Cards like Etherium Sculptor
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
65% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 72%
- Foundry Inspector 70%
- Cloud Key 21%
Other options: Helm of Awakening, Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar, Planar Gate
Cards like Blightsteel Colossus
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
89% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Steel Overseer
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Silver Myr
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Silver Myr 28%
- Copper Myr 25%
- Myr Convert 1%
- Hedron Crawler 1%
- Plague Myr 1%
Other options: Manakin
Cards like Master of Etherium
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Lightning Greaves
2.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 44%
- Swiftfoot Boots 31%
Cards like Fabricate
15× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Fabricate 33%
- Scour for Scrap 22%
Cards like Thopter Spy Network
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Mystic Forge
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Triplicate Titan
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like One with the Machine
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Pongify
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.49 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Pongify 28%
- Rapid Hybridization 25%
Cards like Scrap Trawler
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Spine of Ish Sah
Cards like Palladium Myr
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards like Krang, Utrom Warlord
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 55% of other Simic decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 1.2 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Cultivate 48%
- Kodama's Reach 31%
- Rampant Growth 28%
- Shared Roots 5%
- Explosive Vegetation 3%
- Migration Path 2%
- Reach the Horizon 2%
- Search for Tomorrow 1%
- Viewpoint Synchronization 1%
Other options: Verdant Mastery, Grow from the Ashes, New Generation's Technique, Roamer's Routine, Map the Frontier, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, Beneath the Sands, They Went This Way, Map the Wastes, Terramorph, Peregrination, Untamed Wilds, Deep Reconnaissance, Path to the Festival
Cards like Padeem, Consul of Innovation
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Cybermen Squadron
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Thran Dynamo
4.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Thran Dynamo 20%
- Hedron Archive 3%
Other options: Ring of the Lucii, Sisay's Ring, Sceptre of Eternal Glory, Ur-Golem's Eye, Ichor Elixir
Cards like Liquimetal Torque
15× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.66 in other Simic decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.72 · 83.9% (6,294 of 7,500 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.81 · 71.5% (5,366 of 7,500 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.81 · 70.4% (5,282 of 7,500 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.76 · 76.5% (5,740 of 7,500 decks)
- Steel Overseer relevance 0.84 · 63.1% (4,736 of 7,500 decks)
- Traxos, Scourge of Kroog relevance 0.85 · 61.5% (4,615 of 7,500 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.71 · 77.6% (5,823 of 7,500 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.84 · 59.0% (4,424 of 7,500 decks)
- Master of Etherium relevance 0.85 · 56.5% (4,236 of 7,500 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.85 · 53.1% (3,984 of 7,500 decks)
- Iron Spider, Stark Upgrade relevance 0.87 · 50.9% (3,817 of 7,500 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.82 · 55.9% (4,191 of 7,500 decks)
- Tarrian's Soulcleaver relevance 0.82 · 55.8% (4,187 of 7,500 decks)
- Emissary Escort relevance 0.88 · 46.6% (3,492 of 7,500 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.73 · 63.0% (4,728 of 7,500 decks)
- Metalwork Colossus relevance 0.87 · 44.4% (3,328 of 7,500 decks)
- Cybermen Squadron relevance 0.88 · 43.0% (3,227 of 7,500 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.88 · 42.6% (3,193 of 7,500 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.87 · 44.2% (3,314 of 7,500 decks)
- Darksteel Colossus relevance 0.83 · 48.4% (3,627 of 7,500 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.82 · 47.9% (3,589 of 7,500 decks)
- Karn, Legacy Reforged relevance 0.89 · 40.2% (3,014 of 7,500 decks)
- Oviya, Automech Artisan relevance 0.82 · 47.2% (3,537 of 7,500 decks)
- Cityscape Leveler relevance 0.85 · 43.3% (3,249 of 7,500 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.86 · 41.9% (3,140 of 7,500 decks)
