Cards like Gigantosaurus
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
46% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
4.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
- Gigantosaurus 49%
- Quakestrider Ceratops 47%
- Ancient Brontodon 30%
- Leatherback Baloth 25%
- Vorstclaw 21%
- Enormous Baloth 19%
- Primordial Wurm 19%
- Colossapede 17%
- Cowl Prowler 16%
- Hollowhenge Beast 15%
- Kindercatch 14%
- Grizzled Outrider 13%
- Broodhunter Wurm 10%
- Gnarled Mass 10%
- Murasa Brute 10%
- Axebane Stag 10%
- Axebane Beast 9%
- Silverback Ape 9%
- Trained Armodon 8%
- Spined Karok 8%
- Nettle Swine 8%
- Scaled Wurm 7%
- Canopy Gorger 6%
- Barbtooth Wurm 5%
- Golden Bear 5%
- Pheres-Band Centaurs 4%
- Wild Ceratok 4%
- Moss Monster 4%
- Vastwood Gorger 4%
- Tusked Colossodon 4%
- Thornhide Wolves 4%
- Southern Elephant 3%
- Ironroot Treefolk 3%
- Nema Siltlurker 3%
- Feral Krushok 3%
- Blanchwood Treefolk 3%
- Plated Wurm 3%
- Order of the Sacred Bell 2%
- Durkwood Boars 2%
Cards like Kalonian Tusker
7.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
2.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
- Kalonian Tusker 26%
- Alpine Grizzly 21%
- Orazca Frillback 19%
- Jibbirik Omnivore 19%
- Rumbling Baloth 17%
- Terrain Elemental 17%
- Ferocious Zheng 16%
- Swordwise Centaur 15%
- Bear Cub 14%
- Balduvian Bears 12%
- Runeclaw Bear 10%
- Cylian Elf 9%
- Forest Bear 7%
- Barbary Apes 7%
- Colossodon Yearling 6%
- Trained Jackal 5%
Cards like Rishkar's Expertise
5.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Grizzly Bears
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
- Grizzly Bears 17%
- Spined Wurm 6%
- Elvish Ranger 6%
- Whiptail Wurm 5%
- Redwood Treefolk 3%
- Gorilla Warrior 3%
Other options: Rowan Treefolk
Cards like Elvish Warrior
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
- Elvish Warrior 15%
- Norwood Ranger 10%
Cards like Fanatic of Rhonas
2.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other green decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Leafkin Druid
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.52 in other green decks
Cards
- Garruk's Uprising 59%
- Elemental Bond 20%
- Kavu Lair 2%
Cards like Bite Down
3.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Compel Brutality
Cards like Wild Growth
2.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Verdant Haven, Market Festival, Glittering Frost, Dawn's Reflection, Blighted Burgeoning
Cards like Cultivate
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
49% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 51%
- Rampant Growth 42%
- Kodama's Reach 34%
- Shared Roots 14%
- Explosive Vegetation 7%
- Migration Path 6%
- Roamer's Routine 3%
- Search for Tomorrow 2%
- Untamed Wilds 2%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, They Went This Way, Grow from the Ashes, Path to the Festival, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Map the Wastes, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Quilled Slagwurm
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Colossal Majesty
12× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Return to Nature
3.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards like Fog
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards like Overwhelming Stampede
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards like Overprotect
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.51 in other green decks
Cards
- Overprotect 20%
- Snakeskin Veil 18%
- Tyvar's Stand 16%
Other options: Ranger's Guile, Blossoming Defense, Woodcutter's Grit
Cards like Shamanic Revelation
2.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.19 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Garruk, Primal Hunter
3.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other green decks
Cards like Kenrith's Transformation
3.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Ghalta, Primal Hunger
2.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 0.53 · 19.5% (23 of 118 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.40 · 46.6% (55 of 118 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 0.47 · 29.7% (35 of 118 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 0.48 · 24.6% (29 of 118 decks)
- Kindercatch relevance 0.54 · 13.6% (16 of 118 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 0.51 · 16.9% (20 of 118 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 0.46 · 26.3% (31 of 118 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 0.46 · 26.3% (31 of 118 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 0.50 · 15.3% (18 of 118 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 0.49 · 16.1% (19 of 118 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 0.49 · 16.1% (19 of 118 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 0.46 · 18.6% (22 of 118 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 0.44 · 21.2% (25 of 118 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 0.42 · 24.6% (29 of 118 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 0.46 · 16.9% (20 of 118 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 0.44 · 19.5% (23 of 118 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 0.45 · 16.9% (20 of 118 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 0.47 · 12.7% (15 of 118 decks)
- Axebane Beast relevance 0.50 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.31 · 49.2% (58 of 118 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 0.42 · 18.6% (22 of 118 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 0.43 · 16.9% (20 of 118 decks)
- Cylian Elf relevance 0.49 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Axebane Stag relevance 0.48 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Silverback Ape relevance 0.48 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 0.42 · 15.3% (18 of 118 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 0.43 · 12.7% (15 of 118 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 0.41 · 15.3% (18 of 118 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 0.45 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 0.45 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Broodhunter Wurm relevance 0.44 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Nettle Swine relevance 0.46 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 0.43 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.35 · 24.6% (29 of 118 decks)
- Spined Karok relevance 0.45 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 0.43 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Murasa Brute relevance 0.42 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Willow Elf relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Barbary Apes relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Alpha Tyrranax relevance 0.43 · 8.5% (10 of 118 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 0.41 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Trained Armodon relevance 0.42 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Biowaste Blob relevance 0.35 · 16.1% (19 of 118 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 0.41 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Colossodon Yearling relevance 0.42 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 0.31 · 21.2% (25 of 118 decks)
- Scaled Wurm relevance 0.39 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Moss Monster relevance 0.41 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
- Trained Jackal relevance 0.40 · 5.1% (6 of 118 decks)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 0.33 · 13.6% (16 of 118 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 0.53 · 19.5% (23 of 118 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.40 · 46.6% (55 of 118 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 0.47 · 29.7% (35 of 118 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 0.48 · 24.6% (29 of 118 decks)
