Cards like Breaching Hippocamp
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
54% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Breaching Hippocamp 56%
- Bounding Krasis 50%
- Pestermite 36%
- Hyrax Tower Scout 27%
Cards like Llanowar Elves
3.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Simic decks
64% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
2.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 68%
- Elvish Mystic 62%
- Fyndhorn Elves 47%
- Boreal Druid 18%
- Gyre Engineer 3%
- Druid of the Cowl 2%
- Golden Hind 1%
Other options: Orochi Merge-Keeper, Leaf Gilder, Goobbue Gardener, Woodland Mystic, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Rootrider Faun, Nantuko Elder, Orochi Sustainer, Skyshroud Troopers
Cards like Quirion Ranger
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Quirion Ranger 40%
- Arbor Elf 34%
- Scryb Ranger 28%
Cards like Eternal Witness
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Wildwood Escort
Cards like Kiora's Follower
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards like Neoform
18× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Neoform 36%
- Eldritch Evolution 26%
Cards like Reclamation Sage
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Conclave Naturalists, Viridian Shaman, Uktabi Orangutan, Myconid Spore Tender, Indrik Stomphowler
Cards like Shore Up
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Shore Up 26%
- Magic Damper 16%
- Octopus Form 10%
- Mizzium Skin 3%
- Dive Down 2%
Other options: You See a Guard Approach, Chase Inspiration, Glint, Shell Shield
Cards like Deceiver Exarch
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
2.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 33%
- Lightning Greaves 31%
Cards like Trophy Mage
14× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Trophy Mage 17%
- Tribute Mage 9%
- Trinket Mage 8%
- Transit Mage 4%
- Treasure Mage 1%
Cards like Dispel
4.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards like Peregrine Drake
7.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Thousand-Year Elixir
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Puppet Strings, Jandor's Saddlebags, Synod Artificer, Filigree Sages, Voltaic Construct
Cards like Instill Energy
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Loaming Shaman
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Loaming Shaman 24%
- Endurance 13%
Cards like Spellseeker
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Spellseeker 21%
- Micromancer 7%
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
3.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Earthshaker Giant, Jubilation, Thundering Ceratok
Cards like Sol Ring
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 77% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.94 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 64%
- Mana Vault 11%
- Basalt Monolith 2%
- Grim Monolith 1%
Cards like Woodland Bellower
11× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Counterspell
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 35%
- Negate 23%
Other options: Intervene, Essence Scatter, Wash Away, Spell Snare, Wild Unraveling, Disruption Protocol, Stern Scolding, Nullify, Remove Soul, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, False Summoning, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Wood Elves
5.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Heroic Intervention
1.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Birthing Pod
7.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards like Body Double
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 0.93 · 58.8% (593 of 1,009 decks)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 0.96 · 55.9% (564 of 1,009 decks)
- Bounding Krasis relevance 0.89 · 50.4% (509 of 1,009 decks)
- Deceiver Exarch relevance 0.94 · 35.5% (358 of 1,009 decks)
- Pestermite relevance 0.93 · 35.7% (360 of 1,009 decks)
- Protean Hulk relevance 0.84 · 43.3% (437 of 1,009 decks)
- Body Double relevance 0.84 · 41.2% (416 of 1,009 decks)
- Hyrax Tower Scout relevance 0.93 · 26.6% (268 of 1,009 decks)
- Great Oak Guardian relevance 0.76 · 37.2% (375 of 1,009 decks)
- Fatestitcher relevance 0.81 · 29.5% (298 of 1,009 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.81 · 28.1% (284 of 1,009 decks)
- Loaming Shaman relevance 0.84 · 23.7% (239 of 1,009 decks)
- Disciple of the Ring relevance 0.89 · 14.7% (148 of 1,009 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.67 · 40.3% (407 of 1,009 decks)
- Teardrop Kami relevance 0.88 · 14.4% (145 of 1,009 decks)
- Woodland Bellower relevance 0.72 · 31.9% (322 of 1,009 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.74 · 28.4% (287 of 1,009 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 0.77 · 19.1% (193 of 1,009 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.63 · 35.1% (354 of 1,009 decks)
- Glamermite relevance 0.81 · 12.4% (125 of 1,009 decks)
- Instill Energy relevance 0.72 · 18.3% (185 of 1,009 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.70 · 18.7% (189 of 1,009 decks)
- Piper's Melody relevance 0.86 · 7.7% (78 of 1,009 decks)
- Thornbite Staff relevance 0.83 · 9.4% (95 of 1,009 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 0.69 · 15.9% (160 of 1,009 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.52 · 41.4% (418 of 1,009 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.55 · 36.1% (364 of 1,009 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.63 · 19.7% (199 of 1,009 decks)
