Cards like Quakestrider Ceratops
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
94% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
91% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
5.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Quakestrider Ceratops 81%
- Gigantosaurus 79%
- Leatherback Baloth 72%
- Vorstclaw 63%
- Ancient Brontodon 56%
- Primordial Wurm 55%
- Enormous Baloth 22%
- Colossapede 19%
- Grizzled Outrider 11%
- Axebane Stag 10%
- Cowl Prowler 8%
- Barbtooth Wurm 7%
- Hollowhenge Beast 5%
- Kindercatch 4%
- Canopy Gorger 4%
- Broodhunter Wurm 4%
- Scaled Wurm 3%
- Tusked Colossodon 3%
- Murasa Brute 3%
- Vastwood Gorger 3%
- Trained Armodon 3%
- Wild Ceratok 3%
- Golden Bear 2%
- Feral Krushok 2%
- Silverback Ape 2%
- Axebane Beast 2%
- Thornhide Wolves 2%
- Gnarled Mass 2%
- Spined Karok 2%
- Nettle Swine 2%
- Pheres-Band Centaurs 2%
- Durkwood Boars 1%
Other options: Blanchwood Treefolk, Order of the Sacred Bell, Moss Monster, Plated Wurm, Ironroot Treefolk, Southern Elephant, Nema Siltlurker
Cards like Kalonian Tusker
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
89% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
81% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
3.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Kalonian Tusker 68%
- Alpine Grizzly 61%
- Terrain Elemental 53%
- Orazca Frillback 49%
- Jibbirik Omnivore 43%
- Swordwise Centaur 40%
- Rumbling Baloth 17%
- Colossodon Yearling 7%
- Cylian Elf 6%
- Runeclaw Bear 6%
- Ferocious Zheng 5%
- Bear Cub 4%
- Balduvian Bears 4%
- Forest Bear 3%
- Barbary Apes 1%
Other options: Trained Jackal
Cards like Devilthorn Fox
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
67% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
3.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Devilthorn Fox 46%
- Raptor Companion 43%
- Savai Sabertooth 32%
- Elite Vanguard 32%
- Oreskos Swiftclaw 29%
- Grizzled Leotau 23%
- Cliffhaven Sell-Sword 21%
- Expedition Envoy 20%
- Prowling Caracal 20%
- Knight of New Benalia 15%
- Armored Warhorse 5%
- Kyoshi Warrior Guard 5%
- Yoked Ox 4%
- Ageless Guardian 3%
- Silvercoat Lion 3%
- Staunch Shieldmate 3%
- Sanctuary Cat 3%
- Tasseled Dromedary 2%
- Traveling Philosopher 1%
- Bastion Enforcer 1%
- Those Who Serve 1%
- Valiant Guard 1%
Other options: Pearled Unicorn, Keepers of the Faith, Squire
Cards like Muraganda Petroglyphs
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
59% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
2.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Terrian, World Tyrant
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
55% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Rampant Growth
2.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Selesnya decks
58% of decks run two or more
vs. 29% of other Selesnya decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.93 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Rampant Growth 60%
- Cultivate 56%
- Kodama's Reach 41%
- Shared Roots 7%
- Migration Path 4%
- Search for Tomorrow 3%
- Explosive Vegetation 3%
Other options: Grow from the Ashes, New Generation's Technique, Roamer's Routine, Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Primal Growth, Beneath the Sands, Far Wanderings, They Went This Way, Map the Wastes, Untamed Wilds, Terramorph, Deep Reconnaissance, Peregrination, Path to the Festival, Viewpoint Synchronization, Verdant Mastery
Cards like Indomitable Ancients
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Indomitable Ancients 30%
- Armored Wolf-Rider 15%
- Kami of Old Stone 8%
- Looming Altisaur 4%
- Old Ghastbark 2%
- Great-Horn Krushok 1%
Other options: Ironclad Krovod, Dutiful Servants, Siege Mastodon, Great Hart, Silent Artisan, Pillarfield Ox, Imperial Outrider
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Selesnya decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.55 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 46%
- Three Visits 32%
- Skyshroud Claim 11%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Glimpse the Core, Hunting Wilds, Field Trip
Cards like Beast Within
1.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 39% of other Selesnya decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 19% of other Selesnya decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Beast Within 41%
- Generous Gift 32%
Cards like Glass Golem
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Bronze Sable, Alpha Myr, Phyrexian Hulk, Hexplate Golem, Field Creeper, Razorfield Thresher, Obsianus Golem, Stone Golem, Stonework Puma, Wicker Witch, Gilded Sentinel, Omega Myr, Sliver Construct
Cards like Elemental Bond
3.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Lightning Greaves
1.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 28% of other Selesnya decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Lightning Greaves 24%
- Swiftfoot Boots 22%
Cards like Fog
