Cards like Branching Evolution
4.4× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Sultai decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Cultivate
1.7× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other Sultai decks
52% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other Sultai decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.95 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Cultivate 50%
- Rampant Growth 47%
- Kodama's Reach 40%
- Explosive Vegetation 11%
- Shared Roots 5%
- Search for Tomorrow 3%
- Migration Path 3%
- Grow from the Ashes 2%
Other options: Terramorph, Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Primal Growth, Map the Wastes, Path to the Festival, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, They Went This Way, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Roamer's Routine, New Generation's Technique, Beneath the Sands, Deep Reconnaissance
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Simic Signet
4.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Simic Signet 29%
- Golgari Signet 24%
- Dimir Signet 21%
Cards like Kami of Whispered Hopes
6.2× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Sultai decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Kami of Whispered Hopes 31%
- Gyre Sage 25%
- Incubation Druid 14%
Cards like Counterspell
2.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 42% of other Sultai decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Sultai decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Counterspell 48%
- Negate 34%
- Essence Scatter 2%
- Remove Soul 1%
Other options: Wash Away, Disruption Protocol, Flash Counter, Minor Misstep, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, False Summoning, Nullify, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Wild Unraveling, Outwit
Cards like Tuskguard Captain
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Tuskguard Captain 17%
- Duskshell Crawler 13%
- Zegana, Utopian Speaker 8%
- Crowned Ceratok 2%
- Pridemalkin 2%
Other options: Gnarlid Colony, Drix Fatemaker, Baloth Pup, Trollbred Guardian
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
2.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Sultai decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 42%
- Lightning Greaves 29%
Cards like Hydra's Growth
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Hydra's Growth 29%
- Level Up 9%
- Seismic Tutelage 1%
Cards like Invigorating Surge
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 28% of other Sultai decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Sultai decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 34%
- Elvish Mystic 20%
- Urborg Elf 18%
- Fyndhorn Elves 8%
- Gyre Engineer 1%
Other options: Rootrider Faun, Boreal Druid, Llanowar Dead, Greenweaver Druid, Druid of the Cowl, Goobbue Gardener, Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Ozolith, the Shattered Spire
11× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Heroic Intervention
4.7× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Sultai decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Arcane Signet
2.4× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 68% of other Sultai decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.71 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 63%
- Commander's Sphere 10%
Cards like Gaea's Gift
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Snakeskin Veil
3.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Sultai decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Woodcutter's Grit
Cards like Bristly Bill, Spine Sower
3.5× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Sultai decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Floral Evoker, Oran-Rief Hydra, Vinelasher Kudzu, Foe-liage, Territorial Scythecat, Murasa Ranger, Undergrowth Champion, Seedship Agrarian, Sazh's Chocobo
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Sultai decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 20%
- Mystic Remora 12%
Cards like Doubling Season
1.6× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Sultai decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
1.2× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 77% of other Sultai decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.84 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Assassin's Trophy
3.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Assassin's Trophy 36%
- Deathsprout 7%
All top picks (50)
- Hagra Constrictor relevance 0.74 · 31.6% (95 of 301 decks)
- Mer-Ek Nightblade relevance 0.75 · 18.3% (55 of 301 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.55 · 40.5% (122 of 301 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 0.68 · 16.9% (51 of 301 decks)
- Necropolis Regent relevance 0.58 · 28.2% (85 of 301 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 0.57 · 29.2% (88 of 301 decks)
- Invigorating Surge relevance 0.59 · 23.9% (72 of 301 decks)
- Tanazir Quandrix relevance 0.61 · 20.3% (61 of 301 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.52 · 35.2% (106 of 301 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.43 · 52.2% (157 of 301 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.55 · 24.3% (73 of 301 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.52 · 28.6% (86 of 301 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.59 · 15.0% (45 of 301 decks)
- Jade Orb of Dragonkind relevance 0.67 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Crux of Fate relevance 0.54 · 19.3% (58 of 301 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.53 · 21.9% (66 of 301 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.56 · 15.0% (45 of 301 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.49 · 29.2% (88 of 301 decks)
- Ancient Bronze Dragon relevance 0.56 · 15.0% (45 of 301 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.52 · 17.3% (52 of 301 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.39 · 42.2% (127 of 301 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.43 · 31.9% (96 of 301 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.48 · 18.9% (57 of 301 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.51 · 14.0% (42 of 301 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.45 · 23.6% (71 of 301 decks)
- Ring of Xathrid relevance 0.59 · 7.3% (22 of 301 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 0.32 · 56.8% (171 of 301 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.43 · 27.9% (84 of 301 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.44 · 24.6% (74 of 301 decks)
- Dragonstorm Globe relevance 0.57 · 7.6% (23 of 301 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.49 · 13.0% (39 of 301 decks)
- Zegana, Utopian Speaker relevance 0.55 · 8.0% (24 of 301 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.39 · 30.9% (93 of 301 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.45 · 15.6% (47 of 301 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 0.54 · 6.6% (20 of 301 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.40 · 26.6% (80 of 301 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.38 · 30.9% (93 of 301 decks)
- Oblivion's Hunger relevance 0.55 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.50 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Visions of Dominance relevance 0.51 · 7.6% (23 of 301 decks)
- Clamavus relevance 0.52 · 6.6% (20 of 301 decks)
