Change per day
Archetypes
83% of decks lean toward it
68% of decks lean toward it
18% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Ripples of Undeath
83% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Mystic Remora
68% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Snow-Covered Island
18% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 300 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Neoform
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
49% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Neoform 54%
- Eldritch Evolution 52%
- Diabolic Intent 15%
Cards like Mystic Remora
3.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other Sultai decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Mystic Remora 42%
- Rhystic Study 35%
Cards like Demonic Consultation
7.5× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Demonic Consultation 29%
- Tainted Pact 25%
Cards like Sol Ring
5.0× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 77% of other Sultai decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.84 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 73%
- Mana Vault 22%
- Grim Monolith 6%
- Basalt Monolith 3%
Cards like Force of Will
5.4× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Force of Will 29%
- Force of Negation 28%
Cards like Training Grounds
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
4.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Sultai decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Chrome Mox
4.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 22%
- Mox Diamond 19%
Cards like Flusterstorm
5.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Flusterstorm 24%
- Mental Misstep 23%
- Dispel 9%
- Miscast 3%
Other options: Spell Blast, Spell Burst, Clash of Wills
Cards like Sacrifice
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Sacrifice 20%
- Culling the Weak 13%
- Metamorphosis 1%
Cards like Fierce Guardianship
2.0× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Sultai decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Counterspell
1.6× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 42% of other Sultai decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Sultai decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.52 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Counterspell 39%
- Negate 17%
- Spell Snare 5%
- Stern Scolding 4%
Other options: Essence Scatter, Remove Soul, Minor Misstep, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit
Cards like Talisman of Dominance
1.5× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Sultai decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other Sultai decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Birthing Pod
8.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Thought Scour
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Swan Song
5.7× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Sultai decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Swan Song 41%
- Strix Serenade 6%
Cards like Animate Dead
2.0× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Sultai decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Animate Dead 22%
- Necromancy 7%
- Dance of the Dead 3%
Cards like Eternal Witness
1.5× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Sultai decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Brainstorm
14× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 22%
- Brainsurge 4%
Cards like Reanimate
5.0× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Sultai decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Reanimate 45%
- Life // Death 6%
Cards like Toxic Deluge
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Toxic Deluge 39%
- Languish 5%
Other options: Nausea, Drown in Sorrow, Shrivel, Mephitic Vapors, Festergloom, Infest, Withering Curse
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 28% of other Sultai decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Sultai decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.59 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 28%
- Elvish Mystic 20%
- Fyndhorn Elves 14%
Other options: Boreal Druid, Golden Hind, Urborg Elf, Llanowar Tribe, Bog Initiate, Fyndhorn Elder, Leaf Gilder, Nantuko Elder, Llanowar Dead, Greenweaver Druid, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Apprentice Wizard, Wirewood Elf, Woodland Mystic, Rootrider Faun, Orochi Sustainer, Sea Scryer
Cards like Lotus Petal
4.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Mystical Tutor
5.5× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Merchant Scroll, Eerie Procession
Cards like Deathrite Shaman
5.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Fact or Fiction
13× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Epiphany at the Drownyard, Fortune's Favor, Truth or Tale
Cards like Dig Through Time
13× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Windfall
4.6× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Cyclonic Rift
4.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
4.2× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Koma, Cosmos Serpent
2.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.78 · 35.9% (1,114 of 3,107 decks)
- Neoform relevance 0.65 · 54.4% (1,690 of 3,107 decks)
- Sacrifice relevance 0.90 · 20.3% (630 of 3,107 decks)
- Scholar of the Lost Trove relevance 0.90 · 17.1% (532 of 3,107 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.77 · 28.2% (875 of 3,107 decks)
- Hazel's Brewmaster relevance 0.82 · 22.7% (705 of 3,107 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.60 · 52.0% (1,615 of 3,107 decks)