2.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Fog 30%
- Holy Day 3%
- Moment's Peace 2%
Other options: Lull, Druid's Deliverance, Angelsong, Ethereal Haze, Winds of Qal Sisma, Commencement of Festivities, Safe Passage, Haze of Pollen, Root Snare, Defend the Hearth, Pause for Reflection, Eerie Interference, Thwart the Enemy, Terrifying Presence, Harmless Assault, Chameleon Blur, Divine Light, Tanglesap, Serene Sunset, Forfend, Vine Snare
Cards like Return to Nature
9.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 54% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Blade of the Sixth Pride
No other Selesnya decks run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 0% of other Selesnya decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Tolsimir Wolfblood
6.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Jasmine Boreal
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Toski, Bearer of Secrets
7.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 0.84 · 80.3% (3,264 of 4,064 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.83 · 81.3% (3,304 of 4,064 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 0.84 · 77.3% (3,140 of 4,064 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.83 · 79.0% (3,212 of 4,064 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 0.82 · 78.9% (3,208 of 4,064 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 0.82 · 76.2% (3,098 of 4,064 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 0.85 · 72.4% (2,942 of 4,064 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 0.86 · 71.9% (2,920 of 4,064 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 0.86 · 67.6% (2,747 of 4,064 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 0.84 · 67.2% (2,730 of 4,064 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 0.87 · 62.7% (2,550 of 4,064 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 0.87 · 60.3% (2,451 of 4,064 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 0.85 · 61.2% (2,487 of 4,064 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 0.88 · 56.3% (2,289 of 4,064 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 0.88 · 55.2% (2,245 of 4,064 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 0.89 · 52.8% (2,144 of 4,064 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 0.81 · 58.6% (2,382 of 4,064 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 0.89 · 49.2% (2,000 of 4,064 decks)
- Devilthorn Fox relevance 0.90 · 45.8% (1,862 of 4,064 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 0.90 · 43.4% (1,764 of 4,064 decks)
- Raptor Companion relevance 0.90 · 43.1% (1,750 of 4,064 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 0.91 · 41.1% (1,671 of 4,064 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 0.91 · 40.3% (1,636 of 4,064 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 0.91 · 40.1% (1,630 of 4,064 decks)
- Cheeky House-Mouse // Squeak By relevance 0.89 · 40.4% (1,642 of 4,064 decks)
- Shepherd of the Flock // Usher to Safety relevance 0.89 · 40.3% (1,638 of 4,064 decks)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 0.91 · 34.4% (1,398 of 4,064 decks)
- Elite Vanguard relevance 0.92 · 32.1% (1,304 of 4,064 decks)
- Savai Sabertooth relevance 0.91 · 32.2% (1,310 of 4,064 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 0.91 · 29.0% (1,178 of 4,064 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 0.90 · 29.7% (1,208 of 4,064 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 0.94 · 21.8% (885 of 4,064 decks)
- Cliffhaven Sell-Sword relevance 0.94 · 21.0% (853 of 4,064 decks)
- Expedition Envoy relevance 0.94 · 20.0% (811 of 4,064 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 0.93 · 21.0% (854 of 4,064 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 0.95 · 18.8% (765 of 4,064 decks)
- Grizzled Leotau relevance 0.89 · 23.3% (948 of 4,064 decks)
- Prowling Caracal relevance 0.93 · 19.6% (797 of 4,064 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 0.95 · 17.2% (700 of 4,064 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 0.95 · 17.2% (701 of 4,064 decks)
- Damping Matrix relevance 0.93 · 18.9% (768 of 4,064 decks)
- Glass Golem relevance 0.95 · 15.2% (619 of 4,064 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.74 · 40.0% (1,625 of 4,064 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 0.95 · 15.6% (636 of 4,064 decks)
- Knight of New Benalia relevance 0.95 · 15.4% (627 of 4,064 decks)
- Tuinvale Treefolk // Oaken Boon relevance 0.94 · 15.8% (641 of 4,064 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.74 · 38.0% (1,545 of 4,064 decks)
- Armored Wolf-Rider relevance 0.94 · 14.5% (590 of 4,064 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 0.80 · 28.3% (1,150 of 4,064 decks)
