Cards like Ioreth of the Healing House
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
60% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
2.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards like Flux Channeler
19× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
48% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Flux Channeler 70%
- Dreamtide Whale 54%
Cards like Power Conduit
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Power Conduit 52%
- Coretapper 44%
- Moxite Refinery 19%
- Energy Chamber 19%
Cards like Thrummingbird
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Lux Cannon
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Lux Cannon 48%
- Magistrate's Scepter 29%
- Surge Node 17%
Other options: Tumble Magnet, Necrogen Censer
Cards like Contentious Plan
11× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards like Aphetto Alchemist
9.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Filigree Sages, Jandor's Saddlebags, Synod Artificer, Voltaic Construct
Cards like Inventive Iteration // Living Breakthrough
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards like Summon: Valefor
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Summon: Valefor 21%
- Summon: Shiva 18%
Cards like The Bath Song
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Reject Imperfection
8.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Out of Bounds, Frazzle, Mindstatic, Convolute, Thoughtbind
Cards like Contagion Clasp
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Contagion Clasp 31%
- Contagion Engine 13%
Cards like Astral Cornucopia
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Elementalist's Palette, Ventifact Bottle, Kyren Toy
Cards like Replicating Ring
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Freed from the Real
10× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards like The Mirari Conjecture
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Titan Forge
14× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
All top picks (50)
- Crystalline Giant relevance 0.76 · 49.6% (123 of 248 decks)
- Power Conduit relevance 0.69 · 52.4% (130 of 248 decks)
- Storm of Forms relevance 0.83 · 33.9% (84 of 248 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.51 · 71.4% (177 of 248 decks)
- Coretapper relevance 0.67 · 43.5% (108 of 248 decks)
- Scroll of Isildur relevance 0.63 · 44.0% (109 of 248 decks)
- Lux Cannon relevance 0.60 · 47.6% (118 of 248 decks)
- Myojin of Cryptic Dreams relevance 0.60 · 47.2% (117 of 248 decks)
- The Phasing of Zhalfir relevance 0.65 · 38.3% (95 of 248 decks)
- The Bath Song relevance 0.60 · 44.4% (110 of 248 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.53 · 52.8% (131 of 248 decks)
- O'aka, Traveling Merchant relevance 0.61 · 37.1% (92 of 248 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.44 · 69.8% (173 of 248 decks)
- Time of Ice relevance 0.66 · 29.0% (72 of 248 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.46 · 64.5% (160 of 248 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.47 · 60.1% (149 of 248 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.41 · 70.2% (174 of 248 decks)
- Kiora Bests the Sea God relevance 0.56 · 34.7% (86 of 248 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.42 · 63.3% (157 of 248 decks)
- Darksteel Reactor relevance 0.54 · 36.7% (91 of 248 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 0.50 · 44.0% (109 of 248 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.46 · 52.0% (129 of 248 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.42 · 61.3% (152 of 248 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.49 · 45.6% (113 of 248 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.44 · 53.6% (133 of 248 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.43 · 54.0% (134 of 248 decks)
- Surge Node relevance 0.63 · 16.9% (42 of 248 decks)
- Magistrate's Scepter relevance 0.55 · 29.4% (73 of 248 decks)
- Energy Chamber relevance 0.61 · 19.4% (48 of 248 decks)
- Aven Courier relevance 0.56 · 27.0% (67 of 248 decks)
- Inventive Iteration // Living Breakthrough relevance 0.57 · 25.0% (62 of 248 decks)
- Chisei, Heart of Oceans relevance 0.66 · 12.5% (31 of 248 decks)
- Titan Forge relevance 0.60 · 19.0% (47 of 248 decks)
- Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg relevance 0.59 · 20.2% (50 of 248 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.52 · 30.6% (76 of 248 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.42 · 51.2% (127 of 248 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.45 · 44.0% (109 of 248 decks)
- Transmogrifying Wand relevance 0.57 · 21.0% (52 of 248 decks)
- The Millennium Calendar relevance 0.49 · 32.7% (81 of 248 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.43 · 44.4% (110 of 248 decks)
- Empowered Autogenerator relevance 0.50 · 28.6% (71 of 248 decks)
- Moxite Refinery relevance 0.55 · 19.4% (48 of 248 decks)
- Scavenged Brawler relevance 0.56 · 16.5% (41 of 248 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.44 · 41.1% (102 of 248 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.47 · 33.5% (83 of 248 decks)
- Guildpact Informant relevance 0.49 · 29.4% (73 of 248 decks)