- Greenwarden of Murasa relevance 0.71 · 11.4% (115 of 1,009 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.58 · 26.0% (262 of 1,009 decks)
- Timeless Witness relevance 0.57 · 27.3% (275 of 1,009 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.64 · 16.6% (167 of 1,009 decks)
- Birthing Ritual relevance 0.73 · 9.6% (97 of 1,009 decks)
- Giant-Sized Flying Ant relevance 0.74 · 8.3% (84 of 1,009 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.62 · 16.5% (166 of 1,009 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.64 · 14.2% (143 of 1,009 decks)
- Volrath's Shapeshifter relevance 0.80 · 4.7% (47 of 1,009 decks)
- Marvin, Murderous Mimic relevance 0.58 · 18.7% (189 of 1,009 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 0.66 · 10.6% (107 of 1,009 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 0.57 · 19.3% (195 of 1,009 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.56 · 20.1% (203 of 1,009 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.55 · 20.8% (210 of 1,009 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.57 · 18.1% (183 of 1,009 decks)
- Vivien on the Hunt relevance 0.72 · 5.9% (60 of 1,009 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.52 · 25.6% (258 of 1,009 decks)
- Micromancer relevance 0.69 · 7.1% (72 of 1,009 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.57 · 16.3% (164 of 1,009 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.65 · 9.4% (95 of 1,009 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.51 · 25.2% (254 of 1,009 decks)
- Nature's Chosen relevance 0.70 · 5.6% (56 of 1,009 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 0.93 · 58.8% (593 of 1,009 decks)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 0.96 · 55.9% (564 of 1,009 decks)
- Bounding Krasis relevance 0.89 · 50.4% (509 of 1,009 decks)
- Deceiver Exarch relevance 0.94 · 35.5% (358 of 1,009 decks)
- Pestermite relevance 0.93 · 35.7% (360 of 1,009 decks)
- Protean Hulk relevance 0.84 · 43.3% (437 of 1,009 decks)
- Body Double relevance 0.84 · 41.2% (416 of 1,009 decks)
- Hyrax Tower Scout relevance 0.93 · 26.6% (268 of 1,009 decks)
- Great Oak Guardian relevance 0.76 · 37.2% (375 of 1,009 decks)
- Fatestitcher relevance 0.81 · 29.5% (298 of 1,009 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.81 · 28.1% (284 of 1,009 decks)
- Loaming Shaman relevance 0.84 · 23.7% (239 of 1,009 decks)
- Disciple of the Ring relevance 0.89 · 14.7% (148 of 1,009 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.67 · 40.3% (407 of 1,009 decks)
- Teardrop Kami relevance 0.88 · 14.4% (145 of 1,009 decks)
- Woodland Bellower relevance 0.72 · 31.9% (322 of 1,009 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 0.77 · 19.1% (193 of 1,009 decks)
- Glamermite relevance 0.81 · 12.4% (125 of 1,009 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 0.70 · 18.7% (189 of 1,009 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 0.69 · 15.9% (160 of 1,009 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.52 · 41.4% (418 of 1,009 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.63 · 19.7% (199 of 1,009 decks)
- Greenwarden of Murasa relevance 0.71 · 11.4% (115 of 1,009 decks)
- Timeless Witness relevance 0.57 · 27.3% (275 of 1,009 decks)
- Giant-Sized Flying Ant relevance 0.74 · 8.3% (84 of 1,009 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.64 · 14.2% (143 of 1,009 decks)
- Volrath's Shapeshifter relevance 0.80 · 4.7% (47 of 1,009 decks)
- Marvin, Murderous Mimic relevance 0.58 · 18.7% (189 of 1,009 decks)
- Woodfall Primus relevance 0.66 · 10.6% (107 of 1,009 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 0.57 · 19.3% (195 of 1,009 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.55 · 20.8% (210 of 1,009 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.57 · 18.1% (183 of 1,009 decks)
- Micromancer relevance 0.69 · 7.1% (72 of 1,009 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.57 · 16.3% (164 of 1,009 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.51 · 25.2% (254 of 1,009 decks)
- Cavalier of Gales relevance 0.67 · 5.8% (59 of 1,009 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.44 · 33.9% (342 of 1,009 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.48 · 26.5% (267 of 1,009 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.47 · 26.8% (270 of 1,009 decks)
- Ornithopter relevance 0.61 · 8.7% (88 of 1,009 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.60 · 9.1% (92 of 1,009 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 0.65 · 5.4% (54 of 1,009 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.52 · 14.1% (142 of 1,009 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.46 · 21.8% (220 of 1,009 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.34 · 49.8% (502 of 1,009 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.42 · 24.4% (246 of 1,009 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.44 · 20.2% (204 of 1,009 decks)
- Biogenic Ooze relevance 0.56 · 6.5% (66 of 1,009 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.54 · 7.9% (80 of 1,009 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.33 · 47.3% (477 of 1,009 decks)