- Darksteel Juggernaut relevance 0.90 · 36.8% (2,761 of 7,500 decks)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 0.86 · 40.0% (2,998 of 7,500 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.91 · 31.7% (2,379 of 7,500 decks)
- Mycosynth Golem relevance 0.91 · 29.9% (2,245 of 7,500 decks)
- Krang, Utrom Warlord relevance 0.90 · 31.6% (2,367 of 7,500 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.87 · 33.2% (2,488 of 7,500 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.77 · 45.1% (3,380 of 7,500 decks)
- Canoptek Spyder relevance 0.93 · 25.3% (1,900 of 7,500 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.88 · 30.7% (2,304 of 7,500 decks)
- Omega, Heartless Evolution relevance 0.85 · 32.9% (2,471 of 7,500 decks)
- Chief of the Foundry relevance 0.94 · 21.9% (1,646 of 7,500 decks)
- Verdurous Gearhulk relevance 0.88 · 27.7% (2,079 of 7,500 decks)
- Cryptothrall relevance 0.94 · 21.0% (1,574 of 7,500 decks)
- Ancient Stone Idol relevance 0.88 · 27.7% (2,074 of 7,500 decks)
- Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter relevance 0.91 · 24.1% (1,807 of 7,500 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.86 · 28.8% (2,163 of 7,500 decks)
- Research Thief relevance 0.95 · 18.8% (1,410 of 7,500 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.77 · 38.1% (2,854 of 7,500 decks)
- Silver Myr relevance 0.85 · 28.1% (2,111 of 7,500 decks)
- Copper Myr relevance 0.88 · 24.6% (1,842 of 7,500 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.82 · 31.5% (2,364 of 7,500 decks)
- Lady Octopus, Inspired Inventor relevance 0.92 · 19.7% (1,474 of 7,500 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.90 · 21.0% (1,573 of 7,500 decks)
- Darksteel Forge relevance 0.93 · 18.3% (1,375 of 7,500 decks)
- Triplicate Titan relevance 0.90 · 20.6% (1,548 of 7,500 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Blightsteel Colossus relevance 0.72 · 83.9% (6,294 of 7,500 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.81 · 71.5% (5,366 of 7,500 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.81 · 70.4% (5,282 of 7,500 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.76 · 76.5% (5,740 of 7,500 decks)
- Steel Overseer relevance 0.84 · 63.1% (4,736 of 7,500 decks)
- Traxos, Scourge of Kroog relevance 0.85 · 61.5% (4,615 of 7,500 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.71 · 77.6% (5,823 of 7,500 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.84 · 59.0% (4,424 of 7,500 decks)
- Master of Etherium relevance 0.85 · 56.5% (4,236 of 7,500 decks)
- Iron Spider, Stark Upgrade relevance 0.87 · 50.9% (3,817 of 7,500 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.82 · 55.9% (4,191 of 7,500 decks)
- Emissary Escort relevance 0.88 · 46.6% (3,492 of 7,500 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.73 · 63.0% (4,728 of 7,500 decks)
- Metalwork Colossus relevance 0.87 · 44.4% (3,328 of 7,500 decks)
- Cybermen Squadron relevance 0.88 · 43.0% (3,227 of 7,500 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.88 · 42.6% (3,193 of 7,500 decks)
- Darksteel Colossus relevance 0.83 · 48.4% (3,627 of 7,500 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.82 · 47.9% (3,589 of 7,500 decks)
- Karn, Legacy Reforged relevance 0.89 · 40.2% (3,014 of 7,500 decks)
- Oviya, Automech Artisan relevance 0.82 · 47.2% (3,537 of 7,500 decks)
- Cityscape Leveler relevance 0.85 · 43.3% (3,249 of 7,500 decks)
- Darksteel Juggernaut relevance 0.90 · 36.8% (2,761 of 7,500 decks)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 0.86 · 40.0% (2,998 of 7,500 decks)
- Mycosynth Golem relevance 0.91 · 29.9% (2,245 of 7,500 decks)
- Krang, Utrom Warlord relevance 0.90 · 31.6% (2,367 of 7,500 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.77 · 45.1% (3,380 of 7,500 decks)
- Canoptek Spyder relevance 0.93 · 25.3% (1,900 of 7,500 decks)
- Omega, Heartless Evolution relevance 0.85 · 32.9% (2,471 of 7,500 decks)
- Chief of the Foundry relevance 0.94 · 21.9% (1,646 of 7,500 decks)
- Verdurous Gearhulk relevance 0.88 · 27.7% (2,079 of 7,500 decks)
- Cryptothrall relevance 0.94 · 21.0% (1,574 of 7,500 decks)
- Ancient Stone Idol relevance 0.88 · 27.7% (2,074 of 7,500 decks)
- Liberator, Urza's Battlethopter relevance 0.91 · 24.1% (1,807 of 7,500 decks)
- Research Thief relevance 0.95 · 18.8% (1,410 of 7,500 decks)
- Silver Myr relevance 0.85 · 28.1% (2,111 of 7,500 decks)
- Copper Myr relevance 0.88 · 24.6% (1,842 of 7,500 decks)
- Lady Octopus, Inspired Inventor relevance 0.92 · 19.7% (1,474 of 7,500 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.90 · 21.0% (1,573 of 7,500 decks)
- Triplicate Titan relevance 0.90 · 20.6% (1,548 of 7,500 decks)
- Steel Hellkite relevance 0.85 · 26.3% (1,973 of 7,500 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.95 · 15.3% (1,147 of 7,500 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.74 · 38.3% (2,875 of 7,500 decks)
