Kindred Discovery
Played in 14,084 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (30)
- Uugguu, the Omniplasm relevance 2.81 · 38.9% (1,885 of 4,849 decks)
- Maralen, Fae Ascendant relevance 2.78 · 26.6% (7,219 of 27,103 decks)
- Thranduil, the Elvenking relevance 2.06 · 19.3% (2,401 of 12,450 decks)
- Nashi, Moon's Legacy relevance 1.32 · 20.2% (127 of 629 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.55 · 18.9% (7 of 37 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.54 · 13.6% (11 of 81 decks)
- Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 0.53 · 5.1% (110 of 2,140 decks)
- Zaxara, the Exemplary relevance 0.49 · 3.4% (391 of 11,547 decks)
- Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 0.42 · 2.9% (394 of 13,790 decks)
- Homer, the Hermit relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (147 of 4,790 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.31 · 22.2% (2 of 9 decks)
- Tatsunari, Toad Rider relevance 0.31 · 2.9% (74 of 2,525 decks)
- Volrath, the Shapestealer relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (51 of 2,013 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.25 · 10.0% (3 of 30 decks)
- Sidisi, Brood Tyrant relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (81 of 3,781 decks)
- The Master, Transcendent relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (50 of 2,243 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.22 · 4.5% (8 of 178 decks)
- Xavier Sal, Infested Captain relevance 0.22 · 1.9% (75 of 3,966 decks)
- Teval, the Balanced Scale relevance 0.21 · 1.3% (355 of 27,321 decks)
- The Mimeoplasm relevance 0.20 · 1.8% (67 of 3,686 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (5 of 108 decks)
- Damia, Sage of Stone relevance 0.17 · 1.9% (31 of 1,648 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (6 of 164 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Henry Wu, InGen Geneticist relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (14 of 641 decks)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 0.14 · 1.2% (84 of 7,155 decks)
- Ukkima, Stalking Shadow // Cazur, Ruthless Stalker relevance 0.14 · 1.5% (33 of 2,209 decks)
- Gonti, Canny Acquisitor relevance 0.14 · 1.2% (63 of 5,200 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.13 · 5.6% (2 of 36 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.06 · 45.7% (6,430 of 14,084 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.06 · 46.8% (6,595 of 14,084 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 1.05 · 36.7% (5,169 of 14,084 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 1.05 · 37.5% (5,283 of 14,084 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 1.04 · 38.3% (5,394 of 14,084 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 1.03 · 39.3% (5,530 of 14,084 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 1.03 · 33.9% (4,779 of 14,084 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.03 · 45.1% (6,345 of 14,084 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 1.02 · 43.7% (6,154 of 14,084 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 1.00 · 34.1% (4,809 of 14,084 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.98 · 40.1% (5,647 of 14,084 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.98 · 42.2% (5,948 of 14,084 decks)
- Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor relevance 0.97 · 31.1% (4,387 of 14,084 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 0.96 · 34.3% (4,837 of 14,084 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.92 · 34.9% (4,919 of 14,084 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.91 · 29.5% (4,152 of 14,084 decks)
- Kindred Dominance relevance 0.90 · 27.1% (3,810 of 14,084 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.89 · 50.3% (7,081 of 14,084 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.89 · 32.5% (4,575 of 14,084 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.88 · 26.9% (3,783 of 14,084 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.88 · 35.3% (4,974 of 14,084 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.88 · 26.6% (3,742 of 14,084 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.88 · 33.0% (4,641 of 14,084 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.87 · 30.9% (4,345 of 14,084 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.86 · 26.2% (3,685 of 14,084 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.86 · 58.7% (8,270 of 14,084 decks)
- Archmage of Echoes relevance 0.85 · 24.9% (3,507 of 14,084 decks)
- Oona, Queen of the Fae relevance 0.85 · 27.2% (3,836 of 14,084 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.84 · 28.4% (4,003 of 14,084 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.84 · 47.4% (6,675 of 14,084 decks)
All creatures (34)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.06 · 45.7% (6,430 of 14,084 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.06 · 46.8% (6,595 of 14,084 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 1.05 · 36.7% (5,169 of 14,084 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 1.03 · 39.3% (5,530 of 14,084 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 1.03 · 33.9% (4,779 of 14,084 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.03 · 45.1% (6,345 of 14,084 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 1.02 · 43.7% (6,154 of 14,084 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 1.00 · 34.1% (4,809 of 14,084 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.98 · 40.1% (5,647 of 14,084 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.98 · 42.2% (5,948 of 14,084 decks)
- Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor relevance 0.97 · 31.1% (4,387 of 14,084 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 0.96 · 34.3% (4,837 of 14,084 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.92 · 34.9% (4,919 of 14,084 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.89 · 50.3% (7,081 of 14,084 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.89 · 32.5% (4,575 of 14,084 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.88 · 35.3% (4,974 of 14,084 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.86 · 58.7% (8,270 of 14,084 decks)
- Archmage of Echoes relevance 0.85 · 24.9% (3,507 of 14,084 decks)
- Oona, Queen of the Fae relevance 0.85 · 27.2% (3,836 of 14,084 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.84 · 28.4% (4,003 of 14,084 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.84 · 47.4% (6,675 of 14,084 decks)
- Talion, the Kindly Lord relevance 0.82 · 28.2% (3,977 of 14,084 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.81 · 29.5% (4,153 of 14,084 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.80 · 33.7% (4,742 of 14,084 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.78 · 33.9% (4,779 of 14,084 decks)
- Voracious Tome-Skimmer relevance 0.77 · 25.6% (3,603 of 14,084 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.76 · 27.6% (3,894 of 14,084 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.74 · 27.9% (3,925 of 14,084 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.74 · 28.1% (3,960 of 14,084 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.73 · 26.1% (3,673 of 14,084 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.73 · 25.0% (3,522 of 14,084 decks)
- Faerie Harbinger relevance 0.72 · 20.5% (2,888 of 14,084 decks)
- Chomping Changeling relevance 0.71 · 25.6% (3,604 of 14,084 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.69 · 21.6% (3,037 of 14,084 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.77 · 25.8% (3,632 of 14,084 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Bitterblossom relevance 1.04 · 38.3% (5,394 of 14,084 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.88 · 26.6% (3,742 of 14,084 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.88 · 33.0% (4,641 of 14,084 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.87 · 30.9% (4,345 of 14,084 decks)
All instants (5)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 1.05 · 37.5% (5,283 of 14,084 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.91 · 29.5% (4,152 of 14,084 decks)
- Spell Stutter relevance 0.81 · 25.1% (3,540 of 14,084 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.74 · 52.3% (7,367 of 14,084 decks)
- Glen Elendra's Answer relevance 0.74 · 22.8% (3,208 of 14,084 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Kindred Dominance relevance 0.90 · 27.1% (3,810 of 14,084 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.88 · 26.9% (3,783 of 14,084 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.86 · 26.2% (3,685 of 14,084 decks)
- Notorious Throng relevance 0.68 · 18.7% (2,633 of 14,084 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.77 · 54.0% (7,603 of 14,084 decks)
All lands (1)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.94 · 32.5% (4,584 of 14,084 decks)
EDH data for Kindred Discovery: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 14,084 real decks.