- Cursed Totem relevance 0.88 · 19.3% (784 of 4,064 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.83 · 81.3% (3,304 of 4,064 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 0.84 · 77.3% (3,140 of 4,064 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.83 · 79.0% (3,212 of 4,064 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 0.82 · 78.9% (3,208 of 4,064 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 0.82 · 76.2% (3,098 of 4,064 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 0.85 · 72.4% (2,942 of 4,064 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 0.86 · 71.9% (2,920 of 4,064 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 0.86 · 67.6% (2,747 of 4,064 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 0.84 · 67.2% (2,730 of 4,064 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 0.87 · 62.7% (2,550 of 4,064 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 0.87 · 60.3% (2,451 of 4,064 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 0.85 · 61.2% (2,487 of 4,064 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 0.88 · 56.3% (2,289 of 4,064 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 0.88 · 55.2% (2,245 of 4,064 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 0.89 · 52.8% (2,144 of 4,064 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 0.81 · 58.6% (2,382 of 4,064 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 0.89 · 49.2% (2,000 of 4,064 decks)
- Devilthorn Fox relevance 0.90 · 45.8% (1,862 of 4,064 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 0.90 · 43.4% (1,764 of 4,064 decks)
- Raptor Companion relevance 0.90 · 43.1% (1,750 of 4,064 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 0.91 · 41.1% (1,671 of 4,064 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 0.91 · 40.3% (1,636 of 4,064 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 0.91 · 40.1% (1,630 of 4,064 decks)
- Cheeky House-Mouse // Squeak By relevance 0.89 · 40.4% (1,642 of 4,064 decks)
- Shepherd of the Flock // Usher to Safety relevance 0.89 · 40.3% (1,638 of 4,064 decks)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 0.91 · 34.4% (1,398 of 4,064 decks)
- Elite Vanguard relevance 0.92 · 32.1% (1,304 of 4,064 decks)
- Savai Sabertooth relevance 0.91 · 32.2% (1,310 of 4,064 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 0.91 · 29.0% (1,178 of 4,064 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 0.90 · 29.7% (1,208 of 4,064 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 0.94 · 21.8% (885 of 4,064 decks)
- Cliffhaven Sell-Sword relevance 0.94 · 21.0% (853 of 4,064 decks)
- Expedition Envoy relevance 0.94 · 20.0% (811 of 4,064 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 0.93 · 21.0% (854 of 4,064 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 0.95 · 18.8% (765 of 4,064 decks)
- Grizzled Leotau relevance 0.89 · 23.3% (948 of 4,064 decks)
- Prowling Caracal relevance 0.93 · 19.6% (797 of 4,064 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 0.95 · 17.2% (700 of 4,064 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 0.95 · 17.2% (701 of 4,064 decks)
- Glass Golem relevance 0.95 · 15.2% (619 of 4,064 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 0.95 · 15.6% (636 of 4,064 decks)
- Knight of New Benalia relevance 0.95 · 15.4% (627 of 4,064 decks)
- Tuinvale Treefolk // Oaken Boon relevance 0.94 · 15.8% (641 of 4,064 decks)
- Armored Wolf-Rider relevance 0.94 · 14.5% (590 of 4,064 decks)
- Besotted Knight // Betroth the Beast relevance 0.93 · 14.1% (571 of 4,064 decks)
- Dromoka Warrior relevance 0.95 · 12.1% (491 of 4,064 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 0.95 · 11.3% (461 of 4,064 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 0.95 · 10.6% (431 of 4,064 decks)
- Garenbrig Carver // Shield's Might relevance 0.95 · 10.4% (422 of 4,064 decks)
- Axebane Stag relevance 0.95 · 9.7% (395 of 4,064 decks)
All artifacts (22)
- Damping Matrix relevance 0.93 · 18.9% (768 of 4,064 decks)
- Cursed Totem relevance 0.88 · 19.3% (784 of 4,064 decks)
- Spear of Heliod relevance 0.77 · 25.9% (1,054 of 4,064 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.78 · 12.0% (489 of 4,064 decks)
- Cauldron of Souls relevance 0.87 · 7.1% (287 of 4,064 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.58 · 31.4% (1,278 of 4,064 decks)
- Horn of the Mark relevance 0.79 · 7.6% (309 of 4,064 decks)
- The Immortal Sun relevance 0.72 · 5.3% (216 of 4,064 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.69 · 5.2% (210 of 4,064 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.54 · 8.6% (350 of 4,064 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.53 · 5.9% (239 of 4,064 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.34 · 35.2% (1,432 of 4,064 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.46 · 7.8% (316 of 4,064 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.35 · 23.9% (970 of 4,064 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.50 · 4.7% (192 of 4,064 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.37 · 14.9% (604 of 4,064 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.35 · 19.1% (775 of 4,064 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.60 · 2.9% (117 of 4,064 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.39 · 5.5% (225 of 4,064 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.28 · 22.0% (896 of 4,064 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.13 · 64.6% (2,627 of 4,064 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.07 · 72.9% (2,962 of 4,064 decks)
