Obsessive Search
Played in 182 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
2.0% Simic
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (7)
- Raised by Giants // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 1.39 · 4.8% (5 of 104 decks)
- Master Chef // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 1.32 · 2.9% (6 of 208 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Hardy Outlander relevance 0.93 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Kianne, Corrupted Memory relevance 0.91 · 1.1% (5 of 456 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // The Prismatic Piper relevance 0.65 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.62 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Kianne, Dean of Substance // Imbraham, Dean of Theory relevance 0.38 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Consider relevance 1.59 · 39.0% (71 of 182 decks)
- Opt relevance 1.50 · 54.9% (100 of 182 decks)
- Peek relevance 1.31 · 20.3% (37 of 182 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 1.26 · 25.3% (46 of 182 decks)
- Visions of Beyond relevance 1.04 · 15.4% (28 of 182 decks)
- Quicken relevance 1.01 · 15.4% (28 of 182 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.97 · 48.4% (88 of 182 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.92 · 22.0% (40 of 182 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.89 · 14.3% (26 of 182 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.89 · 13.7% (25 of 182 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.87 · 33.0% (60 of 182 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.87 · 23.1% (42 of 182 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.83 · 16.5% (30 of 182 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.81 · 13.7% (25 of 182 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.79 · 30.2% (55 of 182 decks)
- Twisted Image relevance 0.78 · 12.6% (23 of 182 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.77 · 17.6% (32 of 182 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.75 · 14.8% (27 of 182 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.75 · 14.8% (27 of 182 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.73 · 26.9% (49 of 182 decks)
- Unending Whisper relevance 0.67 · 10.4% (19 of 182 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.63 · 12.1% (22 of 182 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.60 · 11.0% (20 of 182 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.55 · 12.6% (23 of 182 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.55 · 11.5% (21 of 182 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.53 · 30.2% (55 of 182 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.50 · 8.2% (15 of 182 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.48 · 17.6% (32 of 182 decks)
- Chatterstorm relevance 0.46 · 8.2% (15 of 182 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 0.45 · 8.2% (15 of 182 decks)
All creatures (4)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.42 · 12.1% (22 of 182 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.41 · 14.3% (26 of 182 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.38 · 30.2% (55 of 182 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.36 · 10.4% (19 of 182 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.43 · 17.0% (31 of 182 decks)
All instants (27)
- Consider relevance 1.59 · 39.0% (71 of 182 decks)
- Opt relevance 1.50 · 54.9% (100 of 182 decks)
- Peek relevance 1.31 · 20.3% (37 of 182 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 1.26 · 25.3% (46 of 182 decks)
- Visions of Beyond relevance 1.04 · 15.4% (28 of 182 decks)
- Quicken relevance 1.01 · 15.4% (28 of 182 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.97 · 48.4% (88 of 182 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.89 · 14.3% (26 of 182 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.89 · 13.7% (25 of 182 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.87 · 33.0% (60 of 182 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.83 · 16.5% (30 of 182 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.81 · 13.7% (25 of 182 decks)
- Twisted Image relevance 0.78 · 12.6% (23 of 182 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.75 · 14.8% (27 of 182 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.63 · 12.1% (22 of 182 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.60 · 11.0% (20 of 182 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.50 · 8.2% (15 of 182 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.48 · 17.6% (32 of 182 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 0.45 · 8.2% (15 of 182 decks)
- Tolarian Winds relevance 0.42 · 8.2% (15 of 182 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.42 · 8.8% (16 of 182 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.40 · 11.5% (21 of 182 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.40 · 9.9% (18 of 182 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.39 · 8.2% (15 of 182 decks)
- Weather the Storm relevance 0.38 · 6.6% (12 of 182 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.38 · 24.2% (44 of 182 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.37 · 11.5% (21 of 182 decks)
All sorceries (16)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.92 · 22.0% (40 of 182 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.87 · 23.1% (42 of 182 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.79 · 30.2% (55 of 182 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.77 · 17.6% (32 of 182 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.75 · 14.8% (27 of 182 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.73 · 26.9% (49 of 182 decks)
- Unending Whisper relevance 0.67 · 10.4% (19 of 182 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.55 · 12.6% (23 of 182 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.55 · 11.5% (21 of 182 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.53 · 30.2% (55 of 182 decks)
- Chatterstorm relevance 0.46 · 8.2% (15 of 182 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.41 · 9.3% (17 of 182 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.41 · 29.1% (53 of 182 decks)
- Birthday Escape relevance 0.41 · 8.8% (16 of 182 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.39 · 8.2% (15 of 182 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.38 · 9.3% (17 of 182 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.44 · 22.0% (40 of 182 decks)
All lands (1)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.40 · 24.7% (45 of 182 decks)
EDH data for Obsessive Search: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 182 real decks.