Cards like Peregrine Drake
17× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
- Peregrine Drake 67%
- Cloud of Faeries 50%
- Palinchron 3%
- Great Whale 2%
Cards like Solemn Simulacrum
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
10× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Essence Flux
4.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other blue decks
Cards
- Essence Flux 50%
- Planar Incision 23%
- Teferi's Time Twist 17%
- Spaceshift 1%
Cards like Thought Vessel
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
74% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.62 in other blue decks
Cards like Man-o'-War
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Man-o'-War 19%
- Exclusion Mage 6%
- Aether Adept 4%
- Disruptor of Currents 4%
- Bigfin Bouncer 2%
- Rimekin Recluse 1%
Other options: Riddlemaster Sphinx, Winter Eladrin, Mist Raven, Iceridge Serpent, Matterbending Mage, Angler Drake, Air-Cult Elemental, Peerless Ropemaster, Roaming Ghostlight, Separatist Voidmage, Hotshot Investigators, Hoverguard Sweepers, Spellweaver Duo, Voidwielder, Surrakar Banisher
Cards like Archaeomancer
3.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Scrivener
Cards like Mulldrifter
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mulldrifter 62%
- Quantum Riddler 8%
Cards like Quantum Misalignment
2.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Multiversal Recruitment
Cards like Thran Dynamo
1.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Sisay's Ring, Ichor Elixir, Ur-Golem's Eye
Cards like Strionic Resonator
7.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Whirler Rogue
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Nimble Thopterist, Aspiring Aeronaut
Cards like Throne of Eldraine
4.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Throne of Eldraine 21%
- Nyx Lotus 6%
Cards like Swan Song
1.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swan Song 29%
- Strix Serenade 9%
All top picks (50)
- Circuit Mender relevance 0.85 · 60.3% (836 of 1,387 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.63 · 69.6% (966 of 1,387 decks)
- Jill, Shiva's Dominant // Shiva, Warden of Ice relevance 0.76 · 51.0% (708 of 1,387 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.56 · 80.2% (1,113 of 1,387 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.65 · 65.7% (911 of 1,387 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.57 · 76.9% (1,067 of 1,387 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.60 · 71.4% (991 of 1,387 decks)
- Cosmos Elixir relevance 0.91 · 29.8% (413 of 1,387 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.59 · 71.7% (994 of 1,387 decks)
- Anticausal Vestige relevance 0.76 · 45.3% (628 of 1,387 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.70 · 47.8% (663 of 1,387 decks)
- Watcher for Tomorrow relevance 0.78 · 37.1% (514 of 1,387 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.58 · 65.5% (908 of 1,387 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.70 · 46.6% (647 of 1,387 decks)
- Astral Dragon relevance 0.69 · 46.9% (650 of 1,387 decks)
- Feywild Caretaker relevance 0.87 · 22.4% (311 of 1,387 decks)
- Scampering Surveyor relevance 0.76 · 34.6% (480 of 1,387 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.58 · 59.8% (829 of 1,387 decks)
- Primordial Mist relevance 0.80 · 26.8% (372 of 1,387 decks)
- Palantír of Orthanc relevance 0.74 · 32.3% (448 of 1,387 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.52 · 59.8% (829 of 1,387 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.57 · 50.0% (694 of 1,387 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.51 · 61.9% (858 of 1,387 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.47 · 67.1% (931 of 1,387 decks)
- Hurkyl, Master Wizard relevance 0.79 · 14.3% (199 of 1,387 decks)
- Overlord of the Floodpits relevance 0.67 · 28.7% (398 of 1,387 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.64 · 32.2% (446 of 1,387 decks)
- Serum Visionary relevance 0.70 · 23.0% (319 of 1,387 decks)
- Geology Enthusiast relevance 0.78 · 13.0% (181 of 1,387 decks)
- Quistis Trepe relevance 0.70 · 19.8% (274 of 1,387 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.54 · 41.0% (568 of 1,387 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.67 · 19.1% (265 of 1,387 decks)
- Sea Gate Oracle relevance 0.68 · 17.7% (246 of 1,387 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.63 · 24.9% (346 of 1,387 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.54 · 37.0% (513 of 1,387 decks)
- Cynette, Jelly Drover relevance 0.69 · 13.9% (193 of 1,387 decks)
- Azure Fleet Admiral relevance 0.76 · 8.5% (118 of 1,387 decks)
- Gogo, Master of Mimicry relevance 0.60 · 22.4% (311 of 1,387 decks)
- Throne of the God-Pharaoh relevance 0.71 · 11.0% (152 of 1,387 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.38 · 67.6% (937 of 1,387 decks)
- Marang River Regent // Coil and Catch relevance 0.60 · 21.3% (295 of 1,387 decks)
