Cards like Elrond, Master of Healing
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
51% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Elvish Archdruid
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Elvish Archdruid 66%
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary 28%
- Imperious Perfect 22%
- Galadhrim Brigade 22%
- Canopy Tactician 3%
Other options: Elvish Clancaller
Cards like Elvish Mystic
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
55% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Elvish Mystic 65%
- Llanowar Elves 61%
- Fyndhorn Elves 28%
- Boreal Druid 1%
Other options: Druid of the Cowl, Greenweaver Druid, Nantuko Elder, Gyre Engineer, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Path of the Animist
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Elvish Warmaster
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 61%
- Commander's Sphere 10%
Cards like Rampant Growth
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 56% of other Simic decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.2 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rampant Growth 48%
- Cultivate 46%
- Kodama's Reach 14%
- Shared Roots 1%
Other options: Path to the Festival, Peregrination, They Went This Way, Explosive Vegetation, Verdant Mastery, Migration Path, Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, Grow from the Ashes, Search for Tomorrow, Deep Reconnaissance, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Elvish Mariner
5.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Elven Chorus
9.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Marwyn, the Nurturer
7.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Farhaven Elf
4.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Farhaven Elf 20%
- Primeval Herald 1%
Other options: Simulacrum Shaper, Wild Wanderer, Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru, Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary, Quirion Trailblazer, Ondu Giant, Yavimaya Granger
All top picks (50)
- Split Decision relevance 0.71 · 86.1% (255 of 296 decks)
- Messenger Jays relevance 0.86 · 62.2% (184 of 296 decks)
- Orchard Elemental relevance 0.84 · 62.8% (186 of 296 decks)
- Coercive Portal relevance 0.78 · 69.3% (205 of 296 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 0.64 · 91.6% (271 of 296 decks)
- Emissary Green relevance 0.71 · 77.4% (229 of 296 decks)
- Galadriel, Elven-Queen relevance 0.67 · 82.1% (243 of 296 decks)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 0.64 · 84.8% (251 of 296 decks)
- Trap the Trespassers relevance 0.62 · 89.2% (264 of 296 decks)
- Illusion of Choice relevance 0.66 · 80.1% (237 of 296 decks)
- Sail into the West relevance 0.61 · 90.2% (267 of 296 decks)
- Travel Through Caradhras relevance 0.63 · 82.4% (244 of 296 decks)
- Model of Unity relevance 0.61 · 84.8% (251 of 296 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.59 · 90.2% (267 of 296 decks)
- Elrond of the White Council relevance 0.58 · 91.2% (270 of 296 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.58 · 65.9% (195 of 296 decks)
- Path of the Enigma relevance 0.85 · 25.3% (75 of 296 decks)
- Elrond, Master of Healing relevance 0.55 · 62.2% (184 of 296 decks)
- Galadriel of Lothlórien relevance 0.58 · 54.4% (161 of 296 decks)
- Path of the Animist relevance 0.69 · 28.7% (85 of 296 decks)
- Elvish Mariner relevance 0.53 · 54.1% (160 of 296 decks)
- Arwen Undómiel relevance 0.52 · 54.7% (162 of 296 decks)
- Mirkwood Trapper relevance 0.56 · 42.9% (127 of 296 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 0.53 · 44.3% (131 of 296 decks)
- Council's Deliberation relevance 0.60 · 31.8% (94 of 296 decks)
- Tempting Contract relevance 0.68 · 18.2% (54 of 296 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.42 · 65.5% (194 of 296 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.49 · 45.9% (136 of 296 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.49 · 44.6% (132 of 296 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 0.64 · 17.9% (53 of 296 decks)
- Tempt with Reflections relevance 0.59 · 22.6% (67 of 296 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.59 · 21.6% (64 of 296 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.47 · 42.9% (127 of 296 decks)
- Lost Isle Calling relevance 0.51 · 33.4% (99 of 296 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.52 · 28.7% (85 of 296 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 0.47 · 39.5% (117 of 296 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.53 · 27.7% (82 of 296 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.55 · 22.3% (66 of 296 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.44 · 43.9% (130 of 296 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.48 · 35.5% (105 of 296 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.50 · 28.7% (85 of 296 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.48 · 33.1% (98 of 296 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.40 · 50.3% (149 of 296 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.44 · 39.9% (118 of 296 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.45 · 34.5% (102 of 296 decks)
- Song of Eärendil relevance 0.48 · 28.7% (85 of 296 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.51 · 21.6% (64 of 296 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.47 · 29.1% (86 of 296 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.47 · 25.3% (75 of 296 decks)
- Legolas, Counter of Kills relevance 0.49 · 22.6% (67 of 296 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Messenger Jays relevance 0.86 · 62.2% (184 of 296 decks)
- Orchard Elemental relevance 0.84 · 62.8% (186 of 296 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 0.64 · 91.6% (271 of 296 decks)
- Emissary Green relevance 0.71 · 77.4% (229 of 296 decks)
- Galadriel, Elven-Queen relevance 0.67 · 82.1% (243 of 296 decks)
- Elrond of the White Council relevance 0.58 · 91.2% (270 of 296 decks)
- Elrond, Master of Healing relevance 0.55 · 62.2% (184 of 296 decks)
