Cards like Welding Jar
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
72% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Welding Jar 84%
- Herbal Poultice 72%
Cards like Memnite
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
72% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Memnite 74%
- Phyrexian Walker 72%
Cards like Mishra's Bauble
19× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
93% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
70% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mishra's Bauble 93%
- Urza's Bauble 70%
Cards like Cathar's Shield
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
65% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Cathar's Shield 72%
- Accorder's Shield 65%
Cards like Zuran Orb
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
49% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Zuran Orb 72%
- Claws of Gix 58%
Cards like Preordain
6.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other blue decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Preordain 63%
- Serum Visions 49%
Other options: Deliberate, Scour All Possibilities, Foresee, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Opt
4.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Stonecoil Serpent
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Stonecoil Serpent 44%
- Shifting Wall 26%
- Phyrexian Marauder 14%
Cards like Retract
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Retract 40%
- Hurkyl's Recall 28%
Cards like Mystical Tutor
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mystical Tutor 37%
- Personal Tutor 23%
- Merchant Scroll 21%
- Solve the Equation 21%
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
6.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards like Riddlesmith
14× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Chimeric Mass
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Chimeric Mass 33%
- Orochi Hatchery 23%
Cards like Hangarback Walker
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Spellbook
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other blue decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.62 in other blue decks
Cards like Pongify
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 49%
- Rapid Hybridization 42%
Cards like Lotus Petal
13× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
- Lotus Petal 65%
- Lion's Eye Diamond 12%
Cards like The Reality Chip
7.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards like Chrome Mox
2.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 28%
- Mox Diamond 16%
Cards like Wayfarer's Bauble
4.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
- Wayfarer's Bauble 35%
- Expedition Map 16%
- World Map 5%
- Traveler's Amulet 2%
- Keys to the House 2%
- Renegade Map 2%
- Wanderer's Twig 2%
Other options: Moonsilver Key, Armillary Sphere, Braidwood Sextant, Ominous Parcel
Cards like Ponder
9.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Sol Ring
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards like Gitaxian Probe
5.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards like Mana Severance
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Distant Memories, Manipulate Fate, Foresight
Cards like Flusterstorm
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other blue decks
Cards
- Flusterstorm 21%
- Mental Misstep 9%
- Dispel 5%
- Miscast 2%
Other options: Spell Blast, Spell Burst, Clash of Wills
Cards like Amphibian Downpour
16× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Amphibian Downpour 42%
- Frogify 2%
Cards like Propaganda
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other blue decks
Cards
- Propaganda 42%
- War Tax 2%
Cards like Wand of Vertebrae
10× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Perpetual Timepiece, Cranial Archive, Thran Foundry
Cards like Mystic Forge
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other blue decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 23%
- Swiftfoot Boots 19%
All top picks (50)
- Cathar's Shield relevance 0.32 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Accorder's Shield relevance 0.33 · 65.1% (28 of 43 decks)
- Geralf, the Fleshwright relevance 0.34 · 58.1% (25 of 43 decks)
- Phyrexian Walker relevance 0.29 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Kite Shield relevance 0.32 · 62.8% (27 of 43 decks)
- Mana Severance relevance 0.32 · 62.8% (27 of 43 decks)
- Spidersilk Net relevance 0.29 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Herbal Poultice relevance 0.28 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.28 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Memnite relevance 0.27 · 74.4% (32 of 43 decks)
- Bone Saw relevance 0.28 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Surge of Brilliance relevance 0.33 · 48.8% (21 of 43 decks)
- Darksteel Relic relevance 0.30 · 60.5% (26 of 43 decks)
- Delif's Cone relevance 0.31 · 55.8% (24 of 43 decks)
- Fountain of Youth relevance 0.28 · 62.8% (27 of 43 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.24 · 79.1% (34 of 43 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 0.32 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Dark Sphere relevance 0.30 · 53.5% (23 of 43 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 0.32 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.22 · 83.7% (36 of 43 decks)
- Artificer's Assistant relevance 0.26 · 65.1% (28 of 43 decks)
- Claws of Gix relevance 0.27 · 58.1% (25 of 43 decks)
- Paradise Mantle relevance 0.24 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Retract relevance 0.32 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Shifting Wall relevance 0.35 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Chimeric Mass relevance 0.32 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Endless One relevance 0.35 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Jace Reawakened relevance 0.32 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Gustha's Scepter relevance 0.32 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Welding Jar relevance 0.19 · 83.7% (36 of 43 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.28 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.28 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Paradoxical Outcome relevance 0.27 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Sigil of Distinction relevance 0.32 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Hangarback Walker relevance 0.32 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Cryptic Trilobite relevance 0.34 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Hurkyl's Recall relevance 0.31 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Lodestone Bauble relevance 0.26 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Marketback Walker relevance 0.33 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Orochi Hatchery relevance 0.32 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Riddlesmith relevance 0.24 · 48.8% (21 of 43 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.25 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.19 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Tormod's Crypt relevance 0.16 · 88.4% (38 of 43 decks)
- Phyrexian Marauder relevance 0.33 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Jeweled Amulet relevance 0.23 · 51.2% (22 of 43 decks)
- Briber's Purse relevance 0.27 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Engineered Explosives relevance 0.27 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.22 · 48.8% (21 of 43 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.15 · 93.0% (40 of 43 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Geralf, the Fleshwright relevance 0.34 · 58.1% (25 of 43 decks)
- Phyrexian Walker relevance 0.29 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Memnite relevance 0.27 · 74.4% (32 of 43 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 0.32 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 0.32 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.22 · 83.7% (36 of 43 decks)
- Artificer's Assistant relevance 0.26 · 65.1% (28 of 43 decks)
- Shifting Wall relevance 0.35 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Endless One relevance 0.35 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Hangarback Walker relevance 0.32 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Cryptic Trilobite relevance 0.34 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Marketback Walker relevance 0.33 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Riddlesmith relevance 0.24 · 48.8% (21 of 43 decks)
