Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-25 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Feline Sovereign relevance 0.77 · 50.8% (132 of 260 decks)
- On the Trail relevance 0.74 · 38.5% (100 of 260 decks)
- Dissenter's Deliverance relevance 0.74 · 29.2% (76 of 260 decks)
- Qasali Slingers relevance 0.74 · 26.5% (69 of 260 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.66 · 26.9% (70 of 260 decks)
- Wilt relevance 0.57 · 39.2% (102 of 260 decks)
- Fa'adiyah Seer relevance 0.69 · 21.5% (56 of 260 decks)
- Runic Armasaur relevance 0.52 · 47.3% (123 of 260 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.61 · 30.4% (79 of 260 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.59 · 33.8% (88 of 260 decks)
- Generous Stray relevance 0.65 · 22.3% (58 of 260 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.60 · 25.8% (67 of 260 decks)
- Magus of the Library relevance 0.62 · 22.7% (59 of 260 decks)
- Shefet Monitor relevance 0.67 · 14.6% (38 of 260 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.44 · 54.6% (142 of 260 decks)
- Verdant Rebirth relevance 0.60 · 23.8% (62 of 260 decks)
- Barrier Breach relevance 0.58 · 25.0% (65 of 260 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.52 · 36.2% (94 of 260 decks)
- Fluctuator relevance 0.73 · 9.2% (24 of 260 decks)
- Rending Vines relevance 0.62 · 17.3% (45 of 260 decks)
- Collector's Vault relevance 0.62 · 14.6% (38 of 260 decks)
- Endless Atlas relevance 0.52 · 29.6% (77 of 260 decks)
- Bag of Holding relevance 0.64 · 11.9% (31 of 260 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.46 · 40.8% (106 of 260 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.57 · 16.5% (43 of 260 decks)
- Brainstone relevance 0.63 · 11.5% (30 of 260 decks)
- Abandoned Sarcophagus relevance 0.68 · 6.5% (17 of 260 decks)
- Repopulate relevance 0.61 · 11.2% (29 of 260 decks)
- Webstrike Elite relevance 0.60 · 11.9% (31 of 260 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.51 · 23.1% (60 of 260 decks)
- Beneath the Sands relevance 0.54 · 15.4% (40 of 260 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.45 · 31.2% (81 of 260 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.52 · 15.8% (41 of 260 decks)
- Heartwood Storyteller relevance 0.46 · 28.1% (73 of 260 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.39 · 42.3% (110 of 260 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.56 · 11.5% (30 of 260 decks)
- Haze of Pollen relevance 0.51 · 15.0% (39 of 260 decks)
- Hungry Lynx relevance 0.57 · 9.6% (25 of 260 decks)
- Zenith Chronicler relevance 0.50 · 14.6% (38 of 260 decks)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 0.48 · 15.0% (39 of 260 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.47 · 16.2% (42 of 260 decks)
- Waiting in the Weeds relevance 0.55 · 8.1% (21 of 260 decks)
- Provoke relevance 0.52 · 10.8% (28 of 260 decks)
- Hush relevance 0.56 · 6.9% (18 of 260 decks)
- Thornado relevance 0.54 · 8.5% (22 of 260 decks)
- Poison the Blade relevance 0.45 · 15.0% (39 of 260 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.38 · 31.5% (82 of 260 decks)
- Rowen relevance 0.51 · 9.6% (25 of 260 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.34 · 43.5% (113 of 260 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.44 · 14.6% (38 of 260 decks)
Card Stacks
20
Card Stacks
20Showing 1-2 of 20
Cards like Llanowar Visionary
14× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
- Llanowar Visionary 55%
- Elvish Visionary 42%
- Wall of Blossoms 30%
- Generous Stray 22%
- Carven Caryatid 5%
- Owlbear 3%
- Joraga Visionary 2%
- Multani's Acolyte 2%
- Kavu Climber 2%
- Shaman of Spring 1%
- Rhox Oracle 1%
Other options: Striped Bears, Pyknite, Arctic Wolves
Cards like Toski, Bearer of Secrets
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Thought Vessel
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Lull
5.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards
- Lull 36%
- Haze of Pollen 15%
- Fog 5%
- Druid's Deliverance 3%
- Moment's Peace 2%
- Root Snare 2%
Other options: Thwart the Enemy, Pause for Reflection, Terrifying Presence, Winds of Qal Sisma, Defend the Hearth, Commencement of Festivities, Chameleon Blur, Tanglesap, Serene Sunset, Vine Snare
Cards like Psychosis Crawler
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Ohran Frostfang
6.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other green decks
Cards
- Ohran Frostfang 42%
- Oakhame Adversary 16%
- Ohran Viper 5%
Cards like Krosan Tusker
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
- Krosan Tusker 26%
- Shefet Monitor 15%
Cards like Overrun
3.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards like Heritage Reclamation
