Tip: use − and + on any card to filter by it

Adaptive Snapjaw

Played in 731 decks

Adaptive Snapjaw
$0.18 €0.05

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Zilortha, Strength Incarnate relevance 2.39 · 1.8% (44 of 2,416 decks)
  2. Slinza, the Spiked Stampede relevance 2.04 · 1.2% (38 of 3,118 decks)
  3. Roalesk, Apex Hybrid relevance 2.01 · 5.2% (11 of 210 decks)
  4. Radagast, Wizard of Wilds relevance 1.64 · 2.7% (10 of 377 decks)
  5. Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 1.50 · 1.9% (10 of 522 decks)
  6. Tawnos, the Toymaker relevance 1.41 · 1.4% (11 of 790 decks)
  7. Spider-Ham, Peter Porker relevance 1.41 · 3.0% (7 of 237 decks)
  8. Genghis Frog relevance 1.38 · 1.9% (8 of 414 decks)
  9. Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 1.24 · 1.2% (9 of 761 decks)
  10. Questing Beast relevance 1.16 · 1.5% (7 of 460 decks)
  11. Grunn, the Lonely King relevance 0.97 · 1.4% (5 of 358 decks)
  12. Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Alharu, Solemn Ritualist relevance 0.95 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
  13. Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.93 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
  14. Vial Smasher the Fierce // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.82 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
  15. Polukranos, World Eater relevance 0.82 · 4.3% (2 of 47 decks)
  16. Syr Faren, the Hengehammer relevance 0.79 · 3.7% (2 of 54 decks)
  17. Hulkling, Burgeoning Bruiser relevance 0.78 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
  18. Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.78 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
  19. Pippin, Warden of Isengard relevance 0.77 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
  20. Darwin, Adaptive Mutant relevance 0.74 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
  21. Sophina, Spearsage Deserter // Othelm, Sigardian Outcast relevance 0.67 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
  22. Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 0.66 · 2.0% (2 of 101 decks)
  23. Jasmine Boreal relevance 0.66 · 2.8% (1 of 36 decks)
  24. Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 0.61 · 1.5% (2 of 130 decks)
  25. Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Alharu, Solemn Ritualist relevance 0.60 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
  26. Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.60 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
  27. Ghalta the Unstoppable relevance 0.60 · 1.4% (2 of 142 decks)
  28. Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Master Chef relevance 0.58 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
  29. Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.47 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
  30. Thriss, Nantuko Primus relevance 0.46 · 2.8% (1 of 36 decks)

Parallel Cards

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
All parallel cards (3)
  1. Crocanura
  2. Gluttonous Slug
  3. Clinging Anemones