- Wingfold Pteron relevance 0.67 · 7.7% (19 of 248 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.50 · 24.2% (60 of 248 decks)
- The Mirari Conjecture relevance 0.53 · 17.3% (43 of 248 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.47 · 28.2% (70 of 248 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Crystalline Giant relevance 0.76 · 49.6% (123 of 248 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.51 · 71.4% (177 of 248 decks)
- Coretapper relevance 0.67 · 43.5% (108 of 248 decks)
- Myojin of Cryptic Dreams relevance 0.60 · 47.2% (117 of 248 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.53 · 52.8% (131 of 248 decks)
- O'aka, Traveling Merchant relevance 0.61 · 37.1% (92 of 248 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.44 · 69.8% (173 of 248 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.46 · 64.5% (160 of 248 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.41 · 70.2% (174 of 248 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 0.50 · 44.0% (109 of 248 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.46 · 52.0% (129 of 248 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.49 · 45.6% (113 of 248 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.44 · 53.6% (133 of 248 decks)
- Aven Courier relevance 0.56 · 27.0% (67 of 248 decks)
- Inventive Iteration // Living Breakthrough relevance 0.57 · 25.0% (62 of 248 decks)
- Chisei, Heart of Oceans relevance 0.66 · 12.5% (31 of 248 decks)
- Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg relevance 0.59 · 20.2% (50 of 248 decks)
- Scavenged Brawler relevance 0.56 · 16.5% (41 of 248 decks)
- Guildpact Informant relevance 0.49 · 29.4% (73 of 248 decks)
- Wingfold Pteron relevance 0.67 · 7.7% (19 of 248 decks)
- Summon: Valefor relevance 0.50 · 21.0% (52 of 248 decks)
- Skyship Plunderer relevance 0.55 · 13.3% (33 of 248 decks)
- Behold the Unspeakable // Vision of the Unspeakable relevance 0.50 · 16.5% (41 of 248 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.41 · 34.3% (85 of 248 decks)
- Danny Pink relevance 0.49 · 17.3% (43 of 248 decks)
- Rikku, Resourceful Guardian relevance 0.49 · 14.5% (36 of 248 decks)
- Summon: Shiva relevance 0.47 · 17.7% (44 of 248 decks)
- Wingspan Mentor relevance 0.55 · 9.3% (23 of 248 decks)
- Clever Conjurer relevance 0.46 · 15.7% (39 of 248 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.42 · 22.6% (56 of 248 decks)
- Wingshield Agent relevance 0.57 · 5.2% (13 of 248 decks)
- Forensic Researcher relevance 0.44 · 16.5% (41 of 248 decks)
- The Modern Age // Vector Glider relevance 0.52 · 8.5% (21 of 248 decks)
- Myojin of Seeing Winds relevance 0.51 · 8.5% (21 of 248 decks)
- Zephyr Singer relevance 0.50 · 8.1% (20 of 248 decks)
- Ingenious Prodigy relevance 0.44 · 13.3% (33 of 248 decks)
- Loch Mare relevance 0.44 · 10.5% (26 of 248 decks)
- Marvin, Murderous Mimic relevance 0.36 · 22.2% (55 of 248 decks)
- Leech Bonder relevance 0.49 · 4.8% (12 of 248 decks)
- Nimbleclaw Adept relevance 0.44 · 8.1% (20 of 248 decks)
- Benthic Biomancer relevance 0.41 · 10.5% (26 of 248 decks)
- Ferropede relevance 0.46 · 5.2% (13 of 248 decks)
- Chronozoa relevance 0.44 · 7.3% (18 of 248 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.41 · 10.1% (25 of 248 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 0.33 · 23.4% (58 of 248 decks)
- The Watcher in the Water relevance 0.36 · 12.5% (31 of 248 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias // The Great Synthesis relevance 0.36 · 12.9% (32 of 248 decks)
- Hexavus relevance 0.43 · 4.8% (12 of 248 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.25 · 39.9% (99 of 248 decks)
- Avian Oddity relevance 0.47 · 3.6% (9 of 248 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Power Conduit relevance 0.69 · 52.4% (130 of 248 decks)
- Lux Cannon relevance 0.60 · 47.6% (118 of 248 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.47 · 60.1% (149 of 248 decks)
- Darksteel Reactor relevance 0.54 · 36.7% (91 of 248 decks)
- Surge Node relevance 0.63 · 16.9% (42 of 248 decks)
- Magistrate's Scepter relevance 0.55 · 29.4% (73 of 248 decks)
- Energy Chamber relevance 0.61 · 19.4% (48 of 248 decks)
- Titan Forge relevance 0.60 · 19.0% (47 of 248 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.52 · 30.6% (76 of 248 decks)
- Transmogrifying Wand relevance 0.57 · 21.0% (52 of 248 decks)
- The Millennium Calendar relevance 0.49 · 32.7% (81 of 248 decks)
- Empowered Autogenerator relevance 0.50 · 28.6% (71 of 248 decks)
- Moxite Refinery relevance 0.55 · 19.4% (48 of 248 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.47 · 33.5% (83 of 248 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.50 · 24.2% (60 of 248 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.47 · 28.2% (70 of 248 decks)
- Gavel of the Righteous relevance 0.53 · 16.5% (41 of 248 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.47 · 24.6% (61 of 248 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.47 · 18.1% (45 of 248 decks)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.43 · 19.8% (49 of 248 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.36 · 35.1% (87 of 248 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.26 · 64.9% (161 of 248 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.41 · 17.7% (44 of 248 decks)