- Galadriel of Lothlórien relevance 0.58 · 54.4% (161 of 296 decks)
- Elvish Mariner relevance 0.53 · 54.1% (160 of 296 decks)
- Arwen Undómiel relevance 0.52 · 54.7% (162 of 296 decks)
- Mirkwood Trapper relevance 0.56 · 42.9% (127 of 296 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 0.53 · 44.3% (131 of 296 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.42 · 65.5% (194 of 296 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.49 · 44.6% (132 of 296 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 0.64 · 17.9% (53 of 296 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.47 · 42.9% (127 of 296 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 0.47 · 39.5% (117 of 296 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.53 · 27.7% (82 of 296 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.48 · 35.5% (105 of 296 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.50 · 28.7% (85 of 296 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.48 · 33.1% (98 of 296 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.40 · 50.3% (149 of 296 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.51 · 21.6% (64 of 296 decks)
- Legolas, Counter of Kills relevance 0.49 · 22.6% (67 of 296 decks)
- Mirkwood Elk relevance 0.49 · 18.9% (56 of 296 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.47 · 22.0% (65 of 296 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.42 · 29.4% (87 of 296 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 0.44 · 17.9% (53 of 296 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.45 · 13.5% (40 of 296 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.45 · 13.2% (39 of 296 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.35 · 36.8% (109 of 296 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.30 · 48.6% (144 of 296 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.45 · 11.1% (33 of 296 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (26 of 296 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.38 · 23.3% (69 of 296 decks)
- Glorfindel, Dauntless Rescuer relevance 0.45 · 10.5% (31 of 296 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.40 · 16.2% (48 of 296 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.45 · 8.8% (26 of 296 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.44 · 9.1% (27 of 296 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.37 · 15.9% (47 of 296 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.36 · 18.6% (55 of 296 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.35 · 19.6% (58 of 296 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.33 · 25.7% (76 of 296 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.21 · 65.2% (193 of 296 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.36 · 12.2% (36 of 296 decks)
- Chance-Met Elves relevance 0.40 · 6.4% (19 of 296 decks)
- Veteran Explorer relevance 0.41 · 4.4% (13 of 296 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.33 · 10.1% (30 of 296 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.29 · 16.9% (50 of 296 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.36 · 5.1% (15 of 296 decks)
All artifacts (31)
- Coercive Portal relevance 0.78 · 69.3% (205 of 296 decks)
- Model of Unity relevance 0.61 · 84.8% (251 of 296 decks)
- Tempting Contract relevance 0.68 · 18.2% (54 of 296 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.47 · 25.3% (75 of 296 decks)
- The Temporal Anchor relevance 0.47 · 16.9% (50 of 296 decks)
- Mirror of Galadriel relevance 0.45 · 19.6% (58 of 296 decks)
- Lothlórien Blade relevance 0.45 · 16.6% (49 of 296 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.38 · 16.6% (49 of 296 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.37 · 16.9% (50 of 296 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.33 · 8.4% (25 of 296 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (18 of 296 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (12 of 296 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.28 · 8.4% (25 of 296 decks)
- Victory Chimes relevance 0.37 · 3.4% (10 of 296 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.20 · 30.1% (89 of 296 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.26 · 10.1% (30 of 296 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.20 · 24.0% (71 of 296 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.26 · 5.7% (17 of 296 decks)
- Hithlain Rope relevance 0.39 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (8 of 296 decks)
- Helm of Awakening relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (8 of 296 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.34 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.26 · 3.7% (11 of 296 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.15 · 20.6% (61 of 296 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.19 · 6.4% (19 of 296 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.15 · 13.2% (39 of 296 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.14 · 10.1% (30 of 296 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.07 · 61.5% (182 of 296 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 72.0% (213 of 296 decks)
All enchantments (34)
- Lost Isle Calling relevance 0.51 · 33.4% (99 of 296 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.45 · 34.5% (102 of 296 decks)
- Song of Eärendil relevance 0.48 · 28.7% (85 of 296 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.47 · 18.9% (56 of 296 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.39 · 23.3% (69 of 296 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.41 · 14.2% (42 of 296 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.35 · 9.8% (29 of 296 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.38 · 5.1% (15 of 296 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.28 · 16.2% (48 of 296 decks)
- Viridian Revel relevance 0.44 · 3.4% (10 of 296 decks)
- Fall of Gil-galad relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (12 of 296 decks)
- Eladamri's Vineyard relevance 0.40 · 3.0% (9 of 296 decks)