All enchantments (42)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 0.84 · 80.3% (3,264 of 4,064 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.74 · 38.0% (1,545 of 4,064 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 0.80 · 28.3% (1,150 of 4,064 decks)
- Gravity Well relevance 0.91 · 12.9% (524 of 4,064 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 0.60 · 50.0% (2,034 of 4,064 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.58 · 52.8% (2,144 of 4,064 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.62 · 43.6% (1,773 of 4,064 decks)
- Glorious Anthem relevance 0.77 · 22.1% (900 of 4,064 decks)
- Collective Blessing relevance 0.65 · 36.9% (1,499 of 4,064 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.46 · 60.0% (2,440 of 4,064 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.68 · 20.2% (819 of 4,064 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.75 · 8.4% (343 of 4,064 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.66 · 13.0% (528 of 4,064 decks)
- In the Trenches relevance 0.75 · 5.8% (235 of 4,064 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.68 · 8.5% (344 of 4,064 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.47 · 31.8% (1,292 of 4,064 decks)
- Dictate of Heliod relevance 0.61 · 8.4% (340 of 4,064 decks)
- Blessed Sanctuary relevance 0.64 · 6.2% (252 of 4,064 decks)
- Force of Virtue relevance 0.79 · 3.8% (156 of 4,064 decks)
- Marshal's Anthem relevance 0.68 · 4.6% (186 of 4,064 decks)
- Noble Purpose relevance 0.76 · 3.8% (154 of 4,064 decks)
- Flowering of the White Tree relevance 0.49 · 10.9% (441 of 4,064 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.42 · 18.6% (757 of 4,064 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.31 · 38.7% (1,572 of 4,064 decks)
- Virtue of Loyalty // Ardenvale Fealty relevance 0.52 · 4.6% (185 of 4,064 decks)
- Rabble Rousing relevance 0.54 · 4.0% (163 of 4,064 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.60 · 3.3% (136 of 4,064 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.32 · 18.0% (730 of 4,064 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.35 · 11.6% (471 of 4,064 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.31 · 16.7% (678 of 4,064 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.33 · 12.9% (523 of 4,064 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.56 · 2.6% (104 of 4,064 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.33 · 8.7% (355 of 4,064 decks)
- Champions from Beyond relevance 0.50 · 2.9% (119 of 4,064 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.54 · 2.5% (101 of 4,064 decks)
- Reconnaissance relevance 0.47 · 3.2% (132 of 4,064 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.35 · 5.4% (220 of 4,064 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.30 · 9.4% (380 of 4,064 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.32 · 4.4% (178 of 4,064 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.29 · 4.0% (161 of 4,064 decks)
- Darksteel Mutation relevance 0.32 · 3.3% (135 of 4,064 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.28 · 2.9% (116 of 4,064 decks)
All instants (44)
- Crash the Party relevance 0.90 · 11.1% (453 of 4,064 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.61 · 35.6% (1,446 of 4,064 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.75 · 11.0% (448 of 4,064 decks)
- Your Temple Is Under Attack relevance 0.63 · 17.2% (699 of 4,064 decks)
- Curious Herd relevance 0.84 · 4.6% (188 of 4,064 decks)
- Aura Mutation relevance 0.52 · 34.2% (1,390 of 4,064 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.53 · 29.7% (1,207 of 4,064 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.46 · 42.0% (1,705 of 4,064 decks)
- Make a Stand relevance 0.66 · 11.5% (467 of 4,064 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.56 · 18.4% (748 of 4,064 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.62 · 6.8% (278 of 4,064 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.54 · 5.3% (216 of 4,064 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.44 · 14.0% (569 of 4,064 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.53 · 4.9% (198 of 4,064 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.49 · 6.4% (260 of 4,064 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.50 · 5.1% (208 of 4,064 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.39 · 15.4% (627 of 4,064 decks)
- Holy Day relevance 0.65 · 3.1% (126 of 4,064 decks)
