Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Split Decision relevance 0.71 · 86.0% (251 of 292 decks)
- Messenger Jays relevance 0.86 · 62.0% (181 of 292 decks)
- Orchard Elemental relevance 0.83 · 62.7% (183 of 292 decks)
- Coercive Portal relevance 0.78 · 69.5% (203 of 292 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 0.64 · 91.8% (268 of 292 decks)
- Emissary Green relevance 0.71 · 77.1% (225 of 292 decks)
- Galadriel, Elven-Queen relevance 0.67 · 82.2% (240 of 292 decks)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 0.64 · 84.6% (247 of 292 decks)
- Trap the Trespassers relevance 0.62 · 89.0% (260 of 292 decks)
- Illusion of Choice relevance 0.66 · 79.8% (233 of 292 decks)
- Sail into the West relevance 0.61 · 90.1% (263 of 292 decks)
- Travel Through Caradhras relevance 0.63 · 82.2% (240 of 292 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.59 · 90.1% (263 of 292 decks)
- Model of Unity relevance 0.61 · 84.6% (247 of 292 decks)
- Elrond of the White Council relevance 0.58 · 91.4% (267 of 292 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.58 · 65.4% (191 of 292 decks)
- Path of the Enigma relevance 0.85 · 25.0% (73 of 292 decks)
- Elrond, Master of Healing relevance 0.55 · 62.7% (183 of 292 decks)
- Galadriel of Lothlórien relevance 0.58 · 54.8% (160 of 292 decks)
- Elvish Mariner relevance 0.53 · 54.8% (160 of 292 decks)
- Path of the Animist relevance 0.69 · 28.4% (83 of 292 decks)
- Arwen Undómiel relevance 0.52 · 55.1% (161 of 292 decks)
- Mirkwood Trapper relevance 0.56 · 43.2% (126 of 292 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 0.53 · 44.5% (130 of 292 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.42 · 66.4% (194 of 292 decks)
- Council's Deliberation relevance 0.60 · 31.8% (93 of 292 decks)
- Tempting Contract relevance 0.68 · 18.2% (53 of 292 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.49 · 46.6% (136 of 292 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.49 · 45.2% (132 of 292 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 0.64 · 17.8% (52 of 292 decks)
- Tempt with Reflections relevance 0.59 · 22.6% (66 of 292 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.47 · 43.5% (127 of 292 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.59 · 21.6% (63 of 292 decks)
- Lost Isle Calling relevance 0.51 · 33.6% (98 of 292 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 0.47 · 40.1% (117 of 292 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.53 · 28.1% (82 of 292 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.52 · 28.4% (83 of 292 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.55 · 22.3% (65 of 292 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.48 · 36.0% (105 of 292 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.44 · 43.8% (128 of 292 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.50 · 29.1% (85 of 292 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.48 · 33.6% (98 of 292 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.40 · 51.0% (149 of 292 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.44 · 40.4% (118 of 292 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.46 · 34.9% (102 of 292 decks)
- Song of Eärendil relevance 0.48 · 29.1% (85 of 292 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.51 · 21.9% (64 of 292 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.47 · 29.5% (86 of 292 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.47 · 25.7% (75 of 292 decks)
- Legolas, Counter of Kills relevance 0.49 · 22.9% (67 of 292 decks)
Card Stacks
11
Card Stacks
11Showing 1-2 of 11
Cards like Elrond, Master of Healing
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
52% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Elvish Archdruid
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Elvish Archdruid 66%
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary 28%
- Imperious Perfect 22%
- Galadhrim Brigade 22%
- Canopy Tactician 3%
Other options: Elvish Clancaller
Cards like Elvish Mystic
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
55% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Elvish Mystic 66%
- Llanowar Elves 62%
- Fyndhorn Elves 29%
- Boreal Druid 1%
Other options: Druid of the Cowl, Greenweaver Druid, Nantuko Elder, Gyre Engineer, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Path of the Animist
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Elvish Warmaster
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 62%
- Commander's Sphere 10%
Cards like Rampant Growth
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 56% of other Simic decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 1.2 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rampant Growth 48%
- Cultivate 47%
- Kodama's Reach 14%
- Shared Roots 1%
Other options: Path to the Festival, Peregrination, They Went This Way, Explosive Vegetation, Verdant Mastery, Migration Path, Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, Grow from the Ashes, Search for Tomorrow, Deep Reconnaissance, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Elvish Mariner
5.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Elven Chorus
9.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Marwyn, the Nurturer
7.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Farhaven Elf
4.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Farhaven Elf 20%
- Primeval Herald 1%
Other options: Simulacrum Shaper, Wild Wanderer, Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru, Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary, Quirion Trailblazer, Ondu Giant, Yavimaya Granger
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Messenger Jays relevance 0.86 · 62.0% (181 of 292 decks)
- Orchard Elemental relevance 0.83 · 62.7% (183 of 292 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 0.64 · 91.8% (268 of 292 decks)
- Emissary Green relevance 0.71 · 77.1% (225 of 292 decks)
- Galadriel, Elven-Queen relevance 0.67 · 82.2% (240 of 292 decks)
- Elrond of the White Council relevance 0.58 · 91.4% (267 of 292 decks)
- Elrond, Master of Healing relevance 0.55 · 62.7% (183 of 292 decks)
