Cards like Clever Impersonator
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
67% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Clever Impersonator 74%
- Flesh Duplicate 61%
- Gigantoplasm 49%
Cards like Waxen Shapethief
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
60% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
2.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Waxen Shapethief 60%
- Mirror Image 59%
- Clone 55%
- Stunt Double 53%
Other options: Sakashima's Protege
Cards like Ephemerate
17× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Ephemerate 56%
- Cloudshift 43%
- Momentary Blink 14%
- Blur 4%
- Flicker of Fate 4%
- Scrollshift 2%
Other options: Acrobatic Maneuver, Justiciar's Portal, Turn to Mist, Liberate
Cards like Jwari Shapeshifter
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
8.9× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
96% of decks run one or more
vs. 79% of other Bant decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.84 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 96%
- Mana Vault 35%
- Grim Monolith 15%
- Basalt Monolith 2%
Cards like Avacyn's Pilgrim
3.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Bant decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other Bant decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Avacyn's Pilgrim 51%
- Llanowar Elves 42%
- Elvish Mystic 32%
- Fyndhorn Elves 23%
Other options: Boreal Druid, Greenweaver Druid, Nantuko Elder, Gyre Engineer, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Steward of Valeron, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Felidar Guardian
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Felidar Guardian 81%
- Flickerwisp 31%
- Guardian of Ghirapur 19%
- Glimmerpoint Stag 15%
Other options: Wispweaver Angel, Saltskitter, Skyskipper Duo
Cards like Chrome Mox
11× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 40%
- Mox Diamond 31%
Cards like Lotus Petal
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Lotus Petal 45%
- Lion's Eye Diamond 17%
Cards like Voice of Victory
9.6× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Bant decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Voice of Victory 30%
- Grand Abolisher 29%
Cards like Force of Will
5.2× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Force of Will 36%
- Force of Negation 24%
Cards like Mystic Remora
3.0× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other Bant decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Mystic Remora 38%
- Rhystic Study 25%
Cards like Soulherder
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Bloom Tender
2.8× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Bant decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Bloom Tender 31%
- Faeburrow Elder 25%
Cards like Talisman of Curiosity
1.8× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Bant decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Bant decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Eternal Witness
9.0× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Bant decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Elvish Regrower, Greenwarden of Murasa, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Restoration Angel
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
85% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Chord of Calling
2.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Bant decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Deafening Silence
14× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Rule of Law, Curse of Exhaustion, Arcane Laboratory
Cards like Eerie Interlude
3.8× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Cloud of Faeries
3.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Bant decks
Cards like White Plume Adventurer
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Supportive Parents
6.4× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Saruli Caretaker, Loam Dryad, Jaspera Sentinel
Cards like Worldly Tutor
1.6× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Bant decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 32%
- Eladamri's Call 11%
- Sylvan Tutor 3%
Cards like Appa, Steadfast Guardian
2.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Essence Flux
9.1× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Essence Flux 35%
- Planar Incision 3%
Other options: Otherworldly Journey, Spaceshift, Teferi's Time Twist, Long Road Home
Cards like Flusterstorm
6.2× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Bant decks
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
4.6× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards like Silence
2.2× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Bant decks
Cards like Badgermole Cub
4.0× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Bant decks
All top picks (50)
- Katara, the Fearless relevance 0.47 · 78.2% (97 of 124 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.43 · 74.2% (92 of 124 decks)
- Jwari Shapeshifter relevance 0.48 · 60.5% (75 of 124 decks)
- Icewind Stalwart relevance 0.47 · 62.1% (77 of 124 decks)
- Waxen Shapethief relevance 0.48 · 60.5% (75 of 124 decks)
- Mirror Image relevance 0.48 · 58.9% (73 of 124 decks)
- Vizier of Many Faces relevance 0.48 · 56.5% (70 of 124 decks)
- Restoration Angel relevance 0.37 · 83.1% (103 of 124 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.39 · 74.2% (92 of 124 decks)
- Gigantoplasm relevance 0.50 · 49.2% (61 of 124 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.36 · 80.6% (100 of 124 decks)
- Clone relevance 0.47 · 54.8% (68 of 124 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.42 · 64.5% (80 of 124 decks)
- Naga Fleshcrafter relevance 0.47 · 52.4% (65 of 124 decks)
- Mirrorhall Mimic // Ghastly Mimicry relevance 0.49 · 47.6% (59 of 124 decks)
- Visage Bandit relevance 0.49 · 46.8% (58 of 124 decks)
- Copycrook relevance 0.50 · 45.2% (56 of 124 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.43 · 59.7% (74 of 124 decks)
- Felidar Guardian relevance 0.34 · 81.5% (101 of 124 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.36 · 76.6% (95 of 124 decks)
- Altered Ego relevance 0.44 · 55.6% (69 of 124 decks)
- Undercover Operative relevance 0.49 · 44.4% (55 of 124 decks)
- Preston, the Vanisher relevance 0.40 · 65.3% (81 of 124 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.37 · 72.6% (90 of 124 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.43 · 53.2% (66 of 124 decks)