- Secure the Wastes relevance 0.45 · 7.1% (289 of 4,064 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.43 · 8.3% (338 of 4,064 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.37 · 12.8% (522 of 4,064 decks)
- Disenchant relevance 0.53 · 3.3% (135 of 4,064 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.38 · 7.0% (285 of 4,064 decks)
- Grand Crescendo relevance 0.36 · 8.4% (343 of 4,064 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.26 · 32.3% (1,314 of 4,064 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.54 · 2.9% (119 of 4,064 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.32 · 10.8% (440 of 4,064 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.50 · 3.1% (127 of 4,064 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.22 · 41.0% (1,667 of 4,064 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.30 · 8.2% (333 of 4,064 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.21 · 35.5% (1,442 of 4,064 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.30 · 7.4% (302 of 4,064 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (277 of 4,064 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.39 · 2.8% (113 of 4,064 decks)
- White Sun's Zenith relevance 0.39 · 2.9% (116 of 4,064 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.13 · 59.7% (2,427 of 4,064 decks)
- Flare of Fortitude relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (109 of 4,064 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.35 · 2.9% (117 of 4,064 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (121 of 4,064 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.29 · 3.3% (134 of 4,064 decks)
- Sundering Growth relevance 0.29 · 3.2% (129 of 4,064 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.10 · 64.0% (2,601 of 4,064 decks)
- Rootborn Defenses relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (113 of 4,064 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.26 · 2.8% (114 of 4,064 decks)
All sorceries (35)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.69 · 35.7% (1,451 of 4,064 decks)
- Scale Up relevance 0.80 · 16.3% (663 of 4,064 decks)
- Phyrexian Rebirth relevance 0.76 · 15.8% (643 of 4,064 decks)
- Rise from the Wreck relevance 0.83 · 7.8% (319 of 4,064 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.80 · 6.4% (260 of 4,064 decks)
- Call of the Conclave relevance 0.76 · 6.3% (254 of 4,064 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.66 · 6.6% (268 of 4,064 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 0.54 · 10.0% (407 of 4,064 decks)
- Martial Coup relevance 0.51 · 11.7% (475 of 4,064 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.39 · 33.4% (1,358 of 4,064 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.45 · 18.3% (744 of 4,064 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.51 · 10.6% (432 of 4,064 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.44 · 18.4% (749 of 4,064 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.35 · 40.7% (1,653 of 4,064 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.61 · 4.4% (178 of 4,064 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.27 · 60.0% (2,439 of 4,064 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.50 · 6.6% (269 of 4,064 decks)
- You Meet in a Tavern relevance 0.76 · 2.6% (107 of 4,064 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.32 · 40.5% (1,647 of 4,064 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.47 · 7.1% (290 of 4,064 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.31 · 31.6% (1,284 of 4,064 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.34 · 22.1% (900 of 4,064 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.52 · 4.2% (171 of 4,064 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.28 · 40.1% (1,629 of 4,064 decks)
- Secret Rendezvous relevance 0.48 · 4.6% (188 of 4,064 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.62 · 3.1% (126 of 4,064 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.40 · 6.4% (260 of 4,064 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.23 · 45.5% (1,851 of 4,064 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.20 · 56.3% (2,288 of 4,064 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.36 · 6.9% (279 of 4,064 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.48 · 3.4% (138 of 4,064 decks)
- Camaraderie relevance 0.36 · 5.7% (233 of 4,064 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.53 · 2.6% (105 of 4,064 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.35 · 4.7% (192 of 4,064 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.40 · 2.8% (115 of 4,064 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.74 · 40.0% (1,625 of 4,064 decks)
- Elspeth, Sun's Champion relevance 0.45 · 6.3% (254 of 4,064 decks)
All utility lands (31)
- Windbrisk Heights relevance 0.57 · 23.3% (946 of 4,064 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.57 · 12.2% (496 of 4,064 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.44 · 32.7% (1,329 of 4,064 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.56 · 5.6% (228 of 4,064 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.41 · 18.0% (731 of 4,064 decks)