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Battering Krasis
    1.68 18.5%
    $0.08 €0.08
  • Crocanura
    1.21 16.1%
    $0.32 €0.06
  • Renegade Krasis
    1.10 14.2%
    $0.32 €0.42
  • Elusive Krasis
    0.96 12.2%
    $0.17 €0.25
  • Shambleshark
    0.90 10.9%
    $0.19 €0.11
  • Cloudfin Raptor
    0.87 12.9%
    $0.25 €0.21
  • Conifer Strider
    0.79 8.8%
    $0.20 €0.09
  • Aggressive Mammoth
    0.77 12.7%
    $0.39 €0.33
  • Experiment One
    0.75 10.8%
    $0.18 €0.10
  • Garruk's Uprising
    0.73 28.3%
    $0.58 €0.61
All most relevant (30)
  1. Battering Krasis relevance 1.68 · 18.5% (135 of 731 decks)
  2. Crocanura relevance 1.21 · 16.1% (118 of 731 decks)
  3. Renegade Krasis relevance 1.10 · 14.2% (104 of 731 decks)
  4. Elusive Krasis relevance 0.96 · 12.2% (89 of 731 decks)
  5. Shambleshark relevance 0.90 · 10.9% (80 of 731 decks)
  6. Cloudfin Raptor relevance 0.87 · 12.9% (94 of 731 decks)
  7. Conifer Strider relevance 0.79 · 8.8% (64 of 731 decks)
  8. Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.77 · 12.7% (93 of 731 decks)
  9. Experiment One relevance 0.75 · 10.8% (79 of 731 decks)
  10. Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.73 · 28.3% (207 of 731 decks)
  11. Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.71 · 14.4% (105 of 731 decks)
  12. Ayumi, the Last Visitor relevance 0.70 · 7.7% (56 of 731 decks)
  13. Arborback Stomper relevance 0.67 · 7.5% (55 of 731 decks)
  14. Phytotitan relevance 0.65 · 9.6% (70 of 731 decks)
  15. Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.64 · 9.2% (67 of 731 decks)
  16. Forced Adaptation relevance 0.63 · 9.4% (69 of 731 decks)
  17. Rampant Growth relevance 0.62 · 29.8% (218 of 731 decks)
  18. Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.61 · 15.6% (114 of 731 decks)
  19. Simic Fluxmage relevance 0.61 · 6.6% (48 of 731 decks)
  20. Deadly Insect relevance 0.61 · 6.3% (46 of 731 decks)
  21. Bioshift relevance 0.60 · 8.5% (62 of 731 decks)
  22. Gigapede relevance 0.59 · 6.6% (48 of 731 decks)
  23. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.58 · 25.3% (185 of 731 decks)
  24. Cultivate relevance 0.56 · 31.7% (232 of 731 decks)
  25. Simic Manipulator relevance 0.55 · 7.5% (55 of 731 decks)
  26. Watchful Radstag relevance 0.55 · 9.0% (66 of 731 decks)
  27. Beacon Behemoth relevance 0.55 · 5.7% (42 of 731 decks)
  28. Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 0.54 · 7.5% (55 of 731 decks)
  29. Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.54 · 9.4% (69 of 731 decks)
  30. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.53 · 22.7% (166 of 731 decks)