- Jhoira's Familiar relevance 0.92 · 16.7% (1,256 of 7,500 decks)
- Cyberman Patrol relevance 0.96 · 13.6% (1,021 of 7,500 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.63 · 52.6% (3,947 of 7,500 decks)
- Palladium Myr relevance 0.85 · 23.3% (1,750 of 7,500 decks)
- Filigree Attendant relevance 0.96 · 12.5% (938 of 7,500 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.64 · 45.6% (3,417 of 7,500 decks)
- Rootwire Amalgam relevance 0.96 · 10.4% (778 of 7,500 decks)
- Haywire Mite relevance 0.76 · 23.9% (1,794 of 7,500 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.85 · 53.1% (3,984 of 7,500 decks)
- Tarrian's Soulcleaver relevance 0.82 · 55.8% (4,187 of 7,500 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.87 · 44.2% (3,314 of 7,500 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.88 · 30.7% (2,304 of 7,500 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.86 · 28.8% (2,163 of 7,500 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.77 · 38.1% (2,854 of 7,500 decks)
- Darksteel Forge relevance 0.93 · 18.3% (1,375 of 7,500 decks)
- Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass relevance 0.92 · 17.6% (1,322 of 7,500 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.90 · 18.5% (1,389 of 7,500 decks)
- Thunderous Velocipede relevance 0.91 · 15.8% (1,185 of 7,500 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.85 · 20.9% (1,565 of 7,500 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.86 · 19.2% (1,439 of 7,500 decks)
- Adaptive Omnitool relevance 0.93 · 12.7% (956 of 7,500 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.83 · 19.9% (1,492 of 7,500 decks)
- Sledge-Class Seedship relevance 0.91 · 12.3% (924 of 7,500 decks)
- Dawnsire, Sunstar Dreadnought relevance 0.93 · 11.1% (831 of 7,500 decks)
- Extinguisher Battleship relevance 0.92 · 10.2% (763 of 7,500 decks)
- The Indomitable relevance 0.90 · 10.4% (779 of 7,500 decks)
- Brotherhood Vertibird relevance 0.98 · 6.6% (494 of 7,500 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.88 · 10.6% (794 of 7,500 decks)
- Solar Array relevance 0.95 · 7.0% (527 of 7,500 decks)
- Reaver Titan relevance 0.97 · 6.2% (467 of 7,500 decks)
- Encroaching Mycosynth relevance 0.94 · 6.6% (497 of 7,500 decks)
- The Regalia relevance 0.91 · 7.6% (569 of 7,500 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.89 · 8.8% (658 of 7,500 decks)
- Cultivator's Caravan relevance 0.94 · 5.9% (442 of 7,500 decks)
- Mycosynth Lattice relevance 0.92 · 5.7% (430 of 7,500 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.69 · 19.9% (1,494 of 7,500 decks)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.82 · 9.2% (692 of 7,500 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.75 · 12.7% (950 of 7,500 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.77 · 11.8% (884 of 7,500 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.68 · 14.4% (1,079 of 7,500 decks)
- Cosmic Cube relevance 0.89 · 4.3% (325 of 7,500 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.75 · 7.7% (574 of 7,500 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.77 · 5.8% (436 of 7,500 decks)
- Peter Parker's Camera relevance 0.83 · 4.6% (348 of 7,500 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.61 · 14.2% (1,068 of 7,500 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.75 · 4.6% (346 of 7,500 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.68 · 5.1% (385 of 7,500 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.68 · 5.3% (396 of 7,500 decks)
- Darksteel Monolith relevance 0.86 · 3.5% (264 of 7,500 decks)
- Weatherlight relevance 0.95 · 2.9% (217 of 7,500 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.48 · 24.2% (1,812 of 7,500 decks)
- Mirrorworks relevance 0.91 · 2.9% (217 of 7,500 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.57 · 9.9% (743 of 7,500 decks)
- Nautiloid Ship relevance 0.94 · 2.5% (191 of 7,500 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.62 · 5.7% (431 of 7,500 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.36 · 43.8% (3,287 of 7,500 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.84 · 2.9% (216 of 7,500 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.34 · 42.6% (3,195 of 7,500 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All enchantments (20)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.87 · 33.2% (2,488 of 7,500 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.95 · 7.5% (565 of 7,500 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.93 · 7.9% (594 of 7,500 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.69 · 23.9% (1,792 of 7,500 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.74 · 17.4% (1,302 of 7,500 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.67 · 18.4% (1,378 of 7,500 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.39 · 46.6% (3,494 of 7,500 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.92 · 2.7% (206 of 7,500 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.84 · 3.3% (244 of 7,500 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.52 · 13.0% (977 of 7,500 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.55 · 7.5% (565 of 7,500 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (377 of 7,500 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.57 · 2.5% (189 of 7,500 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.31 · 12.7% (951 of 7,500 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.44 · 3.5% (261 of 7,500 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.41 · 3.7% (276 of 7,500 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.49 · 2.5% (187 of 7,500 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.47 · 2.8% (207 of 7,500 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.31 · 5.7% (425 of 7,500 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (212 of 7,500 decks)
All instants (43)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.86 · 41.9% (3,140 of 7,500 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.77 · 21.9% (1,639 of 7,500 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.87 · 8.7% (654 of 7,500 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.60 · 11.8% (886 of 7,500 decks)
- Reality Heist relevance 0.92 · 3.1% (231 of 7,500 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.58 · 9.5% (715 of 7,500 decks)
- Urza's Command relevance 0.90 · 2.8% (210 of 7,500 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.74 · 3.9% (291 of 7,500 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.46 · 17.7% (1,327 of 7,500 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.39 · 21.9% (1,645 of 7,500 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.40 · 15.6% (1,167 of 7,500 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.44 · 8.1% (611 of 7,500 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.45 · 6.7% (503 of 7,500 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.37 · 14.0% (1,052 of 7,500 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.30 · 32.4% (2,428 of 7,500 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.26 · 43.0% (3,225 of 7,500 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.21 · 65.8% (4,938 of 7,500 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.32 · 22.3% (1,670 of 7,500 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.30 · 27.7% (2,078 of 7,500 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.31 · 23.5% (1,766 of 7,500 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.36 · 12.7% (954 of 7,500 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.37 · 10.6% (798 of 7,500 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.34 · 14.1% (1,059 of 7,500 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.46 · 4.2% (316 of 7,500 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.31 · 18.4% (1,382 of 7,500 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.30 · 20.3% (1,519 of 7,500 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.48 · 3.3% (251 of 7,500 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.48 · 3.3% (246 of 7,500 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.40 · 4.4% (327 of 7,500 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.25 · 25.2% (1,888 of 7,500 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.48 · 2.8% (208 of 7,500 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.50 · 2.6% (193 of 7,500 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.18 · 50.9% (3,818 of 7,500 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.40 · 3.5% (262 of 7,500 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.17 · 46.8% (3,509 of 7,500 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.41 · 3.0% (226 of 7,500 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.42 · 2.7% (204 of 7,500 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.35 · 3.7% (281 of 7,500 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.36 · 3.3% (246 of 7,500 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (240 of 7,500 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (216 of 7,500 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.33 · 2.8% (207 of 7,500 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.30 · 2.5% (190 of 7,500 decks)
All sorceries (26)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.91 · 31.7% (2,379 of 7,500 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.82 · 31.5% (2,364 of 7,500 decks)
- March of Progress relevance 0.95 · 9.1% (682 of 7,500 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.61 · 33.2% (2,490 of 7,500 decks)