- Jackdaw Savior relevance 0.49 · 39.5% (49 of 124 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.42 · 53.2% (66 of 124 decks)
- Brenard, Ginger Sculptor relevance 0.50 · 32.3% (40 of 124 decks)
- Sakashima's Student relevance 0.50 · 30.6% (38 of 124 decks)
- Supportive Parents relevance 0.49 · 33.1% (41 of 124 decks)
- Charming Prince relevance 0.42 · 38.7% (48 of 124 decks)
- Flesh Duplicate relevance 0.33 · 61.3% (76 of 124 decks)
- Airbender Ascension relevance 0.42 · 34.7% (43 of 124 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 0.46 · 26.6% (33 of 124 decks)
- Flickerwisp relevance 0.43 · 31.5% (39 of 124 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.42 · 35.5% (44 of 124 decks)
- Guardian of Ghirapur relevance 0.48 · 18.5% (23 of 124 decks)
- White Plume Adventurer relevance 0.41 · 34.7% (43 of 124 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.26 · 78.2% (97 of 124 decks)
- Soulherder relevance 0.34 · 50.0% (62 of 124 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 0.36 · 42.7% (53 of 124 decks)
- Glimmerpoint Stag relevance 0.47 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Renegade Rallier relevance 0.47 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Ennis, Debate Moderator relevance 0.46 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Phelia, Exuberant Shepherd relevance 0.41 · 25.0% (31 of 124 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 0.30 · 56.5% (70 of 124 decks)
- Extraction Specialist relevance 0.47 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Diamond Lion relevance 0.47 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Pentad Prism relevance 0.46 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Salvation Swan relevance 0.46 · 13.7% (17 of 124 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Katara, the Fearless relevance 0.47 · 78.2% (97 of 124 decks)
- Chameleon, Master of Disguise relevance 0.43 · 74.2% (92 of 124 decks)
- Jwari Shapeshifter relevance 0.48 · 60.5% (75 of 124 decks)
- Icewind Stalwart relevance 0.47 · 62.1% (77 of 124 decks)
- Waxen Shapethief relevance 0.48 · 60.5% (75 of 124 decks)
- Mirror Image relevance 0.48 · 58.9% (73 of 124 decks)
- Vizier of Many Faces relevance 0.48 · 56.5% (70 of 124 decks)
- Restoration Angel relevance 0.37 · 83.1% (103 of 124 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.39 · 74.2% (92 of 124 decks)
- Gigantoplasm relevance 0.50 · 49.2% (61 of 124 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.36 · 80.6% (100 of 124 decks)
- Clone relevance 0.47 · 54.8% (68 of 124 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.42 · 64.5% (80 of 124 decks)
- Naga Fleshcrafter relevance 0.47 · 52.4% (65 of 124 decks)
- Mirrorhall Mimic // Ghastly Mimicry relevance 0.49 · 47.6% (59 of 124 decks)
- Visage Bandit relevance 0.49 · 46.8% (58 of 124 decks)
- Copycrook relevance 0.50 · 45.2% (56 of 124 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.43 · 59.7% (74 of 124 decks)
- Felidar Guardian relevance 0.34 · 81.5% (101 of 124 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.36 · 76.6% (95 of 124 decks)
- Altered Ego relevance 0.44 · 55.6% (69 of 124 decks)
- Undercover Operative relevance 0.49 · 44.4% (55 of 124 decks)
- Preston, the Vanisher relevance 0.40 · 65.3% (81 of 124 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.37 · 72.6% (90 of 124 decks)
- Stunt Double relevance 0.43 · 53.2% (66 of 124 decks)
- Jackdaw Savior relevance 0.49 · 39.5% (49 of 124 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.42 · 53.2% (66 of 124 decks)
- Brenard, Ginger Sculptor relevance 0.50 · 32.3% (40 of 124 decks)
- Sakashima's Student relevance 0.50 · 30.6% (38 of 124 decks)
- Supportive Parents relevance 0.49 · 33.1% (41 of 124 decks)
- Charming Prince relevance 0.42 · 38.7% (48 of 124 decks)
- Flesh Duplicate relevance 0.33 · 61.3% (76 of 124 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 0.46 · 26.6% (33 of 124 decks)
- Flickerwisp relevance 0.43 · 31.5% (39 of 124 decks)
- Guardian of Ghirapur relevance 0.48 · 18.5% (23 of 124 decks)
- White Plume Adventurer relevance 0.41 · 34.7% (43 of 124 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.26 · 78.2% (97 of 124 decks)
- Soulherder relevance 0.34 · 50.0% (62 of 124 decks)
- Glimmerpoint Stag relevance 0.47 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Renegade Rallier relevance 0.47 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Ennis, Debate Moderator relevance 0.46 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Phelia, Exuberant Shepherd relevance 0.41 · 25.0% (31 of 124 decks)
- Extraction Specialist relevance 0.47 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Diamond Lion relevance 0.47 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Salvation Swan relevance 0.46 · 13.7% (17 of 124 decks)
- Loyal Retainers relevance 0.47 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Redemption Choir relevance 0.46 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Saffi Eriksdotter relevance 0.45 · 13.7% (17 of 124 decks)
- Aang, Swift Savior // Aang and La, Ocean's Fury relevance 0.39 · 25.8% (32 of 124 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.37 · 32.3% (40 of 124 decks)
All artifacts (36)
- Pentad Prism relevance 0.46 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.33 · 41.9% (52 of 124 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.42 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.38 · 21.0% (26 of 124 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.35 · 15.3% (19 of 124 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.41 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.38 · 8.1% (10 of 124 decks)
- Null Rod relevance 0.37 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.27 · 18.5% (23 of 124 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.31 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- Talisman of Progress relevance 0.27 · 17.7% (22 of 124 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.20 · 45.2% (56 of 124 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.31 · 8.1% (10 of 124 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.23 · 30.6% (38 of 124 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.25 · 22.6% (28 of 124 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.21 · 34.7% (43 of 124 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.20 · 40.3% (50 of 124 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.29 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.27 · 12.1% (15 of 124 decks)