- Solidarity of Heroes relevance 0.51 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.38 · 25.2% (76 of 301 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.40 · 19.6% (59 of 301 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.50 · 6.6% (20 of 301 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.36 · 28.6% (86 of 301 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.40 · 18.3% (55 of 301 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.40 · 15.3% (46 of 301 decks)
- Whirlwing Stormbrood // Dynamic Soar relevance 0.50 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.29 · 45.8% (138 of 301 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Hagra Constrictor relevance 0.74 · 31.6% (95 of 301 decks)
- Mer-Ek Nightblade relevance 0.75 · 18.3% (55 of 301 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.55 · 40.5% (122 of 301 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 0.68 · 16.9% (51 of 301 decks)
- Necropolis Regent relevance 0.58 · 28.2% (85 of 301 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 0.57 · 29.2% (88 of 301 decks)
- Tanazir Quandrix relevance 0.61 · 20.3% (61 of 301 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.43 · 52.2% (157 of 301 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.52 · 28.6% (86 of 301 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.53 · 21.9% (66 of 301 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.56 · 15.0% (45 of 301 decks)
- Ancient Bronze Dragon relevance 0.56 · 15.0% (45 of 301 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.39 · 42.2% (127 of 301 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.48 · 18.9% (57 of 301 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.51 · 14.0% (42 of 301 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.45 · 23.6% (71 of 301 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 0.32 · 56.8% (171 of 301 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.43 · 27.9% (84 of 301 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.44 · 24.6% (74 of 301 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.49 · 13.0% (39 of 301 decks)
- Zegana, Utopian Speaker relevance 0.55 · 8.0% (24 of 301 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.45 · 15.6% (47 of 301 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.40 · 26.6% (80 of 301 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.38 · 30.9% (93 of 301 decks)
- Clamavus relevance 0.52 · 6.6% (20 of 301 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.38 · 25.2% (76 of 301 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.50 · 6.6% (20 of 301 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.40 · 15.3% (46 of 301 decks)
- Whirlwing Stormbrood // Dynamic Soar relevance 0.50 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Scaled Nurturer relevance 0.54 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Host of the Hereafter relevance 0.45 · 9.3% (28 of 301 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.38 · 17.3% (52 of 301 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.33 · 31.2% (94 of 301 decks)
- Pir, Imaginative Rascal relevance 0.46 · 7.3% (22 of 301 decks)
- Scavenger Regent // Exude Toxin relevance 0.45 · 5.6% (17 of 301 decks)
- Railway Brawler relevance 0.42 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.40 · 10.6% (32 of 301 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 0.45 · 5.6% (17 of 301 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.33 · 23.3% (70 of 301 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.34 · 19.9% (60 of 301 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.31 · 28.6% (86 of 301 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.44 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Korlessa, Scale Singer relevance 0.52 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 0.30 · 27.6% (83 of 301 decks)
- Urborg Elf relevance 0.32 · 18.3% (55 of 301 decks)
- Renari, Merchant of Marvels relevance 0.54 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Jugan, the Rising Star relevance 0.51 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.41 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Ambitious Dragonborn relevance 0.50 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Draconic Muralists relevance 0.51 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Jade Orb of Dragonkind relevance 0.67 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.43 · 31.9% (96 of 301 decks)
- Ring of Xathrid relevance 0.59 · 7.3% (22 of 301 decks)
- Dragonstorm Globe relevance 0.57 · 7.6% (23 of 301 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 0.54 · 6.6% (20 of 301 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.40 · 18.3% (55 of 301 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.46 · 9.3% (28 of 301 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.35 · 27.9% (84 of 301 decks)
- Mask of Riddles relevance 0.45 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Bone Sabres relevance 0.46 · 7.6% (23 of 301 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.38 · 16.3% (49 of 301 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.33 · 29.2% (88 of 301 decks)
- Ring of Kalonia relevance 0.48 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.35 · 15.3% (46 of 301 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.32 · 23.6% (71 of 301 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.39 · 10.0% (30 of 301 decks)
- Lapis Orb of Dragonkind relevance 0.55 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.31 · 20.9% (63 of 301 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.36 · 9.6% (29 of 301 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.38 · 6.6% (20 of 301 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.34 · 9.3% (28 of 301 decks)
- Dragon's Hoard relevance 0.48 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.29 · 13.0% (39 of 301 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.20 · 41.9% (126 of 301 decks)
- Grappling Hook relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Fractal Harness relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.28 · 10.0% (30 of 301 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.31 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.31 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.27 · 9.3% (28 of 301 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.33 · 4.0% (12 of 301 decks)
- Hunter's Bow relevance 0.39 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Mask of Memory relevance 0.35 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.34 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.27 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (86 of 301 decks)
- Sultai Banner relevance 0.32 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.23 · 7.3% (22 of 301 decks)
- Brass Knuckles relevance 0.34 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.19 · 13.3% (40 of 301 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (19 of 301 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.23 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Leyline Axe relevance 0.26 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.19 · 11.0% (33 of 301 decks)
- Sword of Vengeance relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.19 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.26 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Sword of Fire and Ice relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.52 · 35.2% (106 of 301 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.49 · 29.2% (88 of 301 decks)