5.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Wilt
4.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
- Wilt 39%
- Krosan Grip 6%
- Break Asunder 6%
- Naturalize 3%
Other options: Oxidize, Stomp and Howl, Relic Crush, Natural Reclamation, Wear Away, Verdigris
Cards like Beast Whisperer
2.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Shamanic Revelation
3.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
2.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Thundering Ceratok
Cards like Eternal Witness
2.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Wildwood Escort, Greenwarden of Murasa
Cards like Rending Vines
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards like Cultivate
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 40%
- Migration Path 32%
- Rampant Growth 30%
- Kodama's Reach 26%
- Beneath the Sands 15%
- Search for Tomorrow 4%
- They Went This Way 3%
- Path to the Festival 2%
- Shared Roots 2%
- Explosive Vegetation 2%
- Far Wanderings 1%
Other options: Primal Growth, Grow from the Ashes, Verdant Mastery, Map the Frontier, Viewpoint Synchronization, Deep Reconnaissance, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Peregrination, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Parallel Lives
1.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards
- Parallel Lives 17%
- Doubling Season 11%
- Primal Vigor 4%
Cards like On the Trail
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards
- On the Trail 38%
- Burgeoning 4%
Cards like Mind Stone
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Howling Mine
7.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Feline Sovereign relevance 0.77 · 50.8% (132 of 260 decks)
- Qasali Slingers relevance 0.74 · 26.5% (69 of 260 decks)
- Fa'adiyah Seer relevance 0.69 · 21.5% (56 of 260 decks)
- Runic Armasaur relevance 0.52 · 47.3% (123 of 260 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.61 · 30.4% (79 of 260 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.59 · 33.8% (88 of 260 decks)
- Generous Stray relevance 0.65 · 22.3% (58 of 260 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.60 · 25.8% (67 of 260 decks)
- Magus of the Library relevance 0.62 · 22.7% (59 of 260 decks)
- Shefet Monitor relevance 0.67 · 14.6% (38 of 260 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.44 · 54.6% (142 of 260 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.46 · 40.8% (106 of 260 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.57 · 16.5% (43 of 260 decks)
- Webstrike Elite relevance 0.60 · 11.9% (31 of 260 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.45 · 31.2% (81 of 260 decks)
- Heartwood Storyteller relevance 0.46 · 28.1% (73 of 260 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.39 · 42.3% (110 of 260 decks)
- Hungry Lynx relevance 0.57 · 9.6% (25 of 260 decks)
- Zenith Chronicler relevance 0.50 · 14.6% (38 of 260 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen of Efrava relevance 0.51 · 8.5% (22 of 260 decks)
- Sage of Ancient Lore // Werewolf of Ancient Hunger relevance 0.51 · 7.7% (20 of 260 decks)
- Owlbear Shepherd relevance 0.43 · 14.2% (37 of 260 decks)
- Insidious Fungus relevance 0.38 · 26.9% (70 of 260 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.30 · 48.1% (125 of 260 decks)
- Feral Prowler relevance 0.51 · 5.8% (15 of 260 decks)
- Battle Mammoth relevance 0.44 · 12.3% (32 of 260 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.41 · 13.1% (34 of 260 decks)
- Voice of Many relevance 0.42 · 10.0% (26 of 260 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.33 · 23.8% (62 of 260 decks)
- Oakhame Adversary relevance 0.35 · 16.2% (42 of 260 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.31 · 28.5% (74 of 260 decks)
- Carven Caryatid relevance 0.44 · 5.0% (13 of 260 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.36 · 12.7% (33 of 260 decks)
- Wild Dogs relevance 0.49 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 0.39 · 8.1% (21 of 260 decks)
- Hollow One relevance 0.55 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
- Rampaging Hippo relevance 0.49 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 0.35 · 11.9% (31 of 260 decks)
- Innocuous Researcher relevance 0.43 · 4.2% (11 of 260 decks)
- Skyscanner relevance 0.45 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 0.33 · 12.3% (32 of 260 decks)
- Ohran Viper relevance 0.38 · 5.4% (14 of 260 decks)
- Nacatl War-Pride relevance 0.41 · 4.2% (11 of 260 decks)
- Regal Force relevance 0.28 · 22.7% (59 of 260 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.29 · 17.3% (45 of 260 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.23 · 42.3% (110 of 260 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.22 · 42.3% (110 of 260 decks)
