Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. 59% of other green decks
69% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
2.2 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 77%
- Elvish Mystic 69%
- Fyndhorn Elves 50%
- Boreal Druid 10%
- Greenweaver Druid 2%
- Leaf Gilder 2%
- Druid of the Cowl 2%
- Woodland Mystic 1%
- Wirewood Elf 1%
- Fyndhorn Elder 1%
Other options: Golden Hind, Nantuko Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Hollowhenge Overlord
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Elvish Visionary
4.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
- Elvish Visionary 22%
- Llanowar Visionary 20%
- Owlbear 4%
- Wall of Blossoms 4%
- Generous Stray 1%
- Joraga Visionary 1%
Other options: Kavu Climber, Carven Caryatid, Multani's Acolyte, Rhox Oracle, Pyknite, Striped Bears, Shaman of Spring, Arctic Wolves
Cards like Beast Whisperer
4.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards like Arbor Elf
2.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other green decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
- Arbor Elf 41%
- Scryb Ranger 25%
- Quirion Ranger 5%
Cards like Reclamation Sage
3.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other green decks
Cards
- Reclamation Sage 50%
- Acidic Slime 10%
- Chomping Changeling 4%
- Foundation Breaker 2%
- Myconid Spore Tender 1%
Other options: Viridian Shaman, Uktabi Orangutan, Conclave Naturalists, Indrik Stomphowler
Cards like Briarpack Alpha
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards like End-Raze Forerunners
3.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Thundering Ceratok
Cards like Wolfbriar Elemental
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Bounding Wolf
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Hitchclaw Recluse, Grappler Spider, Plated Spider, Goliath Spider, Tajuru Snarecaster, Colossadactyl, Canopy Spider, Norwood Archers, Tangle Spider, Cloudcrown Oak, Feiyi Snake, Towering Indrik, Needleshot Gourna, Rib Cage Spider, Grazing Whiptail, The Fabulous Frog-Man, Magnigoth Sentry, Frog-Squirrels, Tree Monkey, Mammoth Spider, Gnottvold Recluse, Sporecap Spider
Cards like Circle of Dreams Druid
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Wood Elves
10.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Overwhelming Stampede
2.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards like Nightpack Ambusher
17× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
3.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Eternal Witness
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Elvish Regrower, Greenwarden of Murasa, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Return to Nature
2.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards like Wild Growth
1.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other green decks
Cards
- Wild Growth 22%
- Wolfwillow Haven 6%
- Fertile Ground 3%
- Overgrowth 2%
Other options: Verdant Haven, Market Festival, Glittering Frost, Dawn's Reflection, Blighted Burgeoning, Shimmerwilds Growth
Cards like You Meet in a Tavern
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Ellywick Tumblestrum relevance 0.88 · 86.8% (250 of 288 decks)
- Wandering Troubadour relevance 0.89 · 79.5% (229 of 288 decks)
- Intrepid Outlander relevance 0.93 · 66.0% (190 of 288 decks)
- You Find a Cursed Idol relevance 0.82 · 75.3% (217 of 288 decks)
- Undermountain Adventurer relevance 0.82 · 74.3% (214 of 288 decks)
- Find the Path relevance 0.84 · 67.4% (194 of 288 decks)
- Dungeon Map relevance 0.92 · 53.8% (155 of 288 decks)
- Sarevok's Tome relevance 0.90 · 45.8% (132 of 288 decks)
- Avenging Hunter relevance 0.80 · 46.2% (133 of 288 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.78 · 49.0% (141 of 288 decks)
- Nightpack Ambusher relevance 0.73 · 54.9% (158 of 288 decks)
- Fifty Feet of Rope relevance 0.88 · 30.6% (88 of 288 decks)
- Dungeoneer's Pack relevance 0.87 · 31.3% (90 of 288 decks)
- Spirit of the Hunt relevance 0.77 · 34.4% (99 of 288 decks)
- Hollowhenge Overlord relevance 0.69 · 44.4% (128 of 288 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.50 · 68.4% (197 of 288 decks)
- Bounding Wolf relevance 0.75 · 28.8% (83 of 288 decks)
- Wildborn Preserver relevance 0.62 · 46.2% (133 of 288 decks)
- Ambush Wolf relevance 0.69 · 35.1% (101 of 288 decks)
- Trailblazer's Torch relevance 0.79 · 20.8% (60 of 288 decks)
- Skylasher relevance 0.79 · 19.8% (57 of 288 decks)
- Sandstalker Moloch relevance 0.75 · 21.5% (62 of 288 decks)
- Ranger Class relevance 0.62 · 36.5% (105 of 288 decks)
- Wolfir Avenger relevance 0.74 · 17.7% (51 of 288 decks)
- Howling Moon relevance 0.65 · 30.9% (89 of 288 decks)
- Green Slime relevance 0.54 · 49.3% (142 of 288 decks)
- Briarpack Alpha relevance 0.73 · 18.4% (53 of 288 decks)
- Pack Guardian relevance 0.72 · 19.4% (56 of 288 decks)
- Master of the Wild Hunt relevance 0.64 · 30.2% (87 of 288 decks)
- Lictor relevance 0.73 · 14.6% (42 of 288 decks)
- Howlpack Resurgence relevance 0.66 · 22.6% (65 of 288 decks)
- Briarhorn relevance 0.72 · 15.3% (44 of 288 decks)
- Moonlight Hunt relevance 0.66 · 21.9% (63 of 288 decks)
- Arlinn, Voice of the Pack relevance 0.66 · 20.5% (59 of 288 decks)
- Packsong Pup relevance 0.63 · 21.9% (63 of 288 decks)
- You Meet in a Tavern relevance 0.62 · 20.8% (60 of 288 decks)
- Gala Greeters relevance 0.49 · 38.9% (112 of 288 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.35 · 68.1% (196 of 288 decks)
