Reclamation Sage
Played in 47,166 Golgari decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 3.05 · 67.3% (13,775 of 20,476 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 2.77 · 56.8% (11,927 of 20,986 decks)
- Meren of Clan Nel Toth relevance 2.05 · 38.7% (5,073 of 13,095 decks)
- Abomination of Llanowar relevance 1.88 · 54.6% (672 of 1,231 decks)
- Tyvar the Bellicose relevance 1.85 · 48.6% (908 of 1,867 decks)
- Trystan, Callous Cultivator // Trystan, Penitent Culler relevance 1.71 · 52.5% (423 of 805 decks)
- Nath of the Gilt-Leaf relevance 1.44 · 41.9% (307 of 733 decks)
- Shadowheart, Dark Justiciar // Master Chef relevance 1.39 · 34.2% (496 of 1,449 decks)
- Baba Lysaga, Night Witch relevance 1.32 · 27.8% (810 of 2,914 decks)
- Harald, King of Skemfar relevance 1.25 · 56.5% (70 of 124 decks)
- Rhys the Exiled relevance 1.23 · 59.8% (58 of 97 decks)
- Jarad, Golgari Lich Lord relevance 1.19 · 23.9% (778 of 3,255 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 1.11 · 47.6% (60 of 126 decks)
- Izoni, Thousand-Eyed relevance 1.10 · 36.7% (112 of 305 decks)
- Vanille, Cheerful l'Cie relevance 1.09 · 26.8% (281 of 1,048 decks)
- Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.99 · 47.1% (40 of 85 decks)
- Ygra, Eater of All relevance 0.93 · 13.9% (1,904 of 13,680 decks)
- Sarulf, Realm Eater relevance 0.92 · 19.2% (375 of 1,953 decks)
- Sivriss, Nightmare Speaker // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.92 · 26.7% (117 of 439 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.90 · 76.5% (13 of 17 decks)
- Hogaak, Arisen Necropolis relevance 0.89 · 19.8% (275 of 1,386 decks)
- Glissa Sunslayer relevance 0.85 · 19.3% (237 of 1,229 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Sarevok, Deathbringer relevance 0.85 · 29.7% (62 of 209 decks)
- Honest Rutstein relevance 0.83 · 22.8% (118 of 517 decks)
- Kagha, Shadow Archdruid relevance 0.83 · 25.1% (87 of 346 decks)
- Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.81 · 61.9% (13 of 21 decks)
- Yargle and Multani relevance 0.80 · 16.0% (346 of 2,156 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.78 · 53.8% (14 of 26 decks)
- Old Rutstein relevance 0.71 · 18.6% (108 of 581 decks)
- Cultist of the Absolute // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.71 · 20.0% (85 of 424 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.15 · 57.0% (26,896 of 47,166 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.09 · 49.2% (23,223 of 47,166 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.06 · 51.7% (24,388 of 47,166 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.02 · 45.9% (21,670 of 47,166 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.99 · 41.6% (19,624 of 47,166 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.96 · 39.2% (18,495 of 47,166 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.96 · 46.6% (22,000 of 47,166 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.94 · 39.0% (18,375 of 47,166 decks)
- Shaman of the Pack relevance 0.88 · 33.1% (15,591 of 47,166 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.88 · 33.3% (15,700 of 47,166 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.88 · 33.7% (15,875 of 47,166 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.84 · 31.6% (14,921 of 47,166 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.80 · 29.9% (14,114 of 47,166 decks)
- Tyvar Kell relevance 0.79 · 29.9% (14,115 of 47,166 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.78 · 29.3% (13,821 of 47,166 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.77 · 28.4% (13,413 of 47,166 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.77 · 28.7% (13,526 of 47,166 decks)
- Skemfar Shadowsage relevance 0.75 · 25.6% (12,089 of 47,166 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.70 · 24.0% (11,325 of 47,166 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.70 · 24.6% (11,598 of 47,166 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.70 · 40.8% (19,221 of 47,166 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.70 · 25.8% (12,189 of 47,166 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.70 · 24.2% (11,405 of 47,166 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.69 · 24.0% (11,332 of 47,166 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.69 · 23.4% (11,018 of 47,166 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.68 · 25.4% (11,989 of 47,166 decks)