- Pridemalkin relevance 0.35 · 6.5% (17 of 260 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.32 · 10.0% (26 of 260 decks)
- Warped Tusker relevance 0.40 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
Page size
All artifacts (50)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.66 · 26.9% (70 of 260 decks)
- Fluctuator relevance 0.73 · 9.2% (24 of 260 decks)
- Collector's Vault relevance 0.62 · 14.6% (38 of 260 decks)
- Endless Atlas relevance 0.52 · 29.6% (77 of 260 decks)
- Bag of Holding relevance 0.64 · 11.9% (31 of 260 decks)
- Brainstone relevance 0.63 · 11.5% (30 of 260 decks)
- Abandoned Sarcophagus relevance 0.68 · 6.5% (17 of 260 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.51 · 23.1% (60 of 260 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.52 · 15.8% (41 of 260 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.56 · 11.5% (30 of 260 decks)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 0.48 · 15.0% (39 of 260 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.47 · 16.2% (42 of 260 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.34 · 43.5% (113 of 260 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.44 · 14.6% (38 of 260 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.50 · 9.2% (24 of 260 decks)
- Venser's Journal relevance 0.50 · 8.8% (23 of 260 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 0.45 · 10.0% (26 of 260 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.38 · 21.2% (55 of 260 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.49 · 5.8% (15 of 260 decks)
- Conjurer's Bauble relevance 0.49 · 5.4% (14 of 260 decks)
- Mazemind Tome relevance 0.47 · 5.0% (13 of 260 decks)
- Currency Converter relevance 0.48 · 4.2% (11 of 260 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.29 · 28.8% (75 of 260 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.41 · 6.5% (17 of 260 decks)
- Slate of Ancestry relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (13 of 260 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.31 · 14.6% (38 of 260 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.40 · 4.2% (11 of 260 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.37 · 5.4% (14 of 260 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.42 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Library of Leng relevance 0.40 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Relic of Progenitus relevance 0.42 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- Eye of Vecna relevance 0.42 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- Smuggler's Copter relevance 0.33 · 6.5% (17 of 260 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.31 · 8.5% (22 of 260 decks)
- Symmetry Matrix relevance 0.38 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.29 · 8.8% (23 of 260 decks)
- Chromatic Star relevance 0.39 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- Spare Supplies relevance 0.41 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
- Tome of Legends relevance 0.36 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Jalum Tome relevance 0.43 · 2.7% (7 of 260 decks)
- Runaway Boulder relevance 0.45 · 2.3% (6 of 260 decks)
- Chromatic Sphere relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.25 · 11.5% (30 of 260 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.28 · 6.9% (18 of 260 decks)
- Maze Skullbomb relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.32 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Arcane Encyclopedia relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (7 of 260 decks)
- Investigator's Journal relevance 0.40 · 2.3% (6 of 260 decks)
- Magnifying Glass relevance 0.38 · 2.3% (6 of 260 decks)
- Fountainport Bell relevance 0.34 · 2.7% (7 of 260 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
Page size
All enchantments (50)
- On the Trail relevance 0.74 · 38.5% (100 of 260 decks)
- Rowen relevance 0.51 · 9.6% (25 of 260 decks)
- Primitive Etchings relevance 0.53 · 6.9% (18 of 260 decks)
- Viridian Revel relevance 0.46 · 10.0% (26 of 260 decks)
- Ground Seal relevance 0.46 · 10.0% (26 of 260 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.40 · 15.8% (41 of 260 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.38 · 16.9% (44 of 260 decks)
- Compost relevance 0.42 · 10.8% (28 of 260 decks)
- Shapers' Sanctuary relevance 0.40 · 10.0% (26 of 260 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.23 · 54.2% (141 of 260 decks)
- Unbridled Growth relevance 0.43 · 5.0% (13 of 260 decks)
- Crystal Carapace relevance 0.41 · 5.4% (14 of 260 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.28 · 29.2% (76 of 260 decks)