- Upwelling relevance 0.41 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Psychic Impetus relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (9 of 296 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.23 · 5.7% (17 of 296 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.22 · 6.8% (20 of 296 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.20 · 8.1% (24 of 296 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (9 of 296 decks)
- Heartbeat of Spring relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (8 of 296 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (21 of 296 decks)
- Party Dude relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (11 of 296 decks)
- Awakening relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Down in the Valley relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (10 of 296 decks)
- Communal Brewing relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (9 of 296 decks)
- In Search of Greatness relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (8 of 296 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.14 · 6.8% (20 of 296 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (8 of 296 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.12 · 3.0% (9 of 296 decks)
All instants (50)
- Split Decision relevance 0.71 · 86.1% (255 of 296 decks)
- Trap the Trespassers relevance 0.62 · 89.2% (264 of 296 decks)
- Illusion of Choice relevance 0.66 · 80.1% (237 of 296 decks)
- Sail into the West relevance 0.61 · 90.2% (267 of 296 decks)
- Council's Deliberation relevance 0.60 · 31.8% (94 of 296 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.49 · 45.9% (136 of 296 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.47 · 29.1% (86 of 296 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.33 · 34.5% (102 of 296 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.36 · 19.6% (58 of 296 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.42 · 5.1% (15 of 296 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.33 · 12.5% (37 of 296 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.35 · 9.5% (28 of 296 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.32 · 12.5% (37 of 296 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.34 · 8.4% (25 of 296 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.28 · 16.9% (50 of 296 decks)
- Shower of Arrows relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (18 of 296 decks)
- Glorious Gale relevance 0.33 · 4.7% (14 of 296 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.28 · 10.1% (30 of 296 decks)
- Tribal Unity relevance 0.43 · 2.7% (8 of 296 decks)
- Out of Bounds relevance 0.44 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Learn from the Past relevance 0.33 · 4.1% (12 of 296 decks)
- Intellectual Offering relevance 0.39 · 3.0% (9 of 296 decks)
- Peel from Reality relevance 0.35 · 3.7% (11 of 296 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.19 · 29.7% (88 of 296 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.19 · 28.0% (83 of 296 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (16 of 296 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.16 · 44.6% (132 of 296 decks)
- Words of Wisdom relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (8 of 296 decks)
- Wrong Turn relevance 0.35 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.17 · 25.3% (75 of 296 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.12 · 54.4% (161 of 296 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (11 of 296 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (10 of 296 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.19 · 9.1% (27 of 296 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.20 · 6.4% (19 of 296 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (14 of 296 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (13 of 296 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (12 of 296 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.20 · 5.7% (17 of 296 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.16 · 16.9% (50 of 296 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.15 · 14.2% (42 of 296 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.11 · 47.3% (140 of 296 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.18 · 5.7% (17 of 296 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.11 · 39.5% (117 of 296 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (21 of 296 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.16 · 6.8% (20 of 296 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (8 of 296 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.15 · 10.5% (31 of 296 decks)
- Dissolve relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Joint Exploration relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (9 of 296 decks)
All sorceries (39)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 0.64 · 84.8% (251 of 296 decks)
- Travel Through Caradhras relevance 0.63 · 82.4% (244 of 296 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.59 · 90.2% (267 of 296 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.58 · 65.9% (195 of 296 decks)
- Path of the Enigma relevance 0.85 · 25.3% (75 of 296 decks)
- Path of the Animist relevance 0.69 · 28.7% (85 of 296 decks)
- Tempt with Reflections relevance 0.59 · 22.6% (67 of 296 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.59 · 21.6% (64 of 296 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.52 · 28.7% (85 of 296 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.55 · 22.3% (66 of 296 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.44 · 43.9% (130 of 296 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.44 · 39.9% (118 of 296 decks)
- Arwen's Gift relevance 0.45 · 14.9% (44 of 296 decks)
- The Ring Goes South relevance 0.47 · 9.1% (27 of 296 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.33 · 33.4% (99 of 296 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.45 · 8.8% (26 of 296 decks)