- Raised by Wolves relevance 0.61 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- Ambush Viper relevance 0.42 · 47.2% (136 of 288 decks)
- Slippery Bogbonder relevance 0.51 · 24.3% (70 of 288 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.59 · 12.8% (37 of 288 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.51 · 21.2% (61 of 288 decks)
- Guardian Augmenter relevance 0.42 · 37.2% (107 of 288 decks)
- Cemetery Prowler relevance 0.52 · 14.9% (43 of 288 decks)
- You Happen On a Glade relevance 0.50 · 18.4% (53 of 288 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.49 · 19.8% (57 of 288 decks)
- Thijarian Witness relevance 0.61 · 6.3% (18 of 288 decks)
- Wolfbriar Elemental relevance 0.49 · 15.3% (44 of 288 decks)
- Vernal Equinox relevance 0.57 · 8.3% (24 of 288 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Wandering Troubadour relevance 0.89 · 79.5% (229 of 288 decks)
- Intrepid Outlander relevance 0.93 · 66.0% (190 of 288 decks)
- Undermountain Adventurer relevance 0.82 · 74.3% (214 of 288 decks)
- Avenging Hunter relevance 0.80 · 46.2% (133 of 288 decks)
- Nightpack Ambusher relevance 0.73 · 54.9% (158 of 288 decks)
- Spirit of the Hunt relevance 0.77 · 34.4% (99 of 288 decks)
- Hollowhenge Overlord relevance 0.69 · 44.4% (128 of 288 decks)
- Bounding Wolf relevance 0.75 · 28.8% (83 of 288 decks)
- Wildborn Preserver relevance 0.62 · 46.2% (133 of 288 decks)
- Ambush Wolf relevance 0.69 · 35.1% (101 of 288 decks)
- Skylasher relevance 0.79 · 19.8% (57 of 288 decks)
- Sandstalker Moloch relevance 0.75 · 21.5% (62 of 288 decks)
- Wolfir Avenger relevance 0.74 · 17.7% (51 of 288 decks)
- Green Slime relevance 0.54 · 49.3% (142 of 288 decks)
- Briarpack Alpha relevance 0.73 · 18.4% (53 of 288 decks)
- Pack Guardian relevance 0.72 · 19.4% (56 of 288 decks)
- Master of the Wild Hunt relevance 0.64 · 30.2% (87 of 288 decks)
- Lictor relevance 0.73 · 14.6% (42 of 288 decks)
- Briarhorn relevance 0.72 · 15.3% (44 of 288 decks)
- Packsong Pup relevance 0.63 · 21.9% (63 of 288 decks)
- Gala Greeters relevance 0.49 · 38.9% (112 of 288 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.35 · 68.1% (196 of 288 decks)
- Ambush Viper relevance 0.42 · 47.2% (136 of 288 decks)
- Slippery Bogbonder relevance 0.51 · 24.3% (70 of 288 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 0.59 · 12.8% (37 of 288 decks)
- Guardian Augmenter relevance 0.42 · 37.2% (107 of 288 decks)
- Cemetery Prowler relevance 0.52 · 14.9% (43 of 288 decks)
- Thijarian Witness relevance 0.61 · 6.3% (18 of 288 decks)
- Wolfbriar Elemental relevance 0.49 · 15.3% (44 of 288 decks)
- Elturgard Ranger relevance 0.57 · 7.6% (22 of 288 decks)
- Boon Satyr relevance 0.56 · 6.6% (19 of 288 decks)
- Sarulf's Packmate relevance 0.54 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
- Haze Frog relevance 0.54 · 7.6% (22 of 288 decks)
- Cloudthresher relevance 0.51 · 9.0% (26 of 288 decks)
- Silverfur Partisan relevance 0.51 · 8.3% (24 of 288 decks)
- Wren's Run Packmaster relevance 0.50 · 8.3% (24 of 288 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.37 · 25.3% (73 of 288 decks)
- Torgal, A Fine Hound relevance 0.46 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.39 · 16.7% (48 of 288 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.34 · 30.9% (89 of 288 decks)
- Tovolar's Huntmaster // Tovolar's Packleader relevance 0.47 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.37 · 20.5% (59 of 288 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.37 · 19.1% (55 of 288 decks)
- Werewolf Pack Leader relevance 0.45 · 8.3% (24 of 288 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.33 · 26.4% (76 of 288 decks)
- Ascendant Packleader relevance 0.44 · 7.6% (22 of 288 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.35 · 21.5% (62 of 288 decks)
- Dawn's Light Archer relevance 0.44 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
- Caller of the Claw relevance 0.38 · 13.2% (38 of 288 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.35 · 18.1% (52 of 288 decks)
All artifacts (24)
- Dungeon Map relevance 0.92 · 53.8% (155 of 288 decks)
- Sarevok's Tome relevance 0.90 · 45.8% (132 of 288 decks)
- Fifty Feet of Rope relevance 0.88 · 30.6% (88 of 288 decks)
- Dungeoneer's Pack relevance 0.87 · 31.3% (90 of 288 decks)
- Trailblazer's Torch relevance 0.79 · 20.8% (60 of 288 decks)
- Vedalken Orrery relevance 0.51 · 21.2% (61 of 288 decks)
- Instrument of the Bards relevance 0.48 · 9.7% (28 of 288 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.31 · 35.8% (103 of 288 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.33 · 5.6% (16 of 288 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.23 · 27.8% (80 of 288 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.32 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.27 · 8.3% (24 of 288 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.27 · 5.6% (16 of 288 decks)
- Ranger's Longbow relevance 0.38 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (15 of 288 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.15 · 20.8% (60 of 288 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.11 · 41.3% (119 of 288 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.14 · 12.5% (36 of 288 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.11 · 9.7% (28 of 288 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.11 · 5.2% (15 of 288 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 54.5% (157 of 288 decks)
All enchantments (37)