- Biomancer's Familiar relevance 0.81 · 22.4% (696 of 3,107 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.70 · 31.2% (970 of 3,107 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.77 · 18.0% (558 of 3,107 decks)
- Hoarding Broodlord relevance 0.74 · 20.1% (625 of 3,107 decks)
- Toxrill, the Corrosive relevance 0.68 · 24.7% (768 of 3,107 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.72 · 16.6% (515 of 3,107 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.65 · 25.2% (782 of 3,107 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.76 · 12.6% (392 of 3,107 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.59 · 33.2% (1,030 of 3,107 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.66 · 20.1% (626 of 3,107 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.65 · 20.1% (625 of 3,107 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.65 · 20.5% (636 of 3,107 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.71 · 12.8% (397 of 3,107 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.70 · 12.9% (401 of 3,107 decks)
- Peer into the Abyss relevance 0.76 · 8.9% (276 of 3,107 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.63 · 18.4% (573 of 3,107 decks)
- Mental Note relevance 0.80 · 6.1% (189 of 3,107 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.67 · 13.2% (409 of 3,107 decks)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.77 · 6.7% (208 of 3,107 decks)
- Yawgmoth's Will relevance 0.67 · 12.7% (394 of 3,107 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.82 · 4.8% (150 of 3,107 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.80 · 5.4% (167 of 3,107 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.55 · 29.1% (903 of 3,107 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.64 · 14.4% (446 of 3,107 decks)
- Sauron's Ransom relevance 0.81 · 4.9% (151 of 3,107 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.56 · 24.8% (770 of 3,107 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.70 · 10.1% (314 of 3,107 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.70 · 9.6% (297 of 3,107 decks)
- Saw in Half relevance 0.59 · 19.3% (601 of 3,107 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.56 · 22.8% (709 of 3,107 decks)
- Murderous Cut relevance 0.74 · 6.2% (194 of 3,107 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.69 · 9.2% (285 of 3,107 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.71 · 7.9% (244 of 3,107 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.64 · 12.0% (373 of 3,107 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.56 · 19.5% (607 of 3,107 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.58 · 15.7% (489 of 3,107 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.59 · 14.9% (462 of 3,107 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.50 · 30.2% (937 of 3,107 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.52 · 25.4% (790 of 3,107 decks)
- Fatal Push relevance 0.71 · 6.7% (209 of 3,107 decks)
- Languish relevance 0.77 · 4.7% (145 of 3,107 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.50 · 29.9% (929 of 3,107 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.64 · 10.7% (332 of 3,107 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.78 · 35.9% (1,114 of 3,107 decks)
- Scholar of the Lost Trove relevance 0.90 · 17.1% (532 of 3,107 decks)
- Hazel's Brewmaster relevance 0.82 · 22.7% (705 of 3,107 decks)
- Biomancer's Familiar relevance 0.81 · 22.4% (696 of 3,107 decks)
- Hoarding Broodlord relevance 0.74 · 20.1% (625 of 3,107 decks)
- Toxrill, the Corrosive relevance 0.68 · 24.7% (768 of 3,107 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.59 · 33.2% (1,030 of 3,107 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.66 · 20.1% (626 of 3,107 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.65 · 20.5% (636 of 3,107 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.63 · 18.4% (573 of 3,107 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.67 · 13.2% (409 of 3,107 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.70 · 10.1% (314 of 3,107 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.70 · 9.6% (297 of 3,107 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.71 · 7.9% (244 of 3,107 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.50 · 29.9% (929 of 3,107 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 0.54 · 21.0% (654 of 3,107 decks)
- The Cabbage Merchant relevance 0.63 · 10.0% (310 of 3,107 decks)
- Endurance relevance 0.58 · 13.9% (432 of 3,107 decks)
- Elvish Spirit Guide relevance 0.54 · 18.1% (562 of 3,107 decks)
- Notion Thief relevance 0.56 · 13.8% (430 of 3,107 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.48 · 26.9% (835 of 3,107 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.53 · 14.9% (463 of 3,107 decks)
- Opposition Agent relevance 0.53 · 15.8% (492 of 3,107 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.54 · 13.9% (432 of 3,107 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.60 · 8.3% (258 of 3,107 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 0.56 · 10.8% (336 of 3,107 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.42 · 33.3% (1,036 of 3,107 decks)
- Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.35 · 47.2% (1,468 of 3,107 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.60 · 5.2% (162 of 3,107 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.49 · 11.2% (348 of 3,107 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.39 · 29.4% (912 of 3,107 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.43 · 17.5% (545 of 3,107 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.49 · 10.7% (333 of 3,107 decks)