- Kindercatch relevance 0.54 · 13.6% (16 of 118 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 0.51 · 16.9% (20 of 118 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 0.46 · 26.3% (31 of 118 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 0.46 · 26.3% (31 of 118 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 0.50 · 15.3% (18 of 118 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 0.49 · 16.1% (19 of 118 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 0.49 · 16.1% (19 of 118 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 0.46 · 18.6% (22 of 118 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 0.44 · 21.2% (25 of 118 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 0.42 · 24.6% (29 of 118 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 0.46 · 16.9% (20 of 118 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 0.44 · 19.5% (23 of 118 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 0.45 · 16.9% (20 of 118 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 0.47 · 12.7% (15 of 118 decks)
- Axebane Beast relevance 0.50 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 0.31 · 49.2% (58 of 118 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 0.42 · 18.6% (22 of 118 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 0.43 · 16.9% (20 of 118 decks)
- Cylian Elf relevance 0.49 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Axebane Stag relevance 0.48 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Silverback Ape relevance 0.48 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 0.42 · 15.3% (18 of 118 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 0.43 · 12.7% (15 of 118 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 0.41 · 15.3% (18 of 118 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 0.45 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 0.45 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Broodhunter Wurm relevance 0.44 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Nettle Swine relevance 0.46 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 0.43 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.35 · 24.6% (29 of 118 decks)
- Spined Karok relevance 0.45 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 0.43 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Murasa Brute relevance 0.42 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Willow Elf relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Barbary Apes relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Alpha Tyrranax relevance 0.43 · 8.5% (10 of 118 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 0.41 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Trained Armodon relevance 0.42 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Biowaste Blob relevance 0.35 · 16.1% (19 of 118 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 0.41 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Colossodon Yearling relevance 0.42 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 0.31 · 21.2% (25 of 118 decks)
- Scaled Wurm relevance 0.39 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Moss Monster relevance 0.41 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
- Trained Jackal relevance 0.40 · 5.1% (6 of 118 decks)
- Canopy Gorger relevance 0.39 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.26 · 17.8% (21 of 118 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.27 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Thrumming Stone relevance 0.26 · 5.1% (6 of 118 decks)
- Locket of Yesterdays relevance 0.26 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
- Soul-Guide Lantern relevance 0.24 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.19 · 13.6% (16 of 118 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.21 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.22 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.21 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.17 · 19.5% (23 of 118 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.19 · 11.0% (13 of 118 decks)
- Ivory Tower relevance 0.27 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.20 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Spellweaver Helix relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.19 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (6 of 118 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.12 · 28.0% (33 of 118 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (6 of 118 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.17 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.17 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Resurrection Orb relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.10 · 45.8% (54 of 118 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.12 · 16.9% (20 of 118 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.13 · 11.9% (14 of 118 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.15 · 5.1% (6 of 118 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Grafted Exoskeleton relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Prowler's Helm relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.10 · 17.8% (21 of 118 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.13 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Endless Atlas relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.10 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (59 of 118 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 0.33 · 13.6% (16 of 118 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.28 · 16.9% (20 of 118 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.23 · 35.6% (42 of 118 decks)
- Triumph of Ferocity relevance 0.31 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Primal Rage relevance 0.28 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.23 · 23.7% (28 of 118 decks)
- March of the World Ooze relevance 0.26 · 11.0% (13 of 118 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.25 · 13.6% (16 of 118 decks)
- Gutter Grime relevance 0.29 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.25 · 11.0% (13 of 118 decks)
- Case of the Trampled Garden relevance 0.27 · 5.1% (6 of 118 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.16 · 45.8% (54 of 118 decks)
- Meltstrider's Resolve relevance 0.25 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.19 · 16.1% (19 of 118 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.20 · 11.9% (14 of 118 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.17 · 20.3% (24 of 118 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.22 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Indomitable Might relevance 0.22 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.18 · 14.4% (17 of 118 decks)
- Death's Presence relevance 0.22 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.16 · 22.9% (27 of 118 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.21 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.20 · 8.5% (10 of 118 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.19 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.11 · 59.3% (70 of 118 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (6 of 118 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.15 · 20.3% (24 of 118 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.19 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.18 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.13 · 28.8% (34 of 118 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.18 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.14 · 15.3% (18 of 118 decks)
- Shimmerwilds Growth relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.17 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.15 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.15 · 8.5% (10 of 118 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.13 · 13.6% (16 of 118 decks)
- Ooze Flux relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.13 · 8.5% (10 of 118 decks)
- Crystalline Armor relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Prodigious Growth relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Canopy Cover relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.13 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
All instants (50)
- Bite Down relevance 0.24 · 26.3% (31 of 118 decks)
- Winds of Qal Sisma relevance 0.30 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.27 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.22 · 20.3% (24 of 118 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.23 · 14.4% (17 of 118 decks)
