Reclamation Sage
Played in 25,314 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 2.61 · 48.6% (3,568 of 7,335 decks)
- Maralen, Fae Ascendant relevance 2.57 · 37.2% (10,200 of 27,396 decks)
- Thranduil, the Elvenking relevance 2.18 · 33.0% (4,247 of 12,880 decks)
- Sidisi, Brood Tyrant relevance 1.49 · 24.1% (934 of 3,883 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 1.38 · 17.3% (2,329 of 13,477 decks)
- Zimone and Dina relevance 1.16 · 17.6% (619 of 3,516 decks)
- Otrimi, the Ever-Playful relevance 1.02 · 16.9% (331 of 1,953 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.92 · 35.4% (29 of 82 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.81 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Tasigur, the Golden Fang relevance 0.50 · 7.0% (216 of 3,087 decks)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 0.34 · 4.9% (141 of 2,870 decks)
- The Mimeoplasm relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (154 of 3,748 decks)
- Vorosh, the Hunter relevance 0.29 · 7.0% (22 of 314 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel relevance 0.29 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Kotis, Sibsig Champion relevance 0.28 · 5.6% (36 of 648 decks)
- Henry Wu, InGen Geneticist relevance 0.26 · 5.2% (34 of 659 decks)
- Kotis, the Fangkeeper relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (282 of 9,553 decks)
- Brokkos, Apex of Forever relevance 0.24 · 4.4% (46 of 1,051 decks)
- Teval, the Balanced Scale relevance 0.23 · 2.2% (625 of 27,859 decks)
- Damia, Sage of Stone relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (62 of 1,690 decks)
- Ukkima, Stalking Shadow // Cazur, Ruthless Stalker relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (70 of 2,265 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.19 · 16.7% (2 of 12 decks)
- Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (65 of 2,183 decks)
- The Master, Transcendent relevance 0.18 · 2.8% (63 of 2,280 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Sin, Spira's Punishment relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (81 of 3,547 decks)
- Zaxara, the Exemplary relevance 0.15 · 1.8% (210 of 11,743 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.14 · 8.1% (3 of 37 decks)
- Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (228 of 14,088 decks)
- Nocturno of Myra's Marvels // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.97 · 42.7% (10,799 of 25,314 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.92 · 40.9% (10,343 of 25,314 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.91 · 37.2% (9,425 of 25,314 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.89 · 38.2% (9,662 of 25,314 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.85 · 48.1% (12,183 of 25,314 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.84 · 57.9% (14,663 of 25,314 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.81 · 29.4% (7,430 of 25,314 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.81 · 34.7% (8,775 of 25,314 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.80 · 29.2% (7,395 of 25,314 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.78 · 29.4% (7,435 of 25,314 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.75 · 26.7% (6,749 of 25,314 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.72 · 27.2% (6,878 of 25,314 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.65 · 27.3% (6,908 of 25,314 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.64 · 21.3% (5,388 of 25,314 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.63 · 20.9% (5,284 of 25,314 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.63 · 22.9% (5,796 of 25,314 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.62 · 26.6% (6,729 of 25,314 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.61 · 22.2% (5,611 of 25,314 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.60 · 22.6% (5,709 of 25,314 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.60 · 19.3% (4,880 of 25,314 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 0.59 · 21.1% (5,343 of 25,314 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.59 · 19.2% (4,859 of 25,314 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.59 · 25.5% (6,444 of 25,314 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.56 · 18.8% (4,767 of 25,314 decks)
- Urborg Elf relevance 0.56 · 18.4% (4,661 of 25,314 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.55 · 20.4% (5,159 of 25,314 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.55 · 19.7% (4,983 of 25,314 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.55 · 18.9% (4,793 of 25,314 decks)
- Ravenous Chupacabra relevance 0.54 · 16.1% (4,081 of 25,314 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.54 · 15.1% (3,835 of 25,314 decks)
All creatures (40)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.97 · 42.7% (10,799 of 25,314 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.92 · 40.9% (10,343 of 25,314 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.91 · 37.2% (9,425 of 25,314 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.89 · 38.2% (9,662 of 25,314 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.85 · 48.1% (12,183 of 25,314 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.84 · 57.9% (14,663 of 25,314 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.81 · 29.4% (7,430 of 25,314 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.81 · 34.7% (8,775 of 25,314 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.80 · 29.2% (7,395 of 25,314 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.78 · 29.4% (7,435 of 25,314 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.75 · 26.7% (6,749 of 25,314 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.72 · 27.2% (6,878 of 25,314 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.65 · 27.3% (6,908 of 25,314 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.63 · 20.9% (5,284 of 25,314 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.63 · 22.9% (5,796 of 25,314 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.62 · 26.6% (6,729 of 25,314 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.61 · 22.2% (5,611 of 25,314 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.60 · 22.6% (5,709 of 25,314 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 0.59 · 21.1% (5,343 of 25,314 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.59 · 19.2% (4,859 of 25,314 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.59 · 25.5% (6,444 of 25,314 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.56 · 18.8% (4,767 of 25,314 decks)
- Urborg Elf relevance 0.56 · 18.4% (4,661 of 25,314 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.55 · 18.9% (4,793 of 25,314 decks)
- Ravenous Chupacabra relevance 0.54 · 16.1% (4,081 of 25,314 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.54 · 15.1% (3,835 of 25,314 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.53 · 18.4% (4,655 of 25,314 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.53 · 18.1% (4,582 of 25,314 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.53 · 29.9% (7,577 of 25,314 decks)
- Voracious Tome-Skimmer relevance 0.52 · 17.4% (4,414 of 25,314 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.52 · 17.6% (4,460 of 25,314 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.51 · 23.2% (5,868 of 25,314 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 0.50 · 16.5% (4,169 of 25,314 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.50 · 15.3% (3,868 of 25,314 decks)
- Oona, Queen of the Fae relevance 0.49 · 15.8% (4,012 of 25,314 decks)
- Tegwyll, Duke of Splendor relevance 0.49 · 15.7% (3,978 of 25,314 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.49 · 15.2% (3,839 of 25,314 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.48 · 13.8% (3,496 of 25,314 decks)
- Chomping Changeling relevance 0.48 · 17.1% (4,327 of 25,314 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.47 · 19.0% (4,805 of 25,314 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.64 · 21.3% (5,388 of 25,314 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.47 · 30.3% (7,682 of 25,314 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.55 · 20.4% (5,159 of 25,314 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.51 · 19.2% (4,850 of 25,314 decks)
All instants (4)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.60 · 19.3% (4,880 of 25,314 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.55 · 19.7% (4,983 of 25,314 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.52 · 35.2% (8,921 of 25,314 decks)
- Spell Stutter relevance 0.50 · 15.6% (3,950 of 25,314 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.55 · 38.4% (9,714 of 25,314 decks)
All lands (1)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.51 · 16.9% (4,283 of 25,314 decks)
EDH data for Reclamation Sage: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 25,314 real decks.