- Find the Path relevance 0.84 · 67.4% (194 of 288 decks)
- Ranger Class relevance 0.62 · 36.5% (105 of 288 decks)
- Howling Moon relevance 0.65 · 30.9% (89 of 288 decks)
- Howlpack Resurgence relevance 0.66 · 22.6% (65 of 288 decks)
- Raised by Wolves relevance 0.61 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- Vernal Equinox relevance 0.57 · 8.3% (24 of 288 decks)
- Wolfcaller's Howl relevance 0.49 · 8.3% (24 of 288 decks)
- Journey to the Lost City relevance 0.51 · 4.5% (13 of 288 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.33 · 29.9% (86 of 288 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.29 · 32.6% (94 of 288 decks)
- Wolfwillow Haven relevance 0.37 · 6.3% (18 of 288 decks)
- Feed the Pack relevance 0.37 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.29 · 9.0% (26 of 288 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.20 · 24.7% (71 of 288 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.20 · 21.2% (61 of 288 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.22 · 12.8% (37 of 288 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.25 · 6.6% (19 of 288 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.24 · 7.3% (21 of 288 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.25 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.19 · 19.1% (55 of 288 decks)
- Howl of the Hunt relevance 0.35 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (13 of 288 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (13 of 288 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.15 · 21.5% (62 of 288 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.27 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.18 · 5.9% (17 of 288 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.16 · 9.7% (28 of 288 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.15 · 13.5% (39 of 288 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.17 · 7.3% (21 of 288 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.15 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.13 · 5.2% (15 of 288 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.10 · 17.0% (49 of 288 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
All instants (46)
- Moonlight Hunt relevance 0.66 · 21.9% (63 of 288 decks)
- You Happen On a Glade relevance 0.50 · 18.4% (53 of 288 decks)
- Predator's Howl relevance 0.48 · 5.2% (15 of 288 decks)
- Savage Summoning relevance 0.40 · 11.5% (33 of 288 decks)
- Choose Your Weapon relevance 0.37 · 5.2% (15 of 288 decks)
- You Look Upon the Tarrasque relevance 0.35 · 5.6% (16 of 288 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.28 · 9.0% (26 of 288 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.23 · 17.4% (50 of 288 decks)
- Song of Inspiration relevance 0.41 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.22 · 10.4% (30 of 288 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.19 · 19.8% (57 of 288 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.23 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.19 · 12.8% (37 of 288 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.19 · 12.5% (36 of 288 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.20 · 9.7% (28 of 288 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.17 · 15.3% (44 of 288 decks)
- Wild Shape relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.19 · 9.7% (28 of 288 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.15 · 18.1% (52 of 288 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.18 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.13 · 26.0% (75 of 288 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.15 · 12.5% (36 of 288 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.24 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Poison the Blade relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (18 of 288 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.14 · 10.4% (30 of 288 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.08 · 55.2% (159 of 288 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.15 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.14 · 7.6% (22 of 288 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.15 · 4.5% (13 of 288 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.09 · 30.2% (87 of 288 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.13 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.13 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.18 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.11 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
All sorceries (32)
- You Find a Cursed Idol relevance 0.82 · 75.3% (217 of 288 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.78 · 49.0% (141 of 288 decks)
- You Meet in a Tavern relevance 0.62 · 20.8% (60 of 288 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.49 · 19.8% (57 of 288 decks)
- Long Rest relevance 0.41 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.35 · 5.6% (16 of 288 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.27 · 14.6% (42 of 288 decks)
