Cards like Cultivate
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
67% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
2.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 59%
- Rampant Growth 53%
- Kodama's Reach 48%
- Explosive Vegetation 17%
- Migration Path 11%
- Shared Roots 9%
- Map the Frontier 8%
- Search for Tomorrow 7%
- Roamer's Routine 7%
- Far Wanderings 5%
- Grow from the Ashes 5%
- Beneath the Sands 3%
- Primal Growth 3%
- Reach the Horizon 2%
- Peregrination 2%
- Deep Reconnaissance 2%
- Untamed Wilds 2%
- Map the Wastes 2%
Other options: Terramorph, They Went This Way, Viewpoint Synchronization, Verdant Mastery, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Ashaya, Soul of the Wild
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other green decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards like Dungrove Elder
17× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Gaea's Liege, People of the Woods, Coiling Woodworm, Treefolk Seedlings
Cards like Cultivator Colossus
14× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Explore
9.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards
- Explore 49%
- Summer Bloom 10%
- Journey of Discovery 9%
- Enter the Unknown 6%
Cards like Traverse the Outlands
10× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
- Traverse the Outlands 21%
- Boundless Realms 18%
- Reshape the Earth 3%
- Celebrate the Harvest 2%
- Nissa's Expedition 1%
- Harvest Season 1%
Other options: Turtle Tracks, New Frontiers, Slimefoot's Survey
Cards like Oracle of Mul Daya
2.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other green decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.44 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 38%
- Skyshroud Claim 28%
- Three Visits 26%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 23%
- Ranger's Path 8%
- Glimpse the Core 3%
Other options: Field Trip, Hunting Wilds
Cards like Farhaven Elf
14× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other green decks
Cards
- Farhaven Elf 21%
- Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru 10%
- Primeval Herald 10%
- Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary 2%
- Ondu Giant 2%
- Simulacrum Shaper 1%
- Wild Wanderer 1%
Other options: Yavimaya Granger, Quirion Trailblazer
Cards like Mossborn Hydra
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other green decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.38 in other green decks
Cards
- Mossborn Hydra 21%
- Territorial Scythecat 11%
- Scythecat Cub 11%
- Oran-Rief Hydra 7%
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 7%
- Seedship Agrarian 6%
- Undergrowth Champion 3%
- Sazh's Chocobo 2%
- Floral Evoker 1%
- Vinelasher Kudzu 1%
Other options: Foe-liage, Murasa Ranger
Cards like Rishkar's Expertise
3.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Arboreal Grazer
13× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Elder
8.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Oashra Cultivator
Cards like Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel
18× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Titania, Gaea Incarnate
Cards like Colossal Majesty
16× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Exploration
2.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Rancor
3.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Cards like Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps
12× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards like Harrow
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Scapeshift
Cards like Fog
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards
- Fog 23%
- Moment's Peace 4%
- Lull 4%
- Haze of Pollen 2%
- Root Snare 1%
Other options: Defend the Hearth, Thwart the Enemy, Tanglesap, Pause for Reflection, Terrifying Presence, Druid's Deliverance, Commencement of Festivities, Chameleon Blur, Serene Sunset, Winds of Qal Sisma, Vine Snare
Cards like Haunted Cloak
4.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.18 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards like Wood Elves
4.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards like Collective Resistance
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Pheres-Band Warchief relevance 0.63 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Pheres-Band Raiders relevance 0.59 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Centaur Rootcaster relevance 0.53 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Spellbane Centaur relevance 0.54 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Centaur Chieftain relevance 0.55 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Harmonious Grovestrider relevance 0.43 · 17.8% (26 of 146 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.43 · 17.1% (25 of 146 decks)
- Pheres-Band Brawler relevance 0.52 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.37 · 30.1% (44 of 146 decks)
- Kalonian Twingrove relevance 0.40 · 21.2% (31 of 146 decks)
- Centaur Nurturer relevance 0.49 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Gaea's Courser relevance 0.49 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Skyshooter relevance 0.50 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.38 · 19.9% (29 of 146 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.36 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Pheres-Band Thunderhoof relevance 0.49 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Pheres-Band Tromper relevance 0.48 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Nylea's Huntmaster relevance 0.45 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Nylea's Disciple relevance 0.43 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.39 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Centaur Omenreader relevance 0.44 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 0.34 · 23.3% (34 of 146 decks)
- Centaur Battlemaster relevance 0.46 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Battlefield Scrounger relevance 0.46 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Grazing Gladehart relevance 0.38 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Centaur Vinecrasher relevance 0.42 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.34 · 18.5% (27 of 146 decks)
- Go Forth relevance 0.39 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.35 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Loaming Shaman relevance 0.40 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.31 · 24.7% (36 of 146 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.29 · 30.8% (45 of 146 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.30 · 28.8% (42 of 146 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.33 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.31 · 21.9% (32 of 146 decks)
- Boseiju Reaches Skyward // Branch of Boseiju relevance 0.35 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Pharika's Disciple relevance 0.40 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.32 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Selesnya Eulogist relevance 0.39 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.31 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.30 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- Nyx Herald relevance 0.42 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Cloak of the Bat relevance 0.36 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Territorial Scythecat relevance 0.34 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Pheres-Band Centaurs relevance 0.42 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Primeval Herald relevance 0.35 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.29 · 21.2% (31 of 146 decks)
- Dowsing Shaman relevance 0.41 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru relevance 0.34 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Freestrider Commando relevance 0.41 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Pheres-Band Warchief relevance 0.63 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Pheres-Band Raiders relevance 0.59 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Centaur Rootcaster relevance 0.53 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Spellbane Centaur relevance 0.54 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Centaur Chieftain relevance 0.55 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Harmonious Grovestrider relevance 0.43 · 17.8% (26 of 146 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.43 · 17.1% (25 of 146 decks)