- Tolarian Contempt relevance 0.67 · 12.8% (178 of 1,387 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.39 · 62.3% (864 of 1,387 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, All-Knowing relevance 0.70 · 10.9% (151 of 1,387 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.33 · 77.0% (1,068 of 1,387 decks)
- Archivist of Gondor relevance 0.76 · 7.1% (99 of 1,387 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.52 · 33.6% (466 of 1,387 decks)
- Wondrous Crucible relevance 0.65 · 12.6% (175 of 1,387 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.59 · 20.3% (282 of 1,387 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.43 · 50.0% (693 of 1,387 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Circuit Mender relevance 0.85 · 60.3% (836 of 1,387 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.63 · 69.6% (966 of 1,387 decks)
- Jill, Shiva's Dominant // Shiva, Warden of Ice relevance 0.76 · 51.0% (708 of 1,387 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.56 · 80.2% (1,113 of 1,387 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.65 · 65.7% (911 of 1,387 decks)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 0.59 · 71.7% (994 of 1,387 decks)
- Anticausal Vestige relevance 0.76 · 45.3% (628 of 1,387 decks)
- Watcher for Tomorrow relevance 0.78 · 37.1% (514 of 1,387 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.58 · 65.5% (908 of 1,387 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.70 · 46.6% (647 of 1,387 decks)
- Astral Dragon relevance 0.69 · 46.9% (650 of 1,387 decks)
- Feywild Caretaker relevance 0.87 · 22.4% (311 of 1,387 decks)
- Scampering Surveyor relevance 0.76 · 34.6% (480 of 1,387 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.52 · 59.8% (829 of 1,387 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.57 · 50.0% (694 of 1,387 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.51 · 61.9% (858 of 1,387 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.47 · 67.1% (931 of 1,387 decks)
- Hurkyl, Master Wizard relevance 0.79 · 14.3% (199 of 1,387 decks)
- Overlord of the Floodpits relevance 0.67 · 28.7% (398 of 1,387 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.64 · 32.2% (446 of 1,387 decks)
- Serum Visionary relevance 0.70 · 23.0% (319 of 1,387 decks)
- Geology Enthusiast relevance 0.78 · 13.0% (181 of 1,387 decks)
- Quistis Trepe relevance 0.70 · 19.8% (274 of 1,387 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.54 · 41.0% (568 of 1,387 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.67 · 19.1% (265 of 1,387 decks)
- Sea Gate Oracle relevance 0.68 · 17.7% (246 of 1,387 decks)
- Cynette, Jelly Drover relevance 0.69 · 13.9% (193 of 1,387 decks)
- Azure Fleet Admiral relevance 0.76 · 8.5% (118 of 1,387 decks)
- Gogo, Master of Mimicry relevance 0.60 · 22.4% (311 of 1,387 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.38 · 67.6% (937 of 1,387 decks)
- Marang River Regent // Coil and Catch relevance 0.60 · 21.3% (295 of 1,387 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, All-Knowing relevance 0.70 · 10.9% (151 of 1,387 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.33 · 77.0% (1,068 of 1,387 decks)
- Archivist of Gondor relevance 0.76 · 7.1% (99 of 1,387 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.52 · 33.6% (466 of 1,387 decks)
- Skycoach Conductor // All Aboard relevance 0.63 · 13.6% (189 of 1,387 decks)
- Cloudkin Seer relevance 0.60 · 14.3% (199 of 1,387 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.41 · 48.1% (667 of 1,387 decks)
- Whirler Rogue relevance 0.52 · 22.4% (311 of 1,387 decks)
- Emeritus of Ideation // Ancestral Recall relevance 0.54 · 17.8% (247 of 1,387 decks)
- Amphin Mutineer relevance 0.62 · 9.8% (136 of 1,387 decks)
- Alrund, God of the Cosmos // Hakka, Whispering Raven relevance 0.68 · 5.5% (76 of 1,387 decks)
- April O'Neil, Hacktivist relevance 0.66 · 6.4% (89 of 1,387 decks)
- Master of Waves relevance 0.52 · 16.6% (230 of 1,387 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 0.60 · 9.0% (125 of 1,387 decks)
- Summon: Valefor relevance 0.61 · 8.5% (118 of 1,387 decks)
- Summon: Bahamut relevance 0.60 · 8.9% (124 of 1,387 decks)
- Myr Battlesphere relevance 0.50 · 18.3% (254 of 1,387 decks)
- Sludge Monster relevance 0.64 · 6.0% (83 of 1,387 decks)
- Summon: Shiva relevance 0.59 · 8.9% (123 of 1,387 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.57 · 76.9% (1,067 of 1,387 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.60 · 71.4% (991 of 1,387 decks)
- Cosmos Elixir relevance 0.91 · 29.8% (413 of 1,387 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.58 · 59.8% (829 of 1,387 decks)
- Palantír of Orthanc relevance 0.74 · 32.3% (448 of 1,387 decks)
- Throne of the God-Pharaoh relevance 0.71 · 11.0% (152 of 1,387 decks)
- Wondrous Crucible relevance 0.65 · 12.6% (175 of 1,387 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.59 · 20.3% (282 of 1,387 decks)
