Cards like Garruk's Uprising
2.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other green decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.52 in other green decks
Cards like Kami of Whispered Hopes
4.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other green decks
Cards
- Kami of Whispered Hopes 28%
- Gyre Sage 19%
- Incubation Druid 18%
Cards like Fanatic of Rhonas
3.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other green decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 59% of other green decks
57% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 67%
- Elvish Mystic 57%
- Fyndhorn Elves 36%
- Boreal Druid 4%
- Druid of the Cowl 3%
- Goobbue Gardener 3%
- Orochi Merge-Keeper 2%
- Golden Hind 2%
- Leaf Gilder 1%
Other options: Greenweaver Druid, Woodland Mystic, Fyndhorn Elder, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Gigantosaurus
3.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Ancient Brontodon, Enormous Baloth, Vorstclaw, Tusked Colossodon, Scaled Wurm, Broodhunter Wurm, Barbtooth Wurm, Grizzled Outrider, Order of the Sacred Bell, Leatherback Baloth, Gnarled Mass, Canopy Gorger, Pheres-Band Centaurs, Trained Armodon, Wild Ceratok, Murasa Brute, Moss Monster, Cowl Prowler, Spined Karok, Southern Elephant, Durkwood Boars, Feral Krushok, Axebane Beast, Hollowhenge Beast, Vastwood Gorger, Blanchwood Treefolk, Axebane Stag, Silverback Ape, Primordial Wurm, Colossapede, Ironroot Treefolk, Thornhide Wolves, Kindercatch, Plated Wurm, Nema Siltlurker, Nettle Swine
Cards like Cultivate
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 49%
- Rampant Growth 37%
- Kodama's Reach 32%
- Shared Roots 9%
- Explosive Vegetation 6%
- Migration Path 6%
- Grow from the Ashes 5%
- Map the Wastes 3%
- Roamer's Routine 3%
- Search for Tomorrow 2%
- New Generation's Technique 2%
- Path to the Festival 1%
Other options: Beneath the Sands, Verdant Mastery, Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Far Wanderings, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Deep Reconnaissance, Untamed Wilds
Cards like Garruk's Packleader
2.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
3.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Earthshaker Giant, Thundering Ceratok
Cards like Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea
6.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Hardened Scales
1.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 42%
- Three Visits 29%
- Skyshroud Claim 18%
- Ranger's Path 5%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 3%
- Glimpse the Core 2%
Other options: Field Trip, Hunting Wilds
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
1.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other green decks
Cards like Frenzied Baloth
5.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other green decks
Cards like The Earth Crystal
1.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Natural Order
5.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Worldly Tutor
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 19%
- Sylvan Tutor 5%
Cards like Apex Devastator
3.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other green decks
All top picks (50)
- Jumbo Cactuar relevance 0.38 · 35.5% (94 of 265 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.32 · 34.3% (91 of 265 decks)
- Railway Brawler relevance 0.35 · 25.3% (67 of 265 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.34 · 24.9% (66 of 265 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.25 · 53.2% (141 of 265 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.23 · 59.2% (157 of 265 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.31 · 27.5% (73 of 265 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.31 · 28.3% (75 of 265 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.32 · 23.4% (62 of 265 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.33 · 15.1% (40 of 265 decks)
- Hulking Raptor relevance 0.31 · 20.4% (54 of 265 decks)
- Whisperer of the Wilds relevance 0.33 · 15.1% (40 of 265 decks)
- Pathbreaker Ibex relevance 0.32 · 15.5% (41 of 265 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 0.35 · 11.7% (31 of 265 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.32 · 17.7% (47 of 265 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.31 · 18.5% (49 of 265 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.27 · 31.3% (83 of 265 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.27 · 28.3% (75 of 265 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.30 · 19.2% (51 of 265 decks)
- Aerie Ouphes relevance 0.43 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.30 · 17.7% (47 of 265 decks)
- Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution relevance 0.32 · 13.6% (36 of 265 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.25 · 33.6% (89 of 265 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.30 · 16.2% (43 of 265 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.29 · 18.5% (49 of 265 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.29 · 18.9% (50 of 265 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.29 · 19.6% (52 of 265 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 0.33 · 10.2% (27 of 265 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.30 · 14.7% (39 of 265 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 0.27 · 26.0% (69 of 265 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.28 · 19.2% (51 of 265 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.25 · 29.1% (77 of 265 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.27 · 24.5% (65 of 265 decks)
- God-Eternal Rhonas relevance 0.32 · 10.6% (28 of 265 decks)
- See the Unwritten relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (14 of 265 decks)
- Curator Beastie relevance 0.43 · 3.8% (10 of 265 decks)
- Ruins Recluse relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (14 of 265 decks)
- Old Gnawbone relevance 0.31 · 12.5% (33 of 265 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.24 · 32.5% (86 of 265 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.24 · 32.1% (85 of 265 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.32 · 9.4% (25 of 265 decks)
- Valgavoth's Onslaught relevance 0.39 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.30 · 10.9% (29 of 265 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.21 · 42.6% (113 of 265 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.27 · 17.0% (45 of 265 decks)
- Crack Open relevance 0.38 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- Dragon Sniper relevance 0.29 · 12.5% (33 of 265 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.21 · 38.9% (103 of 265 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.25 · 23.4% (62 of 265 decks)