Creatures

41

Showing 1-10 of 41

Page size
  • Battering Krasis
    1.68 18.5%
    $0.08 €0.08
  • Crocanura
    1.21 16.1%
    $0.32 €0.06
  • Renegade Krasis
    1.10 14.2%
    $0.32 €0.42
  • Elusive Krasis
    0.96 12.2%
    $0.17 €0.25
  • Shambleshark
    0.90 10.9%
    $0.19 €0.11
  • Cloudfin Raptor
    0.87 12.9%
    $0.25 €0.21
  • Conifer Strider
    0.79 8.8%
    $0.20 €0.09
  • Aggressive Mammoth
    0.77 12.7%
    $0.39 €0.33
  • Experiment One
    0.75 10.8%
    $0.18 €0.10
  • Garruk's Packleader
    0.71 14.4%
    $0.36 €0.34
All creatures (41)
  1. Battering Krasis relevance 1.68 · 18.5% (135 of 731 decks)
  2. Crocanura relevance 1.21 · 16.1% (118 of 731 decks)
  3. Renegade Krasis relevance 1.10 · 14.2% (104 of 731 decks)
  4. Elusive Krasis relevance 0.96 · 12.2% (89 of 731 decks)
  5. Shambleshark relevance 0.90 · 10.9% (80 of 731 decks)
  6. Cloudfin Raptor relevance 0.87 · 12.9% (94 of 731 decks)
  7. Conifer Strider relevance 0.79 · 8.8% (64 of 731 decks)
  8. Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.77 · 12.7% (93 of 731 decks)
  9. Experiment One relevance 0.75 · 10.8% (79 of 731 decks)
  10. Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.71 · 14.4% (105 of 731 decks)
  11. Ayumi, the Last Visitor relevance 0.70 · 7.7% (56 of 731 decks)
  12. Arborback Stomper relevance 0.67 · 7.5% (55 of 731 decks)
  13. Phytotitan relevance 0.65 · 9.6% (70 of 731 decks)
  14. Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.64 · 9.2% (67 of 731 decks)
  15. Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.61 · 15.6% (114 of 731 decks)
  16. Simic Fluxmage relevance 0.61 · 6.6% (48 of 731 decks)
  17. Deadly Insect relevance 0.61 · 6.3% (46 of 731 decks)
  18. Gigapede relevance 0.59 · 6.6% (48 of 731 decks)
  19. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.58 · 25.3% (185 of 731 decks)
  20. Simic Manipulator relevance 0.55 · 7.5% (55 of 731 decks)
  21. Watchful Radstag relevance 0.55 · 9.0% (66 of 731 decks)
  22. Beacon Behemoth relevance 0.55 · 5.7% (42 of 731 decks)
  23. Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 0.54 · 7.5% (55 of 731 decks)
  24. Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.54 · 9.4% (69 of 731 decks)
  25. Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.52 · 10.4% (76 of 731 decks)
  26. Clinging Anemones relevance 0.51 · 5.5% (40 of 731 decks)
  27. Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.51 · 13.7% (100 of 731 decks)
  28. Gyre Sage relevance 0.50 · 12.3% (90 of 731 decks)
  29. Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.49 · 8.8% (64 of 731 decks)
  30. Altanak, the Thrice-Called relevance 0.48 · 7.4% (54 of 731 decks)
  31. Siege Behemoth relevance 0.48 · 7.1% (52 of 731 decks)
  32. Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.48 · 7.9% (58 of 731 decks)
  33. Insatiable Souleater relevance 0.48 · 4.7% (34 of 731 decks)
  34. Krosan Warchief relevance 0.47 · 6.6% (48 of 731 decks)
  35. Kalakscion, Hunger Tyrant relevance 0.47 · 7.7% (56 of 731 decks)
  36. Challenger Troll relevance 0.47 · 6.8% (50 of 731 decks)
  37. Fathom Mage relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (74 of 731 decks)
  38. Advocate of the Beast relevance 0.46 · 5.2% (38 of 731 decks)
  39. Caller of the Pack relevance 0.46 · 6.3% (46 of 731 decks)
  40. Affectionate Indrik relevance 0.45 · 5.2% (38 of 731 decks)
  41. Yargle, Glutton of Urborg relevance 0.45 · 7.3% (53 of 731 decks)

Enchantments

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Garruk's Uprising
    0.73 28.3%
    $0.58 €0.61
  • Forced Adaptation
    0.63 9.4%
    $0.20 €0.15
  • Colossal Majesty
    0.50 10.7%
    $1.15 €1.74
  • Unnatural Growth
    0.46 12.6%
    $3.88 €1.64
All enchantments (4)
  1. Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.73 · 28.3% (207 of 731 decks)
  2. Forced Adaptation relevance 0.63 · 9.4% (69 of 731 decks)
  3. Colossal Majesty relevance 0.50 · 10.7% (78 of 731 decks)
  4. Unnatural Growth relevance 0.46 · 12.6% (92 of 731 decks)

Instants

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Bioshift
    0.60 8.5%
    $0.25 €0.12
  • Naturalize
    0.48 9.3%
    $0.26 €0.06
All instants (2)
  1. Bioshift relevance 0.60 · 8.5% (62 of 731 decks)
  2. Naturalize relevance 0.48 · 9.3% (68 of 731 decks)

Sorceries

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Rampant Growth
    0.62 29.8%
    $1.28 €0.51
  • Cultivate
    0.56 31.7%
    $0.41 €0.48
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.53 22.7%
    $1.77 €1.50
All sorceries (3)
  1. Rampant Growth relevance 0.62 · 29.8% (218 of 731 decks)
  2. Cultivate relevance 0.56 · 31.7% (232 of 731 decks)
  3. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.53 · 22.7% (166 of 731 decks)

EDH data for Adaptive Snapjaw: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 731 real decks.