- Phyrexian Marauder relevance 0.33 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Omarthis, Ghostfire Initiate relevance 0.31 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.22 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.25 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Osgood, Operation Double relevance 0.28 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.21 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.25 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Diligent Excavator relevance 0.27 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 0.28 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Ugin's Conjurant relevance 0.29 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Silver Myr relevance 0.23 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Mm'menon, the Right Hand relevance 0.23 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.21 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.16 · 53.5% (23 of 43 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.22 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.18 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.18 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.24 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.18 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Deranged Assistant relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.16 · 34.9% (15 of 43 decks)
- Harmonized Trio // Brainstorm relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.18 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.19 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Fblthp, Impossibly Lost relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Patchwork Automaton relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Millikin relevance 0.19 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Thing in the Ice // Awoken Horror relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Leveler relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.16 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.15 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.18 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Glaring Fleshraker relevance 0.16 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Blighted Agent relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Surge Conductor relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.17 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Curious Homunculus // Voracious Reader relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Cathar's Shield relevance 0.32 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Accorder's Shield relevance 0.33 · 65.1% (28 of 43 decks)
- Kite Shield relevance 0.32 · 62.8% (27 of 43 decks)
- Spidersilk Net relevance 0.29 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Herbal Poultice relevance 0.28 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.28 · 72.1% (31 of 43 decks)
- Bone Saw relevance 0.28 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Darksteel Relic relevance 0.30 · 60.5% (26 of 43 decks)
- Delif's Cone relevance 0.31 · 55.8% (24 of 43 decks)
- Fountain of Youth relevance 0.28 · 62.8% (27 of 43 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.24 · 79.1% (34 of 43 decks)
- Dark Sphere relevance 0.30 · 53.5% (23 of 43 decks)
- Claws of Gix relevance 0.27 · 58.1% (25 of 43 decks)
- Paradise Mantle relevance 0.24 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Chimeric Mass relevance 0.32 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Gustha's Scepter relevance 0.32 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Welding Jar relevance 0.19 · 83.7% (36 of 43 decks)
- Sigil of Distinction relevance 0.32 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Lodestone Bauble relevance 0.26 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Orochi Hatchery relevance 0.32 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.25 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.19 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Tormod's Crypt relevance 0.16 · 88.4% (38 of 43 decks)
- Jeweled Amulet relevance 0.23 · 51.2% (22 of 43 decks)
- Briber's Purse relevance 0.27 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Engineered Explosives relevance 0.27 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.15 · 93.0% (40 of 43 decks)
- Clown Car relevance 0.28 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Mox Jasper relevance 0.29 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.15 · 81.4% (35 of 43 decks)
- Ghoulcaller's Bell relevance 0.24 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.25 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Wand of Vertebrae relevance 0.23 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.13 · 81.4% (35 of 43 decks)
- Pyxis of Pandemonium relevance 0.24 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.20 · 34.9% (15 of 43 decks)
- Goblin Charbelcher relevance 0.27 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 0.17 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 0.25 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.13 · 67.4% (29 of 43 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.20 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.15 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.19 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Stone of Erech relevance 0.22 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.17 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Golem Foundry relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Chalice of the Void relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.18 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.11 · 65.1% (28 of 43 decks)
All enchantments (41)
- Propaganda relevance 0.22 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.22 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.25 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.24 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Thought Lash relevance 0.27 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Ancestral Knowledge relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.20 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Precognition Field relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Artificer's Intuition relevance 0.19 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.18 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Dissipation Field relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Fortune Teller's Talent relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- War Tax relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Extraordinary Journey relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Insight relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Well of Ideas relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Case of the Filched Falcon relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Honest Work relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Soothsaying relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Diplomatic Immunity relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Frogify relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.09 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Founding the Third Path relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Metallurgic Summonings relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.11 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.08 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.08 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
All instants (50)
- Surge of Brilliance relevance 0.33 · 48.8% (21 of 43 decks)
- Retract relevance 0.32 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.28 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.28 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Paradoxical Outcome relevance 0.27 · 46.5% (20 of 43 decks)