- Prowess of the Fair relevance 0.68 · 22.5% (10,605 of 47,166 decks)
- Elderfang Venom relevance 0.68 · 22.7% (10,705 of 47,166 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.67 · 22.1% (10,425 of 47,166 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.66 · 26.3% (12,420 of 47,166 decks)
All creatures (37)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.15 · 57.0% (26,896 of 47,166 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.09 · 49.2% (23,223 of 47,166 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.06 · 51.7% (24,388 of 47,166 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.02 · 45.9% (21,670 of 47,166 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.99 · 41.6% (19,624 of 47,166 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.96 · 39.2% (18,495 of 47,166 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.96 · 46.6% (22,000 of 47,166 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.94 · 39.0% (18,375 of 47,166 decks)
- Shaman of the Pack relevance 0.88 · 33.1% (15,591 of 47,166 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.88 · 33.3% (15,700 of 47,166 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.80 · 29.9% (14,114 of 47,166 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.78 · 29.3% (13,821 of 47,166 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.77 · 28.4% (13,413 of 47,166 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.77 · 28.7% (13,526 of 47,166 decks)
- Skemfar Shadowsage relevance 0.75 · 25.6% (12,089 of 47,166 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.70 · 24.0% (11,325 of 47,166 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.70 · 24.6% (11,598 of 47,166 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.70 · 40.8% (19,221 of 47,166 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.70 · 25.8% (12,189 of 47,166 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.70 · 24.2% (11,405 of 47,166 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.69 · 24.0% (11,332 of 47,166 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.69 · 23.4% (11,018 of 47,166 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.68 · 25.4% (11,989 of 47,166 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.67 · 22.1% (10,425 of 47,166 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.66 · 26.3% (12,420 of 47,166 decks)
- Poison-Tip Archer relevance 0.66 · 36.6% (17,243 of 47,166 decks)
- Abomination of Llanowar relevance 0.66 · 21.9% (10,341 of 47,166 decks)
- Glissa Sunslayer relevance 0.61 · 26.4% (12,473 of 47,166 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.61 · 19.7% (9,287 of 47,166 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.58 · 18.0% (8,474 of 47,166 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.57 · 34.1% (16,072 of 47,166 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.57 · 18.5% (8,724 of 47,166 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.54 · 20.6% (9,727 of 47,166 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.53 · 19.9% (9,392 of 47,166 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.52 · 15.4% (7,272 of 47,166 decks)
- Ruthless Winnower relevance 0.52 · 15.0% (7,089 of 47,166 decks)
- Eclipsed Elf relevance 0.52 · 16.1% (7,611 of 47,166 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Prowess of the Fair relevance 0.68 · 22.5% (10,605 of 47,166 decks)
- Elderfang Venom relevance 0.68 · 22.7% (10,705 of 47,166 decks)
- Flourishing Defenses relevance 0.61 · 21.9% (10,310 of 47,166 decks)
All instants (3)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.88 · 33.7% (15,875 of 47,166 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.63 · 23.4% (11,058 of 47,166 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.53 · 40.3% (19,023 of 47,166 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.84 · 31.6% (14,921 of 47,166 decks)
- Trystan's Command relevance 0.51 · 16.3% (7,710 of 47,166 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tyvar Kell relevance 0.79 · 29.9% (14,115 of 47,166 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.68 · 23.5% (11,075 of 47,166 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.53 · 38.3% (18,045 of 47,166 decks)
All lands (2)
- Gilt-Leaf Palace relevance 0.68 · 23.8% (11,215 of 47,166 decks)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.52 · 16.1% (7,597 of 47,166 decks)
EDH data for Reclamation Sage: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 47,166 real decks.