- Lux Artillery relevance 0.48 · 8.9% (22 of 248 decks)
- Contagion Engine relevance 0.42 · 13.3% (33 of 248 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.37 · 24.6% (61 of 248 decks)
- Luxior, Giada's Gift relevance 0.47 · 6.0% (15 of 248 decks)
- Geometric Nexus relevance 0.46 · 6.0% (15 of 248 decks)
- Coalition Relic relevance 0.42 · 8.1% (20 of 248 decks)
- Vexing Puzzlebox relevance 0.42 · 7.7% (19 of 248 decks)
- Blitzball Stadium relevance 0.42 · 6.0% (15 of 248 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.40 · 8.1% (20 of 248 decks)
- Lost Jitte relevance 0.41 · 5.6% (14 of 248 decks)
- Aether Vial relevance 0.40 · 6.0% (15 of 248 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.37 · 6.5% (16 of 248 decks)
- Weather Maker relevance 0.38 · 6.0% (15 of 248 decks)
- Sun Droplet relevance 0.42 · 4.0% (10 of 248 decks)
- Eternity Vessel relevance 0.39 · 4.4% (11 of 248 decks)
- Recon Craft Theta relevance 0.37 · 4.4% (11 of 248 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.22 · 35.9% (89 of 248 decks)
- Glistening Sphere relevance 0.34 · 4.8% (12 of 248 decks)
- Adaptive Training Post relevance 0.33 · 4.8% (12 of 248 decks)
- Orochi Hatchery relevance 0.36 · 4.0% (10 of 248 decks)
- Strixhaven Stadium relevance 0.32 · 4.8% (12 of 248 decks)
- Peter Parker's Camera relevance 0.31 · 5.2% (13 of 248 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.30 · 7.7% (19 of 248 decks)
- Golem Foundry relevance 0.33 · 4.4% (11 of 248 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.30 · 6.9% (17 of 248 decks)
- Culling Dais relevance 0.36 · 3.6% (9 of 248 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 0.32 · 4.0% (10 of 248 decks)
All enchantments (38)
- Scroll of Isildur relevance 0.63 · 44.0% (109 of 248 decks)
- The Phasing of Zhalfir relevance 0.65 · 38.3% (95 of 248 decks)
- The Bath Song relevance 0.60 · 44.4% (110 of 248 decks)
- Time of Ice relevance 0.66 · 29.0% (72 of 248 decks)
- Kiora Bests the Sea God relevance 0.56 · 34.7% (86 of 248 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.43 · 54.0% (134 of 248 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.43 · 44.4% (110 of 248 decks)
- The Mirari Conjecture relevance 0.53 · 17.3% (43 of 248 decks)
- Medomai's Prophecy relevance 0.59 · 11.3% (28 of 248 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.39 · 25.4% (63 of 248 decks)
- Gadwick's First Duel relevance 0.52 · 7.3% (18 of 248 decks)
- Ballad of the Black Flag relevance 0.49 · 8.9% (22 of 248 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.41 · 18.1% (45 of 248 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.40 · 20.6% (51 of 248 decks)
- The Antiquities War relevance 0.44 · 12.1% (30 of 248 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.38 · 20.6% (51 of 248 decks)
- Founding the Third Path relevance 0.45 · 8.5% (21 of 248 decks)
- Old Fat Spider Can't See Me relevance 0.47 · 6.9% (17 of 248 decks)
- Second Wind relevance 0.44 · 7.3% (18 of 248 decks)
- Tamiyo Meets the Story Circle relevance 0.44 · 5.6% (14 of 248 decks)
- The Clone Saga relevance 0.42 · 7.3% (18 of 248 decks)
- Mesmerizing Dose relevance 0.38 · 7.7% (19 of 248 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 0.35 · 8.5% (21 of 248 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.25 · 25.0% (62 of 248 decks)
- Crab Umbra relevance 0.35 · 5.2% (13 of 248 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.27 · 15.7% (39 of 248 decks)
- Kang Dynasty relevance 0.37 · 3.2% (8 of 248 decks)
- The Tale of Tamiyo relevance 0.34 · 2.8% (7 of 248 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.16 · 33.1% (82 of 248 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.18 · 13.7% (34 of 248 decks)
- Nightmares and Daydreams relevance 0.31 · 2.4% (6 of 248 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (12 of 248 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.13 · 21.4% (53 of 248 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.16 · 5.2% (13 of 248 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (10 of 248 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.11 · 10.1% (25 of 248 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.15 · 2.8% (7 of 248 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.11 · 3.2% (8 of 248 decks)
All instants (50)
- Storm of Forms relevance 0.83 · 33.9% (84 of 248 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.42 · 63.3% (157 of 248 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.45 · 44.0% (109 of 248 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.44 · 41.1% (102 of 248 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.42 · 26.6% (66 of 248 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.42 · 25.0% (62 of 248 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.40 · 23.0% (57 of 248 decks)
- Nexus Mentality relevance 0.48 · 8.9% (22 of 248 decks)
- Clockspinning relevance 0.39 · 22.2% (55 of 248 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.39 · 15.3% (38 of 248 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.39 · 10.9% (27 of 248 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.27 · 12.9% (32 of 248 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.24 · 11.3% (28 of 248 decks)