- Traverse Eternity relevance 0.84 · 4.9% (368 of 7,500 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.32 · 78.5% (5,889 of 7,500 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.47 · 22.7% (1,704 of 7,500 decks)
- Contest of Claws relevance 0.81 · 2.7% (201 of 7,500 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.60 · 4.2% (315 of 7,500 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.62 · 4.0% (299 of 7,500 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.46 · 9.4% (708 of 7,500 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.39 · 12.4% (932 of 7,500 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.44 · 4.9% (370 of 7,500 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.40 · 6.9% (519 of 7,500 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.53 · 3.1% (234 of 7,500 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.26 · 31.3% (2,350 of 7,500 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.51 · 3.1% (233 of 7,500 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.26 · 25.6% (1,923 of 7,500 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.20 · 47.7% (3,576 of 7,500 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.23 · 36.2% (2,716 of 7,500 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.22 · 28.3% (2,126 of 7,500 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (226 of 7,500 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.29 · 7.1% (533 of 7,500 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.42 · 2.7% (203 of 7,500 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.37 · 3.2% (243 of 7,500 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.31 · 4.0% (298 of 7,500 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.84 · 20.7% (1,556 of 7,500 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.85 · 12.7% (953 of 7,500 decks)
- Karn, Scion of Urza relevance 0.94 · 7.8% (584 of 7,500 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.85 · 2.6% (193 of 7,500 decks)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.73 · 2.7% (200 of 7,500 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.52 · 3.6% (272 of 7,500 decks)
All utility lands (41)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.78 · 45.5% (3,412 of 7,500 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.76 · 48.2% (3,616 of 7,500 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.81 · 37.3% (2,795 of 7,500 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.78 · 35.5% (2,661 of 7,500 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.75 · 38.4% (2,883 of 7,500 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.85 · 19.7% (1,476 of 7,500 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.90 · 12.0% (901 of 7,500 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.90 · 9.3% (694 of 7,500 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.88 · 6.5% (484 of 7,500 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.59 · 22.5% (1,684 of 7,500 decks)
- Balamb Garden, SeeD Academy // Balamb Garden, Airborne relevance 0.71 · 6.8% (509 of 7,500 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.62 · 4.7% (351 of 7,500 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.54 · 8.6% (643 of 7,500 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.52 · 8.8% (657 of 7,500 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.60 · 4.3% (325 of 7,500 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.65 · 3.4% (254 of 7,500 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.48 · 6.7% (505 of 7,500 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.36 · 18.4% (1,378 of 7,500 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.34 · 22.5% (1,691 of 7,500 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.41 · 8.7% (653 of 7,500 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.40 · 9.6% (719 of 7,500 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.51 · 3.9% (293 of 7,500 decks)
- Meditation Pools relevance 0.60 · 2.9% (221 of 7,500 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.29 · 28.3% (2,119 of 7,500 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.36 · 10.3% (774 of 7,500 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.32 · 16.0% (1,202 of 7,500 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.31 · 16.1% (1,209 of 7,500 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.50 · 3.7% (274 of 7,500 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.42 · 4.5% (337 of 7,500 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.37 · 6.6% (495 of 7,500 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.48 · 3.6% (271 of 7,500 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.31 · 13.7% (1,025 of 7,500 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.29 · 17.8% (1,334 of 7,500 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.47 · 3.5% (264 of 7,500 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.32 · 9.2% (693 of 7,500 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.35 · 4.9% (369 of 7,500 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.43 · 3.4% (253 of 7,500 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.22 · 25.9% (1,946 of 7,500 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.27 · 6.0% (453 of 7,500 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.16 · 36.1% (2,710 of 7,500 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (309 of 7,500 decks)