- Servant of the Scale relevance 0.39 · 3.8% (10 of 265 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Jumbo Cactuar relevance 0.38 · 35.5% (94 of 265 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.32 · 34.3% (91 of 265 decks)
- Railway Brawler relevance 0.35 · 25.3% (67 of 265 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.34 · 24.9% (66 of 265 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.25 · 53.2% (141 of 265 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.23 · 59.2% (157 of 265 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.31 · 27.5% (73 of 265 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.31 · 28.3% (75 of 265 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.32 · 23.4% (62 of 265 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.33 · 15.1% (40 of 265 decks)
- Hulking Raptor relevance 0.31 · 20.4% (54 of 265 decks)
- Whisperer of the Wilds relevance 0.33 · 15.1% (40 of 265 decks)
- Pathbreaker Ibex relevance 0.32 · 15.5% (41 of 265 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 0.35 · 11.7% (31 of 265 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.32 · 17.7% (47 of 265 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.31 · 18.5% (49 of 265 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.27 · 31.3% (83 of 265 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.27 · 28.3% (75 of 265 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.30 · 19.2% (51 of 265 decks)
- Aerie Ouphes relevance 0.43 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.30 · 17.7% (47 of 265 decks)
- Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution relevance 0.32 · 13.6% (36 of 265 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.25 · 33.6% (89 of 265 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.30 · 16.2% (43 of 265 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.29 · 18.5% (49 of 265 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.29 · 18.9% (50 of 265 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.29 · 19.6% (52 of 265 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 0.33 · 10.2% (27 of 265 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.30 · 14.7% (39 of 265 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 0.27 · 26.0% (69 of 265 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.28 · 19.2% (51 of 265 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.25 · 29.1% (77 of 265 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.27 · 24.5% (65 of 265 decks)
- God-Eternal Rhonas relevance 0.32 · 10.6% (28 of 265 decks)
- Curator Beastie relevance 0.43 · 3.8% (10 of 265 decks)
- Ruins Recluse relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (14 of 265 decks)
- Old Gnawbone relevance 0.31 · 12.5% (33 of 265 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.32 · 9.4% (25 of 265 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.30 · 10.9% (29 of 265 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.21 · 42.6% (113 of 265 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.27 · 17.0% (45 of 265 decks)
- Dragon Sniper relevance 0.29 · 12.5% (33 of 265 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.25 · 23.4% (62 of 265 decks)
- Servant of the Scale relevance 0.39 · 3.8% (10 of 265 decks)
- Vaultborn Tyrant relevance 0.28 · 13.6% (36 of 265 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.31 · 7.9% (21 of 265 decks)
- Steel Leaf Champion relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (22 of 265 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.31 · 7.5% (20 of 265 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.24 · 22.6% (60 of 265 decks)
- Thrashing Brontodon relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (22 of 265 decks)
All artifacts (38)
- Doc Ock's Tentacles relevance 0.39 · 3.0% (8 of 265 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.25 · 11.7% (31 of 265 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.21 · 21.1% (56 of 265 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.20 · 24.9% (66 of 265 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.18 · 30.6% (81 of 265 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.23 · 10.2% (27 of 265 decks)
- Quicksilver Amulet relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (9 of 265 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.24 · 6.4% (17 of 265 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (12 of 265 decks)
- Scroll of Fate relevance 0.36 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (25 of 265 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (12 of 265 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.15 · 29.1% (77 of 265 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.24 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.21 · 6.4% (17 of 265 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.20 · 6.4% (17 of 265 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (10 of 265 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.12 · 46.0% (122 of 265 decks)
- Summoning Materia relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.13 · 23.8% (63 of 265 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (10 of 265 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.14 · 15.5% (41 of 265 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.19 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- Thunderous Velocipede relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Tangleweave Armor relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (8 of 265 decks)
- Sledge-Class Seedship relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (9 of 265 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (8 of 265 decks)
- Necklace of Girion relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (8 of 265 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 77.7% (206 of 265 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.24 · 32.1% (85 of 265 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.21 · 38.9% (103 of 265 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.23 · 26.8% (71 of 265 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.22 · 30.6% (81 of 265 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.31 · 5.7% (15 of 265 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.19 · 43.4% (115 of 265 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (33 of 265 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.23 · 17.7% (47 of 265 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.25 · 9.8% (26 of 265 decks)