- Psychic Frog relevance 0.49 · 10.1% (314 of 3,107 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.54 · 6.1% (189 of 3,107 decks)
- Cosmogoyf relevance 0.68 · 3.7% (116 of 3,107 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.53 · 6.6% (206 of 3,107 decks)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 0.42 · 14.0% (435 of 3,107 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.40 · 16.9% (524 of 3,107 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.66 · 3.5% (110 of 3,107 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.29 · 47.5% (1,476 of 3,107 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.51 · 5.2% (163 of 3,107 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.48 · 7.7% (238 of 3,107 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (242 of 3,107 decks)
- Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 0.46 · 7.8% (241 of 3,107 decks)
- Dauthi Voidwalker relevance 0.40 · 13.8% (428 of 3,107 decks)
- Golgari Grave-Troll relevance 0.47 · 6.1% (188 of 3,107 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.48 · 5.1% (157 of 3,107 decks)
- Palinchron relevance 0.68 · 2.8% (88 of 3,107 decks)
- Protean Hulk relevance 0.59 · 3.7% (116 of 3,107 decks)
All artifacts (34)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.70 · 31.2% (970 of 3,107 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.77 · 18.0% (558 of 3,107 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.76 · 12.6% (392 of 3,107 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.53 · 22.5% (698 of 3,107 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.55 · 15.5% (483 of 3,107 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.53 · 18.5% (575 of 3,107 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.51 · 21.9% (680 of 3,107 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.46 · 27.4% (850 of 3,107 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.62 · 6.1% (191 of 3,107 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.59 · 8.1% (252 of 3,107 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.45 · 12.4% (386 of 3,107 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.37 · 26.2% (815 of 3,107 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.44 · 13.2% (411 of 3,107 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.45 · 12.0% (372 of 3,107 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.50 · 5.9% (184 of 3,107 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.48 · 5.2% (161 of 3,107 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.42 · 9.0% (281 of 3,107 decks)
- Talisman of Dominance relevance 0.34 · 21.0% (651 of 3,107 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.33 · 18.7% (581 of 3,107 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.33 · 16.2% (502 of 3,107 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.57 · 2.9% (89 of 3,107 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.52 · 3.1% (95 of 3,107 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.38 · 5.0% (154 of 3,107 decks)
- Perpetual Timepiece relevance 0.44 · 4.0% (123 of 3,107 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.44 · 2.7% (83 of 3,107 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.28 · 7.7% (239 of 3,107 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.27 · 6.2% (194 of 3,107 decks)
- Mesmeric Orb relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (140 of 3,107 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.36 · 2.6% (80 of 3,107 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (84 of 3,107 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.30 · 2.5% (77 of 3,107 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.20 · 4.3% (133 of 3,107 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 55.5% (1,724 of 3,107 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 72.6% (2,256 of 3,107 decks)
All enchantments (34)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.77 · 28.2% (875 of 3,107 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.59 · 13.1% (406 of 3,107 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.55 · 15.0% (466 of 3,107 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.52 · 17.6% (547 of 3,107 decks)
- Fire Nation Occupation relevance 0.87 · 3.4% (106 of 3,107 decks)
- Birthing Ritual relevance 0.64 · 5.3% (166 of 3,107 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.37 · 41.8% (1,298 of 3,107 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.57 · 7.5% (233 of 3,107 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.75 · 3.5% (110 of 3,107 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.42 · 17.2% (534 of 3,107 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.32 · 35.4% (1,099 of 3,107 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.36 · 22.3% (694 of 3,107 decks)
- Necromancy relevance 0.47 · 7.0% (216 of 3,107 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.44 · 9.8% (305 of 3,107 decks)
- Pernicious Deed relevance 0.48 · 5.9% (183 of 3,107 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.45 · 6.1% (190 of 3,107 decks)
- Sultai Ascendancy relevance 0.48 · 4.6% (143 of 3,107 decks)
- Ripples of Undeath relevance 0.32 · 21.0% (651 of 3,107 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.43 · 5.2% (162 of 3,107 decks)