- Primal Empathy relevance 0.52 · 17.3% (52 of 301 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.39 · 30.9% (93 of 301 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.29 · 45.8% (138 of 301 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.44 · 9.3% (28 of 301 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.28 · 40.5% (122 of 301 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.34 · 21.6% (65 of 301 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.31 · 24.6% (74 of 301 decks)
- Phyresis relevance 0.41 · 6.3% (19 of 301 decks)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.42 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.32 · 17.9% (54 of 301 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.32 · 12.6% (38 of 301 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.36 · 6.3% (19 of 301 decks)
- Death's Presence relevance 0.39 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.28 · 17.6% (53 of 301 decks)
- Retribution of the Ancients relevance 0.35 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.35 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.32 · 5.6% (17 of 301 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Frontier Siege relevance 0.40 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.33 · 4.0% (12 of 301 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.36 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.31 · 4.0% (12 of 301 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.26 · 7.3% (22 of 301 decks)
- Cloak of Mists relevance 0.34 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.33 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.19 · 20.3% (61 of 301 decks)
- Aether Tunnel relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.24 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.22 · 8.0% (24 of 301 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.22 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.19 · 12.3% (37 of 301 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Hollowmurk Siege relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Beorn's Hospitality relevance 0.30 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- The Eldest Reborn relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.18 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.17 · 5.6% (17 of 301 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (12 of 301 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Pernicious Deed relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (12 of 301 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
All instants (50)
- Invigorating Surge relevance 0.59 · 23.9% (72 of 301 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.55 · 24.3% (73 of 301 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.59 · 15.0% (45 of 301 decks)
- Oblivion's Hunger relevance 0.55 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Solidarity of Heroes relevance 0.51 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.36 · 28.6% (86 of 301 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.41 · 12.0% (36 of 301 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.43 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.43 · 6.3% (19 of 301 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.34 · 19.6% (59 of 301 decks)
- Sultai Charm relevance 0.34 · 16.9% (51 of 301 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.37 · 11.3% (34 of 301 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.34 · 13.3% (40 of 301 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.28 · 29.9% (90 of 301 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.37 · 8.6% (26 of 301 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.23 · 33.9% (102 of 301 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.32 · 9.3% (28 of 301 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.32 · 9.0% (27 of 301 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.24 · 30.9% (93 of 301 decks)
- Deathsprout relevance 0.33 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Draconic Lore relevance 0.49 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.31 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.31 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Hunter's Mark relevance 0.47 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Fate Transfer relevance 0.40 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Go for the Throat relevance 0.30 · 6.3% (19 of 301 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.27 · 9.6% (29 of 301 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.38 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.18 · 37.2% (112 of 301 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.36 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.24 · 12.3% (37 of 301 decks)
- Dispelling Exhale relevance 0.39 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Unravel the Aether relevance 0.40 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Tainted Strike relevance 0.32 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.22 · 13.3% (40 of 301 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.18 · 29.2% (88 of 301 decks)
- Quandrix Command relevance 0.33 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.35 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.29 · 4.0% (12 of 301 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.21 · 13.0% (39 of 301 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.20 · 16.3% (49 of 301 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.29 · 4.0% (12 of 301 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.20 · 15.9% (48 of 301 decks)
- Countersquall relevance 0.31 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.19 · 16.6% (50 of 301 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.13 · 47.5% (143 of 301 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.16 · 25.9% (78 of 301 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.18 · 11.6% (35 of 301 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Crux of Fate relevance 0.54 · 19.3% (58 of 301 decks)
- Visions of Dominance relevance 0.51 · 7.6% (23 of 301 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.40 · 19.6% (59 of 301 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.41 · 11.3% (34 of 301 decks)
- Soul's Might relevance 0.53 · 4.0% (12 of 301 decks)
- Growth Curve relevance 0.43 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.30 · 18.6% (56 of 301 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.34 · 10.3% (31 of 301 decks)
- Read the Bones relevance 0.37 · 5.6% (17 of 301 decks)
- Fearsome Awakening relevance 0.51 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Painful Truths relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.22 · 39.5% (119 of 301 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.32 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- In Garruk's Wake relevance 0.33 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.33 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.33 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Hunter's Edge relevance 0.47 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Night's Whisper relevance 0.31 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.29 · 7.6% (23 of 301 decks)
- Lessons from Life relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.28 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (19 of 301 decks)