- Scroll of Fate relevance 0.65 · 7.5% (104 of 1,387 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Statue relevance 0.52 · 13.9% (193 of 1,387 decks)
- Kimoyo Beads relevance 0.78 · 3.7% (51 of 1,387 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.45 · 16.9% (234 of 1,387 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.41 · 20.9% (290 of 1,387 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.37 · 28.7% (398 of 1,387 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.36 · 26.6% (369 of 1,387 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.45 · 9.6% (133 of 1,387 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.45 · 8.7% (121 of 1,387 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (73 of 1,387 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.36 · 14.3% (198 of 1,387 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.42 · 6.0% (83 of 1,387 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.32 · 20.5% (285 of 1,387 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.42 · 5.6% (77 of 1,387 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.45 · 4.5% (63 of 1,387 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.42 · 4.8% (67 of 1,387 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.38 · 7.5% (104 of 1,387 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.27 · 30.1% (418 of 1,387 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.29 · 23.4% (324 of 1,387 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.27 · 29.7% (412 of 1,387 decks)
- Misleading Signpost relevance 0.39 · 5.7% (79 of 1,387 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.32 · 10.9% (151 of 1,387 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.38 · 4.5% (63 of 1,387 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.32 · 8.1% (113 of 1,387 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.27 · 13.4% (186 of 1,387 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.32 · 5.8% (80 of 1,387 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.28 · 11.8% (163 of 1,387 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (72 of 1,387 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.38 · 3.9% (54 of 1,387 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.19 · 39.6% (549 of 1,387 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.14 · 70.8% (982 of 1,387 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.22 · 21.8% (303 of 1,387 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.27 · 7.7% (107 of 1,387 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (60 of 1,387 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.21 · 18.5% (257 of 1,387 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (75 of 1,387 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.24 · 8.6% (119 of 1,387 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.11 · 77.1% (1,069 of 1,387 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (48 of 1,387 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.23 · 6.6% (91 of 1,387 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (49 of 1,387 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (42 of 1,387 decks)
All enchantments (26)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.70 · 47.8% (663 of 1,387 decks)
- Primordial Mist relevance 0.80 · 26.8% (372 of 1,387 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.63 · 24.9% (346 of 1,387 decks)
- Tolarian Contempt relevance 0.67 · 12.8% (178 of 1,387 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.54 · 12.7% (176 of 1,387 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.56 · 10.9% (151 of 1,387 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.43 · 26.7% (371 of 1,387 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.56 · 8.0% (111 of 1,387 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.56 · 7.7% (107 of 1,387 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.38 · 14.3% (198 of 1,387 decks)
- Gossip's Talent relevance 0.50 · 3.6% (50 of 1,387 decks)
- Roll-Roll-Roll-Roll relevance 0.55 · 2.7% (38 of 1,387 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.38 · 5.2% (72 of 1,387 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.28 · 19.1% (265 of 1,387 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.21 · 44.6% (618 of 1,387 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.29 · 10.3% (143 of 1,387 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.37 · 4.1% (57 of 1,387 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.30 · 5.6% (78 of 1,387 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.20 · 26.7% (371 of 1,387 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.28 · 5.2% (72 of 1,387 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.21 · 20.4% (283 of 1,387 decks)
- Court of Cunning relevance 0.37 · 2.9% (40 of 1,387 decks)
- Fraying Sanity relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (43 of 1,387 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.23 · 8.1% (113 of 1,387 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (45 of 1,387 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (39 of 1,387 decks)
