Cards like Voidmage Apprentice
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
89% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
71% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
2.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mischievous Quanar
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
62% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.9 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Dream Chisel
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
62% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Dream Chisel 78%
- Panoptic Projektor 68%
Cards like Thousand Winds
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
91% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
56% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Thousand Winds 78%
- Echo Tracer 57%
- Exit Specialist 35%
Cards like Aphetto Runecaster
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Brine Elemental
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Brine Elemental 80%
- Coral Trickster 15%
Cards like Cursed Windbreaker
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Azami, Lady of Scrolls
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Brainstorm
2.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 40% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.47 in other blue decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 45%
- Brainsurge 14%
Cards like Twist Reality
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other blue decks
Cards
- Twist Reality 57%
- Wizard's Retort 9%
- Saw It Coming 6%
- Disallow 2%
Other options: Forceful Denial, Cancel, Scatter to the Winds, Fervent Denial, Ertai's Scorn, Broken Concentration, Sinister Sabotage, Confirm Suspicions, Admiral's Order
Cards like Ixidor's Will
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards like Crystal Shard
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Crystal Shard 37%
- Erratic Portal 6%
Cards like Thran Dynamo
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Ur-Golem's Eye, Ichor Elixir, Ring of the Lucii
Cards like Disruptive Pitmage
8.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Disruptive Student, Vodalian Mage, Mistfolk
Cards like Familiar's Ruse
6.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.18 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
All top picks (50)
- Dream Chisel relevance 0.86 · 78.3% (126 of 161 decks)
- Aphetto Runecaster relevance 0.79 · 83.2% (134 of 161 decks)
- Voidmage Apprentice relevance 0.78 · 78.9% (127 of 161 decks)
- Kheru Spellsnatcher relevance 0.75 · 80.7% (130 of 161 decks)
- Thousand Winds relevance 0.77 · 77.6% (125 of 161 decks)
- Mischievous Quanar relevance 0.80 · 73.9% (119 of 161 decks)
- Brine Elemental relevance 0.75 · 80.1% (129 of 161 decks)
- Willbender relevance 0.69 · 85.1% (137 of 161 decks)
- Panoptic Projektor relevance 0.82 · 67.7% (109 of 161 decks)
- Scroll of Fate relevance 0.69 · 84.5% (136 of 161 decks)
- Weaver of Lies relevance 0.86 · 59.6% (96 of 161 decks)
- Primordial Mist relevance 0.66 · 82.6% (133 of 161 decks)
- Fathom Seer relevance 0.75 · 68.3% (110 of 161 decks)
- Master of the Veil relevance 0.87 · 53.4% (86 of 161 decks)
- They Came from the Pipes relevance 0.70 · 74.5% (120 of 161 decks)
- Ugin's Mastery relevance 0.73 · 68.9% (111 of 161 decks)
- Echo Tracer relevance 0.80 · 57.1% (92 of 161 decks)
- Chromeshell Crab relevance 0.65 · 77.6% (125 of 161 decks)
- Ixidron relevance 0.61 · 83.2% (134 of 161 decks)
- Kadena's Silencer relevance 0.75 · 62.7% (101 of 161 decks)
- Backslide relevance 0.84 · 50.9% (82 of 161 decks)
- Stratus Dancer relevance 0.71 · 64.6% (104 of 161 decks)
- Cryptic Coat relevance 0.73 · 61.5% (99 of 161 decks)
- Write into Being relevance 0.77 · 54.0% (87 of 161 decks)
- Vesuvan Shapeshifter relevance 0.62 · 73.3% (118 of 161 decks)
- Become Anonymous relevance 0.73 · 54.7% (88 of 161 decks)
- Unblinking Bleb relevance 0.77 · 49.1% (79 of 161 decks)
- Monastery Loremaster relevance 0.82 · 39.8% (64 of 161 decks)
- Qarsi Deceiver relevance 0.77 · 45.3% (73 of 161 decks)
- Cloudform relevance 0.78 · 43.5% (70 of 161 decks)
- Glitch Interpreter relevance 0.68 · 56.5% (91 of 161 decks)
- Riptide Survivor relevance 0.78 · 42.2% (68 of 161 decks)
- Silumgar Spell-Eater relevance 0.80 · 37.9% (61 of 161 decks)
- Mistfire Weaver relevance 0.79 · 39.1% (63 of 161 decks)
- Riptide Entrancer relevance 0.68 · 49.1% (79 of 161 decks)
- Unnerving Grasp relevance 0.71 · 44.1% (71 of 161 decks)
- Twist Reality relevance 0.62 · 56.5% (91 of 161 decks)
- Dermoplasm relevance 0.80 · 29.8% (48 of 161 decks)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 0.66 · 44.7% (72 of 161 decks)
- Abhorrent Oculus relevance 0.59 · 53.4% (86 of 161 decks)
- Kozilek, the Broken Reality relevance 0.61 · 48.4% (78 of 161 decks)
- Exit Specialist relevance 0.69 · 34.8% (56 of 161 decks)
- Cursed Windbreaker relevance 0.68 · 27.3% (44 of 161 decks)
- Jeskai Infiltrator relevance 0.67 · 26.1% (42 of 161 decks)
- Quicksilver Dragon relevance 0.71 · 19.9% (32 of 161 decks)
- Illithid Harvester // Plant Tadpoles relevance 0.60 · 32.3% (52 of 161 decks)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.51 · 48.4% (78 of 161 decks)