- Galadriel of Lothlórien relevance 0.58 · 54.8% (160 of 292 decks)
- Elvish Mariner relevance 0.53 · 54.8% (160 of 292 decks)
- Arwen Undómiel relevance 0.52 · 55.1% (161 of 292 decks)
- Mirkwood Trapper relevance 0.56 · 43.2% (126 of 292 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 0.53 · 44.5% (130 of 292 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.42 · 66.4% (194 of 292 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.49 · 45.2% (132 of 292 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 0.64 · 17.8% (52 of 292 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.47 · 43.5% (127 of 292 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 0.47 · 40.1% (117 of 292 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.53 · 28.1% (82 of 292 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.48 · 36.0% (105 of 292 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.50 · 29.1% (85 of 292 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.48 · 33.6% (98 of 292 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.40 · 51.0% (149 of 292 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.51 · 21.9% (64 of 292 decks)
- Legolas, Counter of Kills relevance 0.49 · 22.9% (67 of 292 decks)
- Mirkwood Elk relevance 0.49 · 19.2% (56 of 292 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.47 · 22.3% (65 of 292 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.42 · 29.8% (87 of 292 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 0.44 · 18.2% (53 of 292 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.45 · 13.7% (40 of 292 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.35 · 37.3% (109 of 292 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.45 · 13.4% (39 of 292 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.30 · 49.3% (144 of 292 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.45 · 11.3% (33 of 292 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.48 · 8.9% (26 of 292 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.38 · 23.6% (69 of 292 decks)
- Glorfindel, Dauntless Rescuer relevance 0.45 · 10.6% (31 of 292 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.40 · 16.4% (48 of 292 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.45 · 8.9% (26 of 292 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.44 · 9.2% (27 of 292 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.37 · 16.1% (47 of 292 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.36 · 18.8% (55 of 292 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.35 · 19.9% (58 of 292 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.33 · 26.0% (76 of 292 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.21 · 66.1% (193 of 292 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.36 · 12.3% (36 of 292 decks)
- Chance-Met Elves relevance 0.40 · 6.5% (19 of 292 decks)
- Veteran Explorer relevance 0.41 · 4.5% (13 of 292 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.33 · 10.3% (30 of 292 decks)
- Roaming Throne relevance 0.29 · 17.1% (50 of 292 decks)
- Winter Eladrin relevance 0.44 · 3.4% (10 of 292 decks)
Artifacts
31
Artifacts
31 Showing 1-10 of 31
Page size
All artifacts (31)
- Coercive Portal relevance 0.78 · 69.5% (203 of 292 decks)
- Model of Unity relevance 0.61 · 84.6% (247 of 292 decks)
- Tempting Contract relevance 0.68 · 18.2% (53 of 292 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.47 · 25.7% (75 of 292 decks)
- The Temporal Anchor relevance 0.47 · 17.1% (50 of 292 decks)
- Mirror of Galadriel relevance 0.45 · 19.9% (58 of 292 decks)
- Lothlórien Blade relevance 0.45 · 16.8% (49 of 292 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.38 · 16.8% (49 of 292 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.37 · 17.1% (50 of 292 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.33 · 8.6% (25 of 292 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.32 · 6.2% (18 of 292 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (12 of 292 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.28 · 8.6% (25 of 292 decks)
- Victory Chimes relevance 0.37 · 3.4% (10 of 292 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.20 · 30.5% (89 of 292 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.26 · 10.3% (30 of 292 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.20 · 24.0% (70 of 292 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.26 · 5.8% (17 of 292 decks)
- Hithlain Rope relevance 0.39 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (8 of 292 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.34 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Helm of Awakening relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (8 of 292 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (11 of 292 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.15 · 20.5% (60 of 292 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.19 · 6.5% (19 of 292 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.15 · 13.4% (39 of 292 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.14 · 10.3% (30 of 292 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.07 · 62.0% (181 of 292 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 72.6% (212 of 292 decks)
Enchantments
33
Enchantments
33 Showing 1-10 of 33
Page size
All enchantments (33)
- Lost Isle Calling relevance 0.51 · 33.6% (98 of 292 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.46 · 34.9% (102 of 292 decks)
- Song of Eärendil relevance 0.48 · 29.1% (85 of 292 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.47 · 19.2% (56 of 292 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.39 · 23.6% (69 of 292 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.41 · 14.4% (42 of 292 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.35 · 9.6% (28 of 292 decks)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 0.38 · 5.1% (15 of 292 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.28 · 16.4% (48 of 292 decks)
- Viridian Revel relevance 0.43 · 3.1% (9 of 292 decks)
- Fall of Gil-galad relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (12 of 292 decks)