- Suspend relevance 0.28 · 4.8% (12 of 248 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.19 · 24.6% (61 of 248 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.29 · 4.0% (10 of 248 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.17 · 29.0% (72 of 248 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.24 · 5.2% (13 of 248 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.23 · 5.2% (13 of 248 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (12 of 248 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.18 · 12.1% (30 of 248 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (10 of 248 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.17 · 10.1% (25 of 248 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.13 · 28.6% (71 of 248 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.12 · 29.0% (72 of 248 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.13 · 21.8% (54 of 248 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.18 · 4.4% (11 of 248 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (7 of 248 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.12 · 30.2% (75 of 248 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (11 of 248 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.12 · 24.2% (60 of 248 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.11 · 32.7% (81 of 248 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (10 of 248 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.11 · 27.8% (69 of 248 decks)
- Trickbind relevance 0.23 · 2.4% (6 of 248 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.15 · 5.2% (13 of 248 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.12 · 13.7% (34 of 248 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.18 · 3.2% (8 of 248 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.13 · 10.9% (27 of 248 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (10 of 248 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.17 · 3.2% (8 of 248 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.12 · 7.3% (18 of 248 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (6 of 248 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.13 · 5.2% (13 of 248 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.12 · 6.0% (15 of 248 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.10 · 16.9% (42 of 248 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.06 · 56.5% (140 of 248 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.11 · 6.5% (16 of 248 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.11 · 9.3% (23 of 248 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.12 · 4.4% (11 of 248 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All sorceries (18)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.42 · 61.3% (152 of 248 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.42 · 51.2% (127 of 248 decks)
- Vivisurgeon's Insight relevance 0.45 · 17.7% (44 of 248 decks)
- Expansion Algorithm relevance 0.44 · 13.7% (34 of 248 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.24 · 13.7% (34 of 248 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.25 · 8.9% (22 of 248 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (15 of 248 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.17 · 19.0% (47 of 248 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.21 · 7.7% (19 of 248 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.16 · 17.7% (44 of 248 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (12 of 248 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.13 · 18.1% (45 of 248 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (10 of 248 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.14 · 8.5% (21 of 248 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.18 · 3.2% (8 of 248 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (10 of 248 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (7 of 248 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (6 of 248 decks)
All planeswalkers (21)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.41 · 12.9% (32 of 248 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.38 · 9.3% (23 of 248 decks)
- Mu Yanling, Sky Dancer relevance 0.39 · 7.7% (19 of 248 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.32 · 15.7% (39 of 248 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.30 · 14.5% (36 of 248 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.32 · 6.0% (15 of 248 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.24 · 14.1% (35 of 248 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (13 of 248 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (11 of 248 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.30 · 3.6% (9 of 248 decks)
- Mordenkainen relevance 0.26 · 4.4% (11 of 248 decks)
- Will Kenrith relevance 0.33 · 2.8% (7 of 248 decks)
- Vronos, Masked Inquisitor relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (7 of 248 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.20 · 7.3% (18 of 248 decks)
- Jace, Mirror Mage relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (8 of 248 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.18 · 10.5% (26 of 248 decks)