- Pheres-Band Brawler relevance 0.52 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.37 · 30.1% (44 of 146 decks)
- Kalonian Twingrove relevance 0.40 · 21.2% (31 of 146 decks)
- Centaur Nurturer relevance 0.49 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Gaea's Courser relevance 0.49 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Skyshooter relevance 0.50 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.38 · 19.9% (29 of 146 decks)
- Pheres-Band Thunderhoof relevance 0.49 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Pheres-Band Tromper relevance 0.48 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Nylea's Huntmaster relevance 0.45 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Nylea's Disciple relevance 0.43 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Centaur Omenreader relevance 0.44 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Dungrove Elder relevance 0.34 · 23.3% (34 of 146 decks)
- Centaur Battlemaster relevance 0.46 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Battlefield Scrounger relevance 0.46 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Grazing Gladehart relevance 0.38 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Centaur Vinecrasher relevance 0.42 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Loaming Shaman relevance 0.40 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.31 · 24.7% (36 of 146 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.29 · 30.8% (45 of 146 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.30 · 28.8% (42 of 146 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.33 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.31 · 21.9% (32 of 146 decks)
- Boseiju Reaches Skyward // Branch of Boseiju relevance 0.35 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Pharika's Disciple relevance 0.40 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.32 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Selesnya Eulogist relevance 0.39 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.31 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.30 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- Nyx Herald relevance 0.42 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Territorial Scythecat relevance 0.34 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Pheres-Band Centaurs relevance 0.42 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Primeval Herald relevance 0.35 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Dowsing Shaman relevance 0.41 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Sutina, Speaker of the Tajuru relevance 0.34 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Freestrider Commando relevance 0.41 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Innocuous Researcher relevance 0.38 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Sophic Centaur relevance 0.45 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.29 · 17.1% (25 of 146 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.26 · 29.5% (43 of 146 decks)
- Budoka Gardener // Dokai, Weaver of Life relevance 0.35 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Herald of the Pantheon relevance 0.36 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Ainok Guide relevance 0.36 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.35 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Cloak of the Bat relevance 0.36 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.27 · 23.3% (34 of 146 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.34 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Vorrac Battlehorns relevance 0.34 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.29 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.24 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.26 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.25 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.21 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.25 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Fleetfeather Sandals relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.23 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Hero's Heirloom relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Endless Atlas relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.19 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Strata Scythe relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Adventuring Gear relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.17 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Horned Helm relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.11 · 21.9% (32 of 146 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Armillary Sphere relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Chariot of Victory relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Glowcap Lantern relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.10 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Cliffhaven Kitesail relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Skyclave Pick-Axe relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.11 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Hunter's Bow relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Leyline Axe relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.08 · 19.2% (28 of 146 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.36 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.29 · 21.2% (31 of 146 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.24 · 32.2% (47 of 146 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.28 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.27 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Gaea's Embrace relevance 0.31 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.26 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Crystalline Armor relevance 0.27 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.28 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Triumph of Ferocity relevance 0.29 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Frantic Strength relevance 0.28 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.22 · 17.1% (25 of 146 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.23 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.28 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Centaur Glade relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.21 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.24 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.22 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.22 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.17 · 22.6% (33 of 146 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.22 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.20 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Claim the Kingdom relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Moldering Gym // Weight Room relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Omen of the Hunt relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Aspect of Wolf relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Master's Guidance relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.18 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Font of Fertility relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.14 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.10 · 45.2% (66 of 146 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.15 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.13 · 17.1% (25 of 146 decks)
- Point the Way relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.16 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Seal of Primordium relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.13 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
All instants (50)