- Threats Around Every Corner relevance 0.34 · 3.4% (9 of 265 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.22 · 15.1% (40 of 265 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.24 · 10.2% (27 of 265 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.26 · 6.0% (16 of 265 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.25 · 6.4% (17 of 265 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.25 · 5.7% (15 of 265 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.25 · 5.3% (14 of 265 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.13 · 60.4% (160 of 265 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.25 · 6.0% (16 of 265 decks)
- Experimental Lab // Staff Room relevance 0.37 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.21 · 10.9% (29 of 265 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (13 of 265 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.23 · 6.4% (17 of 265 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (16 of 265 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.21 · 9.4% (25 of 265 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.18 · 15.1% (40 of 265 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.25 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.22 · 5.3% (14 of 265 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.18 · 15.8% (42 of 265 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.19 · 10.9% (29 of 265 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.22 · 4.9% (13 of 265 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (8 of 265 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.19 · 7.5% (20 of 265 decks)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.15 · 20.8% (55 of 265 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (9 of 265 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.19 · 7.9% (21 of 265 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (10 of 265 decks)
- Web of Life and Destiny relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Bearscape relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (9 of 265 decks)
- Mirri's Guile relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.16 · 10.6% (28 of 265 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (8 of 265 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.17 · 5.3% (14 of 265 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.17 · 5.7% (15 of 265 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (10 of 265 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.16 · 4.9% (13 of 265 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (8 of 265 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.15 · 5.7% (15 of 265 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
All instants (50)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.24 · 32.5% (86 of 265 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.31 · 7.5% (20 of 265 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (27 of 265 decks)
- Fertilid's Favor relevance 0.34 · 3.4% (9 of 265 decks)
- Tandem Takedown relevance 0.36 · 3.0% (8 of 265 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.26 · 7.2% (19 of 265 decks)
- Terrifying Presence relevance 0.34 · 3.4% (9 of 265 decks)
- Yuna's Whistle relevance 0.34 · 3.4% (9 of 265 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.26 · 7.2% (19 of 265 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.18 · 29.4% (78 of 265 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.23 · 10.6% (28 of 265 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.27 · 4.9% (13 of 265 decks)
- Mortal's Resolve relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (10 of 265 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.21 · 14.3% (38 of 265 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.20 · 17.4% (46 of 265 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.22 · 10.2% (27 of 265 decks)
- Band Together relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (9 of 265 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.21 · 12.5% (33 of 265 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.19 · 15.8% (42 of 265 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.18 · 21.1% (56 of 265 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.26 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.19 · 13.6% (36 of 265 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.16 · 29.1% (77 of 265 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.23 · 5.7% (15 of 265 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (16 of 265 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.17 · 19.2% (51 of 265 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.19 · 11.3% (30 of 265 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.16 · 20.0% (53 of 265 decks)
- Solidarity of Heroes relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (9 of 265 decks)
- Windstorm relevance 0.31 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.21 · 5.3% (14 of 265 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.17 · 12.8% (34 of 265 decks)
- Break Down the Door relevance 0.30 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.13 · 35.1% (93 of 265 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.16 · 17.0% (45 of 265 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (10 of 265 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.19 · 6.8% (18 of 265 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (12 of 265 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (13 of 265 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.19 · 6.4% (17 of 265 decks)
- Airship Crash relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.10 · 48.7% (129 of 265 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.17 · 7.2% (19 of 265 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.17 · 6.4% (17 of 265 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.16 · 10.2% (27 of 265 decks)
- Druid's Deliverance relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- Avoid Fate relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- See the Unwritten relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (14 of 265 decks)
- Valgavoth's Onslaught relevance 0.39 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- Crack Open relevance 0.38 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- Monstrous Onslaught relevance 0.31 · 7.2% (19 of 265 decks)
- Yuna's Decision relevance 0.35 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- Synchronized Charge relevance 0.35 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.23 · 19.6% (52 of 265 decks)
- Storm the Seedcore relevance 0.35 · 3.8% (10 of 265 decks)
- Map the Wastes relevance 0.36 · 3.4% (9 of 265 decks)
- Biogenic Upgrade relevance 0.32 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (14 of 265 decks)
- Primal Might relevance 0.28 · 6.4% (17 of 265 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (12 of 265 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (14 of 265 decks)