- Hurkyl's Recall relevance 0.31 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.19 · 60.5% (26 of 43 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.18 · 44.2% (19 of 43 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.17 · 41.9% (18 of 43 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.13 · 62.8% (27 of 43 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.11 · 79.1% (34 of 43 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.14 · 48.8% (21 of 43 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.22 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.22 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Rebuild relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.21 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Banishing Betrayal relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Spy Network relevance 0.21 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.12 · 37.2% (16 of 43 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.09 · 65.1% (28 of 43 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.12 · 34.9% (15 of 43 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.13 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.16 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.16 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Filter Out relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.13 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.10 · 37.2% (16 of 43 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.10 · 37.2% (16 of 43 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.13 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.11 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.10 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.12 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Visions of Beyond relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Mission Briefing relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.11 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.13 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Ray of Erasure relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Bounce Off relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Blue Elemental Blast relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Twist Reality relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Spell Crumple relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Failed Fording relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.11 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.12 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.10 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Mana Severance relevance 0.32 · 62.8% (27 of 43 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.22 · 48.8% (21 of 43 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.22 · 37.2% (16 of 43 decks)
- Index relevance 0.29 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- See the Truth relevance 0.27 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.17 · 62.8% (27 of 43 decks)
- Drafna's Restoration relevance 0.27 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Temporal Fissure relevance 0.24 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.23 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Displacement Wave relevance 0.26 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.13 · 69.8% (30 of 43 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.16 · 48.8% (21 of 43 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Paradigm Shift relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Selective Memory relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Mystic Speculation relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Void Snare relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.20 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.18 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Contingency Plan relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Mists of Lórien relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.14 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.12 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.11 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Lock and Load relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Telemin Performance relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Crashing Wave relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Talent of the Telepath relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Ransack relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Taigam's Scheming relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Impede Momentum relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Inaction Injunction relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Tunnel Vision relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Stream of Thought relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Omen relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Reconstruction relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Candlekeep Inspiration relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Cut Your Losses relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Lunar Insight relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (9)
- Jace Reawakened relevance 0.32 · 30.2% (13 of 43 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.25 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.18 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Jace, Vryn's Prodigy // Jace, Telepath Unbound relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.13 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.09 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Rivendell relevance 0.26 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.22 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.24 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Beyeen Veil // Beyeen Coast relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.20 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.20 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.23 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.20 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.15 · 39.5% (17 of 43 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.19 · 14.0% (6 of 43 decks)
- Zhalfirin Void relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.20 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.14 · 37.2% (16 of 43 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.15 · 23.3% (10 of 43 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.17 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.19 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.17 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Soldevi Excavations relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.16 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.16 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.13 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.15 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.10 · 32.6% (14 of 43 decks)
- Ipnu Rivulet relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.14 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.08 · 51.2% (22 of 43 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.12 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.13 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Study Hall relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- The Grey Havens relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.13 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.09 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.09 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Labyrinth of Skophos relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Bazaar of Baghdad relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Shelldock Isle relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Blasted Landscape relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
All lands (25)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.28 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.23 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.21 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.15 · 16.3% (7 of 43 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.13 · 27.9% (12 of 43 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.13 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.13 · 25.6% (11 of 43 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.17 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.12 · 20.9% (9 of 43 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.12 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Wastes relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.10 · 18.6% (8 of 43 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.10 · 9.3% (4 of 43 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.10 · 7.0% (3 of 43 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.09 · 11.6% (5 of 43 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.10 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.09 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.10 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 93.0% (40 of 43 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.07 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Fblthp, Lost on the Range, from 43 real Commander decks.