- Titans' Nest relevance 0.46 · 4.6% (142 of 3,107 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.55 · 2.7% (83 of 3,107 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.41 · 4.3% (134 of 3,107 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.54 · 2.5% (79 of 3,107 decks)
- Dance of the Dead relevance 0.50 · 2.8% (86 of 3,107 decks)
- Awaken the Honored Dead relevance 0.36 · 4.6% (144 of 3,107 decks)
- Deadbridge Chant relevance 0.46 · 2.8% (87 of 3,107 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.32 · 5.6% (174 of 3,107 decks)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (115 of 3,107 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.44 · 2.7% (84 of 3,107 decks)
- Teval's Judgment relevance 0.29 · 6.5% (202 of 3,107 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.36 · 3.6% (112 of 3,107 decks)
- Insidious Roots relevance 0.31 · 3.6% (112 of 3,107 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.34 · 2.5% (78 of 3,107 decks)
- Phyrexian Reclamation relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (82 of 3,107 decks)
All instants (50)
- Sacrifice relevance 0.90 · 20.3% (630 of 3,107 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.72 · 16.6% (515 of 3,107 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.65 · 25.2% (782 of 3,107 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.65 · 20.1% (625 of 3,107 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.71 · 12.8% (397 of 3,107 decks)
- Mental Note relevance 0.80 · 6.1% (189 of 3,107 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.82 · 4.8% (150 of 3,107 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.80 · 5.4% (167 of 3,107 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.55 · 29.1% (903 of 3,107 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.64 · 14.4% (446 of 3,107 decks)
- Sauron's Ransom relevance 0.81 · 4.9% (151 of 3,107 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.56 · 24.8% (770 of 3,107 decks)
- Saw in Half relevance 0.59 · 19.3% (601 of 3,107 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.56 · 22.8% (709 of 3,107 decks)
- Murderous Cut relevance 0.74 · 6.2% (194 of 3,107 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.64 · 12.0% (373 of 3,107 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.56 · 19.5% (607 of 3,107 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.58 · 15.7% (489 of 3,107 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.50 · 30.2% (937 of 3,107 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.52 · 25.4% (790 of 3,107 decks)
- Fatal Push relevance 0.71 · 6.7% (209 of 3,107 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.64 · 10.7% (332 of 3,107 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.50 · 27.9% (867 of 3,107 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.52 · 23.8% (738 of 3,107 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.58 · 13.3% (412 of 3,107 decks)
- Cling to Dust relevance 0.76 · 4.5% (140 of 3,107 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.77 · 4.4% (137 of 3,107 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.44 · 38.3% (1,189 of 3,107 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.54 · 17.5% (544 of 3,107 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.55 · 15.6% (486 of 3,107 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 0.82 · 3.9% (122 of 3,107 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.68 · 5.8% (181 of 3,107 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.48 · 28.7% (892 of 3,107 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.49 · 25.9% (806 of 3,107 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.47 · 28.7% (891 of 3,107 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.84 · 3.7% (114 of 3,107 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.68 · 5.2% (161 of 3,107 decks)
- Dismember relevance 0.65 · 6.8% (212 of 3,107 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.67 · 5.5% (172 of 3,107 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.70 · 4.7% (146 of 3,107 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.52 · 15.5% (481 of 3,107 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.61 · 8.7% (269 of 3,107 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.49 · 22.1% (687 of 3,107 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.65 · 5.5% (171 of 3,107 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.63 · 7.2% (225 of 3,107 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.52 · 14.8% (460 of 3,107 decks)
- Rakshasa's Bargain relevance 0.58 · 10.2% (317 of 3,107 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.65 · 5.1% (157 of 3,107 decks)
- Cut Down relevance 0.76 · 3.9% (122 of 3,107 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.68 · 4.5% (141 of 3,107 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Neoform relevance 0.65 · 54.4% (1,690 of 3,107 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.60 · 52.0% (1,615 of 3,107 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.70 · 12.9% (401 of 3,107 decks)
- Peer into the Abyss relevance 0.76 · 8.9% (276 of 3,107 decks)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.77 · 6.7% (208 of 3,107 decks)
- Yawgmoth's Will relevance 0.67 · 12.7% (394 of 3,107 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.59 · 14.9% (462 of 3,107 decks)
- Languish relevance 0.77 · 4.7% (145 of 3,107 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.62 · 11.7% (362 of 3,107 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.59 · 14.1% (439 of 3,107 decks)
- Thoughtseize relevance 0.76 · 4.6% (142 of 3,107 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.52 · 21.8% (676 of 3,107 decks)
