Tip: use − and + on any card to filter by it
Willow Elf
Played in 173 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
173 decks
Commanders
7
Commanders
7All commanders (7)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 3.11 · 3.1% (46 of 1,506 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.10 · 6.8% (8 of 118 decks)
- Jerrard of the Closed Fist relevance 0.83 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Imaryll, Elfhame Elite relevance 0.67 · 1.0% (2 of 193 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 0.66 · 2.8% (1 of 36 decks)
- Galadriel, Gift-Giver relevance 0.60 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary relevance 0.53 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
Parallel Cards
15
Parallel Cards
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 5.28 · 57.2% (99 of 173 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 4.45 · 47.4% (82 of 173 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 3.73 · 45.1% (78 of 173 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 3.26 · 45.1% (78 of 173 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 3.15 · 44.5% (77 of 173 decks)
- Trained Jackal relevance 3.14 · 30.1% (52 of 173 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 3.05 · 47.4% (82 of 173 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 2.99 · 39.9% (69 of 173 decks)
- Cylian Elf relevance 2.94 · 31.2% (54 of 173 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.82 · 46.8% (81 of 173 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.81 · 49.7% (86 of 173 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 2.75 · 35.8% (62 of 173 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 2.67 · 39.3% (68 of 173 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.62 · 39.9% (69 of 173 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 2.62 · 35.8% (62 of 173 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 2.51 · 28.9% (50 of 173 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 2.49 · 32.4% (56 of 173 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 2.48 · 34.7% (60 of 173 decks)
- Trained Armodon relevance 2.46 · 25.4% (44 of 173 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.42 · 38.7% (67 of 173 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 2.37 · 28.9% (50 of 173 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 2.37 · 32.9% (57 of 173 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 2.34 · 31.2% (54 of 173 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 2.34 · 35.3% (61 of 173 decks)
- Bear Cub relevance 2.34 · 35.3% (61 of 173 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 2.25 · 23.1% (40 of 173 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 2.16 · 24.9% (43 of 173 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 2.14 · 25.4% (44 of 173 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 2.12 · 23.1% (40 of 173 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 2.09 · 27.2% (47 of 173 decks)
Creatures
49
Creatures
49 All creatures (49)
- Norwood Ranger relevance 5.28 · 57.2% (99 of 173 decks)
- Woodland Druid relevance 4.45 · 47.4% (82 of 173 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 3.73 · 45.1% (78 of 173 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 3.26 · 45.1% (78 of 173 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 3.15 · 44.5% (77 of 173 decks)
- Trained Jackal relevance 3.14 · 30.1% (52 of 173 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 3.05 · 47.4% (82 of 173 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 2.99 · 39.9% (69 of 173 decks)
- Cylian Elf relevance 2.94 · 31.2% (54 of 173 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.82 · 46.8% (81 of 173 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.81 · 49.7% (86 of 173 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 2.75 · 35.8% (62 of 173 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 2.67 · 39.3% (68 of 173 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 2.62 · 39.9% (69 of 173 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 2.62 · 35.8% (62 of 173 decks)
- Elvish Ranger relevance 2.51 · 28.9% (50 of 173 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 2.49 · 32.4% (56 of 173 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 2.48 · 34.7% (60 of 173 decks)
- Trained Armodon relevance 2.46 · 25.4% (44 of 173 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.42 · 38.7% (67 of 173 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 2.37 · 28.9% (50 of 173 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 2.37 · 32.9% (57 of 173 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 2.34 · 31.2% (54 of 173 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 2.34 · 35.3% (61 of 173 decks)
- Bear Cub relevance 2.34 · 35.3% (61 of 173 decks)
- Gnarled Mass relevance 2.25 · 23.1% (40 of 173 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 2.16 · 24.9% (43 of 173 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 2.14 · 25.4% (44 of 173 decks)
- Nessian Courser relevance 2.12 · 23.1% (40 of 173 decks)
- Quilled Slagwurm relevance 2.09 · 27.2% (47 of 173 decks)
- Ferocious Zheng relevance 2.05 · 22.5% (39 of 173 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 1.99 · 24.9% (43 of 173 decks)
- Harrier Naga relevance 1.96 · 20.2% (35 of 173 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 1.88 · 25.4% (44 of 173 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 1.76 · 19.1% (33 of 173 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 1.74 · 20.8% (36 of 173 decks)
- Whiptail Wurm relevance 1.73 · 17.9% (31 of 173 decks)
- Panther Warriors relevance 1.70 · 19.7% (34 of 173 decks)
- Kindercatch relevance 1.62 · 16.8% (29 of 173 decks)
- Cowl Prowler relevance 1.59 · 17.9% (31 of 173 decks)
- Grizzled Outrider relevance 1.58 · 18.5% (32 of 173 decks)
- Spined Karok relevance 1.54 · 15.6% (27 of 173 decks)
- Forest Bear relevance 1.49 · 20.8% (36 of 173 decks)
- Colossodon Yearling relevance 1.48 · 15.6% (27 of 173 decks)
- Barbary Apes relevance 1.42 · 16.2% (28 of 173 decks)
- Defiant Elf relevance 1.38 · 15.0% (26 of 173 decks)
- Spined Wurm relevance 1.37 · 14.5% (25 of 173 decks)
- Scaled Wurm relevance 1.34 · 14.5% (25 of 173 decks)
- Axebane Stag relevance 1.33 · 15.0% (26 of 173 decks)
Enchantments
1
Enchantments
1 All enchantments (1)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.05 · 30.1% (52 of 173 decks)
EDH data for Willow Elf: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 173 real decks.






























