- Raven Guild Master relevance 0.63 · 24.2% (39 of 161 decks)
- Voidmage Prodigy relevance 0.54 · 37.3% (60 of 161 decks)
- Ixidor's Will relevance 0.63 · 20.5% (33 of 161 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Aphetto Runecaster relevance 0.79 · 83.2% (134 of 161 decks)
- Voidmage Apprentice relevance 0.78 · 78.9% (127 of 161 decks)
- Kheru Spellsnatcher relevance 0.75 · 80.7% (130 of 161 decks)
- Thousand Winds relevance 0.77 · 77.6% (125 of 161 decks)
- Mischievous Quanar relevance 0.80 · 73.9% (119 of 161 decks)
- Brine Elemental relevance 0.75 · 80.1% (129 of 161 decks)
- Willbender relevance 0.69 · 85.1% (137 of 161 decks)
- Weaver of Lies relevance 0.86 · 59.6% (96 of 161 decks)
- Fathom Seer relevance 0.75 · 68.3% (110 of 161 decks)
- Master of the Veil relevance 0.87 · 53.4% (86 of 161 decks)
- Echo Tracer relevance 0.80 · 57.1% (92 of 161 decks)
- Chromeshell Crab relevance 0.65 · 77.6% (125 of 161 decks)
- Ixidron relevance 0.61 · 83.2% (134 of 161 decks)
- Kadena's Silencer relevance 0.75 · 62.7% (101 of 161 decks)
- Stratus Dancer relevance 0.71 · 64.6% (104 of 161 decks)
- Vesuvan Shapeshifter relevance 0.62 · 73.3% (118 of 161 decks)
- Unblinking Bleb relevance 0.77 · 49.1% (79 of 161 decks)
- Monastery Loremaster relevance 0.82 · 39.8% (64 of 161 decks)
- Qarsi Deceiver relevance 0.77 · 45.3% (73 of 161 decks)
- Glitch Interpreter relevance 0.68 · 56.5% (91 of 161 decks)
- Riptide Survivor relevance 0.78 · 42.2% (68 of 161 decks)
- Silumgar Spell-Eater relevance 0.80 · 37.9% (61 of 161 decks)
- Mistfire Weaver relevance 0.79 · 39.1% (63 of 161 decks)
- Riptide Entrancer relevance 0.68 · 49.1% (79 of 161 decks)
- Dermoplasm relevance 0.80 · 29.8% (48 of 161 decks)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 0.66 · 44.7% (72 of 161 decks)
- Abhorrent Oculus relevance 0.59 · 53.4% (86 of 161 decks)
- Kozilek, the Broken Reality relevance 0.61 · 48.4% (78 of 161 decks)
- Exit Specialist relevance 0.69 · 34.8% (56 of 161 decks)
- Jeskai Infiltrator relevance 0.67 · 26.1% (42 of 161 decks)
- Quicksilver Dragon relevance 0.71 · 19.9% (32 of 161 decks)
- Illithid Harvester // Plant Tadpoles relevance 0.60 · 32.3% (52 of 161 decks)
- Raven Guild Master relevance 0.63 · 24.2% (39 of 161 decks)
- Voidmage Prodigy relevance 0.54 · 37.3% (60 of 161 decks)
- Dulcet Sirens relevance 0.59 · 23.6% (38 of 161 decks)
- Paranormal Analyst relevance 0.65 · 14.3% (23 of 161 decks)
- Shaper Parasite relevance 0.64 · 14.3% (23 of 161 decks)
- Coral Trickster relevance 0.62 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Nameless One relevance 0.61 · 14.3% (23 of 161 decks)
- Mistway Spy relevance 0.57 · 20.5% (33 of 161 decks)
- Sage of the Unknowable relevance 0.55 · 19.9% (32 of 161 decks)
- Wall of Deceit relevance 0.59 · 11.8% (19 of 161 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.40 · 45.3% (73 of 161 decks)
- Omarthis, Ghostfire Initiate relevance 0.54 · 14.3% (23 of 161 decks)
- Dragon's Eye Savants relevance 0.54 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 0.54 · 14.3% (23 of 161 decks)
- Creeping Peeper relevance 0.54 · 13.7% (22 of 161 decks)
- Riptide Director relevance 0.49 · 16.1% (26 of 161 decks)
- Shorecrasher Elemental relevance 0.57 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Coveted Falcon relevance 0.48 · 12.4% (20 of 161 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Dream Chisel relevance 0.86 · 78.3% (126 of 161 decks)
- Panoptic Projektor relevance 0.82 · 67.7% (109 of 161 decks)
- Scroll of Fate relevance 0.69 · 84.5% (136 of 161 decks)
- Cryptic Coat relevance 0.73 · 61.5% (99 of 161 decks)
- Cursed Windbreaker relevance 0.68 · 27.3% (44 of 161 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.50 · 36.6% (59 of 161 decks)
- Cybership relevance 0.58 · 21.1% (34 of 161 decks)
- Heartstone relevance 0.45 · 34.2% (55 of 161 decks)
- Dissection Tools relevance 0.56 · 13.0% (21 of 161 decks)
- Conductive Machete relevance 0.56 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Ransom Note relevance 0.48 · 12.4% (20 of 161 decks)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.36 · 36.6% (59 of 161 decks)
- Symmetry Matrix relevance 0.44 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Illusionary Mask relevance 0.48 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.33 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Semblance Anvil relevance 0.34 · 13.0% (21 of 161 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.27 · 29.8% (48 of 161 decks)
- Erratic Portal relevance 0.38 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.36 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.28 · 18.6% (30 of 161 decks)