- Overwhelming Encounter relevance 0.37 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.20 · 33.7% (97 of 288 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.22 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.18 · 29.2% (84 of 288 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.18 · 16.0% (46 of 288 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.22 · 5.9% (17 of 288 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.20 · 8.0% (23 of 288 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.17 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.21 · 5.9% (17 of 288 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.21 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.12 · 30.6% (88 of 288 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.16 · 5.9% (17 of 288 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.12 · 18.4% (53 of 288 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.15 · 7.3% (21 of 288 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.12 · 13.2% (38 of 288 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.11 · 20.1% (58 of 288 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.09 · 28.8% (83 of 288 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.12 · 4.5% (13 of 288 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.11 · 8.3% (24 of 288 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.12 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.15 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.14 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (16)
- Ellywick Tumblestrum relevance 0.88 · 86.8% (250 of 288 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.50 · 68.4% (197 of 288 decks)
- Arlinn, Voice of the Pack relevance 0.66 · 20.5% (59 of 288 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.43 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.36 · 15.6% (45 of 288 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.34 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.34 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.33 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.26 · 7.6% (22 of 288 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.21 · 17.4% (50 of 288 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.27 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.21 · 7.3% (21 of 288 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
- Garruk, Unleashed relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
All utility lands (40)
- Dungeon Descent relevance 0.89 · 61.5% (177 of 288 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.36 · 12.5% (36 of 288 decks)
- Winding Canyons relevance 0.38 · 6.3% (18 of 288 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.30 · 16.0% (46 of 288 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.26 · 21.9% (63 of 288 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.27 · 18.1% (52 of 288 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.28 · 10.8% (31 of 288 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.30 · 6.3% (18 of 288 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.27 · 11.5% (33 of 288 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.21 · 28.5% (82 of 288 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.28 · 8.0% (23 of 288 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.22 · 21.9% (63 of 288 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.21 · 18.1% (52 of 288 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.19 · 24.3% (70 of 288 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.26 · 4.9% (14 of 288 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.16 · 38.5% (111 of 288 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.24 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.19 · 20.8% (60 of 288 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.21 · 10.1% (29 of 288 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.22 · 7.6% (22 of 288 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.26 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.23 · 6.6% (19 of 288 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.18 · 19.8% (57 of 288 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.23 · 5.2% (15 of 288 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.22 · 6.6% (19 of 288 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.16 · 26.0% (75 of 288 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.20 · 8.7% (25 of 288 decks)
- Memorial to Unity relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.14 · 19.1% (55 of 288 decks)
- Cryptic Caves relevance 0.25 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.14 · 13.2% (38 of 288 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.13 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.15 · 5.6% (16 of 288 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.11 · 17.7% (51 of 288 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (10 of 288 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (7 of 288 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (12)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.22 · 16.7% (48 of 288 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.22 · 9.0% (26 of 288 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.15 · 18.4% (53 of 288 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.16 · 6.9% (20 of 288 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.16 · 5.2% (15 of 288 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (11 of 288 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (16 of 288 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.13 · 4.2% (12 of 288 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (9 of 288 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.14 · 2.8% (8 of 288 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 90.3% (260 of 288 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Varis, Silverymoon Ranger, from 288 real Commander decks.