- Green Sun's Twilight relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (12 of 265 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.23 · 13.6% (36 of 265 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.26 · 7.9% (21 of 265 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.24 · 9.8% (26 of 265 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.21 · 15.8% (42 of 265 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.26 · 4.9% (13 of 265 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.16 · 41.1% (109 of 265 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.26 · 5.3% (14 of 265 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.21 · 12.1% (32 of 265 decks)
- Contest of Claws relevance 0.26 · 4.5% (12 of 265 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.19 · 19.6% (52 of 265 decks)
- Under the Skin relevance 0.35 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.18 · 22.6% (60 of 265 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (12 of 265 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.22 · 9.1% (24 of 265 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.24 · 5.7% (15 of 265 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (16 of 265 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.18 · 18.9% (50 of 265 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.21 · 10.2% (27 of 265 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.18 · 18.1% (48 of 265 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.21 · 9.8% (26 of 265 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.18 · 18.9% (50 of 265 decks)
- Atraxa's Fall relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (9 of 265 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.21 · 9.1% (24 of 265 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (9 of 265 decks)
- Scout the City relevance 0.32 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.23 · 4.9% (13 of 265 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.22 · 5.7% (15 of 265 decks)
- Longstalk Brawl relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (8 of 265 decks)
- Many Partings relevance 0.24 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.23 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.15 · 28.7% (76 of 265 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.13 · 41.9% (111 of 265 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.16 · 18.9% (50 of 265 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (8 of 265 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 32.1% (85 of 265 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (8)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (16 of 265 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.24 · 5.3% (14 of 265 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.19 · 11.7% (31 of 265 decks)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (10 of 265 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.21 · 7.5% (20 of 265 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (8 of 265 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (13 of 265 decks)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.26 · 10.6% (28 of 265 decks)
All utility lands (42)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.24 · 19.6% (52 of 265 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.16 · 43.0% (114 of 265 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.26 · 5.7% (15 of 265 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.20 · 22.6% (60 of 265 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.25 · 6.4% (17 of 265 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.19 · 22.6% (60 of 265 decks)
- Fertile Thicket relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (10 of 265 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.22 · 9.8% (26 of 265 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.16 · 33.2% (88 of 265 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.23 · 8.7% (23 of 265 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.19 · 14.7% (39 of 265 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.22 · 6.8% (18 of 265 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.19 · 13.2% (35 of 265 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.21 · 7.2% (19 of 265 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 17.4% (46 of 265 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.15 · 25.7% (68 of 265 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.20 · 8.3% (22 of 265 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.15 · 26.4% (70 of 265 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.19 · 7.5% (20 of 265 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.18 · 10.6% (28 of 265 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.16 · 13.6% (36 of 265 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (12 of 265 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.13 · 30.9% (82 of 265 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.18 · 5.7% (15 of 265 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.14 · 14.0% (37 of 265 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (10 of 265 decks)
- Drannith Ruins relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (11 of 265 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (8 of 265 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (8 of 265 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (8 of 265 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (8 of 265 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.16 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (19)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.22 · 20.0% (53 of 265 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.24 · 12.8% (34 of 265 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.17 · 34.0% (90 of 265 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.20 · 11.3% (30 of 265 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.21 · 6.8% (18 of 265 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.18 · 10.9% (29 of 265 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (16 of 265 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.16 · 6.8% (18 of 265 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.15 · 7.2% (19 of 265 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (9 of 265 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.20 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (10 of 265 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (9 of 265 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.13 · 2.6% (7 of 265 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (6 of 265 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 91.3% (242 of 265 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Surrak and Goreclaw, from 265 real Commander decks.