Refocus
Played in 260 Temur decks
Color Identity Spread
2.6% Temur
All commanders (8)
- Magus Lucea Kane relevance 2.34 · 1.6% (141 of 8,755 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 2.14 · 8.5% (15 of 177 decks)
- Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant // Bjorna, Nightfall Alchemist relevance 2.04 · 5.2% (19 of 365 decks)
- The Twelfth Doctor // Jamie McCrimmon relevance 0.76 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.70 · 4.0% (2 of 50 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.54 · 1.8% (2 of 110 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.37 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.35 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 2.88 · 54.6% (142 of 260 decks)
- Ecological Appreciation relevance 2.75 · 45.8% (119 of 260 decks)
- Multiple Choice relevance 2.72 · 45.0% (117 of 260 decks)
- North Pole Patrol relevance 2.71 · 43.8% (114 of 260 decks)
- Kamahl's Druidic Vow relevance 2.62 · 43.1% (112 of 260 decks)
- The Rollercrusher Ride relevance 2.61 · 41.9% (109 of 260 decks)
- Smellerbee, Rebel Fighter relevance 2.59 · 41.9% (109 of 260 decks)
- The Dominion Bracelet relevance 2.59 · 38.5% (100 of 260 decks)
- Vivien's Arkbow relevance 2.59 · 38.5% (100 of 260 decks)
- Echoing Truth relevance 2.56 · 40.4% (105 of 260 decks)
- Here Comes a New Hero! relevance 2.53 · 43.1% (112 of 260 decks)
- Curator's Ward relevance 2.50 · 39.6% (103 of 260 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 2.46 · 54.6% (142 of 260 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 2.46 · 46.5% (121 of 260 decks)
- Shielding Plax relevance 2.42 · 40.4% (105 of 260 decks)
- Topiary Lecturer relevance 2.41 · 43.5% (113 of 260 decks)
- Void Snare relevance 2.41 · 35.8% (93 of 260 decks)
- Demonfire relevance 2.36 · 36.5% (95 of 260 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 2.35 · 50.4% (131 of 260 decks)
- Strength of the Tajuru relevance 2.30 · 38.8% (101 of 260 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 2.30 · 35.0% (91 of 260 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 2.30 · 53.1% (138 of 260 decks)
- Hammer of Purphoros relevance 2.29 · 44.2% (115 of 260 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 2.29 · 51.2% (133 of 260 decks)
- Pterafractyl relevance 2.27 · 37.7% (98 of 260 decks)
- Rosheen, Roaring Prophet relevance 2.26 · 47.7% (124 of 260 decks)
- Divide by Zero relevance 2.26 · 34.2% (89 of 260 decks)
- Exponential Growth relevance 2.25 · 41.5% (108 of 260 decks)
- Tuktuk Rubblefort relevance 2.23 · 39.2% (102 of 260 decks)
- Sapphire Charm relevance 2.16 · 35.4% (92 of 260 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 2.88 · 54.6% (142 of 260 decks)
- North Pole Patrol relevance 2.71 · 43.8% (114 of 260 decks)
- Smellerbee, Rebel Fighter relevance 2.59 · 41.9% (109 of 260 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 2.46 · 54.6% (142 of 260 decks)
- Topiary Lecturer relevance 2.41 · 43.5% (113 of 260 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 2.29 · 51.2% (133 of 260 decks)
- Pterafractyl relevance 2.27 · 37.7% (98 of 260 decks)
- Rosheen, Roaring Prophet relevance 2.26 · 47.7% (124 of 260 decks)
- Tuktuk Rubblefort relevance 2.23 · 39.2% (102 of 260 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 2.15 · 63.5% (165 of 260 decks)
- Nyxborn Hydra relevance 2.11 · 45.8% (119 of 260 decks)
- Hooded Hydra relevance 2.07 · 42.3% (110 of 260 decks)
- Rosheen Meanderer relevance 2.07 · 47.7% (124 of 260 decks)
- Apocalypse Hydra relevance 1.92 · 41.5% (108 of 260 decks)
- Savageborn Hydra relevance 1.88 · 38.8% (101 of 260 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- The Dominion Bracelet relevance 2.59 · 38.5% (100 of 260 decks)
- Vivien's Arkbow relevance 2.59 · 38.5% (100 of 260 decks)
- Hammer of Purphoros relevance 2.29 · 44.2% (115 of 260 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- The Rollercrusher Ride relevance 2.61 · 41.9% (109 of 260 decks)
- Curator's Ward relevance 2.50 · 39.6% (103 of 260 decks)
- Lost in the Maze relevance 2.46 · 46.5% (121 of 260 decks)
- Shielding Plax relevance 2.42 · 40.4% (105 of 260 decks)
- Extraordinary Journey relevance 2.07 · 40.8% (106 of 260 decks)
All instants (10)
- Echoing Truth relevance 2.56 · 40.4% (105 of 260 decks)
- Strength of the Tajuru relevance 2.30 · 38.8% (101 of 260 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 2.30 · 35.0% (91 of 260 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 2.30 · 53.1% (138 of 260 decks)
- Divide by Zero relevance 2.26 · 34.2% (89 of 260 decks)
- Sapphire Charm relevance 2.16 · 35.4% (92 of 260 decks)
- Traumatic Critique relevance 2.11 · 44.2% (115 of 260 decks)
- Remand relevance 2.09 · 36.5% (95 of 260 decks)
- Snapback relevance 2.03 · 36.5% (95 of 260 decks)
- Spectral Denial relevance 1.74 · 42.3% (110 of 260 decks)
All sorceries (15)
- Ecological Appreciation relevance 2.75 · 45.8% (119 of 260 decks)
- Multiple Choice relevance 2.72 · 45.0% (117 of 260 decks)
- Kamahl's Druidic Vow relevance 2.62 · 43.1% (112 of 260 decks)
- Here Comes a New Hero! relevance 2.53 · 43.1% (112 of 260 decks)
- Void Snare relevance 2.41 · 35.8% (93 of 260 decks)
- Demonfire relevance 2.36 · 36.5% (95 of 260 decks)
- Blue Sun's Twilight relevance 2.35 · 50.4% (131 of 260 decks)
- Exponential Growth relevance 2.25 · 41.5% (108 of 260 decks)
- Hell to Pay relevance 2.14 · 45.0% (117 of 260 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 2.07 · 45.4% (118 of 260 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 2.04 · 47.3% (123 of 260 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 2.01 · 53.1% (138 of 260 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 1.91 · 45.0% (117 of 260 decks)
- Portent relevance 1.91 · 32.7% (85 of 260 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 1.81 · 50.8% (132 of 260 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 2.23 · 34.6% (90 of 260 decks)
All lands (1)
- Great Hall of the Citadel relevance 2.17 · 37.3% (97 of 260 decks)
EDH data for Refocus: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 260 real decks.