- Jace, Ingenious Mind-Mage relevance 0.26 · 2.8% (7 of 248 decks)
- Jace, Architect of Thought relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (7 of 248 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (10 of 248 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (7 of 248 decks)
- Jace, Memory Adept relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (6 of 248 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Segovia // Caetus, Sea Tyrant of Segovia relevance 0.26 · 4.8% (12 of 248 decks)
All utility lands (47)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.55 · 69.8% (173 of 248 decks)
- Diamond City relevance 0.63 · 26.6% (66 of 248 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.42 · 63.7% (158 of 248 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.52 · 40.7% (101 of 248 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.53 · 32.3% (80 of 248 decks)
- Magosi, the Waterveil relevance 0.55 · 23.4% (58 of 248 decks)
- Trenzalore Clocktower relevance 0.43 · 8.1% (20 of 248 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.42 · 6.9% (17 of 248 decks)
- Drannith Ruins relevance 0.44 · 4.8% (12 of 248 decks)
- Hall of Oracles relevance 0.41 · 6.0% (15 of 248 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.27 · 25.0% (62 of 248 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.32 · 10.9% (27 of 248 decks)
- The Monumental Facade relevance 0.41 · 3.6% (9 of 248 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.28 · 13.3% (33 of 248 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.23 · 27.8% (69 of 248 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.33 · 4.0% (10 of 248 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.22 · 11.3% (28 of 248 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.24 · 6.5% (16 of 248 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.19 · 18.5% (46 of 248 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.23 · 6.9% (17 of 248 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (7 of 248 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 21.8% (54 of 248 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (10 of 248 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.22 · 5.6% (14 of 248 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.16 · 16.1% (40 of 248 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.19 · 8.5% (21 of 248 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (12 of 248 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (15 of 248 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.18 · 9.3% (23 of 248 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.18 · 9.3% (23 of 248 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.19 · 5.6% (14 of 248 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.19 · 6.0% (15 of 248 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.17 · 10.1% (25 of 248 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.16 · 8.9% (22 of 248 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.16 · 8.1% (20 of 248 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.16 · 8.5% (21 of 248 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (10 of 248 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.09 · 41.5% (103 of 248 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (12 of 248 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.13 · 10.1% (25 of 248 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.09 · 42.3% (105 of 248 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.14 · 5.2% (13 of 248 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.12 · 8.5% (21 of 248 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (6 of 248 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (6 of 248 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.13 · 2.8% (7 of 248 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (6 of 248 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (17)
- Vivid Creek relevance 0.71 · 22.2% (55 of 248 decks)
- Mirrodin's Core relevance 0.70 · 18.5% (46 of 248 decks)
- Tendo Ice Bridge relevance 0.70 · 14.1% (35 of 248 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.51 · 26.6% (66 of 248 decks)
- Mage-Ring Network relevance 0.45 · 12.5% (31 of 248 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.35 · 16.5% (41 of 248 decks)
- Saprazzan Cove relevance 0.39 · 4.4% (11 of 248 decks)
- Sand Silos relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (6 of 248 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (8 of 248 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.15 · 13.3% (33 of 248 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (12 of 248 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.16 · 8.5% (21 of 248 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (7 of 248 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (9 of 248 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (6 of 248 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.12 · 2.4% (6 of 248 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 83.5% (207 of 248 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Goldberry, River-Daughter, from 248 real Commander decks.