All artifacts (29)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.74 · 28.4% (287 of 1,009 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 0.63 · 35.1% (354 of 1,009 decks)
- Thornbite Staff relevance 0.83 · 9.4% (95 of 1,009 decks)
- Mimic Vat relevance 0.63 · 7.1% (72 of 1,009 decks)
- Sewer-veillance Cam relevance 0.60 · 6.1% (62 of 1,009 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.60 · 6.1% (62 of 1,009 decks)
- Patriar's Seal relevance 0.56 · 5.0% (50 of 1,009 decks)
- Feldon's Cane relevance 0.64 · 3.7% (37 of 1,009 decks)
- Magewright's Stone relevance 0.59 · 3.7% (37 of 1,009 decks)
- Elixir of Immortality relevance 0.50 · 4.1% (41 of 1,009 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.34 · 12.3% (124 of 1,009 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.34 · 11.0% (111 of 1,009 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.34 · 10.7% (108 of 1,009 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.25 · 31.2% (315 of 1,009 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.34 · 8.4% (85 of 1,009 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.36 · 5.8% (59 of 1,009 decks)
- Illusionist's Bracers relevance 0.45 · 3.6% (36 of 1,009 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.23 · 32.6% (329 of 1,009 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.27 · 7.9% (80 of 1,009 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.22 · 19.0% (192 of 1,009 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.37 · 3.0% (30 of 1,009 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.20 · 21.5% (217 of 1,009 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.34 · 2.7% (27 of 1,009 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.25 · 2.9% (29 of 1,009 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.22 · 3.2% (32 of 1,009 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (27 of 1,009 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (36 of 1,009 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 43.1% (435 of 1,009 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 63.5% (641 of 1,009 decks)
All enchantments (25)
- Instill Energy relevance 0.72 · 18.3% (185 of 1,009 decks)
- Birthing Ritual relevance 0.73 · 9.6% (97 of 1,009 decks)
- Nature's Chosen relevance 0.70 · 5.6% (56 of 1,009 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.48 · 28.9% (292 of 1,009 decks)
- Aura of Dominion relevance 0.71 · 4.8% (48 of 1,009 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.50 · 20.7% (209 of 1,009 decks)
- Gutter Grime relevance 0.69 · 4.6% (46 of 1,009 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.38 · 14.9% (150 of 1,009 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.44 · 7.7% (78 of 1,009 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.33 · 15.7% (158 of 1,009 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.35 · 11.4% (115 of 1,009 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.35 · 7.9% (80 of 1,009 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (94 of 1,009 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.35 · 4.4% (44 of 1,009 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.44 · 2.8% (28 of 1,009 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.25 · 13.3% (134 of 1,009 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.29 · 6.9% (70 of 1,009 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.22 · 12.1% (122 of 1,009 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.36 · 2.6% (26 of 1,009 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.30 · 2.5% (25 of 1,009 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.26 · 3.3% (33 of 1,009 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.19 · 5.3% (53 of 1,009 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (44 of 1,009 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.25 · 2.6% (26 of 1,009 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (32 of 1,009 decks)
All instants (50)
- Shore Up relevance 0.58 · 26.0% (262 of 1,009 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.64 · 16.6% (167 of 1,009 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.62 · 16.5% (166 of 1,009 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.56 · 20.1% (203 of 1,009 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.65 · 9.4% (95 of 1,009 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.62 · 10.0% (101 of 1,009 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.58 · 10.1% (102 of 1,009 decks)
- Memory's Journey relevance 0.61 · 5.6% (56 of 1,009 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.55 · 7.6% (77 of 1,009 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.44 · 15.2% (153 of 1,009 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.47 · 7.1% (72 of 1,009 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.54 · 4.4% (44 of 1,009 decks)
- Miscast relevance 0.48 · 5.5% (55 of 1,009 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.39 · 13.4% (135 of 1,009 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.36 · 15.7% (158 of 1,009 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.47 · 4.8% (48 of 1,009 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.40 · 10.0% (101 of 1,009 decks)
- Repudiate // Replicate relevance 0.44 · 5.7% (58 of 1,009 decks)
