Tidal Force
Played in 58 Temur decks
Color Identity Spread
Most Relevant
All most relevant (30)
- Magmatic Force relevance 2.63 · 41.4% (24 of 58 decks)
- Creeping Trailblazer relevance 2.20 · 39.7% (23 of 58 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 2.20 · 55.2% (32 of 58 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 1.86 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Thicket Crasher relevance 1.74 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Brighthearth Banneret relevance 1.73 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Ashling's Command relevance 1.69 · 37.9% (22 of 58 decks)
- Sunderflock relevance 1.63 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.62 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Smokebraider relevance 1.60 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.57 · 53.4% (31 of 58 decks)
- Twinflame Travelers relevance 1.53 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Flamekin Harbinger relevance 1.50 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Overgrowth Elemental relevance 1.47 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 1.40 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.33 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Havoc Eater relevance 1.29 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Embodiment of Spring relevance 1.25 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 1.23 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Ashling, Rekindled // Ashling, Rimebound relevance 1.22 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Champion of the Path relevance 1.17 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Leafkin Avenger relevance 1.16 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 1.14 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 1.13 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Eclipsed Flamekin relevance 1.12 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.12 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Chandra's Embercat relevance 1.11 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Flamebraider relevance 1.10 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 1.07 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Undergrowth Champion relevance 1.03 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
All creatures (46)
- Magmatic Force relevance 2.63 · 41.4% (24 of 58 decks)
- Creeping Trailblazer relevance 2.20 · 39.7% (23 of 58 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 2.20 · 55.2% (32 of 58 decks)
- Incandescent Soulstoke relevance 1.86 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Thicket Crasher relevance 1.74 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Brighthearth Banneret relevance 1.73 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Sunderflock relevance 1.63 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.62 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Smokebraider relevance 1.60 · 32.8% (19 of 58 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.57 · 53.4% (31 of 58 decks)
- Twinflame Travelers relevance 1.53 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Flamekin Harbinger relevance 1.50 · 31.0% (18 of 58 decks)
- Overgrowth Elemental relevance 1.47 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 1.40 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.33 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Havoc Eater relevance 1.29 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Embodiment of Spring relevance 1.25 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 1.23 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Ashling, Rekindled // Ashling, Rimebound relevance 1.22 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Champion of the Path relevance 1.17 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Leafkin Avenger relevance 1.16 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 1.14 · 48.3% (28 of 58 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 1.13 · 34.5% (20 of 58 decks)
- Eclipsed Flamekin relevance 1.12 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.12 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Chandra's Embercat relevance 1.11 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Flamebraider relevance 1.10 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 1.07 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Undergrowth Champion relevance 1.03 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 1.01 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 1.00 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 0.99 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Ivy Elemental relevance 0.94 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 0.93 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.93 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Soulbright Seeker relevance 0.92 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Greenwarden of Murasa relevance 0.91 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.89 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Eris, Roar of the Storm relevance 0.88 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.86 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Lavaleaper relevance 0.85 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 0.85 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.84 · 24.1% (14 of 58 decks)
- Cavalier of Gales relevance 0.84 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.78 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.76 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.89 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
All instants (1)
- Ashling's Command relevance 1.69 · 37.9% (22 of 58 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Flamekin Village relevance 0.80 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
All lands (1)
- Primal Beyond relevance 0.81 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
EDH data for Tidal Force: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 58 real decks.