- Praetor's Grasp relevance 0.64 · 8.9% (275 of 3,107 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.50 · 23.5% (731 of 3,107 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.64 · 7.3% (226 of 3,107 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.53 · 16.3% (505 of 3,107 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.40 · 41.9% (1,302 of 3,107 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.57 · 11.5% (356 of 3,107 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.63 · 5.9% (184 of 3,107 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.58 · 9.5% (295 of 3,107 decks)
- Life // Death relevance 0.60 · 6.0% (186 of 3,107 decks)
- Inquisition of Kozilek relevance 0.81 · 3.3% (101 of 3,107 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.47 · 15.0% (467 of 3,107 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.35 · 39.0% (1,213 of 3,107 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.48 · 11.9% (370 of 3,107 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.45 · 13.3% (413 of 3,107 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.33 · 38.9% (1,209 of 3,107 decks)
- Duress relevance 0.69 · 3.1% (95 of 3,107 decks)
- Vicious Rivalry relevance 0.58 · 4.0% (125 of 3,107 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.66 · 3.0% (93 of 3,107 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.27 · 45.4% (1,412 of 3,107 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.50 · 4.6% (142 of 3,107 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.60 · 3.2% (98 of 3,107 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.44 · 6.0% (186 of 3,107 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.45 · 4.8% (150 of 3,107 decks)
- Chain of Smog relevance 0.61 · 3.0% (93 of 3,107 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.35 · 16.1% (500 of 3,107 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.41 · 7.1% (222 of 3,107 decks)
- Dark Petition relevance 0.62 · 2.7% (84 of 3,107 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.59 · 3.0% (93 of 3,107 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.41 · 6.3% (196 of 3,107 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.37 · 10.4% (322 of 3,107 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.31 · 24.0% (745 of 3,107 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.52 · 3.7% (115 of 3,107 decks)
- Mnemonic Betrayal relevance 0.51 · 3.6% (111 of 3,107 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.52 · 3.4% (107 of 3,107 decks)
- Demonic Counsel relevance 0.55 · 3.0% (93 of 3,107 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.42 · 4.6% (142 of 3,107 decks)
- Emergent Ultimatum relevance 0.47 · 3.8% (118 of 3,107 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.34 · 10.9% (340 of 3,107 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (8)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.69 · 9.2% (285 of 3,107 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.58 · 13.0% (403 of 3,107 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (333 of 3,107 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.70 · 4.1% (128 of 3,107 decks)
- Ashiok, Dream Render relevance 0.52 · 8.9% (275 of 3,107 decks)
- Jace, Vryn's Prodigy // Jace, Telepath Unbound relevance 0.71 · 3.6% (113 of 3,107 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.65 · 3.8% (119 of 3,107 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.52 · 2.7% (83 of 3,107 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.57 · 15.5% (483 of 3,107 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.55 · 11.3% (350 of 3,107 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.53 · 8.9% (278 of 3,107 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 0.76 · 3.2% (99 of 3,107 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.49 · 10.4% (323 of 3,107 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.35 · 37.1% (1,153 of 3,107 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.48 · 10.4% (323 of 3,107 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.42 · 15.5% (482 of 3,107 decks)
- Barren Moor relevance 0.57 · 4.5% (141 of 3,107 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.57 · 4.5% (139 of 3,107 decks)
- Nurturing Peatland relevance 0.50 · 7.4% (231 of 3,107 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.42 · 14.5% (450 of 3,107 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.34 · 31.1% (967 of 3,107 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.49 · 5.2% (162 of 3,107 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.30 · 41.0% (1,274 of 3,107 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.54 · 4.3% (134 of 3,107 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.39 · 14.0% (436 of 3,107 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.38 · 15.1% (469 of 3,107 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.46 · 6.9% (215 of 3,107 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.36 · 17.4% (541 of 3,107 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.32 · 27.7% (862 of 3,107 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.31 · 29.6% (919 of 3,107 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.44 · 7.2% (225 of 3,107 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.34 · 20.0% (622 of 3,107 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.54 · 3.7% (116 of 3,107 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.39 · 8.8% (274 of 3,107 decks)
- Dakmor Salvage relevance 0.40 · 7.2% (225 of 3,107 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.39 · 8.0% (250 of 3,107 decks)