- Glider Staff relevance 0.32 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.26 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.25 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.09 · 66.1% (82 of 124 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.16 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.15 · 8.1% (10 of 124 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.17 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.03 · 96.0% (119 of 124 decks)
All enchantments (29)
- Airbender Ascension relevance 0.42 · 34.7% (43 of 124 decks)
- Touch the Spirit Realm relevance 0.41 · 21.0% (26 of 124 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.35 · 30.6% (38 of 124 decks)
- Deafening Silence relevance 0.33 · 21.8% (27 of 124 decks)
- Cream of the Crop relevance 0.41 · 8.1% (10 of 124 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.40 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.38 · 8.1% (10 of 124 decks)
- Birthing Ritual relevance 0.35 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Teleportation Circle relevance 0.31 · 12.1% (15 of 124 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.37 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Stony Silence relevance 0.32 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.22 · 30.6% (38 of 124 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.28 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.21 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- Angelic Renewal relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.14 · 37.9% (47 of 124 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.21 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Aang's Iceberg relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.17 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.19 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.13 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.11 · 25.0% (31 of 124 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.16 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Gleaming Splendor relevance 0.16 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
All instants (50)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.42 · 35.5% (44 of 124 decks)
- Cloudshift relevance 0.36 · 42.7% (53 of 124 decks)
- Ephemerate relevance 0.30 · 56.5% (70 of 124 decks)
- Waterbender's Restoration relevance 0.42 · 10.5% (13 of 124 decks)
- Momentary Blink relevance 0.36 · 13.7% (17 of 124 decks)
- Airbender's Reversal relevance 0.38 · 8.1% (10 of 124 decks)
- Enter the Avatar State relevance 0.39 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.30 · 15.3% (19 of 124 decks)
- Eerie Interlude relevance 0.29 · 15.3% (19 of 124 decks)
- Parting Gust relevance 0.32 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.35 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Airbending Lesson relevance 0.35 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Personify relevance 0.35 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- It'll Quench Ya! relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.21 · 28.2% (35 of 124 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.19 · 36.3% (45 of 124 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.24 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.29 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.30 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.27 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.20 · 29.0% (36 of 124 decks)
- Earthshape relevance 0.32 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.17 · 36.3% (45 of 124 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.26 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.19 · 24.2% (30 of 124 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.20 · 21.0% (26 of 124 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.17 · 33.9% (42 of 124 decks)
- Flicker of Fate relevance 0.28 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Ghostway relevance 0.25 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.16 · 32.3% (40 of 124 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.17 · 20.2% (25 of 124 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.19 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.22 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Miscast relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.14 · 35.5% (44 of 124 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.13 · 35.5% (44 of 124 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.20 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.12 · 38.7% (48 of 124 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.19 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.13 · 28.2% (35 of 124 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.14 · 21.0% (26 of 124 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.17 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.17 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.14 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
All sorceries (25)
- Avatar's Wrath relevance 0.36 · 23.4% (29 of 124 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.35 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Tale of Momo relevance 0.36 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.33 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.32 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.16 · 33.9% (42 of 124 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.19 · 10.5% (13 of 124 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.20 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.20 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Storm of Souls relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.17 · 12.1% (15 of 124 decks)
- Morningtide's Light relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.15 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.16 · 10.5% (13 of 124 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.15 · 11.3% (14 of 124 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.14 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.13 · 8.1% (10 of 124 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.16 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.13 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Wargate relevance 0.09 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.35 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Teferi, Time Raveler relevance 0.13 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