- Eladamri's Vineyard relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (9 of 292 decks)
- Upwelling relevance 0.41 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.23 · 5.8% (17 of 292 decks)
- Psychic Impetus relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (8 of 292 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.22 · 6.5% (19 of 292 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (24 of 292 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (9 of 292 decks)
- Heartbeat of Spring relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (8 of 292 decks)
- Party Dude relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (20 of 292 decks)
- Awakening relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Down in the Valley relevance 0.28 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (10 of 292 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (10 of 292 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.22 · 3.1% (9 of 292 decks)
- In Search of Greatness relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.14 · 6.8% (20 of 292 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (8 of 292 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (9 of 292 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Split Decision relevance 0.71 · 86.0% (251 of 292 decks)
- Trap the Trespassers relevance 0.62 · 89.0% (260 of 292 decks)
- Illusion of Choice relevance 0.66 · 79.8% (233 of 292 decks)
- Sail into the West relevance 0.61 · 90.1% (263 of 292 decks)
- Council's Deliberation relevance 0.60 · 31.8% (93 of 292 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.49 · 46.6% (136 of 292 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.47 · 29.5% (86 of 292 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.33 · 34.9% (102 of 292 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.36 · 19.5% (57 of 292 decks)
- Reins of Power relevance 0.41 · 4.8% (14 of 292 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.33 · 12.3% (36 of 292 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.35 · 9.6% (28 of 292 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.32 · 12.7% (37 of 292 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.34 · 8.6% (25 of 292 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.28 · 17.1% (50 of 292 decks)
- Shower of Arrows relevance 0.33 · 6.2% (18 of 292 decks)
- Glorious Gale relevance 0.33 · 4.8% (14 of 292 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.28 · 10.3% (30 of 292 decks)
- Tribal Unity relevance 0.43 · 2.7% (8 of 292 decks)
- Out of Bounds relevance 0.44 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Peel from Reality relevance 0.35 · 3.8% (11 of 292 decks)
- Intellectual Offering relevance 0.39 · 3.1% (9 of 292 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.19 · 30.1% (88 of 292 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.19 · 28.4% (83 of 292 decks)
- Learn from the Past relevance 0.32 · 3.8% (11 of 292 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (16 of 292 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.16 · 44.9% (131 of 292 decks)
- Words of Wisdom relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (8 of 292 decks)
- Wrong Turn relevance 0.35 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.17 · 25.7% (75 of 292 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.12 · 54.8% (160 of 292 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (11 of 292 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (10 of 292 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.20 · 6.5% (19 of 292 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (14 of 292 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (13 of 292 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.18 · 8.9% (26 of 292 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (12 of 292 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.16 · 17.1% (50 of 292 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.20 · 5.8% (17 of 292 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.15 · 14.0% (41 of 292 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.11 · 47.9% (140 of 292 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.18 · 5.8% (17 of 292 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.11 · 39.7% (116 of 292 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.16 · 7.2% (21 of 292 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (8 of 292 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.16 · 6.8% (20 of 292 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.15 · 10.6% (31 of 292 decks)
- Dissolve relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Joint Exploration relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (9 of 292 decks)
Sorceries
39
Sorceries
39 Showing 1-10 of 39
Page size
All sorceries (39)
- Selvala's Stampede relevance 0.64 · 84.6% (247 of 292 decks)
- Travel Through Caradhras relevance 0.63 · 82.2% (240 of 292 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.59 · 90.1% (263 of 292 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.58 · 65.4% (191 of 292 decks)
- Path of the Enigma relevance 0.85 · 25.0% (73 of 292 decks)
- Path of the Animist relevance 0.69 · 28.4% (83 of 292 decks)
- Tempt with Reflections relevance 0.59 · 22.6% (66 of 292 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.59 · 21.6% (63 of 292 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.52 · 28.4% (83 of 292 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.55 · 22.3% (65 of 292 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.44 · 43.8% (128 of 292 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.44 · 40.4% (118 of 292 decks)
- Arwen's Gift relevance 0.44 · 14.7% (43 of 292 decks)
- The Ring Goes South relevance 0.47 · 9.2% (27 of 292 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.33 · 33.9% (99 of 292 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.38 · 16.1% (47 of 292 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.44 · 8.6% (25 of 292 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.34 · 20.9% (61 of 292 decks)