- Creeping Tar Pit relevance 0.53 · 3.3% (104 of 3,107 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.49 · 3.7% (115 of 3,107 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.49 · 3.6% (111 of 3,107 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.39 · 4.2% (131 of 3,107 decks)
- Kishla Village relevance 0.41 · 3.7% (114 of 3,107 decks)
- Festering Thicket relevance 0.44 · 3.2% (98 of 3,107 decks)
- Fetid Pools relevance 0.30 · 8.1% (252 of 3,107 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (166 of 3,107 decks)
- Foreboding Landscape relevance 0.26 · 14.2% (440 of 3,107 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.37 · 4.0% (124 of 3,107 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.23 · 20.3% (631 of 3,107 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.30 · 5.8% (179 of 3,107 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.29 · 7.1% (221 of 3,107 decks)
- Zagoth Triome relevance 0.20 · 29.9% (928 of 3,107 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (156 of 3,107 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.42 · 2.5% (78 of 3,107 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.35 · 3.5% (109 of 3,107 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.36 · 3.2% (98 of 3,107 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.25 · 6.7% (207 of 3,107 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.23 · 9.8% (303 of 3,107 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.38 · 2.6% (80 of 3,107 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.38 · 2.5% (78 of 3,107 decks)
All lands (50)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.48 · 36.0% (1,120 of 3,107 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.47 · 35.7% (1,110 of 3,107 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.46 · 36.9% (1,148 of 3,107 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.45 · 39.1% (1,216 of 3,107 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.71 · 5.7% (178 of 3,107 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.44 · 38.7% (1,202 of 3,107 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.45 · 35.5% (1,103 of 3,107 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.51 · 18.8% (584 of 3,107 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.45 · 27.8% (864 of 3,107 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.43 · 29.8% (925 of 3,107 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.45 · 22.4% (697 of 3,107 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.56 · 8.3% (259 of 3,107 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.38 · 31.6% (983 of 3,107 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.47 · 13.3% (414 of 3,107 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.47 · 13.2% (410 of 3,107 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.38 · 31.9% (990 of 3,107 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.37 · 32.1% (997 of 3,107 decks)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.59 · 4.6% (144 of 3,107 decks)
- River of Tears relevance 0.61 · 4.3% (133 of 3,107 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.45 · 10.5% (325 of 3,107 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.44 · 9.7% (302 of 3,107 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.42 · 10.3% (319 of 3,107 decks)
- Darkslick Shores relevance 0.45 · 6.7% (207 of 3,107 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.43 · 8.3% (259 of 3,107 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.46 · 5.6% (175 of 3,107 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.46 · 5.1% (158 of 3,107 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.45 · 5.6% (173 of 3,107 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.44 · 5.1% (157 of 3,107 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.22 · 57.6% (1,791 of 3,107 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.22 · 57.6% (1,791 of 3,107 decks)
- Blooming Marsh relevance 0.44 · 4.9% (153 of 3,107 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.21 · 59.2% (1,840 of 3,107 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.32 · 19.1% (594 of 3,107 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.41 · 5.7% (178 of 3,107 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.30 · 22.8% (707 of 3,107 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.60 · 2.7% (83 of 3,107 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.39 · 7.5% (233 of 3,107 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.38 · 7.5% (234 of 3,107 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.27 · 27.2% (845 of 3,107 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.39 · 5.5% (171 of 3,107 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.38 · 5.0% (156 of 3,107 decks)
- Phyrexian Tower relevance 0.39 · 4.6% (143 of 3,107 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.28 · 17.1% (531 of 3,107 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.28 · 17.3% (536 of 3,107 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.31 · 10.9% (338 of 3,107 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.31 · 10.8% (337 of 3,107 decks)
- Vernal Fen relevance 0.35 · 5.3% (164 of 3,107 decks)
- Twilight Mire relevance 0.33 · 8.0% (249 of 3,107 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.24 · 29.6% (920 of 3,107 decks)
- Wastewood Verge relevance 0.34 · 5.1% (158 of 3,107 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Tasigur, the Golden Fang, from 3,107 real Commander decks.