- Aspect of Hydra relevance 0.25 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.19 · 21.2% (25 of 118 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 0.24 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.18 · 17.8% (21 of 118 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.19 · 11.0% (13 of 118 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.21 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Deglamer relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.16 · 22.0% (26 of 118 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.21 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.20 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.15 · 28.0% (33 of 118 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.19 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.19 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.16 · 16.1% (19 of 118 decks)
- Master's Rebuke relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (6 of 118 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.15 · 20.3% (24 of 118 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.15 · 22.0% (26 of 118 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.17 · 11.0% (13 of 118 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.20 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.12 · 44.1% (52 of 118 decks)
- Bind relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.15 · 15.3% (18 of 118 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.17 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.18 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Choose Your Weapon relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.17 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Primal Bellow relevance 0.18 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Ruinous Intrusion relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.14 · 12.7% (15 of 118 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.12 · 22.9% (27 of 118 decks)
- You Look Upon the Tarrasque relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.16 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.13 · 17.8% (21 of 118 decks)
- Diplomatic Relations relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Bestow Greatness relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.16 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.15 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Staggering Size relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.15 · 5.1% (6 of 118 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Shower of Arrows relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Pawpatch Formation relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Miming Slime relevance 0.35 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.26 · 21.2% (25 of 118 decks)
- Slime Against Humanity relevance 0.28 · 8.5% (10 of 118 decks)
- Roar of Challenge relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.21 · 22.9% (27 of 118 decks)
- Gelatinous Genesis relevance 0.26 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.20 · 17.8% (21 of 118 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.21 · 13.6% (16 of 118 decks)
- Klothys's Design relevance 0.25 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.20 · 14.4% (17 of 118 decks)
- Contest of Claws relevance 0.23 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Life's Legacy relevance 0.21 · 11.0% (13 of 118 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.22 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.13 · 45.8% (54 of 118 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.18 · 15.3% (18 of 118 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.19 · 11.9% (14 of 118 decks)
- Fungal Sprouting relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (6 of 118 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.16 · 24.6% (29 of 118 decks)
- Hunter's Prowess relevance 0.21 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Slime Molding relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Tumbleweed Rising relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.19 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Savage Stomp relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.14 · 22.0% (26 of 118 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.14 · 25.4% (30 of 118 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.18 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.18 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Ent's Fury relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Predatory Rampage relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.11 · 33.9% (40 of 118 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.14 · 14.4% (17 of 118 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.10 · 41.5% (49 of 118 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.13 · 16.1% (19 of 118 decks)
- Thunderherd Migration relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.16 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.12 · 25.4% (30 of 118 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.14 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Glimpse the Core relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Animist's Might relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.15 · 7.6% (9 of 118 decks)
- Exponential Growth relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.09 · 50.8% (60 of 118 decks)
- Mouth // Feed relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.15 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.10 · 31.4% (37 of 118 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- See the Unwritten relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.14 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.22 · 20.3% (24 of 118 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.11 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (3)
- Invasion of Muraganda // Primordial Plasm relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
All utility lands (43)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.20 · 15.3% (18 of 118 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.19 · 16.9% (20 of 118 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.18 · 13.6% (16 of 118 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.16 · 18.6% (22 of 118 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.13 · 38.1% (45 of 118 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (6 of 118 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.18 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.15 · 15.3% (18 of 118 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.18 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.14 · 20.3% (24 of 118 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.12 · 28.8% (34 of 118 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.14 · 16.9% (20 of 118 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.11 · 39.0% (46 of 118 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.17 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.12 · 22.0% (26 of 118 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.12 · 11.9% (14 of 118 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.13 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.13 · 11.0% (13 of 118 decks)
- Tectonic Edge relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.13 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.12 · 4.2% (5 of 118 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.10 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Okina, Temple to the Grandfathers relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.09 · 10.2% (12 of 118 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (4 of 118 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (12)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.16 · 8.5% (10 of 118 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.12 · 18.6% (22 of 118 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.13 · 9.3% (11 of 118 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.13 · 8.5% (10 of 118 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.14 · 5.1% (6 of 118 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.11 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.11 · 5.9% (7 of 118 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.08 · 2.5% (3 of 118 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 86.4% (102 of 118 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Terrian, World Tyrant, from 118 real Commander decks.