- Whetwheel relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.22 · 29.2% (47 of 161 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.28 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.28 · 8.1% (13 of 161 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.24 · 11.8% (19 of 161 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.21 · 17.4% (28 of 161 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.24 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.17 · 25.5% (41 of 161 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.17 · 16.8% (27 of 161 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.17 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.17 · 16.8% (27 of 161 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.18 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.13 · 36.6% (59 of 161 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.15 · 16.1% (26 of 161 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.16 · 9.9% (16 of 161 decks)
- Armillary Sphere relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Torpor Orb relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Brainstone relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Stonespeaker Crystal relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Helm of Awakening relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.14 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.11 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.12 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.13 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.06 · 58.4% (94 of 161 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.08 · 30.4% (49 of 161 decks)
All enchantments (30)
- Primordial Mist relevance 0.66 · 82.6% (133 of 161 decks)
- They Came from the Pipes relevance 0.70 · 74.5% (120 of 161 decks)
- Ugin's Mastery relevance 0.73 · 68.9% (111 of 161 decks)
- Cloudform relevance 0.78 · 43.5% (70 of 161 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 0.53 · 24.8% (40 of 161 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.34 · 62.7% (101 of 161 decks)
- Underwater Tunnel // Slimy Aquarium relevance 0.57 · 12.4% (20 of 161 decks)
- Stay Hidden, Stay Silent relevance 0.45 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Sea's Claim relevance 0.37 · 6.2% (10 of 161 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.31 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Cunning Evasion relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.25 · 6.2% (10 of 161 decks)
- Words of Wind relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.20 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Parallel Thoughts relevance 0.27 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Levitation relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Day of the Dragons relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.16 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Echoes of Eternity relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Mind's Dilation relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Gossip's Talent relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.15 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.10 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.11 · 11.8% (19 of 161 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.10 · 9.9% (16 of 161 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.09 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
All instants (50)
- Backslide relevance 0.84 · 50.9% (82 of 161 decks)
- Become Anonymous relevance 0.73 · 54.7% (88 of 161 decks)
- Twist Reality relevance 0.62 · 56.5% (91 of 161 decks)
- Ixidor's Will relevance 0.63 · 20.5% (33 of 161 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.38 · 31.7% (51 of 161 decks)
- Familiar's Ruse relevance 0.42 · 16.8% (27 of 161 decks)
- Spy Network relevance 0.40 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.31 · 16.8% (27 of 161 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.18 · 63.4% (102 of 161 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.29 · 18.0% (29 of 161 decks)
- Mage's Guile relevance 0.34 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Paradoxical Outcome relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Turnabout relevance 0.26 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Wizard's Retort relevance 0.26 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.24 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Leadership Vacuum relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (23 of 161 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.22 · 12.4% (20 of 161 decks)
- Saw It Coming relevance 0.24 · 6.2% (10 of 161 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Unsubstantiate relevance 0.24 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.20 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.21 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Complicate relevance 0.27 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Sudden Substitution relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.11 · 45.3% (73 of 161 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.12 · 28.0% (45 of 161 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.15 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.14 · 13.0% (21 of 161 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.15 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Mystic Reflection relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Arcane Epiphany relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.10 · 34.2% (55 of 161 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.14 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Echoing Truth relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.13 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.16 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Polymorphist's Jest relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.12 · 8.1% (13 of 161 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (23 of 161 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.09 · 18.6% (30 of 161 decks)