All utility lands (49)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.42 · 65.3% (81 of 124 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.36 · 43.5% (54 of 124 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.37 · 14.5% (18 of 124 decks)
- Jasmine Dragon Tea Shop relevance 0.40 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.39 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.39 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Kyoshi Village relevance 0.37 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Ally Encampment relevance 0.37 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- North Pole Gates relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.34 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.35 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.26 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.21 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.32 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.21 · 16.1% (20 of 124 decks)
- Meditation Pools relevance 0.31 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.22 · 11.3% (14 of 124 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.21 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Restless Anchorage relevance 0.29 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.20 · 12.1% (15 of 124 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.14 · 39.5% (49 of 124 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.20 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.18 · 11.3% (14 of 124 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.19 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Temple of Enlightenment relevance 0.19 · 6.5% (8 of 124 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.12 · 39.5% (49 of 124 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.17 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Tranquil Landscape relevance 0.18 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.18 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.22 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.15 · 10.5% (13 of 124 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.16 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Spara's Headquarters relevance 0.11 · 16.1% (20 of 124 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.15 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Irrigated Farmland relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.14 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.13 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.10 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.08 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
All lands (50)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.48 · 16.9% (21 of 124 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.44 · 20.2% (25 of 124 decks)
- Great Hall of the Citadel relevance 0.43 · 13.7% (17 of 124 decks)
- Tarnished Citadel relevance 0.33 · 13.7% (17 of 124 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.39 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.29 · 21.8% (27 of 124 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.20 · 46.8% (58 of 124 decks)
- Skycloud Expanse relevance 0.25 · 20.2% (25 of 124 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.21 · 39.5% (49 of 124 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.26 · 15.3% (19 of 124 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.20 · 39.5% (49 of 124 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.19 · 45.2% (56 of 124 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.23 · 26.6% (33 of 124 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.24 · 18.5% (23 of 124 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.22 · 28.2% (35 of 124 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.19 · 41.9% (52 of 124 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.19 · 38.7% (48 of 124 decks)
- Port Town relevance 0.25 · 12.1% (15 of 124 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.17 · 42.7% (53 of 124 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.17 · 41.1% (51 of 124 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.18 · 33.1% (41 of 124 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.17 · 41.9% (52 of 124 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.17 · 41.1% (51 of 124 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.24 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.16 · 47.6% (59 of 124 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.24 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Irrigation Ditch relevance 0.31 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Gemstone Mine relevance 0.28 · 4.0% (5 of 124 decks)
- Seachrome Coast relevance 0.23 · 9.7% (12 of 124 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.20 · 13.7% (17 of 124 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.22 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
- Gathering Place relevance 0.29 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Gleaming Bastion relevance 0.29 · 3.2% (4 of 124 decks)
- Prairie Stream relevance 0.16 · 26.6% (33 of 124 decks)
- Deserted Beach relevance 0.19 · 12.9% (16 of 124 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.21 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.17 · 16.1% (20 of 124 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.20 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.16 · 17.7% (22 of 124 decks)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.20 · 5.6% (7 of 124 decks)
- Adarkar Wastes relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (31 of 124 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.14 · 28.2% (35 of 124 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.15 · 21.0% (26 of 124 decks)
- Urban Retreat relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (6 of 124 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.19 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.18 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Floodfarm Verge relevance 0.18 · 7.3% (9 of 124 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.13 · 28.2% (35 of 124 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.17 · 8.9% (11 of 124 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Aang, at the Crossroads // Aang, Destined Savior, from 124 real Commander decks.