Affectionate Indrik
Played in 995 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
995 decks
Commanders
30
Commanders
30All commanders (30)
- Slinza, the Spiked Stampede relevance 3.06 · 3.8% (118 of 3,087 decks)
- Tawnos, the Toymaker relevance 2.80 · 4.1% (32 of 775 decks)
- Radagast, Wizard of Wilds relevance 1.83 · 3.0% (11 of 372 decks)
- Kaheera, the Orphanguard relevance 1.76 · 3.0% (7 of 230 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 1.73 · 1.6% (46 of 2,859 decks)
- Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 1.39 · 1.1% (11 of 1,001 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.24 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.23 · 1.1% (25 of 2,378 decks)
- Neyith of the Dire Hunt relevance 1.14 · 1.3% (12 of 939 decks)
- Borborygmos relevance 0.94 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.92 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 0.90 · 1.0% (10 of 964 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.86 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.83 · 1.7% (5 of 287 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.79 · 1.2% (3 of 258 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.70 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.69 · 1.1% (5 of 456 decks)
- Flopsie, Bumi's Buddy relevance 0.64 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Kraven, Proud Predator relevance 0.60 · 2.2% (2 of 90 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.54 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh relevance 0.53 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Jacques le Vert relevance 0.52 · 1.0% (1 of 96 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 0.50 · 1.7% (2 of 118 decks)
- Jermane, Pride of the Circus relevance 0.50 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Guild Artisan relevance 0.44 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- Marhault Elsdragon relevance 0.41 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.39 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.39 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.36 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Strider, Ranger of the North relevance 0.36 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
Parallel Cards
11
Parallel Cards
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 1.24 · 25.0% (249 of 995 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 1.07 · 23.7% (236 of 995 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.07 · 41.4% (412 of 995 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.94 · 25.9% (258 of 995 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.91 · 39.3% (391 of 995 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.88 · 12.4% (123 of 995 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 0.88 · 14.2% (141 of 995 decks)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 0.86 · 11.9% (118 of 995 decks)
- Apothecary Stomper relevance 0.82 · 10.2% (101 of 995 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.78 · 13.0% (129 of 995 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 0.77 · 10.3% (102 of 995 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.75 · 20.7% (206 of 995 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.75 · 14.2% (141 of 995 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 0.71 · 9.6% (96 of 995 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.70 · 19.0% (189 of 995 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.69 · 12.9% (128 of 995 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 0.69 · 10.5% (104 of 995 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.69 · 14.1% (140 of 995 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.69 · 13.8% (137 of 995 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.68 · 14.1% (140 of 995 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.67 · 13.4% (133 of 995 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.66 · 11.8% (117 of 995 decks)
- Indrik Stomphowler relevance 0.64 · 8.1% (81 of 995 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.64 · 12.8% (127 of 995 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.62 · 9.5% (95 of 995 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.62 · 9.0% (90 of 995 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.62 · 11.3% (112 of 995 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 0.62 · 13.1% (130 of 995 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.61 · 10.2% (101 of 995 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.61 · 8.8% (88 of 995 decks)
Creatures
38
Creatures
38 All creatures (38)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 1.24 · 25.0% (249 of 995 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.94 · 25.9% (258 of 995 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.91 · 39.3% (391 of 995 decks)
- Coliseum Behemoth relevance 0.88 · 12.4% (123 of 995 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 0.88 · 14.2% (141 of 995 decks)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 0.86 · 11.9% (118 of 995 decks)
- Apothecary Stomper relevance 0.82 · 10.2% (101 of 995 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.78 · 13.0% (129 of 995 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 0.77 · 10.3% (102 of 995 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 0.71 · 9.6% (96 of 995 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.70 · 19.0% (189 of 995 decks)
- Goobbue Gardener relevance 0.69 · 10.5% (104 of 995 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.69 · 14.1% (140 of 995 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.69 · 13.8% (137 of 995 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.67 · 13.4% (133 of 995 decks)
- Indrik Stomphowler relevance 0.64 · 8.1% (81 of 995 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.62 · 9.5% (95 of 995 decks)
- Garruk's Horde relevance 0.62 · 9.0% (90 of 995 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 0.62 · 13.1% (130 of 995 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.61 · 10.2% (101 of 995 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.61 · 8.8% (88 of 995 decks)
- Hivespine Wolverine relevance 0.58 · 7.9% (79 of 995 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.58 · 14.7% (146 of 995 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.57 · 10.2% (101 of 995 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.55 · 11.8% (117 of 995 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 0.55 · 7.9% (79 of 995 decks)
- Foe-Razer Regent relevance 0.54 · 7.9% (79 of 995 decks)
- Altanak, the Thrice-Called relevance 0.54 · 8.3% (83 of 995 decks)
- Thorn Mammoth relevance 0.54 · 8.7% (87 of 995 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.52 · 11.4% (113 of 995 decks)
- Thragtusk relevance 0.52 · 7.7% (77 of 995 decks)
- Advocate of the Beast relevance 0.52 · 5.8% (58 of 995 decks)
- Lashwhip Predator relevance 0.52 · 6.4% (64 of 995 decks)
- Elvish Regrower relevance 0.52 · 8.3% (83 of 995 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 0.52 · 9.8% (98 of 995 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 0.51 · 9.2% (92 of 995 decks)
- Needletooth Pack relevance 0.51 · 6.3% (63 of 995 decks)
- Somberwald Stag relevance 0.51 · 5.3% (53 of 995 decks)
Enchantments
3
Enchantments
3 All enchantments (3)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.07 · 41.4% (412 of 995 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.64 · 12.8% (127 of 995 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.56 · 12.0% (119 of 995 decks)
Instants
4
Instants
4 All instants (4)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.75 · 20.7% (206 of 995 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.75 · 14.2% (141 of 995 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.69 · 12.9% (128 of 995 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.66 · 11.8% (117 of 995 decks)
Sorceries
4
Sorceries
4 All sorceries (4)
- Bushwhack relevance 1.07 · 23.7% (236 of 995 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.68 · 14.1% (140 of 995 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.62 · 11.3% (112 of 995 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.52 · 29.8% (297 of 995 decks)
Lands
1
Lands
1 All lands (1)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.52 · 11.2% (111 of 995 decks)
EDH data for Affectionate Indrik: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 995 real decks.

























































