- Give // Take relevance 0.38 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.15 · 47.2% (142 of 301 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.32 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Vigor Mortis relevance 0.38 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.31 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.23 · 7.0% (21 of 301 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.13 · 50.2% (151 of 301 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (43 of 301 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.15 · 31.2% (94 of 301 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Hunter's Prowess relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.16 · 22.6% (68 of 301 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.27 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.26 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Treasured Find relevance 0.31 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.17 · 12.0% (36 of 301 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.11 · 44.9% (135 of 301 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Death Begets Life relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.22 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.50 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.41 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.31 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Garruk, Cursed Huntsman relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Vraska, Betrayal's Sting relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
All utility lands (43)
- Novijen, Heart of Progress relevance 0.47 · 8.0% (24 of 301 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.40 · 11.3% (34 of 301 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.25 · 44.2% (133 of 301 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.31 · 16.3% (49 of 301 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (22 of 301 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Haven of the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.42 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Revitalizing Repast // Old-Growth Grove relevance 0.25 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Maelstrom of the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.38 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Shizo, Death's Storehouse relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.20 · 15.0% (45 of 301 decks)
- Jwar Isle Refuge relevance 0.32 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.18 · 25.2% (76 of 301 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.20 · 10.6% (32 of 301 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.18 · 17.9% (54 of 301 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.22 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.19 · 9.3% (28 of 301 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.16 · 15.0% (45 of 301 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.17 · 11.6% (35 of 301 decks)
- Zagoth Triome relevance 0.13 · 30.2% (91 of 301 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.17 · 9.6% (29 of 301 decks)
- Foreboding Landscape relevance 0.15 · 12.6% (38 of 301 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.14 · 16.9% (51 of 301 decks)
- Festering Thicket relevance 0.23 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.16 · 8.6% (26 of 301 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (8 of 301 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (19 of 301 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.16 · 5.3% (16 of 301 decks)
- Barren Moor relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Fetid Pools relevance 0.15 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.13 · 10.0% (30 of 301 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.12 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (9 of 301 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
All lands (50)
- Crucible of the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.46 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.26 · 11.3% (34 of 301 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.26 · 11.3% (34 of 301 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.22 · 18.9% (57 of 301 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.25 · 9.6% (29 of 301 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.25 · 8.3% (25 of 301 decks)
- Twilight Mire relevance 0.22 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.25 · 7.6% (23 of 301 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.20 · 15.0% (45 of 301 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.21 · 13.0% (39 of 301 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.20 · 13.6% (41 of 301 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (28 of 301 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (40 of 301 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.18 · 19.3% (58 of 301 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.26 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.22 · 7.6% (23 of 301 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.29 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Deathcap Glade relevance 0.18 · 16.9% (51 of 301 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.23 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Necroblossom Snarl relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (14 of 301 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.19 · 10.3% (31 of 301 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.23 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.21 · 5.6% (17 of 301 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Vernal Fen relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (19 of 301 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.16 · 16.9% (51 of 301 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.15 · 20.6% (62 of 301 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (12 of 301 decks)
- Undergrowth Stadium relevance 0.14 · 23.9% (72 of 301 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.15 · 15.9% (48 of 301 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.21 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.24 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.14 · 20.9% (63 of 301 decks)
- Drowned Catacomb relevance 0.14 · 26.6% (80 of 301 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.17 · 8.6% (26 of 301 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.14 · 21.9% (66 of 301 decks)
- Tainted Wood relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (18 of 301 decks)
- Blooming Marsh relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (11 of 301 decks)
- Hidden Lair relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.13 · 23.9% (72 of 301 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.22 · 3.3% (10 of 301 decks)
- Foul Orchard relevance 0.26 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.16 · 9.3% (28 of 301 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.15 · 9.6% (29 of 301 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (13 of 301 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.12 · 21.9% (66 of 301 decks)
- Llanowar Wastes relevance 0.12 · 21.3% (64 of 301 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (15 of 301 decks)
- Opulent Palace relevance 0.10 · 42.5% (128 of 301 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Vorosh, the Hunter, from 301 real Commander decks.