- Overwhelming Instinct relevance 0.40 · 5.0% (13 of 260 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.29 · 18.5% (48 of 260 decks)
- Bonds of Mortality relevance 0.37 · 6.5% (17 of 260 decks)
- Symbiotic Deployment relevance 0.38 · 4.6% (12 of 260 decks)
- Bequeathal relevance 0.38 · 4.6% (12 of 260 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.26 · 28.1% (73 of 260 decks)
- Karametra's Favor relevance 0.40 · 4.2% (11 of 260 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.34 · 6.9% (18 of 260 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.27 · 16.5% (43 of 260 decks)
- Fecundity relevance 0.33 · 6.5% (17 of 260 decks)
- Ulvenwald Mysteries relevance 0.38 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.21 · 35.4% (92 of 260 decks)
- Frog Tongue relevance 0.37 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Court of Bounty relevance 0.32 · 4.6% (12 of 260 decks)
- Weirding Wood relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.26 · 11.2% (29 of 260 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.22 · 20.4% (53 of 260 decks)
- Party Dude relevance 0.32 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.32 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.19 · 25.0% (65 of 260 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (14 of 260 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.19 · 18.1% (47 of 260 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.19 · 13.1% (34 of 260 decks)
- Leaves from the Vine relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (7 of 260 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.25 · 4.2% (11 of 260 decks)
- Ranger Class relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.22 · 6.2% (16 of 260 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.20 · 8.8% (23 of 260 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.19 · 9.2% (24 of 260 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.18 · 10.8% (28 of 260 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.20 · 5.8% (15 of 260 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (7 of 260 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (7 of 260 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (11 of 260 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.15 · 18.5% (48 of 260 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (11 of 260 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Dissenter's Deliverance relevance 0.74 · 29.2% (76 of 260 decks)
- Wilt relevance 0.57 · 39.2% (102 of 260 decks)
- Verdant Rebirth relevance 0.60 · 23.8% (62 of 260 decks)
- Barrier Breach relevance 0.58 · 25.0% (65 of 260 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.52 · 36.2% (94 of 260 decks)
- Rending Vines relevance 0.62 · 17.3% (45 of 260 decks)
- Repopulate relevance 0.61 · 11.2% (29 of 260 decks)
- Haze of Pollen relevance 0.51 · 15.0% (39 of 260 decks)
- Provoke relevance 0.52 · 10.8% (28 of 260 decks)
- Thornado relevance 0.54 · 8.5% (22 of 260 decks)
- Poison the Blade relevance 0.45 · 15.0% (39 of 260 decks)
- Airship Crash relevance 0.44 · 13.5% (35 of 260 decks)
- Slice in Twain relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (22 of 260 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.40 · 16.5% (43 of 260 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.40 · 14.6% (38 of 260 decks)
- Viridescent Wisps relevance 0.44 · 8.1% (21 of 260 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.35 · 23.1% (60 of 260 decks)
- Stinging Shot relevance 0.51 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Fresh Meat relevance 0.41 · 6.5% (17 of 260 decks)
- Bind relevance 0.41 · 6.9% (18 of 260 decks)
- Pawpatch Formation relevance 0.35 · 10.4% (27 of 260 decks)
- Glorious Decay relevance 0.38 · 6.5% (17 of 260 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.28 · 22.3% (58 of 260 decks)
- Aggressive Urge relevance 0.35 · 4.2% (11 of 260 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.27 · 8.5% (22 of 260 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.25 · 11.5% (30 of 260 decks)
- Decree of Savagery relevance 0.36 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
- Refresh relevance 0.38 · 2.7% (7 of 260 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.21 · 15.4% (40 of 260 decks)
- Warriors' Lesson relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Wildsize relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (26 of 260 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.14 · 43.8% (114 of 260 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.21 · 8.8% (23 of 260 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.20 · 10.4% (27 of 260 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.19 · 11.2% (29 of 260 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.19 · 9.2% (24 of 260 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.18 · 8.5% (22 of 260 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.14 · 15.4% (40 of 260 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.15 · 10.8% (28 of 260 decks)
