expedition Map 14%
- Traveler's Amulet 9%
- World Map 5%
- Wanderer's Twig 5%
- Moonsilver Key 2%
- Keys to the House 2%
- Renegade Map 2%
Other options: Armillary Sphere, Braidwood Sextant, Ominous Parcel
Cards like Hangarback Walker
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Opt
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Chimeric Mass
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Chimeric Mass 25%
- Orochi Hatchery 16%
Cards like Lotus Petal
13× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
- Lotus Petal 73%
- Lion's Eye Diamond 11%
Cards like Pongify
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 45%
- Rapid Hybridization 41%
Cards like Mystical Tutor
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Etherium Sculptor
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate
Cards like Sol Ring
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
93% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards like Ponder
7.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Mana Severance
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Distant Memories, Manipulate Fate, Foresight
Cards like Mystic Forge
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Gitaxian Probe
3.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Amphibian Downpour
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Amphibian Downpour 36%
- Frogify 2%
Cards like Chrome Mox
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 23%
- Mox Diamond 7%
Cards like Ornithopter
6.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
95% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards like Mind Stone
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mind Stone 32%
- Chromatic Sphere 14%
All top picks (50)
- Accorder's Shield relevance 0.50 · 75.0% (33 of 44 decks)
- Cathar's Shield relevance 0.48 · 77.3% (34 of 44 decks)
- Kite Shield relevance 0.51 · 68.2% (30 of 44 decks)
- Spidersilk Net relevance 0.47 · 72.7% (32 of 44 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.45 · 70.5% (31 of 44 decks)
- Bone Saw relevance 0.43 · 72.7% (32 of 44 decks)
- Dark Sphere relevance 0.46 · 65.9% (29 of 44 decks)
- Fountain of Youth relevance 0.45 · 68.2% (30 of 44 decks)
- Herbal Poultice relevance 0.44 · 70.5% (31 of 44 decks)
- Surge of Brilliance relevance 0.50 · 52.3% (23 of 44 decks)
- Mana Severance relevance 0.48 · 54.5% (24 of 44 decks)
- Geralf, the Fleshwright relevance 0.51 · 45.5% (20 of 44 decks)
- Phyrexian Walker relevance 0.34 · 81.8% (36 of 44 decks)
- Claws of Gix relevance 0.41 · 61.4% (27 of 44 decks)
- Delif's Cone relevance 0.46 · 50.0% (22 of 44 decks)
- Paradise Mantle relevance 0.35 · 77.3% (34 of 44 decks)
- Darksteel Relic relevance 0.38 · 68.2% (30 of 44 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.30 · 86.4% (38 of 44 decks)
- Memnite relevance 0.29 · 88.6% (39 of 44 decks)
- Artificer's Assistant relevance 0.32 · 70.5% (31 of 44 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.44 · 34.1% (15 of 44 decks)
- Retract relevance 0.42 · 34.1% (15 of 44 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 0.35 · 50.0% (22 of 44 decks)
- Gustha's Scepter relevance 0.43 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Lodestone Bauble relevance 0.39 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Endless One relevance 0.45 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Paradoxical Outcome relevance 0.34 · 47.7% (21 of 44 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.31 · 56.8% (25 of 44 decks)
- Briber's Purse relevance 0.40 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.24 · 77.3% (34 of 44 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.34 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- Chimeric Mass relevance 0.40 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Welding Jar relevance 0.21 · 90.9% (40 of 44 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.23 · 79.5% (35 of 44 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 0.35 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Jace Reawakened relevance 0.40 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.33 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Sigil of Distinction relevance 0.38 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.35 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Shifting Wall relevance 0.37 · 15.9% (7 of 44 decks)
- Orochi Hatchery relevance 0.37 · 15.9% (7 of 44 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.18 · 95.5% (42 of 44 decks)
- Omarthis, Ghostfire Initiate relevance 0.39 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
- Engineered Explosives relevance 0.34 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Osgood, Operation Double relevance 0.34 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.26 · 50.0% (22 of 44 decks)
- Ghoulcaller's Bell relevance 0.32 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Tormod's Crypt relevance 0.18 · 86.4% (38 of 44 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 0.35 · 13.6% (6 of 44 decks)
- Drafna's Restoration relevance 0.33 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Geralf, the Fleshwright relevance 0.51 · 45.5% (20 of 44 decks)
- Phyrexian Walker relevance 0.34 · 81.8% (36 of 44 decks)
- Memnite relevance 0.29 · 88.6% (39 of 44 decks)
- Artificer's Assistant relevance 0.32 · 70.5% (31 of 44 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 0.35 · 50.0% (22 of 44 decks)
- Endless One relevance 0.45 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 0.35 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Shifting Wall relevance 0.37 · 15.9% (7 of 44 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.18 · 95.5% (42 of 44 decks)
- Omarthis, Ghostfire Initiate relevance 0.39 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
- Osgood, Operation Double relevance 0.34 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 0.35 · 13.6% (6 of 44 decks)
- Riddlesmith relevance 0.24 · 50.0% (22 of 44 decks)
- Phyrexian Marauder relevance 0.35 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
- Cryptic Trilobite relevance 0.34 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.23 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Marketback Walker relevance 0.28 · 15.9% (7 of 44 decks)
- Ugin's Conjurant relevance 0.31 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.14 · 68.2% (30 of 44 decks)
- Myr Mindservant relevance 0.26 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Hangarback Walker relevance 0.19 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.15 · 47.7% (21 of 44 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.19 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.11 · 70.5% (31 of 44 decks)
- Patchwork Automaton relevance 0.22 · 9.1% (4 of 44 decks)
- Mm'menon, the Right Hand relevance 0.18 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.16 · 34.1% (15 of 44 decks)
- Excavated Wall relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Leveler relevance 0.22 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.15 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.14 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.12 · 56.8% (25 of 44 decks)
- Glaring Fleshraker relevance 0.17 · 13.6% (6 of 44 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Blighted Agent relevance 0.19 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Gingerbrute relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.16 · 9.1% (4 of 44 decks)
- Harmonized Trio // Brainstorm relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Siren Stormtamer relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Erdwal Illuminator relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Silver Myr relevance 0.12 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.11 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.13 · 13.6% (6 of 44 decks)
- Senator Peacock relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Stitcher's Apprentice relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Jeering Homunculus relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Furtive Homunculus relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Referee Squad relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Accorder's Shield relevance 0.50 · 75.0% (33 of 44 decks)