All sorceries (24)
- Write into Being relevance 0.77 · 54.0% (87 of 161 decks)
- Unnerving Grasp relevance 0.71 · 44.1% (71 of 161 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.40 · 24.8% (40 of 161 decks)
- Rush of Knowledge relevance 0.34 · 9.9% (16 of 161 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.28 · 18.6% (30 of 161 decks)
- Dream Cache relevance 0.34 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.27 · 18.0% (29 of 161 decks)
- Gruesome Slaughter relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.23 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.23 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.20 · 11.8% (19 of 161 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.22 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.14 · 34.8% (56 of 161 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.15 · 23.6% (38 of 161 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.18 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.14 · 13.7% (22 of 161 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (10 of 161 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.13 · 9.9% (16 of 161 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.14 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.51 · 48.4% (78 of 161 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Machinist relevance 0.46 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.26 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.25 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
All utility lands (39)
- Zoetic Cavern relevance 0.71 · 67.7% (109 of 161 decks)
- Tomb of the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.50 · 34.8% (56 of 161 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.31 · 55.3% (89 of 161 decks)
- Ruins of Oran-Rief relevance 0.38 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.25 · 23.0% (37 of 161 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.24 · 16.8% (27 of 161 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 0.28 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.24 · 12.4% (20 of 161 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.20 · 26.7% (43 of 161 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.22 · 13.0% (21 of 161 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 32.9% (53 of 161 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.20 · 20.5% (33 of 161 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.19 · 23.6% (38 of 161 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.24 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.22 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Soldevi Excavations relevance 0.26 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Winding Canyons relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.20 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.16 · 13.0% (21 of 161 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.15 · 17.4% (28 of 161 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.19 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.14 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.12 · 12.4% (20 of 161 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.09 · 39.1% (63 of 161 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.11 · 11.2% (18 of 161 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.08 · 41.6% (67 of 161 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (8 of 161 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.12 · 6.2% (10 of 161 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (5 of 161 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.08 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (20)
- Branch of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 0.70 · 51.6% (83 of 161 decks)
- Shrine of the Forsaken Gods relevance 0.53 · 32.9% (53 of 161 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.28 · 32.9% (53 of 161 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.28 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.24 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.21 · 3.7% (6 of 161 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.15 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.15 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.12 · 6.2% (10 of 161 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.09 · 4.3% (7 of 161 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (4 of 161 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 87.6% (141 of 161 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Ixidor, Reality Sculptor, from 161 real Commander decks.