- Druid's Deliverance relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (7 of 260 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.15 · 7.3% (19 of 260 decks)
- Blinding Fog relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (6 of 260 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (7 of 260 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.14 · 9.2% (24 of 260 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.08 · 55.8% (145 of 260 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.14 · 10.4% (27 of 260 decks)
- Master's Rebuke relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (7 of 260 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.14 · 8.8% (23 of 260 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.15 · 6.2% (16 of 260 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
Page size
All sorceries (50)
- Beneath the Sands relevance 0.54 · 15.4% (40 of 260 decks)
- Waiting in the Weeds relevance 0.55 · 8.1% (21 of 260 decks)
- Hush relevance 0.56 · 6.9% (18 of 260 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.38 · 31.5% (82 of 260 decks)
- Break Asunder relevance 0.53 · 5.8% (15 of 260 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 0.44 · 12.3% (32 of 260 decks)
- Claws of Wirewood relevance 0.54 · 4.2% (11 of 260 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.39 · 13.5% (35 of 260 decks)
- Gaea's Blessing relevance 0.39 · 11.2% (29 of 260 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.22 · 60.4% (157 of 260 decks)
- Track Down relevance 0.44 · 5.0% (13 of 260 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.40 · 9.2% (24 of 260 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.28 · 34.2% (89 of 260 decks)
- Field Trip relevance 0.43 · 4.6% (12 of 260 decks)
- Insist relevance 0.40 · 5.4% (14 of 260 decks)
- Irresistible Prey relevance 0.39 · 5.8% (15 of 260 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.34 · 10.8% (28 of 260 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.28 · 20.4% (53 of 260 decks)
- Monstrous Step relevance 0.43 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- Oracle's Restoration relevance 0.36 · 4.6% (12 of 260 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.21 · 43.1% (112 of 260 decks)
- Become the Avalanche relevance 0.33 · 6.5% (17 of 260 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.31 · 7.3% (19 of 260 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.19 · 43.5% (113 of 260 decks)
- Vivien's Stampede relevance 0.37 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- Root Out relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.28 · 6.5% (17 of 260 decks)
- Audience with Trostani relevance 0.36 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
- Life's Legacy relevance 0.25 · 8.5% (22 of 260 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.23 · 9.2% (24 of 260 decks)
- Tapping at the Window relevance 0.37 · 2.3% (6 of 260 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.21 · 10.4% (27 of 260 decks)
- Path to the Festival relevance 0.35 · 2.3% (6 of 260 decks)
- They Went This Way relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (7 of 260 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.17 · 16.5% (43 of 260 decks)
- Recollect relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (7 of 260 decks)
- Nature's Way relevance 0.26 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.21 · 5.8% (15 of 260 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.17 · 12.7% (33 of 260 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- Beacon of Creation relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (6 of 260 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
- Fade from History relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.13 · 20.8% (54 of 260 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 25.8% (67 of 260 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.13 · 18.8% (49 of 260 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.17 · 6.9% (18 of 260 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.15 · 9.2% (24 of 260 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
Planeswalkers
8
Planeswalkers
8 Showing 1-8 of 8
Page size
All planeswalkers (8)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.24 · 13.1% (34 of 260 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.26 · 6.2% (16 of 260 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.15 · 5.8% (15 of 260 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