- Zndrsplt's Judgment relevance 0.47 · 4.5% (13 of 292 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.31 · 30.1% (88 of 292 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.34 · 6.2% (18 of 292 decks)
- Rally the Galadhrim relevance 0.34 · 5.1% (15 of 292 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.24 · 21.6% (63 of 292 decks)
- Manifold Insights relevance 0.42 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (16 of 292 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.14 · 48.3% (141 of 292 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.25 · 4.5% (13 of 292 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.12 · 46.6% (136 of 292 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (14 of 292 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (9 of 292 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.14 · 16.1% (47 of 292 decks)
- Seeds of Renewal relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.14 · 18.2% (53 of 292 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.12 · 21.2% (62 of 292 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (8 of 292 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.12 · 13.7% (40 of 292 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (9 of 292 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (8 of 292 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
Planeswalkers
3
Planeswalkers
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All planeswalkers (3)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.37 · 19.2% (56 of 292 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (12 of 292 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
Utility Lands
29
Utility Lands
29 Showing 1-10 of 29
Page size
All utility lands (29)
- Rivendell relevance 0.41 · 47.6% (139 of 292 decks)
- The Grey Havens relevance 0.42 · 21.2% (62 of 292 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.40 · 7.9% (23 of 292 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.31 · 16.1% (47 of 292 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.34 · 9.6% (28 of 292 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.21 · 44.9% (131 of 292 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.28 · 8.2% (24 of 292 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.27 · 7.2% (21 of 292 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 14.7% (43 of 292 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.25 · 6.8% (20 of 292 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.19 · 22.6% (66 of 292 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.14 · 43.2% (126 of 292 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.17 · 13.7% (40 of 292 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.19 · 7.9% (23 of 292 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (10 of 292 decks)
- Elvenking's Halls relevance 0.27 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (15 of 292 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.18 · 5.5% (16 of 292 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 8.9% (26 of 292 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.15 · 12.3% (36 of 292 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.10 · 47.3% (138 of 292 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.15 · 9.9% (29 of 292 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.14 · 7.2% (21 of 292 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 8.6% (25 of 292 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.12 · 6.8% (20 of 292 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (10 of 292 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (9 of 292 decks)
Lands
33
Lands
33 Showing 1-10 of 33
Page size
All lands (33)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.30 · 11.0% (32 of 292 decks)
- Elven Passage relevance 0.32 · 4.8% (14 of 292 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.28 · 9.2% (27 of 292 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.17 · 41.4% (121 of 292 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.21 · 18.2% (53 of 292 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.13 · 52.4% (153 of 292 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (13 of 292 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.12 · 48.3% (141 of 292 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.16 · 20.9% (61 of 292 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.11 · 54.1% (158 of 292 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.16 · 16.8% (49 of 292 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (12 of 292 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (13 of 292 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.16 · 12.3% (36 of 292 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.10 · 46.9% (137 of 292 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.17 · 8.2% (24 of 292 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.16 · 10.6% (31 of 292 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.15 · 11.3% (33 of 292 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.16 · 7.5% (22 of 292 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (11 of 292 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.14 · 9.2% (27 of 292 decks)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (7 of 292 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.07 · 69.2% (202 of 292 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.15 · 5.5% (16 of 292 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.11 · 24.3% (71 of 292 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 13.0% (38 of 292 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (10 of 292 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.09 · 33.6% (98 of 292 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.08 · 36.0% (105 of 292 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.11 · 4.1% (12 of 292 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 76.0% (222 of 292 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 83.6% (244 of 292 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 83.6% (244 of 292 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Erestor of the Council, from 292 real Commander decks.