- Tidal Bore relevance 0.59 · 3.2% (32 of 1,009 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.41 · 7.9% (80 of 1,009 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.34 · 12.7% (128 of 1,009 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.36 · 10.3% (104 of 1,009 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.34 · 11.8% (119 of 1,009 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.37 · 7.7% (78 of 1,009 decks)
- Mizzium Skin relevance 0.53 · 3.1% (31 of 1,009 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.36 · 8.7% (88 of 1,009 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.29 · 23.6% (238 of 1,009 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.37 · 7.6% (77 of 1,009 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.31 · 14.5% (146 of 1,009 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.36 · 8.4% (85 of 1,009 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.31 · 11.9% (120 of 1,009 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.44 · 3.8% (38 of 1,009 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.36 · 5.2% (52 of 1,009 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.32 · 10.6% (107 of 1,009 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.35 · 5.9% (60 of 1,009 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.29 · 14.2% (143 of 1,009 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.34 · 6.8% (69 of 1,009 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.33 · 7.7% (78 of 1,009 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.33 · 6.8% (69 of 1,009 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.26 · 19.5% (197 of 1,009 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.24 · 26.5% (267 of 1,009 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.22 · 31.5% (318 of 1,009 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.30 · 9.0% (91 of 1,009 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.30 · 6.8% (69 of 1,009 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.23 · 23.4% (236 of 1,009 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.28 · 7.3% (74 of 1,009 decks)
- Incubation // Incongruity relevance 0.39 · 3.1% (31 of 1,009 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.26 · 8.9% (90 of 1,009 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.25 · 10.5% (106 of 1,009 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.25 · 10.2% (103 of 1,009 decks)
All sorceries (23)
- Piper's Melody relevance 0.86 · 7.7% (78 of 1,009 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.55 · 36.1% (364 of 1,009 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.52 · 25.6% (258 of 1,009 decks)
- Gaea's Blessing relevance 0.52 · 5.3% (53 of 1,009 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.45 · 5.6% (57 of 1,009 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.34 · 19.2% (194 of 1,009 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.28 · 15.3% (154 of 1,009 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (40 of 1,009 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.29 · 5.2% (52 of 1,009 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (55 of 1,009 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (50 of 1,009 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.18 · 15.5% (156 of 1,009 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.26 · 4.2% (42 of 1,009 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.20 · 8.3% (84 of 1,009 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (34 of 1,009 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.17 · 13.8% (139 of 1,009 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.16 · 20.4% (206 of 1,009 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.15 · 17.5% (177 of 1,009 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (26 of 1,009 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.13 · 20.1% (203 of 1,009 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.15 · 10.1% (102 of 1,009 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (29 of 1,009 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (28 of 1,009 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (3)
- Vivien on the Hunt relevance 0.72 · 5.9% (60 of 1,009 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.41 · 16.3% (164 of 1,009 decks)
- Kiora, Master of the Depths relevance 0.38 · 3.4% (34 of 1,009 decks)
All utility lands (37)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.70 · 27.4% (276 of 1,009 decks)
- Hall of the Bandit Lord relevance 0.64 · 6.4% (65 of 1,009 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.44 · 28.0% (283 of 1,009 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.51 · 6.3% (64 of 1,009 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.49 · 7.1% (72 of 1,009 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.40 · 12.5% (126 of 1,009 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.37 · 12.9% (130 of 1,009 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.38 · 9.8% (99 of 1,009 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.26 · 33.3% (336 of 1,009 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.34 · 8.7% (88 of 1,009 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.34 · 9.1% (92 of 1,009 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.37 · 4.9% (49 of 1,009 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.33 · 9.3% (94 of 1,009 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.28 · 15.5% (156 of 1,009 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.25 · 25.0% (252 of 1,009 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.29 · 11.4% (115 of 1,009 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.25 · 20.7% (209 of 1,009 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.23 · 27.4% (276 of 1,009 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.29 · 9.8% (99 of 1,009 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.24 · 20.2% (204 of 1,009 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (52 of 1,009 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.31 · 4.5% (45 of 1,009 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.39 · 2.7% (27 of 1,009 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (41 of 1,009 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (35 of 1,009 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.24 · 5.4% (54 of 1,009 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.23 · 5.5% (55 of 1,009 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (35 of 1,009 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (112 of 1,009 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.16 · 22.1% (223 of 1,009 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.30 · 2.9% (29 of 1,009 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (27 of 1,009 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.20 · 5.8% (59 of 1,009 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.18 · 6.4% (65 of 1,009 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (46 of 1,009 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.10 · 16.3% (164 of 1,009 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.14 · 3.7% (37 of 1,009 decks)
All lands (47)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.36 · 12.5% (126 of 1,009 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.33 · 16.1% (162 of 1,009 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.33 · 15.5% (156 of 1,009 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.32 · 16.4% (165 of 1,009 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.31 · 18.2% (184 of 1,009 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.35 · 11.5% (116 of 1,009 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.31 · 16.7% (168 of 1,009 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.49 · 3.6% (36 of 1,009 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.32 · 14.4% (145 of 1,009 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.34 · 11.1% (112 of 1,009 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.34 · 10.7% (108 of 1,009 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.30 · 17.4% (176 of 1,009 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.33 · 9.7% (98 of 1,009 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.28 · 17.0% (172 of 1,009 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.27 · 19.6% (198 of 1,009 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.46 · 2.6% (26 of 1,009 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.24 · 19.5% (197 of 1,009 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.29 · 6.9% (70 of 1,009 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.19 · 35.6% (359 of 1,009 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.23 · 17.8% (180 of 1,009 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.33 · 3.8% (38 of 1,009 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.21 · 18.9% (191 of 1,009 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.39 · 2.7% (27 of 1,009 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.23 · 8.7% (88 of 1,009 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.19 · 21.7% (219 of 1,009 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.15 · 40.6% (410 of 1,009 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.20 · 11.4% (115 of 1,009 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (71 of 1,009 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.12 · 51.8% (523 of 1,009 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.20 · 11.3% (114 of 1,009 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.28 · 3.6% (36 of 1,009 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.29 · 3.5% (35 of 1,009 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (31 of 1,009 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.14 · 28.8% (291 of 1,009 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.11 · 54.1% (546 of 1,009 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (101 of 1,009 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.19 · 8.2% (83 of 1,009 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.13 · 36.7% (370 of 1,009 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.13 · 37.4% (377 of 1,009 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (252 of 1,009 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (27 of 1,009 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.19 · 4.6% (46 of 1,009 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.08 · 48.7% (491 of 1,009 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (31 of 1,009 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 71.6% (722 of 1,009 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 83.3% (840 of 1,009 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 82.6% (833 of 1,009 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Prime Speaker Vannifar, from 1,009 real Commander decks.