- Zndrsplt's Judgment relevance 0.48 · 4.7% (14 of 296 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.38 · 15.9% (47 of 296 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.34 · 20.6% (61 of 296 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.31 · 29.7% (88 of 296 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.35 · 6.4% (19 of 296 decks)
- Rally the Galadhrim relevance 0.34 · 5.1% (15 of 296 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.24 · 21.3% (63 of 296 decks)
- Manifold Insights relevance 0.42 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.27 · 6.1% (18 of 296 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.14 · 47.6% (141 of 296 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.25 · 4.4% (13 of 296 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.12 · 46.3% (137 of 296 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.20 · 4.7% (14 of 296 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (9 of 296 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.14 · 15.9% (47 of 296 decks)
- Seeds of Renewal relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.14 · 17.9% (53 of 296 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.12 · 20.9% (62 of 296 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (8 of 296 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.12 · 13.5% (40 of 296 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (9 of 296 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (8 of 296 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (3)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.37 · 18.9% (56 of 296 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (12 of 296 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
All utility lands (29)
- Rivendell relevance 0.41 · 47.0% (139 of 296 decks)
- The Grey Havens relevance 0.42 · 20.9% (62 of 296 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.39 · 7.8% (23 of 296 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.31 · 15.9% (47 of 296 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.34 · 9.5% (28 of 296 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.21 · 44.3% (131 of 296 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.28 · 8.1% (24 of 296 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.27 · 7.1% (21 of 296 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 14.5% (43 of 296 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.25 · 6.8% (20 of 296 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.19 · 22.3% (66 of 296 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.14 · 42.9% (127 of 296 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.17 · 13.5% (40 of 296 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.19 · 7.8% (23 of 296 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (10 of 296 decks)
- Elvenking's Halls relevance 0.27 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (15 of 296 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.18 · 5.4% (16 of 296 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 8.8% (26 of 296 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.15 · 12.2% (36 of 296 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.10 · 46.6% (138 of 296 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.15 · 9.8% (29 of 296 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (21 of 296 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 8.8% (26 of 296 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.12 · 6.8% (20 of 296 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (10 of 296 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.11 · 3.0% (9 of 296 decks)
All lands (33)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.30 · 10.8% (32 of 296 decks)
- Elven Passage relevance 0.32 · 4.7% (14 of 296 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.28 · 9.1% (27 of 296 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.17 · 41.2% (122 of 296 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.21 · 17.9% (53 of 296 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.13 · 52.4% (155 of 296 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.24 · 4.4% (13 of 296 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.16 · 20.6% (61 of 296 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.12 · 47.6% (141 of 296 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.11 · 53.7% (159 of 296 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.16 · 16.6% (49 of 296 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (12 of 296 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (13 of 296 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.16 · 12.2% (36 of 296 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.10 · 46.6% (138 of 296 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.17 · 8.1% (24 of 296 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.16 · 10.5% (31 of 296 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.15 · 11.1% (33 of 296 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.16 · 7.4% (22 of 296 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.20 · 3.7% (11 of 296 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.14 · 9.1% (27 of 296 decks)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (7 of 296 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.07 · 68.9% (204 of 296 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (16 of 296 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.11 · 24.3% (72 of 296 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 12.8% (38 of 296 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (10 of 296 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.09 · 33.1% (98 of 296 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.08 · 35.5% (105 of 296 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.11 · 4.1% (12 of 296 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 75.3% (223 of 296 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 82.8% (245 of 296 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 82.8% (245 of 296 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Erestor of the Council, from 296 real Commander decks.