530+45+2+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
3.2% Simic
-
Green 2,540 · 64.6%
-
Naya 367 · 9.3%
-
Gruul 220 · 5.6%
-
Simic 125 · 3.2%
-
Selesnya 123 · 3.1%
-
Golgari 113 · 2.9%
- Other (12) 442 · 11.2%
Commanders
Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Sword Coast Sailor 1.8% of decks
Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Sword Coast Sailor 1.8% of decks
Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Thrasios, Triton Hero 4.8% of decks
Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Thrasios, Triton Hero 4.8% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix 3.6% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix 3.6% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces 1.8% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces 1.8% of decks
Zegana, Utopian Speaker 1.2% of decks
Zegana, Utopian Speaker 1.2% of decks
Most Relevant
Impervious Greatwurm 20.8% of decks
Impervious Greatwurm 20.8% of decks
Worldspine Wurm 24.8% of decks
Worldspine Wurm 24.8% of decks
Archetype of Endurance 17.6% of decks
Archetype of Endurance 17.6% of decks
Apex Altisaur 14.4% of decks
Apex Altisaur 14.4% of decks
Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger 16.8% of decks
Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger 16.8% of decks
Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant 15.2% of decks
Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant 15.2% of decks
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces
0.46| 1.8%
$0.33 · €0.23$31.00 · €31.03
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.92 · 1.8% (3 of 163 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.58 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.55 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.46 · 1.8% (1 of 56 decks)
- Zegana, Utopian Speaker relevance 0.41 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.16 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.89 · 24.8% (31 of 125 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.80 · 17.6% (22 of 125 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.70 · 14.4% (18 of 125 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.66 · 16.8% (21 of 125 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.65 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 0.65 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.64 · 30.4% (38 of 125 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.62 · 12.8% (16 of 125 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.60 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.59 · 20.0% (25 of 125 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.57 · 14.4% (18 of 125 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.57 · 19.2% (24 of 125 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.56 · 24.8% (31 of 125 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.56 · 30.4% (38 of 125 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.53 · 12.0% (15 of 125 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.53 · 10.4% (13 of 125 decks)
- Canopy Gargantuan relevance 0.53 · 11.2% (14 of 125 decks)
- Ancient Adamantoise relevance 0.52 · 11.2% (14 of 125 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.52 · 8.8% (11 of 125 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.51 · 12.8% (16 of 125 decks)
- Murkfiend Liege relevance 0.51 · 22.4% (28 of 125 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.50 · 20.0% (25 of 125 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.49 · 10.4% (13 of 125 decks)
- Sphinx of the Second Sun relevance 0.49 · 10.4% (13 of 125 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.49 · 38.4% (48 of 125 decks)
- Summon: Bahamut relevance 0.48 · 9.6% (12 of 125 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.48 · 12.0% (15 of 125 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.48 · 32.0% (40 of 125 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.47 · 24.8% (31 of 125 decks)
All creatures (45)
- Impervious Greatwurm relevance 1.16 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
- Worldspine Wurm relevance 0.89 · 24.8% (31 of 125 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.80 · 17.6% (22 of 125 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.70 · 14.4% (18 of 125 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.66 · 16.8% (21 of 125 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.65 · 15.2% (19 of 125 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 0.65 · 28.0% (35 of 125 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.64 · 30.4% (38 of 125 decks)
- Giant Adephage relevance 0.62 · 12.8% (16 of 125 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.60 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.59 · 20.0% (25 of 125 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.57 · 14.4% (18 of 125 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.57 · 19.2% (24 of 125 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.56 · 24.8% (31 of 125 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.56 · 30.4% (38 of 125 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.53 · 12.0% (15 of 125 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.53 · 10.4% (13 of 125 decks)
- Canopy Gargantuan relevance 0.53 · 11.2% (14 of 125 decks)
- Ancient Adamantoise relevance 0.52 · 11.2% (14 of 125 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.52 · 8.8% (11 of 125 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.51 · 12.8% (16 of 125 decks)
- Murkfiend Liege relevance 0.51 · 22.4% (28 of 125 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.50 · 20.0% (25 of 125 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.49 · 10.4% (13 of 125 decks)
- Sphinx of the Second Sun relevance 0.49 · 10.4% (13 of 125 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.49 · 38.4% (48 of 125 decks)
- Summon: Bahamut relevance 0.48 · 9.6% (12 of 125 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.48 · 32.0% (40 of 125 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.47 · 24.8% (31 of 125 decks)
- Sire of Seven Deaths relevance 0.46 · 9.6% (12 of 125 decks)
- Platinum Angel relevance 0.46 · 8.8% (11 of 125 decks)
- Stonehoof Chieftain relevance 0.45 · 8.0% (10 of 125 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.45 · 8.8% (11 of 125 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.44 · 34.4% (43 of 125 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.44 · 21.6% (27 of 125 decks)
- Ilysian Caryatid relevance 0.43 · 12.8% (16 of 125 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.43 · 12.0% (15 of 125 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 0.43 · 12.8% (16 of 125 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.42 · 14.4% (18 of 125 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.42 · 18.4% (23 of 125 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.42 · 10.4% (13 of 125 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.41 · 12.0% (15 of 125 decks)
- Abhorrent Oculus relevance 0.40 · 10.4% (13 of 125 decks)
- Jumbo Cactuar relevance 0.40 · 8.0% (10 of 125 decks)
- Trygon Predator relevance 0.40 · 12.8% (16 of 125 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.48 · 12.0% (15 of 125 decks)
- They Came from the Pipes relevance 0.42 · 12.0% (15 of 125 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.42 · 13.6% (17 of 125 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.40 · 20.8% (26 of 125 decks)
All lands (1)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.44 · 27.2% (34 of 125 decks)
EDH data for Elderscale Wurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 125 real decks.