Utility Lands
50
Utility Lands
50 Showing 1-25 of 50
Page size
All utility lands (50)
- Blasted Landscape relevance 0.63 · 23.1% (60 of 260 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.49 · 48.1% (125 of 260 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.47 · 49.6% (129 of 260 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.54 · 24.2% (63 of 260 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.44 · 33.1% (86 of 260 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.32 · 61.9% (161 of 260 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.45 · 12.7% (33 of 260 decks)
- Capital City relevance 0.49 · 9.2% (24 of 260 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.40 · 14.2% (37 of 260 decks)
- Roadside Reliquary relevance 0.42 · 7.7% (20 of 260 decks)
- Animal Sanctuary relevance 0.40 · 5.8% (15 of 260 decks)
- Cryptic Caves relevance 0.38 · 8.1% (21 of 260 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.35 · 10.4% (27 of 260 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.18 · 63.1% (164 of 260 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.21 · 39.2% (102 of 260 decks)
- Night Market relevance 0.42 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- Throne of the High City relevance 0.38 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.24 · 18.1% (47 of 260 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.25 · 12.7% (33 of 260 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.21 · 21.2% (55 of 260 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.28 · 5.8% (15 of 260 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (14 of 260 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.29 · 4.2% (11 of 260 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.23 · 11.2% (29 of 260 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.19 · 23.1% (60 of 260 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.22 · 11.5% (30 of 260 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.17 · 14.2% (37 of 260 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 16.5% (43 of 260 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.15 · 21.2% (55 of 260 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.17 · 10.0% (26 of 260 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.14 · 20.4% (53 of 260 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (11 of 260 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.14 · 20.4% (53 of 260 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.14 · 14.6% (38 of 260 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.19 · 4.2% (11 of 260 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.18 · 4.2% (11 of 260 decks)
- Memorial to Unity relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (6 of 260 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (6 of 260 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (7 of 260 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (6 of 260 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.19 · 2.3% (6 of 260 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.10 · 13.1% (34 of 260 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (7 of 260 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (6 of 260 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.12 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
Lands
22
Lands
22 Showing 1-22 of 22
Page size
All lands (22)
- Matzalantli, the Great Door // The Core relevance 0.55 · 9.2% (24 of 260 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.24 · 27.7% (72 of 260 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.20 · 14.2% (37 of 260 decks)
- Branch of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 0.34 · 2.3% (6 of 260 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.20 · 7.7% (20 of 260 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.31 · 2.3% (6 of 260 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.15 · 16.2% (42 of 260 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.17 · 6.9% (18 of 260 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.22 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (11 of 260 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (11 of 260 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.16 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.15 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (8 of 260 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.14 · 3.5% (9 of 260 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (10 of 260 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 88.8% (231 of 260 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Jolrael, Mwonvuli Recluse, from 260 real Commander decks.