Tidal Force
Played in 63 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
Most Relevant
All most relevant (30)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 1.36 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Murkfiend Liege relevance 1.23 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 1.19 · 34.9% (22 of 63 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 1.00 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.98 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.98 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 0.96 · 39.7% (25 of 63 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.94 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.89 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.89 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.89 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.86 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 0.83 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.80 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.79 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.76 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Tidespout Tyrant relevance 0.76 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Shalai, Voice of Plenty relevance 0.75 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.75 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.74 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
- Sister of Silence relevance 0.74 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.73 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Fatestitcher relevance 0.73 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.71 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.71 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.69 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 0.69 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.68 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.68 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.68 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
All creatures (39)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 1.36 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Murkfiend Liege relevance 1.23 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 1.19 · 34.9% (22 of 63 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 1.00 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.98 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 0.96 · 39.7% (25 of 63 decks)
- Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir relevance 0.89 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.89 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.89 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Nulldrifter relevance 0.86 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 0.83 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.80 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Mystic Snake relevance 0.79 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Kelpie Guide relevance 0.76 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Tidespout Tyrant relevance 0.76 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Shalai, Voice of Plenty relevance 0.75 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.74 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
- Sister of Silence relevance 0.74 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Fatestitcher relevance 0.73 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.71 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.71 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.69 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 0.69 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Frilled Mystic relevance 0.68 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.68 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.68 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Smirking Spelljacker relevance 0.68 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Great Oak Guardian relevance 0.67 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.65 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.61 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.60 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.60 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.59 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.59 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Drumbellower relevance 0.58 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.56 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.52 · 34.9% (22 of 63 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 0.50 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.48 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.75 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.73 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.55 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.51 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
All instants (1)
- Shore Up relevance 0.94 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.98 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.48 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
All lands (4)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.54 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.49 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.48 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.47 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
EDH data for Tidal Force: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 63 real decks.