- Cathar's Shield relevance 0.48 · 77.3% (34 of 44 decks)
- Kite Shield relevance 0.51 · 68.2% (30 of 44 decks)
- Spidersilk Net relevance 0.47 · 72.7% (32 of 44 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.45 · 70.5% (31 of 44 decks)
- Bone Saw relevance 0.43 · 72.7% (32 of 44 decks)
- Dark Sphere relevance 0.46 · 65.9% (29 of 44 decks)
- Fountain of Youth relevance 0.45 · 68.2% (30 of 44 decks)
- Herbal Poultice relevance 0.44 · 70.5% (31 of 44 decks)
- Claws of Gix relevance 0.41 · 61.4% (27 of 44 decks)
- Delif's Cone relevance 0.46 · 50.0% (22 of 44 decks)
- Paradise Mantle relevance 0.35 · 77.3% (34 of 44 decks)
- Darksteel Relic relevance 0.38 · 68.2% (30 of 44 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.30 · 86.4% (38 of 44 decks)
- Gustha's Scepter relevance 0.43 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Lodestone Bauble relevance 0.39 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Briber's Purse relevance 0.40 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.24 · 77.3% (34 of 44 decks)
- Chimeric Mass relevance 0.40 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Welding Jar relevance 0.21 · 90.9% (40 of 44 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.23 · 79.5% (35 of 44 decks)
- Sigil of Distinction relevance 0.38 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
- Orochi Hatchery relevance 0.37 · 15.9% (7 of 44 decks)
- Engineered Explosives relevance 0.34 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Ghoulcaller's Bell relevance 0.32 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Tormod's Crypt relevance 0.18 · 86.4% (38 of 44 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.28 · 34.1% (15 of 44 decks)
- Clown Car relevance 0.32 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
- Mox Jasper relevance 0.33 · 13.6% (6 of 44 decks)
- Pyxis of Pandemonium relevance 0.32 · 15.9% (7 of 44 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.15 · 90.9% (40 of 44 decks)
- Jeweled Amulet relevance 0.24 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 0.20 · 52.3% (23 of 44 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.14 · 77.3% (34 of 44 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.22 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.14 · 72.7% (32 of 44 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.19 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Fountainport Bell relevance 0.25 · 13.6% (6 of 44 decks)
- Wand of Vertebrae relevance 0.25 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
- Chromatic Star relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Stone of Erech relevance 0.22 · 13.6% (6 of 44 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.22 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.12 · 61.4% (27 of 44 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.21 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.17 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Traveler's Amulet relevance 0.21 · 9.1% (4 of 44 decks)
- Witching Well relevance 0.20 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
- Chromatic Sphere relevance 0.18 · 13.6% (6 of 44 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.18 · 13.6% (6 of 44 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.19 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
All enchantments (45)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.33 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.20 · 45.5% (20 of 44 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.18 · 47.7% (21 of 44 decks)
- Extraordinary Journey relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Ancestral Knowledge relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.15 · 31.8% (14 of 44 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.20 · 9.1% (4 of 44 decks)
- Honest Work relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Case of the Filched Falcon relevance 0.19 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.18 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Fortune Teller's Talent relevance 0.15 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Artificer's Intuition relevance 0.13 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.13 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Aquitect's Defenses relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Insight relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Soothsaying relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.10 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.12 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Drowned Secrets relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Diplomatic Immunity relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Frogify relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.09 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Cryoshatter relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Overburden relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.08 · 15.9% (7 of 44 decks)
- Thought Lash relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Clan Crafter relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.07 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.06 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.06 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.06 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
All instants (50)
- Surge of Brilliance relevance 0.50 · 52.3% (23 of 44 decks)
- Retract relevance 0.42 · 34.1% (15 of 44 decks)
- Paradoxical Outcome relevance 0.34 · 47.7% (21 of 44 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.31 · 56.8% (25 of 44 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.35 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.31 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Hurkyl's Recall relevance 0.31 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.26 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.24 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.23 · 34.1% (15 of 44 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.16 · 68.2% (30 of 44 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.19 · 47.7% (21 of 44 decks)
- Spy Network relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Rebuild relevance 0.23 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.14 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.12 · 45.5% (20 of 44 decks)
- Relic's Roar relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.18 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.19 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.15 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
- Filter Out relevance 0.19 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.13 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Take the Fall relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.12 · 15.9% (7 of 44 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.12 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.15 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.12 · 15.9% (7 of 44 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.12 · 15.9% (7 of 44 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.14 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.10 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.11 · 13.6% (6 of 44 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.14 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.12 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.10 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Predict relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.09 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.13 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Theoretical Duplication relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Metamorphic Blast relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.12 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Accumulate Wisdom relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.11 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.12 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.10 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Eliminate the Impossible relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.12 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Lat-Nam's Legacy relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.12 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