- Botanical Plaza relevance 0.51 · 4.8% (197 of 4,064 decks)
- Restless Prairie relevance 0.42 · 9.4% (384 of 4,064 decks)
- Castle Ardenvale relevance 0.42 · 9.5% (388 of 4,064 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.29 · 37.1% (1,507 of 4,064 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.38 · 10.0% (408 of 4,064 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.40 · 7.5% (304 of 4,064 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.33 · 18.3% (742 of 4,064 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.32 · 20.3% (825 of 4,064 decks)
- Vitu-Ghazi, the City-Tree relevance 0.46 · 4.2% (172 of 4,064 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.37 · 5.6% (229 of 4,064 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.33 · 9.6% (391 of 4,064 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.24 · 31.8% (1,291 of 4,064 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.29 · 13.5% (548 of 4,064 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.39 · 4.5% (183 of 4,064 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.26 · 18.8% (762 of 4,064 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.28 · 9.6% (390 of 4,064 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.29 · 7.5% (304 of 4,064 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.45 · 2.7% (110 of 4,064 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.28 · 8.7% (353 of 4,064 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.41 · 3.0% (123 of 4,064 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.39 · 3.1% (128 of 4,064 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.33 · 3.3% (135 of 4,064 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.35 · 2.7% (111 of 4,064 decks)
- Graypelt Refuge relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (137 of 4,064 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.21 · 5.8% (236 of 4,064 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.23 · 4.2% (170 of 4,064 decks)
All lands (34)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.43 · 21.1% (859 of 4,064 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.45 · 7.8% (317 of 4,064 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.44 · 7.1% (290 of 4,064 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.45 · 5.6% (228 of 4,064 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.33 · 23.8% (966 of 4,064 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.37 · 11.1% (453 of 4,064 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.26 · 37.3% (1,516 of 4,064 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.33 · 10.8% (438 of 4,064 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.35 · 7.8% (317 of 4,064 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.25 · 28.4% (1,153 of 4,064 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.33 · 8.3% (337 of 4,064 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.28 · 15.5% (631 of 4,064 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.38 · 4.5% (182 of 4,064 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.27 · 17.9% (726 of 4,064 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.27 · 14.6% (594 of 4,064 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.21 · 36.4% (1,478 of 4,064 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.47 · 2.7% (109 of 4,064 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.28 · 11.3% (459 of 4,064 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.18 · 49.0% (1,992 of 4,064 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.18 · 43.2% (1,754 of 4,064 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.44 · 2.6% (105 of 4,064 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.43 · 2.6% (104 of 4,064 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.19 · 33.3% (1,355 of 4,064 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.21 · 17.2% (697 of 4,064 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.18 · 31.3% (1,274 of 4,064 decks)
- Gathering Place relevance 0.38 · 2.9% (117 of 4,064 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.15 · 37.8% (1,536 of 4,064 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.12 · 59.2% (2,404 of 4,064 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (123 of 4,064 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.34 · 2.5% (101 of 4,064 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.10 · 64.4% (2,617 of 4,064 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.05 · 76.8% (3,122 of 4,064 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.02 · 91.0% (3,697 of 4,064 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 92.0% (3,740 of 4,064 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Jasmine Boreal of the Seven, from 4,064 real Commander decks.