Pheres-Band Brawler
Played in 172 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (7)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 2.63 · 7.3% (11 of 151 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 1.22 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Stonebrow, Krosan Hero relevance 1.17 · 1.5% (3 of 194 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Keleth, Sunmane Familiar relevance 0.93 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Nylea, God of the Hunt relevance 0.77 · 1.1% (2 of 184 decks)
- Syr Faren, the Hengehammer relevance 0.56 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Michelangelo, Mutant BFF relevance 0.50 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Pheres-Band Raiders relevance 2.18 · 20.9% (36 of 172 decks)
- Affectionate Indrik relevance 2.07 · 23.8% (41 of 172 decks)
- Nylea's Huntmaster relevance 2.06 · 21.5% (37 of 172 decks)
- Pheres-Band Tromper relevance 1.88 · 19.2% (33 of 172 decks)
- Pheres-Band Warchief relevance 1.68 · 20.3% (35 of 172 decks)
- Centaur Nurturer relevance 1.67 · 18.6% (32 of 172 decks)
- Nyx Herald relevance 1.48 · 16.3% (28 of 172 decks)
- Spellbane Centaur relevance 1.48 · 14.5% (25 of 172 decks)
- Gaea's Courser relevance 1.48 · 15.1% (26 of 172 decks)
- Nylea's Disciple relevance 1.44 · 16.3% (28 of 172 decks)
- Foe-Razer Regent relevance 1.39 · 20.3% (35 of 172 decks)
- Somberwald Stag relevance 1.32 · 14.0% (24 of 172 decks)
- Centaur Chieftain relevance 1.29 · 12.2% (21 of 172 decks)
- Centaur Battlemaster relevance 1.27 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Pharika's Disciple relevance 1.23 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Centaur Rootcaster relevance 1.21 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Centaur Omenreader relevance 1.20 · 15.1% (26 of 172 decks)
- Pheres-Band Thunderhoof relevance 1.18 · 11.0% (19 of 172 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 1.14 · 19.2% (33 of 172 decks)
- Loaming Shaman relevance 1.12 · 15.7% (27 of 172 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 1.11 · 18.0% (31 of 172 decks)
- Ghor-Clan Savage relevance 1.09 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Battlefield Scrounger relevance 1.09 · 10.5% (18 of 172 decks)
- Skyshooter relevance 1.06 · 11.6% (20 of 172 decks)
- Greenbelt Radical relevance 1.05 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Phantom Centaur relevance 1.04 · 10.5% (18 of 172 decks)
- Hivespine Wolverine relevance 0.98 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Selesnya Eulogist relevance 0.97 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Forcemage Advocate relevance 0.96 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.96 · 20.3% (35 of 172 decks)
All creatures (44)
- Pheres-Band Raiders relevance 2.18 · 20.9% (36 of 172 decks)
- Affectionate Indrik relevance 2.07 · 23.8% (41 of 172 decks)
- Nylea's Huntmaster relevance 2.06 · 21.5% (37 of 172 decks)
- Pheres-Band Tromper relevance 1.88 · 19.2% (33 of 172 decks)
- Pheres-Band Warchief relevance 1.68 · 20.3% (35 of 172 decks)
- Centaur Nurturer relevance 1.67 · 18.6% (32 of 172 decks)
- Nyx Herald relevance 1.48 · 16.3% (28 of 172 decks)
- Spellbane Centaur relevance 1.48 · 14.5% (25 of 172 decks)
- Gaea's Courser relevance 1.48 · 15.1% (26 of 172 decks)
- Nylea's Disciple relevance 1.44 · 16.3% (28 of 172 decks)
- Foe-Razer Regent relevance 1.39 · 20.3% (35 of 172 decks)
- Somberwald Stag relevance 1.32 · 14.0% (24 of 172 decks)
- Centaur Chieftain relevance 1.29 · 12.2% (21 of 172 decks)
- Centaur Battlemaster relevance 1.27 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Pharika's Disciple relevance 1.23 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Centaur Rootcaster relevance 1.21 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Centaur Omenreader relevance 1.20 · 15.1% (26 of 172 decks)
- Pheres-Band Thunderhoof relevance 1.18 · 11.0% (19 of 172 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 1.14 · 19.2% (33 of 172 decks)
- Loaming Shaman relevance 1.12 · 15.7% (27 of 172 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 1.11 · 18.0% (31 of 172 decks)
- Ghor-Clan Savage relevance 1.09 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Battlefield Scrounger relevance 1.09 · 10.5% (18 of 172 decks)
- Skyshooter relevance 1.06 · 11.6% (20 of 172 decks)
- Greenbelt Radical relevance 1.05 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Phantom Centaur relevance 1.04 · 10.5% (18 of 172 decks)
- Hivespine Wolverine relevance 0.98 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Selesnya Eulogist relevance 0.97 · 13.4% (23 of 172 decks)
- Forcemage Advocate relevance 0.96 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.96 · 20.3% (35 of 172 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.95 · 14.0% (24 of 172 decks)
- Nessian Wilds Ravager relevance 0.95 · 12.8% (22 of 172 decks)
- Centaur Vinecrasher relevance 0.91 · 14.0% (24 of 172 decks)
- Seton, Krosan Protector relevance 0.91 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
- Crashing Centaur relevance 0.89 · 7.6% (13 of 172 decks)
- Krosan Druid relevance 0.88 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Dowsing Shaman relevance 0.85 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Territorial Allosaurus relevance 0.84 · 10.5% (18 of 172 decks)
- Pheres-Band Centaurs relevance 0.84 · 8.1% (14 of 172 decks)
- Agatha's Champion relevance 0.83 · 8.7% (15 of 172 decks)
- Atzocan Archer relevance 0.80 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.80 · 16.9% (29 of 172 decks)
- Centaur Veteran relevance 0.77 · 6.4% (11 of 172 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.77 · 11.0% (19 of 172 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Warbriar Blessing relevance 0.85 · 11.0% (19 of 172 decks)
- Centaur Glade relevance 0.83 · 8.7% (15 of 172 decks)
All instants (2)
- Fated Intervention relevance 0.93 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.79 · 14.0% (24 of 172 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Relentless Pursuit relevance 0.79 · 9.3% (16 of 172 decks)
- Outmuscle relevance 0.78 · 9.9% (17 of 172 decks)
EDH data for Pheres-Band Brawler: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 172 real decks.