All instants (50)
- Displace relevance 0.54 · 37.0% (513 of 1,387 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.39 · 62.3% (864 of 1,387 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.43 · 50.0% (693 of 1,387 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.52 · 15.9% (220 of 1,387 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.46 · 24.5% (340 of 1,387 decks)
- Waterbender's Restoration relevance 0.56 · 10.2% (141 of 1,387 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.46 · 22.6% (313 of 1,387 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.44 · 16.8% (233 of 1,387 decks)
- Illusionist's Stratagem relevance 0.53 · 6.8% (94 of 1,387 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.37 · 10.4% (144 of 1,387 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.32 · 14.0% (194 of 1,387 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.34 · 9.2% (128 of 1,387 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.37 · 5.3% (73 of 1,387 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.29 · 13.0% (181 of 1,387 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.20 · 43.2% (599 of 1,387 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.23 · 30.3% (420 of 1,387 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.31 · 6.8% (95 of 1,387 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.32 · 5.6% (77 of 1,387 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.26 · 14.3% (198 of 1,387 decks)
- Siren's Ruse relevance 0.43 · 3.2% (44 of 1,387 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.35 · 4.3% (60 of 1,387 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.21 · 34.3% (476 of 1,387 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (76 of 1,387 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.24 · 17.2% (238 of 1,387 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.18 · 43.0% (596 of 1,387 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.23 · 19.0% (264 of 1,387 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.32 · 4.6% (64 of 1,387 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.27 · 8.9% (124 of 1,387 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.16 · 54.0% (749 of 1,387 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.21 · 28.8% (399 of 1,387 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.23 · 14.4% (200 of 1,387 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.22 · 19.1% (265 of 1,387 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.17 · 45.6% (632 of 1,387 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.25 · 11.7% (162 of 1,387 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.28 · 5.8% (80 of 1,387 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.28 · 5.8% (81 of 1,387 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.19 · 32.7% (454 of 1,387 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.25 · 10.3% (143 of 1,387 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.25 · 9.3% (129 of 1,387 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.30 · 4.5% (63 of 1,387 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.18 · 34.5% (478 of 1,387 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.17 · 39.7% (550 of 1,387 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.28 · 4.5% (62 of 1,387 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.27 · 4.8% (66 of 1,387 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.21 · 13.3% (184 of 1,387 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (47 of 1,387 decks)
- Spider-Sense relevance 0.36 · 2.7% (38 of 1,387 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.33 · 3.0% (42 of 1,387 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.18 · 21.1% (293 of 1,387 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (88 of 1,387 decks)
All sorceries (22)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.50 · 17.7% (246 of 1,387 decks)
- Relm's Sketching relevance 0.49 · 15.2% (211 of 1,387 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.45 · 10.4% (144 of 1,387 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.46 · 8.4% (116 of 1,387 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.39 · 17.0% (236 of 1,387 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.40 · 10.9% (151 of 1,387 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.36 · 10.4% (144 of 1,387 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.33 · 9.5% (132 of 1,387 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.41 · 4.3% (59 of 1,387 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.34 · 4.8% (67 of 1,387 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.32 · 5.8% (81 of 1,387 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.21 · 30.9% (429 of 1,387 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.23 · 21.0% (291 of 1,387 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.31 · 5.6% (78 of 1,387 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.24 · 15.6% (217 of 1,387 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.40 · 3.2% (44 of 1,387 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.33 · 4.2% (58 of 1,387 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (59 of 1,387 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.29 · 5.2% (72 of 1,387 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.23 · 12.3% (170 of 1,387 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.31 · 2.8% (39 of 1,387 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (44 of 1,387 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.46 · 7.5% (104 of 1,387 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.27 · 10.7% (149 of 1,387 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Segovia // Caetus, Sea Tyrant of Segovia relevance 0.46 · 6.4% (89 of 1,387 decks)
All utility lands (37)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.38 · 21.8% (302 of 1,387 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.44 · 11.1% (154 of 1,387 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.39 · 15.1% (210 of 1,387 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.42 · 9.5% (132 of 1,387 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.37 · 12.6% (175 of 1,387 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.34 · 11.6% (161 of 1,387 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.30 · 18.9% (262 of 1,387 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.29 · 20.0% (278 of 1,387 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.29 · 20.1% (279 of 1,387 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (173 of 1,387 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.37 · 5.1% (71 of 1,387 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.26 · 26.0% (360 of 1,387 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.28 · 15.7% (218 of 1,387 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.35 · 5.3% (74 of 1,387 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.23 · 32.5% (451 of 1,387 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.23 · 28.5% (395 of 1,387 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.32 · 6.8% (94 of 1,387 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.25 · 20.3% (281 of 1,387 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (115 of 1,387 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.35 · 4.5% (62 of 1,387 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.37 · 4.0% (56 of 1,387 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.40 · 3.3% (46 of 1,387 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (85 of 1,387 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.25 · 12.9% (179 of 1,387 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (73 of 1,387 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (56 of 1,387 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.26 · 8.2% (114 of 1,387 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.32 · 4.0% (56 of 1,387 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.26 · 7.9% (109 of 1,387 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.12 · 66.9% (928 of 1,387 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.14 · 56.7% (787 of 1,387 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (69 of 1,387 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.28 · 3.6% (50 of 1,387 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.22 · 4.9% (68 of 1,387 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (63 of 1,387 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (36 of 1,387 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (47 of 1,387 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (16)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.31 · 33.0% (458 of 1,387 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.36 · 12.0% (167 of 1,387 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.34 · 8.4% (117 of 1,387 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.28 · 8.1% (112 of 1,387 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.33 · 4.0% (56 of 1,387 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.23 · 14.3% (199 of 1,387 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.36 · 2.7% (37 of 1,387 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.34 · 2.9% (40 of 1,387 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (49 of 1,387 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.27 · 3.6% (50 of 1,387 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.27 · 3.6% (50 of 1,387 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (34 of 1,387 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (45 of 1,387 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (42 of 1,387 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.22 · 3.3% (46 of 1,387 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 85.8% (1,190 of 1,387 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Y'shtola Rhul, from 1,387 real Commander decks.