All lands (50)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.70 · 67.9% (5,091 of 7,500 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.72 · 61.3% (4,595 of 7,500 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.76 · 52.7% (3,953 of 7,500 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.67 · 49.3% (3,700 of 7,500 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.84 · 19.1% (1,431 of 7,500 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.56 · 13.5% (1,009 of 7,500 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.57 · 10.9% (814 of 7,500 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.57 · 10.8% (811 of 7,500 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.56 · 10.8% (812 of 7,500 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.34 · 33.2% (2,488 of 7,500 decks)
- Guadosalam, Farplane Gateway relevance 0.61 · 3.7% (279 of 7,500 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.47 · 5.4% (408 of 7,500 decks)
- Shrine of the Forsaken Gods relevance 0.70 · 2.5% (187 of 7,500 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.33 · 20.1% (1,508 of 7,500 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.35 · 14.0% (1,049 of 7,500 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.35 · 12.5% (940 of 7,500 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.35 · 12.4% (930 of 7,500 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.36 · 10.7% (806 of 7,500 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.40 · 6.5% (487 of 7,500 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.54 · 3.3% (246 of 7,500 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.55 · 3.1% (235 of 7,500 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.27 · 29.4% (2,206 of 7,500 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.30 · 15.5% (1,166 of 7,500 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.28 · 18.7% (1,406 of 7,500 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.40 · 4.5% (340 of 7,500 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.33 · 8.8% (659 of 7,500 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.28 · 15.6% (1,168 of 7,500 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.35 · 5.7% (426 of 7,500 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.36 · 5.1% (379 of 7,500 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.47 · 3.3% (244 of 7,500 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.25 · 26.4% (1,980 of 7,500 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.18 · 57.6% (4,318 of 7,500 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.20 · 44.0% (3,301 of 7,500 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.49 · 2.8% (212 of 7,500 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (380 of 7,500 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.17 · 56.9% (4,269 of 7,500 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.28 · 9.7% (726 of 7,500 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.35 · 4.4% (328 of 7,500 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.18 · 46.5% (3,488 of 7,500 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.45 · 2.7% (203 of 7,500 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.27 · 8.4% (633 of 7,500 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.19 · 30.0% (2,249 of 7,500 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.35 · 3.6% (272 of 7,500 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.15 · 53.2% (3,987 of 7,500 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.35 · 3.3% (251 of 7,500 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.35 · 3.3% (246 of 7,500 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.19 · 24.0% (1,802 of 7,500 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.11 · 66.1% (4,956 of 7,500 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.05 · 83.7% (6,276 of 7,500 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 93.6% (7,021 of 7,500 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Aloy, Savior of Meridian, from 7,500 real Commander decks.