All sorceries (49)
- Mana Severance relevance 0.48 · 54.5% (24 of 44 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.44 · 34.1% (15 of 44 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.34 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.26 · 50.0% (22 of 44 decks)
- Drafna's Restoration relevance 0.33 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
- See the Truth relevance 0.32 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.19 · 61.4% (27 of 44 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.21 · 47.7% (21 of 44 decks)
- Index relevance 0.31 · 9.1% (4 of 44 decks)
- Temporal Fissure relevance 0.30 · 9.1% (4 of 44 decks)
- Displacement Wave relevance 0.29 · 9.1% (4 of 44 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.23 · 13.6% (6 of 44 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.20 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.25 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.24 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Selective Memory relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.21 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.16 · 13.6% (6 of 44 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.13 · 13.6% (6 of 44 decks)
- Otterball Antics relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.14 · 9.1% (4 of 44 decks)
- Mystic Speculation relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Silent Departure relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Open into Wonder relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Press for Answers relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Mists of Lórien relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Shifting Grift relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Birthday Escape relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Crashing Wave relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.08 · 34.1% (15 of 44 decks)
- Cut Your Losses relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Follow the Bodies relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Saheeli's Artistry relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Reconstruction relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.07 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.06 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.05 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (12)
- Jace Reawakened relevance 0.40 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.21 · 15.9% (7 of 44 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.20 · 15.9% (7 of 44 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.11 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Jace, Cunning Castaway relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Jace, Vryn's Prodigy // Jace, Telepath Unbound relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.07 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.05 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.06 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.05 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Rivendell relevance 0.27 · 45.5% (20 of 44 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.25 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.19 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.13 · 52.3% (23 of 44 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.17 · 15.9% (7 of 44 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.19 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Soldevi Excavations relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.16 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.11 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.16 · 9.1% (4 of 44 decks)
- Zhalfirin Void relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.16 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.13 · 13.6% (6 of 44 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.16 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.14 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.13 · 13.6% (6 of 44 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.08 · 59.1% (26 of 44 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.11 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Ipnu Rivulet relevance 0.15 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.09 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.09 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.14 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.12 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.10 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Trenchpost relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.12 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.12 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Shelldock Isle relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.12 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- The Grey Havens relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.08 · 29.5% (13 of 44 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Beyeen Veil // Beyeen Coast relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.10 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.08 · 13.6% (6 of 44 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.09 · 9.1% (4 of 44 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.08 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.06 · 15.9% (7 of 44 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.07 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
All lands (33)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.24 · 15.9% (7 of 44 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.23 · 13.6% (6 of 44 decks)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 0.26 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.25 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.25 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.22 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.18 · 25.0% (11 of 44 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.17 · 22.7% (10 of 44 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.17 · 20.5% (9 of 44 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.16 · 18.2% (8 of 44 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.16 · 11.4% (5 of 44 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.15 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.13 · 9.1% (4 of 44 decks)
- Bad River relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Flood Plain relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Grixis Panorama relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Esper Panorama relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.10 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Wastes relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Dowsing Dagger // Lost Vale relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.09 · 6.8% (3 of 44 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.09 · 4.5% (2 of 44 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.08 · 9.1% (4 of 44 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.04 · 27.3% (12 of 44 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.04 · 9.1% (4 of 44 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.05 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.05 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 90.9% (40 of 44 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Fblthp, Lost on the Range, from 44 real Commander decks.