- Go Forth relevance 0.39 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.32 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Fated Intervention relevance 0.40 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.28 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.27 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Wilt relevance 0.29 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- You Happen On a Glade relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.26 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Clear Shot relevance 0.28 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.18 · 29.5% (43 of 146 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.23 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.21 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.23 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.16 · 30.8% (45 of 146 decks)
- Primal Bellow relevance 0.22 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Respite relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.21 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.17 · 23.3% (34 of 146 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.18 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.20 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.19 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.16 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.19 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.19 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Seedship Impact relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.19 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.18 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Rampage of the Clans relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.19 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.16 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.15 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Ranger's Guile relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.18 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.15 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.17 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Shower of Arrows relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.16 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.13 · 16.4% (24 of 146 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.14 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.11 · 30.8% (45 of 146 decks)
- Aerial Predation relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Sheltering Word relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.39 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.34 · 18.5% (27 of 146 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.33 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.27 · 23.3% (34 of 146 decks)
- Emergent Sequence relevance 0.34 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.26 · 17.1% (25 of 146 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.26 · 17.1% (25 of 146 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.19 · 49.3% (72 of 146 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.23 · 26.0% (38 of 146 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.27 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Enter the Unknown relevance 0.31 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.29 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.28 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.30 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.29 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.29 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.30 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.24 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.22 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- Adventurous Impulse relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.24 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.24 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Woodland Guidance relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Abundant Harvest relevance 0.27 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.26 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Adventure Awaits relevance 0.28 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.24 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.18 · 28.1% (41 of 146 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Into the North relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Seismic Sense relevance 0.24 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.13 · 47.9% (70 of 146 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Beneath the Sands relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Primal Growth relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.11 · 52.7% (77 of 146 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.19 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Mwonvuli Acid-Moss relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.18 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.17 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.18 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Path of the Animist relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.17 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Nissa's Triumph relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Hunter's Prowess relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.26 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.21 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.24 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.16 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.21 · 19.2% (28 of 146 decks)
- Kazandu Mammoth // Kazandu Valley relevance 0.27 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.20 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.24 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 26.7% (39 of 146 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.23 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.18 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.19 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.18 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.17 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 39.0% (57 of 146 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.17 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.14 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Roiling Canopy relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.12 · 21.2% (31 of 146 decks)
- Avishkar Raceway relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.14 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.12 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.14 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.12 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.13 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Treetop Village relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.14 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Arena relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Ghost Town relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.10 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Adventurer's Inn relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Sapseep Forest relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.10 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.11 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.11 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
All lands (24)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.21 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.23 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.16 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.16 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Grasslands relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.14 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.16 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.13 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.10 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.11 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.12 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 91.8% (134 of 146 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Braulios of Pheres Band, from 146 real Commander decks.